The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
Improving efficiency in the infusion unit through a critical review of medication protocols
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Jesper van Breeschoten, Chang Chui, Bert Storm, Grootswagers-Sobels Annemieke
Why was it done?
After the introduction of new medications in a hospital, it is uncommon for local treatment and administration protocols to be reevaluated in light of the latest scientific evidence. Infusion units are facing numerous challenges today, including staffing shortages and a growing number of patients receiving intravenous treatments. It may prove beneficial to periodically conduct a comprehensive review of the current protocols, with the objective of minimizing the time patients spend in the infusion unit and to prevent unnecessary use of medication while upholding the delivery of high-quality care.
What was done?
We performed an extensive review of treatment protocols for all medications administered at our infusion unit.
How was it done?
We performed an extensive review of treatment protocols for all medications administered at our infusion unit, drawing insights from the most recent literature. Our evaluation covered a range of factors, including premedication, infusion rates, observation periods, line flushing, administration routes, hydration strategies, and anti-emetic regimens. To provide additional data supporting protocol refinements, we utilized an electronic health record text mining tool known as CTcue, which facilitated the collection of retrospective patient information. Subsequently, these protocol modifications received unanimous approval from both pharmacist and attending specialist.
What has been achieved?
Treatment and administration protocols of 17 medications were optimized. We decreased infusion times for atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, doxorubicine, durvalumab, folinic acid, irinotecan, panitimumab, vinblastine and vincristine. Vital sign assessment during infusion were omitted from protocols. Premedication and anti-emetic medication were converted to oral administration. Intravenous administration was converted to subcutaneous administration for abatacept, daratumumab, infliximab, tocilizumab, trastuzumab + pertuzumab and vedolizumab. Observation time after infusion was omitted for daratumumab, infliximab and vedolizumab. Based on the current literature, hydration schemes of cisplatin were shortened from 20 hours to 4 hours. The implementation of all optimization measures resulted in a reduction of ± 6000 hours of bed occupancy by patients annually. Based on our estimation, this has resulted in a reduction of approximately 16% in total time that beds were occupied.
What next?
We aim to periodically review our treatment and administration protocols and share our experiences with other hospital pharmacists. Other infusion units that also face challenges in shortness of staff may copy this blueprint to mitigate these problems.