EMBEDDING EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING ACROSS AN MPHARM CURRICULUM: IMPLEMENTATION, EVOLUTION, AND IMPACT TWO YEARS ON
European Statement
Education and Research
Author(s)
Connor Thompson-Poole
Sam Ingram
Why was it done?
The University of Brighton introduced an Experiential Learning Strategy in 2023 to enhance pharmacy education through progressive, practice-based learning. The strategy aimed to allow students to apply their knowledge through the Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) degree and strengthen their clinical preparedness and professional identity. This initiative is in response to the General Pharmaceutical Council’s (GPhC) Initial Education and Training of Pharmacist (IETP) standards of 2021, which emphasise real-world competence and interprofessional collaboration.
What was done?
A structured experiential framework was implemented, utilising our ‘Teach > Simulate > Do’ model combining lectures, simulated clinical experiences, and real-world placements. Each year of study now includes both simulated practice activities, such as virtual clinical experiences and prescribing simulations, and direct placements across community, hospital, primary care, and specialist sectors.
A central Pharmacy Placement Operational Advisory Group (PPOAG) was established to co-create and quality assure placement provision in partnership with providers and national teams. Placement activities were supported by structured logbooks, learning agreements, and supervisor training resources to standardise expectations and feedback.
How was it done?
Over two years, the programme has expanded to over 120 multisector placement providers, offering students a total of 60 days of placement activity across the four-year MPharm degree. This expansion has opened access to previously inaccessible learning environments for undergraduate pharmacy students, including general practice, ambulance services, mental health trusts, and prison pharmacy. Simulated learning activities have been aligned with placement learning outcomes to ensure coherence between taught and experiential learning.
What has been achieved?
Student pharmacists reported improved clinical confidence and understanding of team-based care, and many students have gained part-time employment as a result of their placement experiences. Providers noted greater consistency and preparedness of students, and improved communication channels with the university. Placement networks across the region expanded significantly, increasing placement capacity and diversity.
What next?
Future work will focus on using both quantitative data, including placement capacity and completion rates, and qualitative data, such as student reflections and provider feedback, to continue to inform iterative development and quality enhancement of the programme. Continued collaboration with NHS and community partners will ensure sustainable and high-quality experiential learning for future cohorts.
Reconciliation of shared medicine record at discharge: hospital pharmacy ensures correct information on patients’ transition
Pdf
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Linda Jeffery, Maria Grønkjær Abrahamsen, Anja Alrø Bøtkjær, Lotte Aggergaard, Ann Brit Andersen
Why was it done?
Our country has a national SMR for every citizen. The SMR shows the current medication that the citizen has been prescribed, from all sectors. All sectors can see the SMR, which is considered/ought to be the ‘truth’ about the patient’s medication. On discharge from the hospital the SMR is updated by the doctor. Afterwards, pharmacy technicians dispense medicines for discharge. The technicians, at this stage, often find discrepancies in the SMR compared to the medication prescribed and given during admission. The SMR is electronically updated but not adequately reconciled. False information in the SMR may ultimately lead to adverse drug safety events in the primary sector.
What was done?
The regional hospital pharmacy patient safety network studied how many patients do not have a reconciled electronic Shared Medication Record (SMR) at discharge, despite the doctor having electronically updated it.
How was it done?
The technician recorded the discrepancies found before contacting the doctor to get the SMR corrected.
Each discrepancy was reported into the national patient safety database.
The technicians do not dispense medicines to all discharged patients, so our results were extrapolated to all discharged patients in the time period (there was no reason to expect bias).
The study was carried out in the whole region (5 hospitals) during the same week in September 2022.
What has been achieved?
Preliminary data shows that 994 patients were discharged from the wards studied.
Technicians dispensed medicines to 278 patients. They found one or more discrepancies in 65 SMRs (23,4%).
Extrapolation of these results revealed that, in the period, there were potentially 232 patients with drug-related problems from these wards (and approx. 17,000/year in the region).
What next?
Our results showed that the SMR is not adequately reconciled in 23% of discharges, despite the doctor feeling that the task is completed. This gives drug related problems in the primary sector, often resulting in calls to the ward etc. that are time consuming and difficult to solve after discharge. Updating the SMR at discharge is essential for patient safety under transition of care. Our results will be brought to the hospital administrations, patient safety organisations and the regional medicines board for further discussion about the problem and possible solutions.
IMMPACT: A THERAPEUTIC EDUCATION PROGRAM TO SUPPORT SEAMLESS CARE FOR PATIENTS LIVING WITH CANCER
Pdf
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
A. Decottignies, D. Bouchoucha, S. Lévêque, S. Barthier, J.F. Morere, A. Marfaing, A. Rieutord
Why was it done?
Cancer has become a chronic disease. However, the impact of the disease and related treatments on patients’ everyday life remain poorly addressed all along the patient clinical pathway. The objective was to customise support to the patient to be able to better understand and control the disease and treatment consequences.
What was done?
An integrated care model based on a therapeutic education programme (TEP) was designed to better support patients living with cancer in their everyday life. The hospital pharmacy led the project, launched in October 2013 and implemented for patients in March 2015. It is called IMMPACT (impact of illness and medication in patients undergoing chemotherapy). This TEP was accredited by the National Authority (ref No ETP 13/30 in August 2013).
How was it done?
A transprofessional working group was formed. Our concern was to propose a smooth and safe transition from hospital to home. To do so, the hospital set up a partnership with the health network to facilitate seamless care. A prospective survey was conducted in October 2013 including 41 ambulatory patients. Three priority themes were identified: tiredness, haematological problems and digestive disorders management. According to the results, educational sessions have been collaboratively designed and implemented.
What has been achieved?
The patients group workshops began in January 2014. To date, 31 group workshops have been run. These group workshops are facilitated by trained healthcare professionals using educational tools such as Barrows Cards, mosaic characters or metaplan. 83 patients have already experienced this programme. Patient global satisfaction is >92%.
What next?
Given the success of this programme and to fulfil the growing expectations of patients, new sequences are being designed about pain, chemotherapy related neurotoxicity, socio-aesthetics and lymphoedema management as well as developing a serious game for the patient. Finally, IMMPACT extension to community pharmacists is being considered to further sustain patients empowerment and continuity of care.