EAHP represents over 29,000 hospital pharmacists across 36 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professionals.
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic of Germany and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
Sponsor Channel
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
D. PROTZENKO (1) (2), Y. GONZALEZ (2), M. TASHAN (2), J. CARDI (2), A. PLAN (1) (2).
(1) CHICAS, CLINICAL PHARMACY, GAP, FRANCE.
(2) CHICAS, HOME-HOSPITALIZATION, GAP, FRANCE.
Our service area spans four departments in France, encompassing numerous mountain valleys with weather-dependent access, making deployment challenging. Additionally, some patients are over two hours’ drive from our hospital.
We developed a territorial network by integrating hospital and extra-hospital structures into our home-hospitalization logistics circuit. This integration allowed us to strategically place equipment storage points across our region, enhancing the speed of care in emergencies.
We utilized a computerized tool to map areas accessible within 30 minutes by car and identified strategic points (both hospital and extra-hospital) to maximize coverage with minimal investment.
To optimize operations and improve response times, we established equipment storage points with ready-to-use kits. These kits, created through multi-disciplinary meetings to address key emergency scenarios, are designed to address a range of situations, including post-operative treatments, pressure sores, and end-of-life care, which are particularly prevalent in our population. The variability of care settings—such as patients’ homes, short-term rehabilitation facilities, and long-term care facilities— is also considered. This approach ensures that nurses and doctors can access the necessary equipment at all time, regardless of their location or the specific care requirements. We formalized partnerships to ensure the presence of these kits at designated sites, which are now referenced on a map accessible to our team. Quality processes were implemented to maintain kit quality and prevent expiry.
Immediate deployment of equipment for home hospitalization is now possible, regardless of patient location or weather conditions.
We are expanding our network by recruiting additional partners to enhance our local coverage. This strategy will also apply to areas with shared medical and paramedical skills, improving our responsiveness, particularly in end-of-life care situations. We will also forge new partnerships to broaden our capabilities, enabling other hospitals to prepare patient materials or medications, or to be used as parcel delivery service.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Christina Anastasiadou – Lead Pharmacist Acute & Emergency Medicine
Karen Dicks – Chief Pharmacy Technician Medicines Management
Radhika Patel – Pharmacy Technician MMS
Until October 2023, the A&E department in Croydon University Hospital in London lacked a full-time pharmacy service, unlike other London trusts. This has contributed to suboptimal medicine management and a delay in the identification of prescribing errors. This has resulted in longer stays, missed medication doses, and a rise in patient safety incidences. At a hospital level this reduces flow and increases cost due to medication wastage. Ultimately, the aim is to improve the flow of patients within the hospital via timely medicines provision, early clinical pharmacy intervention and early discharge planning.
We have obtained funding from the Better Care Fund for a period of 2 years. This funding is aimed at assisting local systems in effectively achieving the integration of health and social care in a manner that promotes person-centred care, sustainability, and improved outcomes for individuals and caregivers. Therefore, we introduced a full-time pharmacy service including one pharmacist and two medicines management technicians (MMTs)—one full-time and one part-time. This initiative was implemented as a 2-year trial period, using key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate its effectiveness.
Data has been collected against the below KPIS:
1) Number of drug histories completed on admission, before patient is allocated a ward (by MMT or pharmacist) per calendar month.
2) Number of medicines reconciliations completed (by pharmacist) per calendar month.
3) Number of clinical interventions completed by all members of the pharmacy team.
4) Savings secondary to the use of patient’s own drugs (PODs) brought from home for administration to reduce medicines wastage.
5) Savings due to the return of medicines to inpatient pharmacy for re-use from other patients when appropriate.
6) Time between request of medicines from pharmacy dispensary and medicine being dispensed, checked and released to A&E.
7) Review of stock lists in all areas in A&E.
8) Reduction in omitted doses.
9) Discharge medicines supply and screening from A&E to streamline discharge.
10) Number of patients counselled on their medicines and provided with patient-friendly information on them.
11) Number of referrals to community teams i.e allocated chemist via Discharge Medicines Service, Integrated Care Network (ICN) pharmacists or specialty teams (i.e anticoagulation clinic for newly initiated anticoagulant) to provide continuation of care.
12) Liaising with specialty teams within the hospital to expedite review and treatment in a time efficient and cost-effective way.
The current pharmacy team is fully integrated into the A&E service and has contributed significantly towards advancing patient experience, via early pharmacy engagement with patients. During the first 10 months of the project, we have data to show:
1) A 540% increase in drug histories and medicines reconciliation on admission.
