Author(s)

Ignacio Javier Tamboleo Sánchez, Julia Fernández Vela, Fernando Lago Ballester, Mª CARMEN MIRA SIRVENT, Elena Conesa Nicolas

Why was it done?

The initiative started in October 2022, it was a response to the challenges associated with prolonged intravenous antibiotic use. The overarching goals were to enhance patient care, mitigate unnecessary intravenous antibiotic prescriptions, and foster a culture of responsible antimicrobial stewardship. Recognizing the need for a systematic and collaborative approach, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) pharmacist played a central role in implementing interventions across various medical specialties, with a clear focus on improving patient outcomes.

What was done?

The initiative promoted the adoption of sequential antibiotic therapy among hospitalised patients undergoing intravenous treatment for more than three days. Leveraging the Wise Antimicrobial Stewardship Support System® (WASPSS®) and detailed analysis of medical records, the programme identified eligible patients based on criteria such as clinical stability, oral bioavailability, infection specifics, and antibiotic suitability.

How was it done?

The ASP pharmacist’s central role proved instrumental, with 74% of alerts resulting in actionable recommendations. WASPSS® detects every patient with intravenous antibiotic more than 3 days and the ASP pharmacist decides which patients will benefit from sequential therapy. Choosing the recommendation criteria is essential to have a good response from medical specialties ensuring a more efficient and tailored approach to intervention implementation. The main obstacles to the introduction of this initiative were the establishment of refined communication routes and the targeted training to the different specialties which are not yet fully implemented.

What has been achieved?

Results revealed that 74% of alerts met the criteria for transitioning from intravenous to oral administration. Among the 573 alerts reviewed, 45.1% witnessed a successful switch to oral antibiotics, 21.2% showed no change, and 16.7% of patients were discharged. Notably, higher acceptance rates were observed in specific specialties, such as pneumology (61.3%) and general medicine (54.4%). Nevertheless, oncology (35,3%) general and digestive surgery (25,8%) had the lowest acceptance rate. In conclusion, the global acceptance rate was lowest than expected (43,8%) but there are many improvements measures that are being carried out.

What next?

This initiative serves as a beacon for responsible antibiotic management, making noteworthy contributions to patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and the overall quality of healthcare delivery. Recommending ongoing collaboration, continuous training, and regular analysis of recommendation criteria will enhance its impact.

Pdf

Author(s)

Ana Concepción Sánchez Cerviño, Jorge Coca Crespo, Maria Rivera Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Alcaraz López, Adrián López Fernández, Elena Pérez García, Bárbara Ubeda Ruiz, Amelia Sánchez Guerrero

Why was it done?

Sequential therapy, or switch therapy, consists of an early conversion from intravenous to oral (PO) treatment, without compromising the therapeutic effectiveness. In advantage, PO in selected cases, avoids intravenous associated risks, it is more comfortable to patients and represents an important economic saving.

The aim of the GPI was to implement a daily program that allows the pharmacist to identify the patients that would benefit from the AST.

What was done?

Implementation of a program of antibiotic sequential therapy (AST) and evaluate the outcome of the pharmaceutical recommendations carried out in a third-level hospital.

How was it done?

A database was created to select the active antibiotic prescriptions with more than 72 hours duration, susceptible to AST: metronidazole, clindamycin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and linezolid.

Patients clinical criteria for initiating AST were established as:
• Temperature ≤ 37 ºC
• Systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg
• Heart rate < 100 bpm • Respiratory rate < 24 rpm • Oxygen saturation ≥ 90% • Capacity for oral intake Once the patients were identified, the pharmacist communicated the recommendation to the doctor in charge, and worked together to make a final decision. Due to the high burden of care, the follow-up of patients who could not be substituted to PO in the first 72 hours was lost.

What has been achieved?

From October 2022 to March 2023, 453 patients on intravenous antibiotic treatment were reviewed. The mean age was 65.7 ± 20.9, and 57.4% of the patients were men.
47 patients were selected as they met the established criteria.

All the antibiotics presented a similar percentage of recommendation with a mean of 19.2% ± 6.3. Of this percentage, 59.6% of the patients were switched to oral antibiotics. Stands out linezolid, with a 83.3% of acceptance.

Lower respiratory tract infections were the most prevalent, representing 51.6% of the total. However, only 11 patients (5.1%) were suggested for AST due to the frequent use of nasal spectacles or oxygen therapy, a criterion that excludes AST

What next?

The high number of accepted recommendations shows the importance of implementing an AST programme in order to optimize antimicrobial treatment, and this initiative could be easily implemented to all Pharmacy Services.

