Pdf

Author(s)

Esther Chamorro de Vega, Carmen Rodriguez Gonzalez, Belen Mayo Canaleja, María Pilar Montero Anton, Sergio Herrera Bermejo, Rosa Romero Jimenez, Vicente Escudero Vilaplana, Roberto Collado Borrell, Ana Herranz Alonso, María Sanjurjo Sáez

Why was it done?

The profile of patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) has changed. Patients are more active, autonomous and have greater information and communication needs.
Mobile health, especially apps, can help to healthcare professionals to optimize pharmacotherapeutic follow-up and provide patients greater autonomy facilitating communication with healthcare professionals and contributing to the humanization of their care.
Through this application we seek to achieve the following objectives:
– Allow patients to participate in their illness and/or treatment, promoting their compliance and safety and communication with the healthcare professional.
– Strengthen pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients receiving ART, avoiding visits to the emergency room and hospital consultations.
– Generate pioneering evidence on the impact of mobile applications on the pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients on ART.

What was done?

FarMCuida® is a mobile application designed for a closer and better pharmacotherapeutic monitorization of patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Through this app the patient can actively participate in his or her disease and treatment.

How was it done?

A multidisciplinary group was created to design and develop an app called FarMCuida® for patients on ART in a tertiary hospital. Once the app was designed and developed, we offered the app to patients starting or undergoing ART. Identification and inclusion of candidate patients was performed in the Pharmaceutical Care Consultation of the Pharmacy Service. The pharmacists responsible for the Infectious Diseases area performed real-time pharmacotherapeutic follow-up of the patients.
Records of adverse effect (AE) and Safety-related messages received (Adverse effects, interactions, drug administration) can be analyzed. All data can be exported from FarmCuida®. Informed consent is requested from all the patients included.

What has been achieved?

FarMCuida® was designed as a digital health mobile application that allows our patients to participate in their disease and/or treatment, promoting treatment safety, as well as making available a source of information and bidirectional communication, in real-time, between patients and healthcare professionals.
During a period of 13 months, a total of 152 patients were included in FarMCuida®. Seventy-two percent of the patients were diagnosed with HIV infection while 27.6% of them were included in the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis programme.
In AE module, 58 adverse events (AEs) were registered. Twenty-two percent of the patients registered at least one AE.
Thirty-two percent of patients used the Messages module to communicate with healthcare professionals.
One hundred and twenty-six telematic consultations were carried out. Two hundred and five messages were exchanged between the patient and the pharmacist.
Forty-three percent of the consultations corresponded to doubts about interactions: 66.7% interactions with other drugs, 28.5% with herbal products and 4.8% with vitamin supplements. Three type D interactions and one type X interaction were identified.
In addition, 11% of the consultations corresponded to doubts about the administration of ART while 5.2% were related to adverse effects experienced by the patient.
At least three visits to the emergency department were avoided, resulting in health care and economic savings for the health system.

What next?

Based on the limited studies on the impact of mobile applications on the pharmacotherapeutic follow-up of patients, the results obtained will allow us to generate evidence in this regard. It is worth highlighting the flexibility of FarMCuida® design, being easily adaptable to different pathologies and hospital centres.

Pdf

Author(s)

Samantha HUYNH, Catarina GONCALVES BARROSO, Sophie PATERNOTTE, Sofia DA SILVA MENDES, Claire JUDEL, Elvire MARTIN-LEMAIRE, Georges NICOLAOS, Chloé DUPONT, Nicolas CORNILLET

Why was it done?

Raising awareness and ongoing training of healthcare professionals is a crucial criterion for High Authority for Health certification. Flashpharma provides reliable information, particularly for night-shift nurses. This becomes critical in a context of reduced physician presence and absence of pharmacists, and the increasing presence of temporary nurses due to staffing shortages.

What was done?

The pharmacy department developed FlashPharma, an innovative training tool to enhance medication management within healthcare units. For instance, it contributes by promoting the proper use of high-risk medications (HRM) and risky medications (RM) by providing information to care teams as close to the patient as possible.

How was it done?

A working group created eleven sheets based on literature and adapted to the practices of adult hospitalization departments. Validated by medical experts and institutional committees, they include points to watch and key figures. They link up with our institutional protocols, our prescribing software and the points addressed by the visiting experts during the mock certification. Accessible by flashing QR codes strategically positioned or on our web platform, they serve as a basis for discussion with caregivers. Trainers included pharmacists, a pharmacy intern, and a hospital quality manager. Anonymous written questionnaires were used to gather feedback.

