Skip to content

Project for the optimization of processes for the reception, conditioning and storage of medicines

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

PATRICIA ORTIZ FERNANDEZ, Alba Maria Martinez Soto, PILAR FERNANDEZ-VILLACAÑAS FERNANDEZ, IGNACIO SALAR VALVERDE

Why was it done?

The objective is to improve patient safety, detecting mistake in real time. Review good work practices and achieve greater effectiveness. Improve the communication of the work team.

What was done?

Improve the quality of the reception, conditioning and storage processes that are carried out in the pharmacy service using tools that in the field of quality have shown great effectiveness. Simplify processes and update work instructions and standardize these. Establish quality indicators.

How was it done?

ing the `Lean healthcare´methodology based on eliminating inefficiencies in work processes and identifying opportunities for improvement which are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bounded. Another of the methodologies used is the `5S´ (five basic elements: selection, systematization, cleaning, normalization and self-discipline) and `PDCA´(plan, do, check, act).
1. Establish a multidisciplinary group.
2. Training on the methodology developed in 5 sessions.
3. Elaboration of a project charter with the objetives, the scope and the planning.
4. Analyze the chosen processes with the following dynamics: a) Team visit to the work area, b) Interview an expert from each process, c) Registration of inefficiencies and process data in a value steam mapping, d) Compilation of possible improvement actions, e) Meeting for consensus and realization of an action plan to prioritize and assign those responsible for carrying out the improvement actions.

What has been achieved?

Number of meetings with the multidisciplinary team: 10
Reception process: improvements implemented(II): 11, pending improvements (PI): 2, indicators evaluated (IE): 4
Conditioning process: II: 4, PI: 0, IE: 2
Storage process: II: 13, PI: 2, IE: 2

What next?

Must be maintained and evaluated over time and anytime there that may be a change. These improvements allowed a better anticipation. The process improvement approach aimed to identify solutions was very fruitful and led to outcome practical. This method could be applied to improve other types of processes in our pharmacy service.

Which analytical method for parenteral nutrition mixtures dosing to choose? A regional comparative study

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Joan-Candy MABIN , Aïssé DIALLO, Hortense LANNELUC-BEAUJARD, Xavier DEVIOT

Why was it done?

The aim of this work is to find a cheaper alternative, reducing the analysis duration and allowing the pharmacy to be laboratory independent.

What was done?

The opening of the production unit (PU) leads to reorganize the parenteral nutrition mixtures (PNM) dosing. Primarily carried out in the biochemistry laboratory of our hospital, potentiometry and colorimetry analysis were long (more than an hour) and costly. PNM composition accelerates the aging of one of the device components that costs 1400 euros and have to be changed every 3 weeks, raising the total around 24300 euros per year only for this component.

How was it done?

Hospitals producing PNM in the region were identified and approached. They were asked about the type of dosed elements, the analysis method and the equipment used, about the analysis duration and localization (laboratory or pharmacy departments) and their overall cost estimation.

What has been achieved?

Five hospitals with different dosing equipment answered. Four of them analyze cations: calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium by capillary electrophoresis, potentiometry or spectrometry, three of them analyze glucose by chromatography or colorimetry, and two of them determine osmolarity of the PNM mixtures. Dosages are performed by the pharmacy department in three PU where technician are required. Results are provided in about an hour when the activity depends on the laboratory and around five to ten minutes when it is managed by the pharmacy department. The average cost to purchase the equipment for each hospital was around 50000 euros (without the associated materials and the labour cost).

What next?

To conclude, no hospital interviewed can be a model because of either the high costs or the unadapted equipment size to the scale of the room of our PU. Nevertheless, during discussions, an equipment that might answer our needs was suggested, because no technician is needed for analysis, and it is described simple and easy to use. The manufacturer has been reached out asking for demonstration and information before any purchase. If accepted, the device will be qualified before going into production.

Physicochemical and biological stability study of mogamulizumab in diluted solution

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Emma Pinet, Lionel Barty, Anne Blandine Bouvrain, Françoise Le Cheviller, Nicolas Vaillant, Nathalie Jourdan, Hélène Sauvageon, Isabelle Madelaine

Why was it done?

In order to make hospital preparations in advance and optimize costs, a physicochemical and biological stability study was conducted in the pharmaceutical control laboratory.

What was done?

Mogamulizumab is a monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of Sezary syndrome and mycosis fungoides. The dilution of the 4 mg/ml vial of Poteligeo® in the infusion bag is stable for 24 hours at room temperature between 0.1 to 3 mg/ml.