2) A 19.525% increase in clinical interventions and early detection of medication errors.
3) We have completed 5 teaching sessions so far, in order to tackle common prescribing and medicines management inaccuracies and embedding solutions into nurses and doctors training.
4) We have contributed towards the reduction in omitted doses by 6%.
Positive contribution towards tackling medicines wastage has been shown too. Our team contributed towards saving £13.110 from April to September 2024 by using PODs for administration in hospital and £10.483 by returning dispensed medications to the inpatient pharmacy for recycling and use for other patients for the same time period.
In addition, the team has completed 66 referrals to the community pharmacy team for follow up on newly started medicines, stopped medicines, adherence concerns and polypharmacy. This is in order to provide continuous care and establish follow-up after discharge from hospital.
All in all, improved safe patients flow in and out of hospital.
Work towards a business case for a permanent pharmacy service in A&E, to continue further developing the above. Utilise all the skills our MMTs hold, in order to continue working on patient safety, improved flow and cost improvement plans. Introduce a pharmacist-prescriber who will be able to tackle arising problems as soon as possible and provide high quality care in liaison with doctors, nurses and advanced care practitioners.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
AGUILAR GUISADO, CAROLINA. PHARMACY SERVICE. EL ESCORIAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
SANCHEZ SUAREZ , SUSANA.PHARMACY SERVICE. EL ESCORIAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
GARCIA GIMENO, M MERCEDES.PHARMACY SERVICE. EL ESCORIAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
OTERINO MOREIRA, IVAN.PHARMACY SERVICE. EL ESCORIAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
FIORANTE EMILSE SILVANA. INTERNAL MEDICINE SERVICE.EL ESCORIAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
BARCIA MARTIN M ISABEL.PHARMACY SERVICE. EL ESCORIAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
SAAVEDRA QUIROS VIRGINIA.PHARMACY SERVICE. EL ESCORIAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Current antiretroviral therapies are effective, but adherence can be difficult for some patients, so innovation in parenterally administered antiretroviral treatments can help with adherence, as well as reducing the burden on patients with chronic HIV infection.
Aim and Objectives: to implement a pharmaceutical care circuit for dispensing long-acting antiretroviral treatments in adult HIV patients.
Expected Improvements: Optimize antiviral use, enhance patient satisfaction, address adherence and maintain clinical effectiveness.
Circuit Design and Stages: In 2023, Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee introduced intramuscular antiviral treatment with cabotegravir and rilpivirine, and established use criteria, in collaboration with the Internal Medicine service and Nursing consultation involved in the administration(NP):
1. Adults with undetectable Viral Load (VL) for at least 12 months
2. Treatment duration of 6-12 months
3. No prior resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or integrase inhibitors
4. Absence of HBV co-infection
5. Not pregnant or planning to conceive
6. Good treatment adherence
Pre-Treatment Circuit:
1. Medical Consultation: Clinical assessment and criteria evaluation.
2. Treatment Request: Physicians submit requests electronically.
3. Pharmacy Evaluation: Assessment of adherence to criteria with communication to the physician. Approved requests result in electronic prescriptions, ensuring correct dispensing.
In-Person Pharmaceutical Care Consultations (FCC):
• The first two visits confirm patient commitment and deliver dosing schedules.
• Medications are dispensed by pharmacy technicians and administered at Nursing practice
• From the third dose, consultations are conducted remotely to monitor adherence and effectiveness.
Nursing practice tasks:
• Confirm patient attendance the day before administration.
• Request medication from the pharmacy for the patient.
• Administer treatment and schedule future appointments based on the established calendar.
Implementation: The program began in November 2023.
8 patients were included, achieving 100% compliance from all services involved. Patient satisfaction is high, with undetectable VL maintained for 6-12 months post-treatment change. Mild flu-like symptoms were reported by 2 patients, and 2voluntarily discontinued due to mood concerns. 3 patients are awaiting treatment changes. All patients included underwent face-to-face FCC for the first and second doses, and telematic consultation for successive doses.
Limitations: small sample size.
This pharmaceutical care circuit can be adapted to various pharmacy services, providing a promising approach for HIV treatment adherence.The sample size needs to be enlarged for further studies.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Lotte Borg
In the home care team (HTC), it is often assistants, who may be unskilled workers, that administer the medication from a multi-dose compliance aid. The quality control they perform before administration involves verifying that the number of tablets and capsules for the designated time slot matches what is recorded in the HTC’s digital system.