What has been achieved?

Two QR codes are placed on automated dispensing cabinets and mobile medical carts, linking to sheets on MHR, RM, and guidelines for proper drug crushing and administration via an enteral feeding tube. Another QR code on refrigerators provides information on drug storage and temperature alerts management. A label provides information on drugs prescribed outside the booklet, with six therapeutic equivalence tables validated by doctors.
Three sessions were attended by nurses, healthcare managers, orderlies, and doctors (n=18). Fifteen (83%) participants strongly agreed, and 3 (17%) agreed that they acquired new knowledge. All participants would recommend these sheets; 16 (89%) strongly expressed their willingness to participate in a second session.

What next?

Positive feedback highlighted the need for further education in various hospital units. Feedback on the use of QR codes by day and night teams will be sought during subsequent sessions and quantified using analytical dashboards. Appropriate continuing education initiatives will be implemented in paediatrics, intensive care and operating room departments.

Pdf

Author(s)

Sabrina Trivellato, Daniele Mengato, Francesca Venturini

Why was it done?

Bulevirtide, available in Italy since June 2023, is the sole approved drug for treating long-term HDV. It represents a precious clinical opportunity but its technical features make it a complex therapeutic regimen to handle. It is commercially available as a powder for injection that needs daily reconstitution before subcutaneous use, has strict storage requirements (+2/+8°C), and requires familiarity with needles and syringes. As home therapy, this is the responsibility of the patient, who will therefore need to be enrolled in a PEP to ensure compliance.

What was done?

A Patient Education Programme (PEP) was implemented to support patients diagnosed with hepatitis delta virus (HDV) being compliant to a complex therapeutic chronic regimen.

How was it done?

In July 2023, a specific pharmacist-led PEP (named “EXPLAIN”) was defined. It consists of two phases: education & training; follow-up & assistance. After clinical examination, patients were received by pharmacists and introduced to the therapy thanks to a simulation kit. Posology, storage conditions and special warnings were described and the drug together with the administration kit was delivered. During the follow-up phase the pharmacist was focused on proofing medication adherence, discussing with the patient about any problems or ADRs and drug refilling. Quality of Life (QoL, measured through EuroQoL5) was adopted as an effectiveness outcome. Evaluation feedback on the service was requested as well.

What has been achieved?

Up to September 2023, 15 patients, with a mean QoL starting score of 72,5/100±15, are assisted by the EXPLAIN program. 12 of them already accessed the follow-up phase. A single episode of medium gravity ADR was reported, but it did not affect therapy continuation. Globally, an excellent reported medication adherence (98.5% of doses taken) was registered and the educational support of the pharmacist was considered to be “essential on positively approaching the medication”.

What next?

QoL, adherence and feedback on the received service have to be proofed after 6, 9 and 12 months as well, together with a regular viral load detection to confirm referred compliance. Although the EXPLAIN program has just started, it represents a promising PEP model to be adopted in the case of complex therapies, where continuity is crucial to ensure effectiveness and safety.

Pdf

Author(s)

Carmen Redondo Galán, Cristina Ortega Navarro, Ana de Lorenzo Pinto, Beatriz Torroba Sanz, Cecilia Martínez Fernández-Llamazares, Silvia Manrique Rodríguez, Álvaro Narrillos Moraza, Carmen Rodríguez González, Ana Herranz Alonso , María Sanjurjo Sáez

Why was it done?

Transitions of care put the patients at risk for medication error as a result of poor communication and information loss. Treatment beginnings, complex treatment and medication reconciliation errors are an important cause of morbidity and have a predominant role in chronic complex patients (CCP). In this sense, collaboration and effective communication between hospital and community pharmacy are considered essential elements to guarantee continuity of patient care, obtaining better health results in terms of safety, effectiveness and efficiency.

What was done?

Create and implement a collaborative network with direct communication between the Hospital Pharmacy Service of a tertiary hospital and the community pharmacies responsible for patient follow -up.

How was it done?

A multidisciplinary group of hospital pharmacists dedicated to different clinical areas was created: three pharmacists from the Emergency Department, two from the Paediatrics Department, one from the Neurology Department and one from the Outpatients area. They selected and contacted by telephone the 40 community pharmacies responsible for 25% of patient prescriptions in the area. Periodic meetings were scheduled and possible strategic lines of collaboration were shared. The following priority groups were identified: Group 1: CCP (paediatric patients and fragile elderly patients) and Group 2: patients treated in the hospital emergency department. We addressed logistical aspects (supplies and preparation of formulations), pharmacotherapeutic monitoring (adherence, adverse drug reactions and collaboration in the management of CCP). The main limitations were small population and short follow-up time.

