The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
Collaborative network between healthcare settings: hospital and community pharmacy
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Carmen Redondo Galán, Cristina Ortega Navarro, Ana de Lorenzo Pinto, Beatriz Torroba Sanz, Cecilia Martínez Fernández-Llamazares, Silvia Manrique Rodríguez, Álvaro Narrillos Moraza, Carmen Rodríguez González, Ana Herranz Alonso , María Sanjurjo Sáez
Why was it done?
Transitions of care put the patients at risk for medication error as a result of poor communication and information loss. Treatment beginnings, complex treatment and medication reconciliation errors are an important cause of morbidity and have a predominant role in chronic complex patients (CCP). In this sense, collaboration and effective communication between hospital and community pharmacy are considered essential elements to guarantee continuity of patient care, obtaining better health results in terms of safety, effectiveness and efficiency.
What was done?
Create and implement a collaborative network with direct communication between the Hospital Pharmacy Service of a tertiary hospital and the community pharmacies responsible for patient follow -up.
How was it done?
A multidisciplinary group of hospital pharmacists dedicated to different clinical areas was created: three pharmacists from the Emergency Department, two from the Paediatrics Department, one from the Neurology Department and one from the Outpatients area. They selected and contacted by telephone the 40 community pharmacies responsible for 25% of patient prescriptions in the area. Periodic meetings were scheduled and possible strategic lines of collaboration were shared. The following priority groups were identified: Group 1: CCP (paediatric patients and fragile elderly patients) and Group 2: patients treated in the hospital emergency department. We addressed logistical aspects (supplies and preparation of formulations), pharmacotherapeutic monitoring (adherence, adverse drug reactions and collaboration in the management of CCP). The main limitations were small population and short follow-up time.
What has been achieved?
From March 2023 to September 2023, the hospital Pharmacy Service has received 50 consultations on 45 patients from community pharmacies: 85% were classified as group 1 and 15% group 2. Pharmaceutical interventions were related to medical shortages (28%), reconciliation errors at discharge (22%), information about formulations (20%), information about new treatments (15%), prescribing errors (12%) and adverse drug reactions (3%). Community pharmacists appreciated accessibility and value of information provided by hospital pharmacists. 50% of patients avoided a hospital visit to solve their queries.
What next?
Our first results show the importance of pharmacist interventions with patients and other healthcare professionals.This collaborative network can be applicable to all services that work with community pharmacies to guarantee greater coordination and integration in the different healthcare settings.
Assessing patient behaviour after calling a drug information telephone centre (MiS): what impact on the proper use of medicines?
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Vanessa Gomes, Jonathan De Gregori, Greta Dusabe, Hélène Feyeux, Cyril Boronad
Why was it done?
MiS is a telephone service that provides free, reliable information about medicines to all patients and their caregivers. Requests are handled by experienced hospital pharmacists. It is important to know how patients behave after calling MiS in order to assess the benefits of this service on the proper use of medicines.
What was done?
The aim of this study was to assess patients’ behaviour regarding their medication after calling the MiS.
How was it done?
After prior agreement, patients were called back 7 days later to answer a specific survey including six questions: Was the medication changed after the call? Did the patient follow the advice of the MiS pharmacist? Did the patient consult a doctor? or another source of information? Did the patient feel that their health had improved? What are the benefits of this service?
What has been achieved?
Between 2024/03/05 and 2024/03/18, 20 callers completed the survey (65%). Most questions concerned drug interactions (48%), followed by side effects (22%), drug stability (7%), administrative information (7%), indications/contraindications (7%), product availability (3,%), proper use (3%) and dosage (3%). Thanks to the advice of MiS pharmacists, 47% of callers started taking their medication: half of these were prescribed by their doctor and the other half self-administered. Around a third of treatments were continued without change, while 6% were modified. Finally, 12% of treatments were discontinued because of side effects. After calling MiS, 15% of patients consulted a doctor and 15% consulted other sources of information (neighbours, health professionals, etc.). More than half of the patients felt that their health had improved after calling MiS. Lastly, 70% of patients described MiS as safe, 40% as accessible, 35% as available and 30% as a time-saver.