Pdf

Author(s)

STEFANIE HEHENBERGER, IRENE LAGOJA, SANDRA BIELITZ-HOLZER

Why was it done?

Creation of a stoma means change in secretion, intestinal motility and absorption. Depending on localisation, this has also consequences for the absorption of drugs or certain drug forms. Data on absorption of drugs in ostomy patients are rare, but as most drugs are absorbed in the small intestine, ileostomy patients may more likely experience difficulty in absorbing and, therefore, gaining maximum benefit from oral medications.

What was done?

As part of a project, it was evaluated whether and which drug-related problems (DRPs) occur in stoma patients and, if so, measures for optimising drug therapy were proposed.
Relevant drug data (tmax, site of absorption, etc.) were collected and systematised in tabular form and the need for further pharmaceutical interventions was surveyed.

How was it done?

Over a period of 21 weeks, medication of Ileostomy patients (new created and pre-existing) hospitalised in various wards was screened.
A Level 3 medication analysis was performed, and the medication was then analysed with regard to possible stoma-specific DRPs.
All DRPs and pharmaceutical interventions were categorised and documented, and the identified DRPs brought to the attention of the patient’s medical team for review/ discussion in written form and/or personally.

What has been achieved?

Seventy-nine DRPs were identified in 15 medication reviews, of which 49 (62%) were classified as stoma associated DRPs. The pharmaceutical interventions were categorised, most common recommendations were monitoring (18) and change of the medication form (15). Acceptance of the interventions was also recorded (82%). Since a HOS (High output stoma) occurred frequently, an escalation scheme for the therapy of liquid stool and/or stool volume ≥1500ml/day was established. Finally, an interdisciplinary cooperation taking into account the complex patient factors could successfully be established.

What next?

Due to these results it can be assumed that ileostomy patients benefit greatly from pharmaceutical interventions, and that clinical-pharmaceutical care of ileostomy patients contributes to the drug therapy safety of this patient group and is therefore now being continued and incorporated into everyday clinical practice. In addition, further projects such as the creation of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the interdisciplinary care of ileostomy patients are in progress.

Pdf

Author(s)

Carlos José Cortés Sánchez, Josefina Giménez Castellanos, Mónica Abdilla Bonías, Arantxa Valdivia Piqueres, José María Gómez Portolés, Irene Toledo Guasp, Eva García Cortés

Why was it done?

Proper use of antimicrobials is essential to ensure their efficacy and minimize the emergence of resistance. The evaluation of antibiotic prescription in a district hospital can provide information about clinical practice, adherence to local protocols, and the possibility of addressing antimicrobial resistance issues.

What was done?

Review the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription according to local guidelines and protocols.

How was it done?

This is 4-month prospective observational study(May to August 2023) in a district hospital. A daily list of admitted patients on antibiotic treatment was obtained through OrionClinic® electronic prescription. Each patient was reviewed and discussed for appropriateness with antimicrobial stewardship team in a Microsoft-TEAMS© chat. The following data were recorded: registration date, patient identification, hospitalization unit, microbiological culture, treatment modality (prophylaxis, empirical, or targeted) and appropriateness using a Microsoft FORMS©.
Descriptive analysis expressed as number and percentage and relationships derived from registration: percentage of patients by hospitalization unit, treatment modality, and appropriateness. Percentage of patients on empirical treatment with microbiological culture. And appropriateness according to treatment modality.

What has been achieved?

A total of 172 patients were analysed, of which 83(48.25%) were surgical patients (orthopaedic surgery, general surgery, urology, gynaecology, otolaryngology), 64(37.2%) are from internal medicine,MIN, 17(9.9%) from intensive care unit,ICU, and 8(4.7%) from paediatrics,PED. Of the total of patients, 95(55.2%) had requested a microbiological culture. About 52(30.2%) patients were on prophylactic treatment, 103(59.9%) empirically, and 17(9.9%) on targeted treatment. In conclusion, 119(69.2%) antibiotic treatments were appropriate (prophylactic 26/50%, empiric 80/77.67% and targeted treatment 13/76.5%).
Breaking-down data by hospitalization unit and treatment, of the 83 surgical (49 prophylactic, 28 empirical, and 6 targeted) 47(56.6%) were appropriate. Among the 64 MIN patients(1 prophylactic, 56 empirical, and 7 targeted), 54(84.4%) were appropriate. In ICU of 17 patients(2 prophylactic, 12 empirical, and 3 targeted), 11(64.7%) were appropriate. In PED of 8 patients(7 empirical and 1 targeted), 7(87.5%) were appropriate. Of the total of patients on empirical treatment(103), in 28(27.2%) there isn’t microbiological sample.