How was it done?

Four bags of mogamulizumab were prepared in 0.9% NaCl 250 ml (2 at 0.14 mg/ml, 2 at 0.34 mg/ml). Each dilution is evaluated at 20±5°C and at 5±3°C, protected from light for 28 days. Analyses are performed in triplicate by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC-UV) associated with Chromeleon™ software. Concentrations are measured by HPLC after Flow Injection Analysis (FIA). Physical stability is studied by searching for IgG aggregates by Steric Exclusion Chromatography (Biozen™SEC3 column, 1.8µm 300*4.6mm). Chemical stability is evaluated by assessing acidic and basic variants proportions of the antibody by Cation Exchange Chromatography (CEC) (Biozen™WCX column, 6µm 250*4.6mm). Biological activity is determined by evaluation of the different glycoforms, by affinity chromatography (FcyRIIIa column, 5µm 75*4.6mm Tosoh®). The microbiological stability is performed by seeding the diluted solution on chocolate agar and brain heart broth.

What has been achieved?

At D28, the quantitative determination of mogamulizumab by FIA showed a deviation of less than 10% compared to theoretical concentrations. No aggregates or antibody fragments were found. The proportion of acidic, basic variants and of the main peak did not deviate by more than 5% compared to D0. For all infusion-bags studied by CEC, the main peak rates were between 79.1% and 85.8%, the acidic variant rates between 6.7% and 9.9% and the basic variant rates between 7.8% and 11.2%. The proportion of each antibody species (low, medium, high affinity) did not deviate by 5% from D0. The low affinity rate is between 48.2% and 52.7%, medium between 39.6% and 44.8% and high between 6.9% and 7.9%. No colonies were found on chocolate agar and heart-brain broth.

What next?

Mogamulizumab is physically, chemically and biologically stable for 28 days in diluted solution between 0.14 mg/L and 0.41 mg/L at 5°C and 20°C.

Implementation of dose banding strategy for Daptomycin

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Marta García-Queiruga, Begoña Feal-Cortizas, José María Gutiérrez-Urbón, Andrea Luaces-Rodríguez, Alejandro Martínez-Pradeda, Sandra Rotea-Salvo, Carla Fernandez-Oliveira, Víctor Giménez-Arufe, Luis Margusino-Framiñán, Isabel Martín-Herranz

Why was it done?

Daptomycin is an intravenous antibiotic usually prepared in Hospital Pharmacy services. Normally it is dosed based on body weight, which requires each intravenous mixture to be prepared in an individual manner for each patient. This might lead to an increased assistance workload in elaboration areas, a higher number of errors in the preparation and high costs due to waste materials generated during preparation.

What was done?

The aim of this study is to describe the preparation of intravenous daptomycin by dose banding, a system in which daptomycin doses are rounded up or down in order to standardize and protocolize the preparation of intravenous mixtures as much as possible.

How was it done?

In order to improve this situation, dose banding strategy was implemented in February 2019: the obtained final dose was rounded in such a way that only mixtures of 500, 700 and 850 mg were prepared (in agreement with Hospital Pharmacy and Infectious and Microbiology medical teams) , following this scheme:
PRESCRIBED DOSE PREPARED DOSE
< 400 mg Prescribed dose (individualized) 400–599 mg 500 mg ≥600–799 mg 700 mg ≥800 mg 850 mg

What has been achieved?

Previous year before starting dose banding strategy (2018), 5493 individualized doses of daptomycin were prepared for 437 patients in our Pharmacy service. Between June 2020 and June 2021, 2680, 2555 and 997 units of daptomycin 500, 700 and 850 mg, respectively, were prepared for 360 patients. Batches of standardized doses were prepared in advance and kept refrigerated (stability of 10 days in 100 ml of physiological saline) until dispensation. In addition, during the same period, 15 patients (4 from pediatrics) received 209 individualized doses (3.2% of the total doses) due to their low body weight.

What next?

This strategy might decrease the number of errors in preparation and reduce processing times, which is essential since early appropriate antibiotic treatment in severe infection has been associated with better outcomes. Dose banding model could be extrapolated to other drugs with good physical, medical and microbiological stability in dilution, which are frequently prescribed and when few dose bands can cover most of the prescriptions.

Use of a closed-system drug transfer device in the handling and administration of ganciclovir outside the hospital pharmacy unit

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Lucia Ricchi, Gregorio Medici, Porretta Serapiglia Carla, Marzia Bacchelli, Marianna Rivasi

Why was it done?