What next?
The demand for MiS shows that patients are looking for more information about their treatments, even if they have already consulted a healthcare professional. The number of treatments prescribed by the doctor that were only initiated after the call also illustrates the benefits of the MiS service. It is an additional service that can reassure callers and contribute to the proper use of medicines by conveying a positive image of treatments and information suited to callers’ knowledge.
Pharmaceutical care for human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis users
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
NURIA FERNANDEZ PIÑEIRO, CRISTINA GONZALEZ PEREZ, LIDIA YBAÑEZ GARCIA, NATALIA SANCHEZ-OCAÑA MARTÍN, JOSE MANUEL MARTINEZ SESMERO
Why was it done?
In our area all care for PrEP users was centralised in a specialised centre. Here, a multidisciplinary team made up of doctors, nurses and pharmacists integrated in a patient-centred care model. PrEP users are a potentially vulnerable population. Health education and motivation are provided in the PhC consultations to raise awareness about the use of medication and adherence to treatment, which are key to avoiding HIV infection. The use of sex-related drugs is a growing health problem in this population and has been associated with increased HIV transmission risk.
What was done?
Development and implementation of a monographic pharmaceutical care (PhC) consultation for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users.
How was it done?
On 20 January 2020, the PhC consultation was launched in a monographic STI care centre linked to a tertiary hospital.
– On the same day as the first medical appointment, the user attends a PhC appointment. In this unit the user receives the necessary information to properly take the medication. Possible interactions are reviewed, not only with medications, but also with natural medicine, sports supplements and drugs. All doubts are resolved and the medication is dispensed.
– Every 3 months medical follow-up is carried out and, in the PhC consultation, where not only possible adverse effects are reviewed, but also adherence and related problems are specially monitored. To increase the quality of care, active communication between all health personnel was ensured.
What has been achieved?
Until 30 September 2022, 3,460 initial visits and 13,349 follow-up visits have been made (411 of them through telepharmacy during the lockdown as a result of the global pandemic by SARS-CoV-2). From the users, 98.98% were men who have sex with men (MSM), 0.80% transgender women, 0.04% transgender men and 0.18% were women. 70.3% used sex-related drugs (Chemsex), with the most used substances being Popper (37.1%), mephedrone (28.2%) and gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) (24.6%).
What next?
In our experience, the role of hospital pharmacists as a reference health personnel for HIV-PrEP users has become clear, not only as an expert in medication. Given the prevalence of drug use in this population makes the health education that we hospital pharmacists can provide especially important.
Low-risk pregnancy: how to help the doctor prescribe?
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Ana Rita Silva, Cláudia Santos
Why was it done?
Low-risk pregnant women are also prone to suffer from minor pathological conditions, such as migraines, low back pain, gastrointestinal disorders. In view of this particularity, collaboration was requested from the pharmaceutical services to prepare a therapeutic guide to make available to all doctors in the hospital, in particular general and family medicine.
What was done?
Develop a pocket guide with OTC medicines classification in pregnant women for the following symptoms: pain control; colds; gastrointestinal changes and skin changes, according to Food and Drug Association (FDA) classification, for general and family practice physicians in the hospital.
How was it done?
It was necessary to define which pathologies/symptoms we would focus on, this choice was made in collaboration with the person responsible for the obstetrics service. Then, focusing our work on low-risk pregnant women, we selected some drugs that are prescribed to non-pregnant women for chosen pathologies/symptomatologies. These drugs were thus analysed in view of their safe use in low-risk pregnant women using tools such as the summary of drug characteristics, the FDA website, the UpToDate online platform. The guide was made available to general and family physicians.
What has been achieved?
The drug classification was compiled in a table organised by INN, divided by pathology/symptomatology, with the FDA classification and also a column with a pictogram indicating the safety of the drug for use during pregnancy. The acceptance by clinicians was very positive, reinforcing that it is important to pay special attention when prescribing in the 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy, use the lowest effective dose and for the shortest possible period, avoid using “new” drugs unless there are safety studies.
What next?
The next step to support clinicians will be to develop other tools to help prescribe other classes of drugs as well as another population group, such as safe drugs in breastfeeding.