What next?

This is a preliminary analysis of our hospital’s situation in order to assess where interventions are needed for those patients who are not appropriate. It also helps us identify the hospitalisation units in which it is more necessary to implement strategic non-imposing measures to improve antibiotic prescription.

Pdf

Author(s)

Franco Perna, Maria Elisabetta Uda, Maxime Annereau, Hail Aboudagga , André Rieutord, My Lan Vo

Why was it done?

The process of pharmaceutical validation of chemotherapy involves several steps, and the hospital pharmacist must rely on multiple therapy protocols. In addition, pharmacists who have just finished university do not have the appropriate training for pharmaceutical validation. Thus, we decided to develop a tool to support the validation of chemotherapy, in which pharmacists can learn therapy protocols.

What was done?

The hospital pharmacy has developed a pedagogical tool to support pharmaceutical validation in the context of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

How was it done?

We initially carried out a systematic review, following the PRISMA 2020 Statement, to find if there were any educational methods or tools exist to facilitate pharmaceutical validation in paediatric oncology.
Then, we contacted several pharmacists, currently employed in French hospitals and abroad, to understand how they train new pharmacists and resident students about chemotherapies validation. After this first stage, we focused our research on the content of our future educational tool. We created an easy-to-fill questionnaire to obtain information and meet from clinical pharmacists inside our department to understand which information was needed for the tool and what could be the most suitable format for them.

What has been achieved?

Regarding the systematic review, only two studies were identified, in which tools for pharmacists were developed, but none of these concerned the pharmaceutical validation of paediatric chemotherapy. The hospital centres contacted did not develop pedagogical tools, but some of them support the training with standard operating procedures (SOPs).
The questionnaire, in which 15 pharmacists (27% students) were interviewed, revealed that most preferred a tool in pdf (48%) and paper format (22%), containing information on pathophysiology (48%) and epidemiology (22%) of rhabdomyosarcoma, on chemotherapy protocols (32%) and dosage regimens (19%). For this reason, a pedagogical tool has been developed in pdf format and in the form of a paper booklet with the required information.

What next?

This tool could be the first presented regarding the validation of paediatric chemotherapy.
The future prospect would be to develop other tools to support pharmaceutical validation so that we can invest more and more and provide more and more quality training to new hospital pharmacists.

Pdf

Author(s)

Sergio Portillo-Haro, Aída Rueda-Naharro, María Martínez-Pérez, Manuela Martínez-Camacho, David García-Marco

Why was it done?

Currently, multi-resistant microorganisms are a huge global problem of Public Health. In addition, this problem will be bigger in the next decades. The main strategy to face this threat is improve the use of antibiotics. DADA was born with this purpose. The app lets the Pharmacy Department manage a sizable number of inpatients using the time to analyse the results obtained by DADA. In other words, we have improved the efficiency in our use of time.
How was it done?
The app was developed in July 2022, and since then it has been updated multiple times to adapt it to our needs and expectations and the changes in clinical guidelines. Every Monday and Thursday, the app is started up. The results are analysed carefully by a pharmacist and afterwards the conclusions are transmitted to an Infectious Diseases Medician, who decides if modify the treatment.

What was done?

In July 2022, Pharmacy Department designed an app easy to use and comfortable in order to detect active antibiotic treatments that might be de-escalated. This app, DADA (Automated Antibiotic De-escalation) is fed with data of antibiotic treatments and microbiological cultures. DADA reads and understands every gap of information, and finally search results between the active treatments comparing it with theorical de-escalation sequencies, designed by Infectious Diseases Commission in our hospital and based in local epidemiological guidelines. In this way, DADA works with automatic decision algorithms. In addition, DADA also provides alerts of active treatments for resistant microorganisms to that antibiotic.

How was it done?

The app was developed in July 2022, and since then it has been updated multiple times to adapt it to our needs and expectations and the changes in clinical guidelines. Every Monday and Thursday, the app is started up. The results are analyzed carefully by a pharmacist and afterwards the conclusions are transmited to an Infectious Diseases Medician, who decides if modify the treatment.

What has been achieved?

Since August 2022 to March 2023, using DADA, the Pharmacy Department has made 25 proposals of antibiotic de-escalation, and 11 proposals were accepted (44.0%) by Medicians. In addition, the Department made two proposals of change for resistance to that antibiotic, both accepted by Medicians. This app has improved efficiency of time in the clinical team.