What has been achieved?

From March 2023 to September 2023, the hospital Pharmacy Service has received 50 consultations on 45 patients from community pharmacies: 85% were classified as group 1 and 15% group 2. Pharmaceutical interventions were related to medical shortages (28%), reconciliation errors at discharge (22%), information about formulations (20%), information about new treatments (15%), prescribing errors (12%) and adverse drug reactions (3%). Community pharmacists appreciated accessibility and value of information provided by hospital pharmacists. 50% of patients avoided a hospital visit to solve their queries.

What next?

Our first results show the importance of pharmacist interventions with patients and other healthcare professionals.This collaborative network can be applicable to all services that work with community pharmacies to guarantee greater coordination and integration in the different healthcare settings.

Pdf

Author(s)

Beatriz Somoza-Fernández, Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana, Cristina Ortega-Navarro, Ana de Lorenzo-Pinto, Ana Herranz-Alonso, María Sanjurjo-Sáez

Why was it done?

HH units have experienced an extraordinary period of growth over the past few years and are already considered the preferred option of care model for most patients. However, its full potential is actually limited by some challenges both demanding and ripe with opportunities for pharmacy engagement, such as patient clinical complexity (usually elderly and chronic patients at greater risk of poor adherence and suffering from medication errors) and lack of medical staff physically available for monitoring patients’ evolution.

What was done?

We developed and implemented a comprehensive pharmaceutical care programme in a home hospitalisation (HH) unit.

How was it done?

The project was conceived by a multidisciplinary team (physicians, pharmacists, and nurses) that conducted a literature review and developed a new home medication management standardised operating procedure. The team worked in the design of a HH pharmaceutical care guideline and the implementation of an e-health care tool for remote patient monitoring.

What has been achieved?

1. HH pharmaceutical care guideline: it included the directions for the following measures: (1) a comprehensive pharmaceutical assessment and medication reconciliation, (2) standardised recommendations for optimising acute and chronic treatments at home, (3) daily interviews with patients or caregivers to explain medication changes, and (4) follow-up calls 7 days after discharge in order to assess medication adherence.
2. HH monitoring app: this new tool ensures pharmacotherapeutic monitoring by setting medication schedules and intake notifications. The platform includes a patient recording for vital signs, side effects, medication intake, and health status (functional status and quality of life). The system enables online access for pharmacists and physicians in real-time and continuous two-way communication.

What next?

Since our programme is easily applicable to any HH unit, we are working on implementing it in other hospitals in our country, in order to overcome HH medication management complexity nationally. We aim to conduct a multicentre study to evaluate its external validity in terms of increasing medication errors detected and optimising hospital resources.

Pdf

Author(s)

BEATRIZ TORROBA-SANZ, CRISTINA ORTEGA-NAVARRO, ANA DE LORENZO-PINTO, CARMEN REDONDO-GALAN, JUAN ANTONIO ANDUEZA-LILLO, MARTA SANCHEZ-CELAYA POZO, ANA HERRANZ-ALONSO, MARÍA SANJURJO-SAEZ

Why was it done?

Almost half of the patients discharged from the ED receive incomplete information at discharge and they forget approximately 60% of the medical information received when they leave the hospital. All these hinders the proper management of medication at home, generating anxiety to patients and favoring the appearance of adverse events and new visits to the hospital.

What was done?

We have designed, implemented and evaluated a tool to resolve pharmacotherapeutic queries of patients discharged from the Emergency Department (ED).

How was it done?

Patients with doubts about the pharmacological treatment prescribed upon discharge can contact FarmaCenter through the instructions included in the discharge report (telephone/email). The pharmacist will then analyze each query, gathering information from the clinical history and, if necessary, contact the care-team for resolution. Finally, the pharmacist will contact the patient, resolve the query and offer the opportunity to complete a satisfaction survey.

What has been achieved?

