EAHP represents over 30,000 hospital pharmacists across 37 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professional
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
The Early Career Network aims to empower early-career pharmacists by sharing opportunities, insights, and success stories from across 25 member countries.
Together, we’re building a stronger, more connected hospital pharmacy community: one story, one country, one pharmacist at a time.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Christina Theil Schnor and Saranya Loganathan.
In 2018, hospitals in Region Zealand (RZ), Denmark, transitioned to the electronic health record (EHR) system, EPIC. Following this, hospital pharmacists faced repeated medication order challenges causing adverse events such as inappropriate medication orders, dispensing and administration errors, and insufficient workflow coordination. These issues resulted in complex, time-consuming workflows impacting quality and patient safety. Additionally, collaboration between corporate IT and clinical staff was challenged by a lack of understanding of practical issues. To address this, pharmacists of RZ established the Clinical Pharmaceutical Service IT Team (CPS IT Team) to build specialized knowledge of the EHR medication module, aiming to assure quality, optimize workflows, strengthen interdisciplinary coordination, and support safer and more efficient clinical use.
CPS IT Team standardized workflows, enhanced coordination of medication order tasks, and created a forum to effectively utilize professional knowledge and networks across areas.
To address diverse Clinical Pharmacy challenges, CPS IT Team became the bridge between internal organization (RZ Hospital Pharmacy and corporate IT) and external partners (EPIC and The Capital Region of Denmark (CRD)). For this reason, CPS IT Team was established with one team manager and two units: Internal and External unit. CPS IT Team continuously adapts to evolving Clinical Pharmacy needs.
The establishment of CPS IT Team has driven significant internal optimization and standardized workflows. Acting as a coordinating unit, it optimizes medication processes from ordering to dispensing and administration. Dialogue with IT has been strengthened, enabling more efficient, targeted communication across professional groups.
Collaboration with EPIC and CRD has enhanced quality assurance and optimized workflows. CPS IT Team efforts have helped prevent medication-related adverse events, improve workflows, and optimize medication processes. Interdisciplinary collaboration and professional consultation networks between regional clinics, hospital pharmacies, IT, and EPIC have been notably strengthened. These efforts have increased patient safety and fostered a safer, more coherent workflow in EPIC.
Fusion of RZ and CRD into Region Eastern Denmark will change CPS IT Team’s working conditions, opening new opportunities such as an expanded collegial network and broader range of tasks and needs. Systematic data use will support Hospital Pharmacy’s work, improving efficiency and quality in daily operations.
Introductory Statements and Governance
Nonia Ferreras López, Irene de la Fuente Villaverde, Blanca de la Nogal Fernández, Virginia Martínez Fernández, Eva Martínez Álvarez, Zulema Rodríguez Fernández, Henar García Lagunar, Raúl Martínez, Miriam Rodríguez María.
A Multidisciplinary Biological Therapy Committee for Airway Diseases (BTCAD) was established in a secondary-level hospital. The committee integrated pulmonologists, ENT specialists, allergists, pathologists, and hospital pharmacists (HPs) to optimize the use of biological therapies (BTs). Its main functions included patient evaluation, development of consensus-based protocols, and structured monitoring of treatment outcomes.
The initiative was introduced in 2022 to address the absence of standardized decision-making processes for BTs in severe uncontrolled asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Prior to implementation, therapeutic selection was fragmented and lacked uniform criteria. The primary aim was to improve appropriateness of BT use, reduce variability in clinical practice, and ensure optimal patient outcomes through a coordinated multidisciplinary approach.
The BTCAD defined clinical and laboratory criteria for patient selection, developed a consensus document for BT positioning, and designed workflows for dispensing and follow-up. Monthly meetings were held to evaluate cases, supported by a shared calendar and a structured database. Educational sessions were organized to update staff knowledge. Obstacles included the requirement for strong managerial support and the impact of staff turnover on continuity. These were mitigated by formalizing procedures and ensuring standardized documentation and training.
From March 2022 to March 2025, 54 patients were assessed: 49 with severe asthma and 5 with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Treatment was discontinued in two cases due to lack of efficacy, and seven patients were switched to alternative BTs. At follow-up, 52 patients remained on therapy (17 benralizumab, 20 mepolizumab, 7 omalizumab, 6 dupilumab, 2 tezepelumab). The HP contributed to patient evaluation, drafting of reports, pharmacovigilance, and adherence monitoring. A survey revealed that all members reported increased knowledge, 87,5% considered the pharmacist’s role essential, and overall satisfaction reached 4,38/5.