The hospital may not have all the strengths in stock, and therefore a dose can be composed of multiple or fewer tablets.
If the number of tablets deviates from the HCT’s digital system, the assistant is not allowed to administer the medicine and must call on a nurse to make sure that the hospital has dispensed the correct medicine.
This is time consuming for the HCT and the patient may receive their medicine at a later time than prescribed with consequent health effects. Furthermore the phone call between the assistant and the nurse can be worrying for the patient to hear.
Communication with the local HCT regarding deviations from the medication list was enhanced through the use of an existing digital discharge report (DDR).
A DDR was already in place, and the enhancement is that nurses and pharmacy technicians now use it to report any changes in the number of tablets and capsules dispensed when discharging a patient to the HTC. A nurse from the HTC then adjusts the quantity of tablets in the HTC’s digital system based on the number of days for which the hospital has dispensed medication to be administered by the HTC.
The implementation was initiated on May 1st, 2024, in two hospital wards.
It is not technically feasible to generate a report of all the DDRs where this improvement has been implemented; however, the HCT has indicated that each time deviations are noted in the DDR, they will save a significant amount of time.
If a DDR is available and the hospital wards and clinical pharmacy department can reach an agreement on its usage and timing, there is no reason not to utilize it, especially if it can enhance patient safety during transitions in care.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Mélanie Hinterlang, Mona Assefi, Pauline Glasman, Delphine Brugier, Meriem Charfi, Fanny Charbonnier-Beaupel, Marie Antignac, Carole Metz
Clinical trials in critical care sometimes demand swift inclusion and administration, often occurring at any hour of the day or night. To enhance patient care, the experimental drug may be provided in a non-nominative manner directly from the pharmacy unit to the care unit for storage before any inclusion as a stock. This dispensing pathway is considered less secure than the conventional named dispensing but can be necessary. The objective of this risk analysis for this dispensing process was to identify the risks, determine the number of them with unacceptable criticality, and propose actions to reduce criticality of these risks.
A risk analysis of non nominative dispensation of experimental drugs process was conducted to streamline, secure, optimize, and standardize this dispensing process.
Following a preliminary investigation, three pilot services were chosen: surgical intensive care, post-interventional recovery room (SSPI), and cardiology. The Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method was applied to the non-nominal dispensing circuit of experimental drugs from reception at the pharmacy unit to the administration of the drug to patient. Investigators, clinical research associates, nurse, and pharmacists participated.
Following the FMECA, 281 risks were identified. The majority were either acceptable (123 or 44%, 110 or 39%, 147 or 52%) or tolerable (139 or 49%, 148 or 53%, and 130 or 46%) for the intensive care, SSPI, and cardiology services, respectively. Unacceptable risks numbered 19 (7%), 23 (8%), and 4 (1%) for intensive care, SSPI, and cardiology services, respectively. The process identified as most critical for all three services was communication. After risk prioritization, a plan comprising 17 actions was implemented.
This risk analysis demonstrated that control over the non-nominal dispensing circuit is achievable. Once the actions are in place, a reduction in criticality is anticipated due to a decrease in the frequency. Theoretically unacceptable risks are now at 0%. In the long term, this project has the potential to participate to improve the care of patients enrolled in emergency clinical trials and boost research in the concerned units.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
All errors, whether involving medication or not, are required to be reported and classified in the hospital reporting system. However, the system is poorly adapted for medication management and lacks the relevant terms. This results in the same type of error being classified in various ways, making systematic quality improvement difficult. A pilot study confirmed the system’s shortcomings, after which a new medication management process was developed and evaluated.
The existing process for classifying medication errors was supplemented with a new process in which hospital pharmacists reclassified medication errors detected in the reporting system. The reclassification was based on a predefined medication management process.
A medication management process was developed in collaboration with specialist nurses and in accordance with applicable regulations and policies. The process consisted of the following activities: 1) Prescription, 2) Ordering/Delivery, 3) Storage/Narcotics Control, 4) Preparation, 5) Handover/Administration, 6) Medicines information in transitions of care, 7) Follow-up of treatment, and 8) Miscellaneous. The process was validated by having four hospital pharmacists independently classify 176 medication errors. Consistency in the assessment was evaluated, and the process was corrected as needed. All medication errors classified as medication-related in 2022 or containing the word “medication” in free text were thereafter exported from the reporting tool to Microsoft Excel and then into a data processing and performance monitoring tool for further analysis.