What next?

The main outcome is to improve the confidence of Medicians in this tool, in order to increase the percentage of acceptance in the proposals. Furthermore, the app can be more complete and interprets data, such as analytics parameters. In the future, other hospitals might use this tool to analyse their patients or in outpatients treatments.

Pdf

Author(s)

Eleonora Castellana, Simonetta Felloni, Matilde Scaldaferri, Giuseppina Bonfante, Elena Maggiora, Francesco Cresi, Maria Francesca Campagnoli, Alessandra Coscia, Maria Rachele Chiappetta, Francesco Cattel

Why was it done?

The purpose was to provide the Neonatal-Intensive-Care-Unit (NICU) with ready-to-use bags that could improve patient safety by minimizing procedural incidents and maximize resource efficiency while providing clinically appropriate nutrition for the single PP.

What was done?

Seven standard bags (SSB), ready-to-use, have been formulated and developed for parenteral nutrition (PN) in preterm patients (PP). An assisted prescribing software was developed for selecting the most appropriate standard bags (SB).

How was it done?

The project was carried out in collaboration between pharmacists, nurses and neonatologist of NICU.
The composition of the SB was identified from the retrospective analysis of the types of individualized bags requested from the Pharmacy and from the analysis of the recommended ESPGHAN-Paediatric-Parenteral-Nutrition-2018 contributions.

What has been achieved?

SSB ready-to-use were identified:

The bags have been produced by an industrial partner according to Good Manufacturing Practice-Annex 1. The shelf life is 90 days.

The SSB were implemented successfully on the PP. Starting from 2021, approximately 250 bags/month have been used, with a reduction in individual preparations by the Pharmacy of approximately 80%.

This approach showed results in terms of clinical results and economic outcomes. The computer program guided the physician to the most appropriate standardized solution.

Early and timely administration of ready-to-use PN showed reduced weight loss and a shorter duration of PN than individualized bags (21 vs 25 days).

What next?

The project described has shown benefits including improved nutrient supply, fewer prescribing and administration errors, lower risk of infection, cost sav-ings, ready availability of the bags 24/7 and safe and effective supply of SB. This project will be strengthened in our hospital.

Pdf

Author(s)

Giorgia Babaglioni, Lorenzo Silva, Elena Festa, Daniela Paganotti, Tullio Elia Testa

Why was it done?

In Italy, the rising PDMPs demand had to face the international shortage caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outbreak. The self-sufficiency level of albumin represents one of the National Blood Centre (NBC) main challenge, in view of the health system sustainability.

What was done?

The hospital pharmacy of a northern Italy centre, in accordance with the Good Use of Blood Committee, introduced a nominal form for human albumin (HA) requests to evaluate and rationalise the HA clinical-therapeutic demand. It represents a pharmacist led intervention approach shared by physicians, in favour of an economically sustainable healthcare contrasting the lack of plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs).

How was it done?

Prescription criteria were updated according to the most recent guidelines. The cut-off of blood albumin level above 2.5 g/dl has been introduced as eligibility threshold value and for the daily dose calculation, except for HA calculation based on volumes for plasmapheresis and large volume evacuative paracentesis in hepatic cirrhosis. The pharmacy provides a maximum of five days therapy, then a new revaluation and updating of blood albuminemia was required; 690 total requests were analyzed.

What has been achieved?

In March 2023, HA consumption was 61400 gr, collapsed by 75% in April and then settled at – 58% in May and June. The most important reductions in monthly requirements affected the surgical (- 75%), intensive (- 62%), internist (- 64%) and gastro-hepatological (- 52%) areas. 97,5% of requests were on-label: 20% for plasmapheresis or paracentesis, 21% for liver failure, 16% for cirrhosis of the liver with refractory ascites. 26% of requests (n = 180) reported in-range blood albumin value, while the 14% was unknown or ongoing because administered in emergency phase. 37% of requests has been evaded even if the blood albumin was > 2,5 g/dl due to mandatory clinical need. Thanks to the new prescription model it was possible to save € 91 752 in the second quarter.

What next?

The introduction of the reasoned request allowed to achieve albumin self-sufficiency with voluntary blood donations and reduce the market products purchase. Furthermore, it fostered the clinicians awareness on the HA use appropriateness, considering crystalloids and non-protein colloids as alternative therapeutic strategies as resuscitation fluids.