Hazardous drugs (HDs) may include antineoplastic or cytotoxic agents, biologic agents, antiviral agents, immunosuppressive agents, and drugs from other classes. Healthcare workers, especially nurses and pharmacy personnel, experience occupational exposure to these HDs.
Preparation and administration of ganciclovir should only be performed by health professionals who have been appropriately educated and trained and deemed competent in its use. Until now the preparation of ganciclovir was performed by the pharmacy’s antiblastic drugs unit. However, during closing times, kits for the self-preparation (antiblastic gloves and gowns, FFP3 masks, eye protections and brief instructions for reconstitution) were provided.
Many strategies have been deployed to reduce the risk of occupational exposure to HDs, including control devices designed to act as closed systems and preventing exposure through liquid or vapor leakage. These devices mechanically prohibit the escape of HDs from the system and can be used for preparing and administering these drugs.

What was done?

Some of the intensive care units of our hospital have been enabled to prepare their own ganciclovir bags by using a closed system drug transfer device (CSTDs).

How was it done?

Each nurse involved was instructed by hospital pharmacists on how to handle CSTDs. In addition to this they were also given a short video and an infographic showing the main operations to be carried out.
Ganciclovir bags are prepared using the Tevadaptor® (Simplivia), in a needleless technique, by combination of the Vial adaptor, the Syringe adaptor, the Spike port adaptor and a connector closed male (Spiros, ICU).

What has been achieved?

Use of CSTDs is a simple and effective way to reduce exposure to HDs, provide better protection, better aseptic technique and better containment of waste than the traditional method, as well as allows the preparation of HDs to be carried out outside the antineoplastic drug unit.

What next?

In the future their use could also be extended to the preparation of monoclonal antibodies and antibiotics considering that there is not enough definitive research on the effects of occupational exposure to these agents. And, to date, there is no known safe maximum level of exposure to these drugs.

Homemade personalized 3D printed guides for mandibular reconstruction – A pharmacist feedback

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Quentin Misandeau, Romain Bosc, Muriel Paul, Valérie Archer, Lionel Tortolano

Why was it done?

The plastic surgery department bought two 3D printers in order to design and create custom-made medical devices. The main objective was to decrease the delay between mandibular cancer diagnosis and the surgery. The delays of production in the medical device manufacturers may exceed 2 weeks. Those delays are considered as a lost of chance for the patients.

What was done?

We helped our surgeons to secured the production procedure and reduce the risks for patients. We create a management quality system for supply, production, sterilization and using of our homemade personalized 3D printed guides.

How was it done?

First, we created a task force of pharmacist and surgeons.
The main work was a risk analysis with the FMECA method for all the steps in the procedure (software, tools, actors and materials).

What has been achieved?

Some correctives actions were taken. The riskier points were the plastic materials toxicity risk, the sterilization procedure that has been validated and the production traceability. A biocompatibility evaluation was performed. A clinical evaluation has been initiated in the same period.

What next?

Since the new medical device regulatory (2017 /745 CE) was published in 2017, the article five, that regulate the 3D printing in hospital, changes the possibilities. In fact, as personalized 3D printed guides are available on the EU market, homemade personalized 3D printed guides for mandibular reconstruction could be not authorized anymore. The only way would be for the hospital to obtain the regulatory statut of manufacturer and comply with the essential requirements.

Expanding hospital pharmacy services by centralizing the preparation of non-cytotoxic intravenous medications: A preliminary overview of the Italian community of APOTECA users

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Alessandro D’Arpino, Fiorenza Enrico, Caterina Donati, Simone Leoni, Giorgia Longobardo, Marco Bellero, Alessandra Bianco, Giuseppe Zacchi, Anna Zaltieri, Stefano Monica, Nicolò Squartini, Matteo Federici

Why was it done?

In most of Italian healthcare organizations, the large majority of non-cytotoxic IV medications are prepared in clinical environment by nursing staff. This is recognized as a complex and labour-intensive process that entails various risks of potential medication errors (microbial contamination, wrong reconstitution/dosing). Centralizing the preparation from the clinical environment to the pharmacy in order to provide ready-to-administer IV medications represents a strategy to improve safety and prevent medication errors.

What was done?

The community of APOTECA technology users is committed to fostering co-de¬sign of technology based on the hospitals’ needs and sharing best practices for improving hospital pharmacy services. During a meeting taken place in September 2021, a panel of hospital pharmacists belonging to APOTECA community laid the groundwork for centralized preparation of non-cytotoxic intravenous (IV) drugs and establishment of Central Intravenous Additive Service (CIVAS) in Italian hospital pharmacies.