The BTCAD improved coordination, standardization, and professional development within the hospital. Its model is transferable to other healthcare settings, providing a framework for safe and efficient BT implementation. The high satisfaction and demonstrated value of multidisciplinary collaboration, particularly the HP’s role, support its consideration as an example of good practice.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
Line Jarvig MSc Pharm.
Christine Dinsen-Andersen MSc Pharm.
Aysegül Sekeroglu MSc Pharm.
The national Health Technology Assessment (HTA) institute in Denmark issued its first recommendation on medicines for the treatment of Fabry disease based on four therapies considered clinically equivalent. Only one therapy was recommended due to cost. This recommendation initiated a national implementation effort, led by pharmaceutical staff, to support a correct and efficient medication switch to the recommended therapy.
A pharmacist coordinated the implementation of the medication switch, in collaboration with the hospital with the national responsible for the treatment of Fabry disease, the hospital pharmacies, and the regional drug committee.
Coordination of the implementation strategy was carried out through virtual meetings and email correspondence. The implementation was based on a robust data foundation and was highly prioritized by hospital management. Representatives from the hospital pharmacies in the patient’s home region were included in the information flow to ensure optimal pharmaceutical inventory management at local hospitals. Furthermore, the pharmaceutical supplier was thoroughly informed regarding the timeline and expected drug consumption.
This case demonstrates that even complex medication switches can be successfully implemented when there is clear managerial support, detailed coordination, and strong engagement from all involved parties. It also highlights that there is no standard model for implementation, and that adaptation to local conditions is essential.
Drivers identified as contributing to the complexity of the implementation:
• Patients’ usual treatment was managed at regional hospitals, while the switch was conducted by the hospital with the specialized treatment responsibility.
• Detailed planning of treatment and pre-switch paraclinical examinations was required.
• The majority of patients had to switch treatment, including a change from oral to intravenous therapy.
• Early planning was necessary to meet supplier requirements for consumption estimates.
• Estimating drug use was complex due to the planned full switch over an estimated period.
• High drug prices required close monitoring of drug inventories to minimalize medication waste.
The switch is being monitored to ensure continued adherence. Experiences gained form this case will be applied to future switches, with planning focused on early identification of complexity drivers and strategies to manage them.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Sergio Portillo-Haro, Aída Rueda-Naharro, María Martínez-Pérez, Manuela Martínez-Camacho, David García-Marco
Currently, multi-resistant microorganisms are a huge global problem of Public Health. In addition, this problem will be bigger in the next decades. The main strategy to face this threat is improve the use of antibiotics. DADA was born with this purpose. The app lets the Pharmacy Department manage a sizable number of inpatients using the time to analyse the results obtained by DADA. In other words, we have improved the efficiency in our use of time.
How was it done?
The app was developed in July 2022, and since then it has been updated multiple times to adapt it to our needs and expectations and the changes in clinical guidelines. Every Monday and Thursday, the app is started up. The results are analysed carefully by a pharmacist and afterwards the conclusions are transmitted to an Infectious Diseases Medician, who decides if modify the treatment.
In July 2022, Pharmacy Department designed an app easy to use and comfortable in order to detect active antibiotic treatments that might be de-escalated. This app, DADA (Automated Antibiotic De-escalation) is fed with data of antibiotic treatments and microbiological cultures. DADA reads and understands every gap of information, and finally search results between the active treatments comparing it with theorical de-escalation sequencies, designed by Infectious Diseases Commission in our hospital and based in local epidemiological guidelines. In this way, DADA works with automatic decision algorithms. In addition, DADA also provides alerts of active treatments for resistant microorganisms to that antibiotic.
The app was developed in July 2022, and since then it has been updated multiple times to adapt it to our needs and expectations and the changes in clinical guidelines. Every Monday and Thursday, the app is started up. The results are analyzed carefully by a pharmacist and afterwards the conclusions are transmited to an Infectious Diseases Medician, who decides if modify the treatment.
Since August 2022 to March 2023, using DADA, the Pharmacy Department has made 25 proposals of antibiotic de-escalation, and 11 proposals were accepted (44.0%) by Medicians. In addition, the Department made two proposals of change for resistance to that antibiotic, both accepted by Medicians. This app has improved efficiency of time in the clinical team.
The main outcome is to improve the confidence of Medicians in this tool, in order to increase the percentage of acceptance in the proposals. Furthermore, the app can be more complete and interprets data, such as analytics parameters. In the future, other hospitals might use this tool to analyse their patients or in outpatients treatments.