Pdf

Author(s)

Vanesa Alonso Castro, Pablo Jimenez Moreno, Marta Alcaraz Borrajo, Angel Luis Mataix Sanjuan, Beatriz Casamayor Lázaro, Maria Dolores García Cerezuela , Cristian Rosas Espinoza, Beatriz Santos Mena, Estrella Maroto García, Beatriz López Centeno, Daniele Alioto, María Jose Calvo Alcántara

Why was it done?

MTX is an immunosuppressor drug utilised in certain types of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Its dosage and frequency of administration varies depending on indication.
Throughout the years, medication errors (ME) have been reported at national and supranational levels where patients have received excessive doses (the most common being daily administration of the drug rather than weekly) with severe consequences for the patients, including death.
In our RHS, 222 ME related to MTX have been reported in the last 5 years,seven of them resulted in harm to the patient.

What was done?

An integral strategy to ensure the correct prescribing of weekly Methotrexate (MTX) was developed in a Regional Health Service (RHS).

How was it done?

1st PHASE (May 2021):
a. Monthly reporting to prescribers of their patients affected by duplicated prescriptions or incorrect dosing instructions for review and amending. These reports are available on the IT platform that collates prescribing indicators.
b. Development and dissemination of training materials to correctly prescribe medications with non-daily dosing instructions in the RHS electronic prescription tool.
2nd PHASE (After two years of follow-up):
a. Request to implement ME prevention plans (MEPP) to the hospitals of the RHS.
b. Creation and dissemination of informative material for patients and/or caregivers, where the weekly dosing instructions is emphasized.

What has been achieved?

Incidence of MTX prescribing mistakes: When this strategy was implemented, prescriptions for 2388 patients had been identified as potential mistakes. 1 year later, the incidence had diminished by 78.1% (2146 cases were resolved, 242 were still active and 310 were new). 2 years later, the incidence remained stable with a reduction of 78.5% thoroughout the whole period and 514 patients affected (150 new MTX prescribing mistakes in the last year).
• MEPP implantation (2nd PHASE): In two months, six hospitals (17.6% of all) implemented a MEPP. The key strategies that should be included in the MEPPs were disseminated to all hospitals by our team.

What next?

Thanks to this strategy, MTX prescribing mistakes have fallen by 78.5% in two years. However, prescribing mistakes continue to be made, which demonstrates the need for continuous training and awareness raising among prescribers to prevent ME related to MTX.

Pdf

Author(s)

Elisabetta Volpi, Giuseppa Lo Surdo, Mattia Lorenzini, Anna Carmignani, Debora Luccetti, Stefania Baratta, Mario Cossu, Maurizio Mangione, Pierantonio Furfori, Monica Baroni, Paolo Del Sarto, Stefania Biagini

Why was it done?

This implementation was designed to provide a safe tool for the particular context of the operating room, in which prescription and administration are actions usually urgent and concomitant. The program suggests a rapid list of prescriptions standardized for adult patients (i.e. dose, diluent, bolus/drip) and allows to register any other drug or modify default information, respecting the rules for a clear prescription before registration.
Our aim was to demonstrate the possibility to validate this program and prove its functionality.

What was done?

In 2019 a multidisciplinary group (doctors, nurses, pharmacists, computer scientists) created an electronic program dedicated to the Cardiac Operating Room of the Heart Hospital, Fondazione Monasterio (Italy), which allow the prompt registration of drug prescriptions and administrations. Furthermore this program guarantees traceability of the drugs administered by the nurses, in order to improve medication safety practice.

How was it done?

This program was created into the electronic prescribing system available in Fondazione Monasterio. The standardized prescriptions already in use in the operating room were reviewed by a pharmacist, consulting the information in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), in the literature or by contacting the company that holds the MA. For each discrepancies identified a solution was proposed and shared with the working group, in order to validate a definitive list.
The prescriptions extracted by the IT Systems unit 6 months before and after the implementation of the new program were therefore analyzed.

What has been achieved?

A list of 182 standardized prescriptions was validated and reported in the program.
Among the 10,320 prescriptions made before the new program none had traceability of the drugs administered, while the 8,730 of the following period were complete and 99.6% of them fell within the standardized prescriptions, demonstrating the functionality and correct selection by the working group.
The development of a program for the computerized registration of prescriptions made during the surgery, which respond to the requirements of drug safety and traceability, represents an example of good practice.

What next?

We have implemented this tool in the paediatric population, with particular precautions due to the weight variability (i.e. dose/kg). The next step could be integration with further assessments (e.g., kidney function evaluation) and the transfer to other settings