How was it done?

The following methodology was adopted to promote a standard profile of centralization: (1) definition of criteria for the selection of drugs suitable for centralized preparation, (2) identification of IV medication classes for which preparation should be centralized due to intrinsic risks and demand, (3) evaluation of potential benefits, (4) discussion on organizational challenges regarding the establishment of CIVAS, (5) assessment of the role of automated preparation with robotics.

What has been achieved?

Five selection criteria to centralize drugs were mentioned: long-term stability data, frequency of use, cost, complexity of preparation, microbial contamination risk. Continuous infusion of antibiotics, vasoactive drugs, anaesthetics, pain medications, intravitreal injections, and patient-individual doses for paediatric patients were chosen as eligible IV medication classes to implement centralized preparation. Major benefits of centralization were pointed out, i.e. proper aseptic preparation, perspective quality controls, process traceability, reduced drug wastage, and releasing nursing time to care. Logistics, inventory management, limited space, and inadequate quality control units were identified as main challenges to the CIVAS establishment. Participants agreed that robotics plays an important role to minimize repetitive manual activities, optimize working efficiency, and increase pharmacy production capacity, thereby streamlining the introduction of CIVAS.

What next?

A close collaboration between healthcare staff and hospital pharmacy will be essential to evaluate the feasibility of centralized preparation as well as its clinical and cost-effectiveness.

DEVELOPMENT OF A PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIC MIXTURE FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN CONTROL

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

María Molinero, Virginia Puebla, Cristina González, Lidia Ybáñez, Gonzalo Hernando, Natalia Sánchez-Ocaña, Javier Corazón, María de la Torre, Jose Manuel Martínez

Why was it done?

This technique provides autonomy to the patient allowing to adjust the dose based on the intensity of pain. It has been demonstrated that small on-demand doses of analgesia provide a reduction in the final dose, thus reducing side effects. In addition, by minimizing the possible delay in the administration of analgesia, the anxiety associated with pain and exacerbations is reduced.

What was done?

Hospital Pharmacy Service in collaboration with Acute Pain Unit has developed a protocol for an analgesic mixture for intravenous administration in continuous infusion based on tramadol, dexketoprofen and haloperidol. It is a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) administered by pump for the treatment of acute postoperative pain.

How was it done?

We performed a bibliographic search of stability studies in order to standardize the analgesic mixture, guaranteeing its physical-chemical and microbiological stability.

What has been achieved?

A mixture of 600mg tramadol, 300mg dexketoprofen and 5mg haloperidol was prepared and it was filtered through a 5-micron filter. It was diluted in 100mL of 0.9% sodium chloride, obtaining a mixture of 125mL. It was sealed and bagged in a photoprotective bag. After the bibliographic search on stability data and physical-chemical compatibility of the mixture, a stability of 14 days at 2-8 ºC was established. Once elaborated, quality control was performed by gravimetry. It was dispensed weekly by stock to the post-anesthesia resuscitation unit. The established perfusion rate is 1.3 mL/h or 1.7 mL/h for 48h. With each rescue, 8mg of tramadol and 4mg of dexketoprofen are released per hour or 4mg and 2mg every 30min, respectively. The maximum dose that can be administered is 400mg tramadol, 150mg dexketoprofen and 2mg haloperidol, except if the patient weighs less than 50kg: 8mg/kg tramadol. If renal insufficiency, dose adjustment was mandatory.

What next?

The centralization of the preparation of intravenous admixtures from the pharmacy service allow us to adjust the expiry date based on stability studies reported in the literature, to maintain the asepsis of the mixture as it is prepared in horizontal laminar flow cabinets, to increase the safety and to secure the traceability.

Added value of centralised compounding of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in Hospital Pharmaceutical Services – a quantitative analysis

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Rui Relvas, Rui Pedro Marques, Ana Castro, Sérgio Nobre, João Paulo Lopes da Cruz

Why was it done?

Medicines compounding by the HPS-staff is a primordial activity, and its centralisation allows several benefits in levels such as patient safety, quality, efficiency, and pharmacoeconomics. Despite this recognised importance, it is not always possible to quantify its added value. The fact that vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are supplied in multi-dose vials and the need to prepare and assure enough doses to vaccinate a broad population presented itself as an excellent opportunity to analyse such indicators.

What was done?