COMPREHENSIVE SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMME RUN BY CLINICAL PHARMACIST IN COLLABORATION WITH THE ADDICTOLOGY DEPARTMENT
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Mathilde ROCHE, Niccolo CURATOLO, Marion ADLER, José POLO DEVOTO, André RIEUTORD
Why was it done?
Many smoking patients are not identified as smokers when admitted at the hospital, depriving them of any help to quit smoking. During medication reconciliation at admission (MR), the pharmacist is in a position to identify smoking patients and then offer a support programme.
What was done?
An integrated care model based on a smoking cessation programme was designed to assist smoking patients to quit tobacco. Pharmacy and addictology departments co-built and led the project. It was implemented and proposed to patients from May 2018 in three medical and surgical wards.
How was it done?
The project included five steps:
1. Training of one clinical pharmacist about smoking cessation by the addictology team.
2. Designing the process and developing tools used for a smoking cessation programme.
3. Implementing the programme.
4. Evaluating the pilot phase.
5. Developing a comprehensive training programme (including role-play sessions) for the pharmaceutical team.
The process counted six steps:
1. Smoking patients’ identification (MR, patient record, request from doctors). If the patient was polyaddicted, the addictology team was informed.
2. First patient visit: patient consent was collected, anamnesis related to tobacco and explanation about nicotine’s mechanisms and nicotine substitutes given. Appropriate nicotine substitutes were selected and tested with the patient.
3. Prescription and administration of nicotine substitutes.
4. Second patient visit (24 to 48 hours’ later): nicotine substitutes adjusted if needed.
5. Third patient visit if needed.
6. Discharge medication reconciliation.
What has been achieved?
During 4 months, 62 patients were identified as smokers during MR interviews. Twenty-seven per cent of the patients (n= 17) were sent to the addictology team because of polyaddiction, 39% (n=24) refused the programme and 34% (n=21) accepted to experience our support programme. Of these, 62% (n=13) either reduced or quit smoking during hospitalisation.
What next?
According to our encouraging preliminary results, this programme will continue to be carried on by the pharmaceutical team, while keeping a close link with the addictology team. We decided to call the patients one week and one month after discharge to better assess the performance of our smoking cessation programme.
DRUG-FOOD INTERACTION GUIDE PREPARATION FOR OUTPATIENT CONSULTATION
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Gregorio Romero Candel, Paula Ruiz Belda, Carmen Caballero Requejo, Maria Jesus Sanchez Cuenca, Jose Marco del Rio, Juilan Castillo Sanchez, Luna Carratala Herrera
Why was it done?
Some drugs dispensed in the outpatient office present interactions with food, leading to changes in their bioavailability. These changes which can result in a decrease in therapeutic activity or an increase in adverse effects, when dealing with narrow therapeutic margin drugs, may lead to alterations in their efficacy and/or toxicity. Developing the quick and accessible consultation table, we improved the quality and effectiveness of the treatment.
What was done?
Preparation of the drug and food interaction guide for outpatient consultations.
How was it done?
The technical specifications of all drugs that are dispensed in the hospital outpatient office were consulted, and the possible interactions with food of every one of them were analysed by consulting the following electronic databases: Technical sheet, Bot Plus, Micromedex, Pubmed, UpToDate and Online Medicine Information Centre of the AEMPS. A database was developed with drugs that presented some type of restriction with meals, designing a quick reference table for outpatient consultation.
What has been achieved?
One-hundred specialities were reviewed, of which 22 were to be taken without food, 43 with food and 35 could be taken with or without food. The information given to the patient was quick and efficient, improving the effectiveness and safety of the treatment.
What next?
Our goal is to continue developing tools that allow us to provide quality information to the patient, improving the effectiveness and safety of treatments.
LET’S DIVERSIFY TO GUARANTEE ACCESS TO THE HOSPITAL PHARMACIST’S EXPERTISE: ALL GOOD THINGS COME IN FOURS!