766 consultations were received (November 2022- 31 August 2023), mean age was 49.8 years and 49.3% were men. The majority (96%) contacted by telephone and the mean time of resolution was 1.5 hours. Half of the cases (53.7%) were resolved by the hospital pharmacist without the necessity of contacting the rest of the healthcare team. The main reasons for consultation were: medication not prescribed (28.3%), drug administration (8.7%), management of adverse reactions (6.9%), shortages (6.8%), dosage (5.9%) and duration of treatment (5.7%). 15.5% of consultations were not related to medication. The satisfaction survey was sent to 288 patients and 40% responded. The overall rating was 4.9/5 and the most highly valued aspects were the individualized attention, fast resolution of the query and the pharmacist’s kindness. In addition, 95% of patients considered that FarmaCenter had helped them to avoid a visit to a healthcare center.

What next?

Developing improvement strategies to reduce the number of patients with medication-related concerns from the ED.

Pdf

Author(s)

Hilde Omestad, Maria Grønkjær Abrahamsen, Fatima Afif Mouaanaki, Charlotte Mosbæk Dybdahl, Anne Wulff Petersen, Emil Dalsgaard Züricho, Philip Hojrizi, Charlotte Arp Sørensen

Why was it done?

The sustainability strategy of the Central Denmark Region include less consumption and less waste. Our Pharmacy delivers an increasing amount of high-cost homecare medications, requiring refrigerator storage. In case of an accidental temperature exposure, patients may ask whether their medicine can be used or not. There may be a delay during transport or a breakdown of their refrigerator at home. During these medicines’ shelf-lives, most products can be kept at room temperature for days, weeks or months. When SmPC and the insert package leaflet says that the product should not be returned to the refrigerator, high-cost medicines sometimes are wasted, only because of this warning, instead of giving them a shorter shelf-life. When we hesitate to return packages to the refrigerator, time can elapse while waiting for the manufacturer’s or pharmacist’s answers to the patient’s questions after storage incidents.

What was done?

The Hospital Pharmacy categorized 47 Blood Coagulation Factors and Monoclonal Antibody Products requiring storage at 2-8 °C if Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) had any warning of returning a product to the refrigerator or not, after an unwanted time at room temperature

How was it done?

We asked manufacturers if a return of their product to the refrigerator would cause any harm. Should their product be disposed of because it has been put back into a refrigerator after being left out? Our findings were documented in a local guideline and in the Danish national information database (SAID).
Drug Information Pharmacists discussed several cases of real-world handling situations to be more confident to reduce medicine wastage.

What has been achieved?

Being aware of the reasons for these warnings, reduced medicine wastage in certain cases of incidental storage. The pharmacists have been given tools for pharmaceutical professional assessments in cases of temperature challenges.

What next?

Spread the good news. Improve communication between manufacturer and pharmacy, because manufacturer can’t be responsible for storage different from their SmPC. Inspire manufacturers to improve their storage warnings in SmPC

Author(s)

Nina RANJIT, Matthieu GALLET, Anthony TRIPLET, Myriam QUERMONNE , Alexandre COCHET

Why was it done?

The rise of RLT is seeing the emergence of new treatments, using radioisotopes such as 177Lu or 223Ra. The radioactive nature of these treatments raises questions from patients. The aim of pharmaceutical consultations (PCs) is to respond to them by providing appropriate information on treatment modalities, adverse effects (AEs) and radiation protection rules. Thus, we carry out a PC at the initiation of an RIV for all new patients from January 2022 for PLUVICTO.

What was done?

Radioligand therapy (RLT) consists of the administration of a radioactive drug. It makes it possible to treat cancer patients by specifically targeting tumour cells and destroying them using ionising radiation.
These particular treatments raise questions from patients. This is why we have implemented pharmaceutical interviews since 2022 and the beginning of RLT by PLUVICTO® during the first treatment, for all patients concerned. Subsequently, these consultations were extended to other therapies (lutathera, xofigo).

How was it done?

Before initiating RLT to a new patient, radiopharmacists check the eligibility of patients and the conformity of the indication. A few days before the first treatment, the patient’s file is consulted and important information is noted (urinary or fecal incontinence, digestive problems, biological assessment, co-medications). The day of the treatment, a personalized care plan is drawn up by the radiopharmacist and an information sheet bringing together information on the treatment (interval of treatments, dose, etc.), side effects and their management and the rules of radiation protection are provided. to the patient.

What has been achieved?

Collaboration with nuclear doctors has been set up to optimise patient care and information.
When necessary, pharmaceutical interventions are formulated directly to the clinician and plotted in a table.
Facing the success of these PCs we implement them for lutathera and xofigo, the two other RLT available.
In case of side effects, we also declare it to the pharmacovigilance service and give advice to patients and/or clinicians for manage them.
All documents are recorded in the computerised patient file.