A quantitative analysis of the importance and added value of centralised preparation and compounding of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 at the Hospital Pharmaceutical Services’ (HPS) Compounding Unit from a Central Hospital in Portugal.

How was it done?

Between 27th December 2020 and 2nd August 2021, 13.030 doses were prepared (96.9% Pfizer/BioNTech; 3.1% AstraZeneca). At the first 3 vaccination sessions, multi-dose vials were diluted at the HPS, and each syringe measured by the nursing-staff previously to the administration.
After these initial sessions, each dose started to be individualised by the HPS-staff on pre-filled, ready-to-use syringes. Each vaccine dose was individualised on a horizontal laminar flow cabinet according to a previously approved operational procedure.
Reception, preparation, and dispensation records were retrospectively analysed. Key performance indicators were quantified.

What has been achieved?

During the first 3 sessions of vaccination, when nursing-staff measured each vaccine volume, a total of 1640 doses were administered. However, it would be possible to measure a total of 1932 doses (84,9%). The daily maximum of people vaccinated was 770.
In the following sessions was possible to prepare 11.390 doses, with a theoretical maximum of 10.892 (104,6%) and a daily maximum of 1.113.
This yield, over 100%, allowed an excess of 498 doses, which translated into the vaccination of 249 extra individuals fully vaccinated with the 2 doses. Factors like needle and syringe selection and preparation beyond an aseptic and validated environment contributed for the yield increase.

What next?

Series-production of compounded medicines in a sterile, validated, and controlled environment allows important benefits and this analysis shows the potentiation of every key performance indicator considered. These data should be considered for the future planning of population-wide activities involving the massive preparation of sterile medicines.

COMPOUNDING AUTOMATION OF NON-STERILE EMULSIONS

European Statement

Production and Compounding

Author(s)

Lidia Ybañez, Virginia Puebla , Cristina Gonzalez, María Molinero, Estefanía Rosón, Gonzalo Hernando, Natalia Sanchez-Ocaña, María De la Torre, Javier Corazón, Jose Manuel Martinez-Sesmero

Why was it done?

In 2020, Compounding laboratory’s activity increased as a result of COVID-19 pandemic. In order to achieve new needs and requirements, we decided to introduce a mixing and emulsifying robot. Improvement in productivity would also allow us to elaborate formulas that were previously outsourced (such as selective digestive decontamination (SDD) solution and oropharyngeal paste), thus saving money. The effectiveness of this measures was evaluated from April 2020 to April 2021.

What was done?

An emulsifying-mixing device for non-sterile oral and topical formulation was introduced at the pharmacy’s compounding laboratory. A reorganization of laboratory workflows was implemented to ensure an optimal use of the device.

How was it done?

We performed a needs assesments plan to determine what needs to be accomplished to reach our project goals (Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) compliant. Formulas suitable to be compounded in the robot were selected. A reorganization of the daily practice was performed to achieve an optimal workflow.

What has been achieved?

Seven product formulations and 3 excipient formulations were suitable for being produced by robot (SDD solution and oropharyngeal paste being two of them, (11536 single dose packages of SDD solution and 5977 of oropharyngeal paste have been prepared throughout the year ).
37202€ have been saved by producing the SDD solution and paste instead of outsourcing its production. The investment required to purchase and operate the robot was approximately 2600 euros.

What next?

Compounding automation improves efficiency and productivity (as we have been able to produce formulas that were previously outsourced), saving costs. Robot has been successfully incorporated into daily practice in a Hospital Pharmacy compounding laboratory. Its implementation has allowed the optimization of available resources (especially during the pandemic) and significant financial savings for the Hospital.
By implementing this device, other hospitals will be able to improve their production processes for non-sterile medicines in compliance with GMP.

×

Join us in Prague for

the 2nd edition of BOOST!

Secure your spot (limited seats available!)

BOOST is where visionaries, innovators, and healthcare leaders come together to tackle one of the biggest challenges in hospital pharmacy — the shortage of medicine and medical devices.

×

Deadline extended to July 15th

Problems caused by shortages are serious, threaten patient care and require urgent action.

Help us provide an overview of the scale of the problem, as well as insights into the impact on overall patient care.

Our aim is to investigate the causes of medicine and medical device shortages in the hospital setting,  while also gathering effective solutions and best practices implemented at local, regional, and national levels.

×

Join us in Prague for the 2nd edition of BOOST!

Secure your spot in the Movement for Shortage-Free World

BOOST is where visionaries, innovators, and healthcare leaders come together to tackle one of the biggest challenges in hospital pharmacy—medicine shortages.