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Maria Kundracikova, Petra Pölzleitner, Katharina Ocko, Bernadette Aretin, Barbara Datterl, Klara Jadrna, Eva-Luise Hobl, Martin Holbik, Sonja Steininger-Salmer, Helga Fend, Gerda Laml-Wallner, Martina Anditsch, Gunar Stemer
Why was it done?
Due to limited human ressources (8 FTE) in the medicines information and clinical pharmacy department only selected wards could be provided with daily clinical pharmacists’ presence offering medication review, patient discharge counselling and ward round participation. To expand the reach of our clinical services, two further service pillars were introduced complementing the already existing services.
What was done?
The Vienna General Hospital is a 1900 bed university hospital in which patients and health care professionals have access to hospital pharmacists’ expertise via various channels. In addition to already existing services (i.e. provision of hospital-wide medicines information and clinical pharmacy services on particularly selected wards) two new services (i.e. e-pharmacy consult and a dedicated drug interactions and pharmacotherapy clinic) have recently been implemented.
How was it done?
As ward services are staff-intensive, alternatives to expand the access of patients and health care professionals to the hospital pharmacists’ expertise were examined. An e-pharmacy consult was designed, implemented, and promoted in collaboration with the hospital IT department. E-consults can electronically be requested by all wards (e.g. for medication review, patient counselling), but mainly aim at those areas which are not regularly covered by a clinical pharmacist. E-consults are executed by the medicines information pharmacist on duty. Recently, a special clinic was implemented as a collaborative project with the clinical pharmacology department addressing the specific medicines-related needs of patients with complex medication regimens.
What has been achieved?
The scope of services provided by the department currently comprises four pillars: (1) provision of medicines information (2016: 1.200 requests), (2) clinical pharmacy services (2016: 9.000 medication-related problems prevented), (3) pharmacy e-consults, and (4) the drug interactions and pharmacotherapy clinic. While the scope and reach of services was expanded by diversification, the two new services are operated with existing ressources after reassignment of tasks.
What next?
After the implementation of new services (i.e. e-consult, clinic) constant promotion is needed to increase the awareness level among health care professionals in the hospital. Quality assurance and continuity of service provision is crucial for acceptance.
Medication Safety Audits developed and conducted by a hospital pharmacy in Finland
Author(s)
E. Celikkayalar, E. Suvikas-Peltonen, J. Palmgren
HIGHLY ACTIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY PRESCRIPTIONS IN NAIVE PATIENTS: IMPROVEMENT PLAN
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
A. Rodríguez-Perez, M.I. Sierra-Torres, M.D. Toscano-Guzmán, A. Monzón-Moreno, M. Soriano-Martinez, A. Lluch-Colomer, M.D. Santos-Rubio
Why was it done?
According to the guidelines and recommendations for the rational use of medication, prescriptions of HAARTs must be standardised following the principles of efficiency and based on the best evidence available.
What was done?
A multidisciplinary group of clinical pharmacists and physicians made an easy-to-read handout that summarised the main recommendations of GESIDA for the treatment of naive patients, treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The hand-out consisted of a table with the allowed and not-allowed antiretroviral combinations and the exceptions. The multidisciplinary group disseminated the handout to the prescribers through clinical sessions. The multidisciplinary group made a 6 month study to evaluate the adherence to GESIDA, previous and after the implementation of the easy-to-read handout.
How was it done?
We did not have any problem implementing these recommendations or organizing the clinical sessions.
What has been achieved?
The multidisciplinary group made a retrospective study of the 6-months previous the implementation of the handout, by a chart review of the prescriptions. One hundred naive patients were evaluated. We found an eleven per cent of deviations of the recommendations, none of them justified. The multidisciplinary group made a prospective study during a 6-months period after the implementation of the handout, by a chart review of the prescriptions. Seventy-one naive patients were evaluated. We found a 7% of deviations of the recommendations, three of them were justified because of co-morbidity that contraindicated the recommended medication. We also made a follow-up of the treatment of the patients of the retrospective study, six of the eleven patients of that group changed their HAART to the recommended ones.
What next?
The multidisciplinary team has periodic meetings to evaluate the adherence to the recommendations and to study news reported by GESIDA. The economic impact of the practice is planned to be evaluated.