A total of 756 medication errors were identified in the reporting tool, distributed across 65 different activities. Hospital pharmacists identified an additional 305 errors through free-text searches that had not been reported as medication-related. A total of 1,061 medication errors (756+305) were reclassified and grouped into eight activities. The highest risk of errors was associated with the preparation (19%), followed by storage/narcotics control (18%), and prescription (17%). The new process, involving hospital pharmacists in classification, creates conditions for a more systematic approach to medication errors. The pilot project was presented at the hospital’s themed day for World Patient Safety Day 2022.
Discussions have been initiated with system developers to improve the reporting tool. Discussions with hospital management will be initiated with the goal of creating a structure in which hospital pharmacists have an active role in the hospital’s work on patient safety related to medication.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
Douwe van der Meer, Peder Nygard
In our hospital 30% of the daily distributed medication for individual patients was not administered. Reasons for not administering were for example lack of need because of patients clinical performance, discontinuation of prescriptions or early discharge. Because of safety concerns, like mix-ups, our standard procedure was to discard all returned medication. This resulted in a waste of about 220.000 pills annually.
We reduced medicine waste by 90% by reusing returned medication from our medical wards. With this result we made an important step for our hospital to meet the national sustainability goals in the Dutch ‘Healthcare Green Deal (3.0)’.
Reusing returned medication brings multiple safety concerns. By performing a prospective risk analysis we identified three major risks: mix-ups, expired medication and accepting non-qualitative packages (like slightly opened blisters or incomplete labels). With these risks identified we redefined our distribution process on four key elements: 1) Every medication has a barcode on unit level and if not, is labelled by our team through duplicating the ‘Falsified Medicine Directive’-barcodes to small 2D barcode labels which includes expiration date. 2) All returned medication is checked by a pharmacy employee on major quality aspects. 3) Returned medication is placed in a separate ‘return-box’ in front of the original stock inside the distribution cabinet. 4) Expiration dates are checked more frequently and are checked upon distribution and administration through barcode scanning.
The new distribution process was implemented in all of our eight distribution cabinets and resulted in saving 90% of the returned medication; witch amount to 200.000 pills and 70.000 euro savings annually. On average we work with 6 employees daily, who need 15 minutes extra per person per day to process returned medication.
Our goal is to save all returned medication that meets our quality standards. 5% of the returns that are not reused are medicines not included in the assortments of the specific distribution cabinet, so extra logistic and administrative steps are needed to place them back in the pharmacy stock. We are exploring new ways to make this next step in reducing medication waste further.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Maria Gregori, Eva Legido, Marta Bellver, Inmaculada Seguí, Amando Mengual, Jose Manuel Ventura
In Spain hospital pharmacy services dispense specific medications to outpatients. Nevertheless, some patients have difficulties in getting to the hospital due to disabilities, displacement problems or work reconciliation. In this sense, the objectives of the programme were as follows: Improve patient access to healthcare professionals and reduce visits to the hospital. Promote patient autonomy, responsibility, and participation in decision making regarding pharmaceutical care and dispensing of medicines. Increase patient satisfaction with the healthcare provided. To expand the portfolio of services of the OPCUs. Promote the integration and continuity of pharmaceutical care between the OPCU and CP.
Implementation of a programme in the Outpatient Pharmaceutical Care Unit (OPCU) that includes telematic pharmaceutical care (telepharmacy) as well as the dispensing of hospital medications in proximity through our health structures (primary care centres) or community pharmacy (CP).
We took the following steps:
– Establish inclusion and prioritisation criteria for the selection of patients who are candidates to participate in the telematic pharmaceutical care and proximity dispensing programme.
– Establish the procedures for the development of telematic pharmacotherapeutic follow-up: telephone consultation at the beginning of inclusion and successive ones prior to each dispensation.
– Establish the processes, procedures, and resources for the performance of drug dispensing in CP.
– Coordination of all participants in the process.
– Establish indicators and variables to measure and improve the results obtained.
– Guarantee patients’ rights in terms of confidentiality, authorisation, and information.
From January 2022 to August 2023, a total of 376 patients have been included in the programme, which translates to 2,041 telephone consultations and 2,306 dispensations of medication from hospital to CPs or primary care centres. A total of 36 incidences were resolved.
Of these patients, 68% were included because of having reduced mobility or dependence, 18% due to work-life balance, and 14% due to distance or problems getting to the hospital.
– Inclusion of at least 15-20% of patients from face-to-face modality to telepharmacy and proximity program.
– Evaluate indicators and detect opportunities for improvement in the processes.