Introductory Statements and Governance
The role of the NMC is to provide guidance about new medicines for use in public hospitals, and recommendations from the NMC can lead to changes in medical treatments. Before changes can be implemented, a variety of preparatory processes are necessary and relevant stakeholders, e.g. drug and therapeutic committees, hospital pharmacies, clinicians, and the national supply organization have to be involved.
Knowledge sharing and coordination among stakeholders are crucial to ensure efficient and nationally aligned implementation.
To undertake these tasks and support the NMC in their work, there was a need for a national group with expertise in implementation of changes of medicines in hospitals.
The National Implementation Group was established in September 2019. The main purpose of the Group is to discuss, assess and ensure implementation of recommendations and treatment guidelines from the National Medicines Council (NMC) across regions, hence achieving national consensus on aligned medical treatment.
We formed the National Implementation Group with representatives from all stakeholders for swift and coordinated execution of changes of medicines. Each region designated participants directly involved in the implementation. To ensure effective knowledge sharing and coordination, the Group holds a monthly one-hour virtual meeting one week after NMC recommendations are published.
The monthly Group meetings ensure that the national implementation process takes approximately 14 days and the recommendations from the NMC are regularly discussed, assessed, and implemented efficiently and aligned at national level.
In 2022, the Group was evaluated through focus group interviews, highlighting quality and value. Results show that the Group aligns implementation nationally, offers expertise, saves regional resources, and fosters valued knowledge sharing concerning implementation of changes of medicine and adherence to recommendations.
The Group has now been successfully integrated as part of implementation at national level, emphasizing the importance of shared knowledge for efficient implementation of changes of medicines at national scale.
In future, the Group will increase its focus on identifying differences in treatments based on enhanced utilization of health data.
The Group provides the basis for knowledge sharing and can easily be transferred to other healthcare settings, both nationally and internationally.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
LUCIA JIMENEZ-PICHARDO, INMACULADA LOMARES-MANZANO, LEONOR GOMEZ-SAYAGO
Hospital with 118 beds in which all medication prescribed by the doctor that was not included in the pharmacotherapeutic guide was purchased through an external pharmacy. The proposed objective was to elaborate an improvement plan in therapeutic equivalence, with the development of a TEG
Therapeutic Exchange Guidelines (TEG) are an intervention on the prescription according to a previously agreed protoco, in which the prescribed drug is subtituted for the one available in the hospital (because it is considered equivalent or because it is a better therapeutic option).
In this way, the most appropriate drug included in the Pharmacotherapeutic Guide (PG) of the hospital would be selected.
A work schedule was established distinguishing five phases: a) Elaboration Phase, which consists of consulting and review of the medical specialties included in the hospital, b) Presentation / approval phase by the Pharmacy Commission, c) Modifications Phase, d) Disclosure Phase, through a clinical session to the hospital’s internists and other hospital medicians and e) Implementation Phase. For its preparation, a manual was consulted for the writing of TEG, guides from other reference hospitals and different bibliography obtained from Pubmed, as well as the technical data sheet of each drug.
The TEG is prepared over a period of 3 months and was structured with the following sections:
Therapeutic group according to the ATC classification of drugs (351), Reference drug included in the PG (443 drugs), Medicines not included
(620) y Recommended therapeutic attitude: substitute the one available at the hospital (469) (specifying dose and regimen), continue (82) or suspend treatment (69).
Subsequently, it was presented to the Pharmacy Commission, the appropriate modifications were made and the final version was released through a clinical session before its publication through the hospital’s intranet.
The therapeutic equivalence improvement plans are considered efficient management strategies, applicable in all hospitals and health centers. It is a multidisciplinary and continuous process that will require periodic reviews.
Introductory Statements and Governance
Mikala Vasehus Holck, Jette Østergaard Rathe
The role of the National Medicines Council (NMC) is to provide guidance about new medicines for use in the public hospital sector.
Recommendations from the NMC must be implemented at hospitals. Implementation of changes of medicines requires preparation and collaboration and involves numerous stakeholders, e.g. drug and therapeutic committees, hospital pharmacies, clinicians, and the national supply organization (NSO) to public hospitals. Knowledge sharing is crucial to ensure efficient implementation.
We needed a workflow focusing on knowledge sharing at national level, and thus we introduced the structured implementation workflow in September 2019.
We have established a structured implementation workflow focusing on knowledge sharing. The workflow ensures rapid and efficient implementation of changes of medicines, and a more aligned treatment at national level.