What next?

The next step is to evaluate patient’s comprehension before the first interview to adapt its content to the patient.
We also would like to evaluate the patient’s satisfaction and expectations.
Discussions are underway to financially promote these tripartite consultations as exists for oral chemotherapy consultations.

Author(s)

Vanessa Gomes, Jonathan De Gregori, Greta Dusabe, Hélène Feyeux, Cyril Boronad

Why was it done?

MiS is a telephone service that provides free, reliable information about medicines to all patients and their caregivers. Requests are handled by experienced hospital pharmacists. It is important to know how patients behave after calling MiS in order to assess the benefits of this service on the proper use of medicines.

What was done?

The aim of this study was to assess patients’ behaviour regarding their medication after calling the MiS.

How was it done?

After prior agreement, patients were called back 7 days later to answer a specific survey including six questions: Was the medication changed after the call? Did the patient follow the advice of the MiS pharmacist? Did the patient consult a doctor? or another source of information? Did the patient feel that their health had improved? What are the benefits of this service?

What has been achieved?

Between 2024/03/05 and 2024/03/18, 20 callers completed the survey (65%). Most questions concerned drug interactions (48%), followed by side effects (22%), drug stability (7%), administrative information (7%), indications/contraindications (7%), product availability (3,%), proper use (3%) and dosage (3%). Thanks to the advice of MiS pharmacists, 47% of callers started taking their medication: half of these were prescribed by their doctor and the other half self-administered. Around a third of treatments were continued without change, while 6% were modified. Finally, 12% of treatments were discontinued because of side effects. After calling MiS, 15% of patients consulted a doctor and 15% consulted other sources of information (neighbours, health professionals, etc.). More than half of the patients felt that their health had improved after calling MiS. Lastly, 70% of patients described MiS as safe, 40% as accessible, 35% as available and 30% as a time-saver.

What next?

The demand for MiS shows that patients are looking for more information about their treatments, even if they have already consulted a healthcare professional. The number of treatments prescribed by the doctor that were only initiated after the call also illustrates the benefits of the MiS service. It is an additional service that can reassure callers and contribute to the proper use of medicines by conveying a positive image of treatments and information suited to callers’ knowledge.

Author(s)

Joana Pinto, José Feio, Sebastião Silva, Francisco Machado, Ana Dinis, Margarida Abreu, João Peres, Mariana Guia

Why was it done?

Clinical decision support systems comprising information on DDI improve DDI risk detection, avoiding preventable patient harm. The resulting DDI alerts can change prescribers’ behaviour to benefit patient care. However, an excessive number of alerts can lead to alerts’ desensitisation by prescribers.

What was done?

We monitored the drug-drug interactions (DDI) alerts displayed in the prescription system through three subsequent homologous periods, occurring after the integration of a DDI database in the prescribing software system of a teaching hospital to assess its impact on the prescribing pattern.

How was it done?

We developed a DDI database – MedH® – to be integrated into the prescribing software system to support hard stop DDI alerts. only the higher clinical risk DDIs were included in this database in order to restrain the burden of alerts and warrant acceptance by health professionals.
Data of all inpatient hospital prescriptions over a 12-month period prior to MedH® implementation were extracted and intersected with MedH® DDI BD to identify the top 10 co-prescribed binomials at risk of severe DDI. The number of alerts for the same binomials was then monitored through three subsequent, post-implementation, homologous periods.

What has been achieved?

Considered the TOP10 observed in the pre-implementation period, the number of alerts for all binomials has consistently reduced over the three post-implementation periods analysed.
The integration of MedH® DDI BD into the prescribing system, resulted in changes in the prescribing pattern, translated by a decrease, between 67% and 100%, in the number of alerts for a sample of control risk binomials coinciding with the top 10 co-prescribed risk binomials observed in the pre-implementation period. These results reflect the good acceptance by the professionals and the didactic effect achieved by the exposure to alerts.
More importantly, these results are indicative of the effectiveness of the implementation of MedH® Alerts in reducing patient exposure to high-risk combinations of medicines, thus promoting patient safety.

What next?

It will be important to ensure that data from IDD alerts are rigorously analysed to recognise clinical situations in which the co-administration of risk binomials is justified, to ensure consistent application of recommended risk minimisation measures, and the availability of safer therapeutic alternatives whenever possible.