– Determination of patient reported outcomes.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
Ariadna Martin Torrente , Itziar Palacios Zabalza, María Olatz Ibarra Barrueta, Maialen Palacios Filardo, Garazi Miron Elorriaga
To optimise the functioning and the management of the procedures and an accessible and effective communication system in the PS. Moreover, the quality of the shipment is guaranteed all the time. The development of a circuit has allowed being faster and more efficient during its preparation than before.
Establishing the circuit of execution, preparation, distribution, and delivery of medicine to Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO) from the Pharmaceutical Service (PS) of a tertiary hospital in the Basque Country (Spain). The circuit has been designed taking into account the criteria in a context of humanitarian donations, published and updated by the Spanish Agency of Drugs and Sanitary Products (AEMPS) on 16 March 2022
Since it has been included in the daily activity of the service it has cause and increase its amount of work, hence, daily routine tasks have been slowed down, given the increase of petitions the hospital has had during last year. However, its creation has allowed being faster and more efficient during its preparation.
The circuit begins with the request of NGO, which has to be authorised by the hospital’s directory. Then, in the procedure participate pharmacists; pharmacy technicians and office clerks who prepare the donation rely on the personalised list that the donation has created. Once, the necessary documents are filled out and they are sent to the AEMPS.
From November 2021 to September 2022, 7 donations have been carried out; these contained 100 active ingredients, concretely 15.198 units. We could find most of them in the WHO model lists of essential medicines. The NGO’s destinations have been Guatemala, Romania, Ukraine and Senegal. The medications sent most according to the ATC classification were 21% anti-infective medicines, 17% cardiovascular, 13% nervous system, 12% systemic hormonal preparations and 3% alimentary tract and metabolism.
The project is easily enforceable in any Spanish PS that is willing to process a donation at any given occasion. Some of our ideas for the future are the creation of a standard list including common medications, avoiding personalised lists, in addition to connect it to our internal programme to be faster when preparing the donation.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Due to the COVID-19 lockdown, many patients could not attend to hospital pharmacy for medication supply. To ensure treatment effectiveness, tolerance and therapeutic adherence, we developed this new model of medication dispensing as well as additional routes of patient follow-up, such as the use of mobile Health (mHealth).
In 2024/03 we started to approach hospital medication (mainly onco-haematology oral treatments, subcutaneous monoclonal antibodies and clotting factors) to the patient’s home. We developed an alternative model of medication supply through the collaboration with community pharmacies (CPs) and a logistics partner.
The collaboration with CPs was coordinated by the Barcelona College of Pharmacists, who developed a new digital platform to manage and track delivery orders. A pharmaceutical wholesaler delivered these medications to CPs in 48–72 hours. In case of requiring a faster dispensation, we used a logistics operator which guaranteed a delivery time to the patient’s home of 24 hours.
Considering that our hospital pharmacy attends more than 8,000 patients, we prioritised this service to those with a complex socio-functional situation or who lived far from the hospital.
Pharmacy technicians were the key managers in this process. Through a telephone interview, they detected possible medication related problems (adverse effects, administration errors, inadequate dose/route of administration/duration of therapy and lack of treatment adherence). They also checked for in-person medical appointments that could justify dispensing direct to the patient. If any incident was detected, the technician referred the case to the pharmacist for further assessment and resolution.
Additionally, for some health conditions (heart transplant, colorectal and breast cancer, haematopoietic stem cell transplant, chronic migraine or HIV infection), we developed a mHealth programme in which patients were empowered by using a smartphone and tablet app to promote self-care management and contact with their healthcare professionals.
In 2020, 4,793 shipments were made to 1,814 patients. This meant 12.4% of the total hospital pharmacy dispensations (N=38,527). Of these shipments, 61.0% went to CPs and 39.0% to patients at home. In 2021, there were 4,171 shipments to 1,248 patients, 90.0% of which were sent to CF, which implies a decrease of the shipments of 12.9% compared to the previous year.
In our setting, mean time of virtual dispensing was 10 minutes versus 3 minutes of in-person dispensing. This additional time was due to the preparation of drug shipments and tracked delivery orders. The assessment of this model was positive for both patients and pharmacy staff. However, it was not exempt from some incidents, such as delivery delays or errors in package identification.
As for telepharmacy follow-up, 257 patients are using mHealth applications. In 2021, they performed 4,387 consultations with the pharmaceutical team.
The COVID-19 pandemic forced us to rethink the care model for outpatient care in hospital pharmacy services. Our assessment is positive and we believe that this model should continue in the future for a selected group of patients.