To ensure knowledge sharing through the workflow, we developed:
– Implementation memo: Summarizes NMC recommendations and treatment guidelines, with information about current and upcoming tendering procedures and prices. The memo is shared with the stakeholders.
– Implementation group: The group is a mix of people with a direct connection to the implementation workflow. The group ensures that implementation of the recommendations from the NMC is regularly discussed and assessed.
– Implementation site: An intranet for the NSO and hospital pharmacies to share information and material related to the implementation of changes of medicines.
– A system to ensure that essential stakeholders receive the same information.
The structured implementation workflow has been a success and is now an integrated part of implementation. Evaluation shows that the workflow with knowledge sharing between relevant stakeholders is essential for effective implementation of changes of medicines, and it identifies discrepancies at national level.
The structured workflow is an integral part of managing the national implementation, and the workflow and outcomes will continue to undergo evaluation.
The workflow provides the basis for knowledge sharing and can easily be transferred to other healthcare settings.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Beatriz Zurita Alonso, Marta Martí Navarro, Monica Estelrich, Alejandro Ballestero Corominas, Anna Badell Giralt, Diana Patricia Vera Rodríguez, Milagros Ricse Salcedo, Roxana Rubio Vargas
The use of biosimilar drugs has been a breakthrough to improve the sustainability of the health system. Although since 2015 position papers have been published by some scientific societies, there is no clear consensus about the recommendation for a switch from the original drug to its biosimilar. The rate of biosimilar use in our country is one of the lowest in Europe.
The pharmacy service led the creation of a working group formed by rheumatologists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists and pharmacists to promote the use of biosimilar drugs in our hospital.
The working group wrote a consensus document in which it was jointly decided to start all new biological treatments with biosimilars. In addition, it was decided that the prescribers would determine which patients were candidates for switch to a biosimilar based on clinical criteria. If the drug is administered subcutaneously, the pharmacist is responsible to explain the reason for the change and the management of the new device to the patient. In case of disagreement, the original is kept and communicated to the prescribing physician. If the drug is administered intravenously, it is the physician who informs the patient about the change.
From May 2019 to September 2019, 17 switches were made: 4 infliximab (66.7%), 9 adalimumab (10.1%) and 4 rituximab (80.0%). This measure led to an economic saving of €111,106.96 per year. Twenty new treatments with biosimilars were started: 1 with etanercept, 2 with infliximab, and 17 with adalimumab. This supposed an economic saving of €141,826.36/year if we compare with the cost of the original drug. The rate of antiTNF biosimilars increased from 33% to 48% in 5 months. None of the patients refused the use of a biosimilar. By now, all treatments maintain their effectiveness without safety issues. This optimisation of treatments will allow the hospital to treat a greater number of patients and invest in innovative treatments.
These results indicate a great opportunity to offer biological treatment to a higher number of patients every year. Therefore, our objective is to achieve the switch of remaining patients as it could generate an additional saving of €630,072.28 per year.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
The consumption of medicine for the treatment of wAMD, DME and RVO is increasing. The medicines used are in the top five of the most expensive drugs in Denmark. With the prospect of more patients, greater costs and the introduction of new drugs in the field, there was a need to develop a national treatment guideline.
An expert committee prepared a national treatment guideline including a clinical medicine comparison report for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). The aim was to create uniform treatment across the country and to trigger competition between medicines in the hope of achieving lower prices.
An expert committee consisting of physicians, clinical pharmacist, clinical pharmacologist and medicine procurement pharmacist was appointed. The committee prepared a national treatment guideline including a clinical medicine comparison report based on existing clinical evidence and Danish practice. The committee reached the conclusion that the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs ranibizumab and aflibercept are ranked equally in terms of effect and side effects. The choice of anti-VEGF should be determined solely by price and dosage. A tender was prepared in alignment with the guidelines. This result led to the development of a medicine recommendation, which was passed onto hospital pharmacies, clinical pharmacists and physicians to ensure implementation in the clinic. Feedback from the clinics concerning estimated consumption was forwarded to the drug suppliers and was continuously monitored by the procurement pharmacist to ensure compliance at the clinics.
The clinicians switched patients to the new first-line choice. The market share of first-line treatment was 89% compared to 25% before the guideline. Two tenders were published based on the guideline. The first resulted in a price reduction of 28%, the second a reduction of 54%. Total actual savings in the first tender (based on a 31-month contract period) was €38m. In the second tender (based on the first 12 months of the contract period) was €35m.
New medicines are expected to be approved in the near future. We will continue to use and develop national treatment guidelines in combination with tender procedures and proper implementation of guidelines to obtain better and cheaper treatment options for patients.
