The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
CAN THE CLINICAL PHARMACIST INCREASE HOSPITAL STAYS’ PRICING? (submitted in 2019)
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Thibault Stala, Niels Martignene, Céline Monchy, Anne-Laure Lefebvre, Geoffrey Strobbe, Ali Hammoudi, Frédéric Feutry, Malgorzata Cucchi, Guillaume Marliot
Why was it done?
In France, hospitalisations’ reimbursement is linked to care severity. In this context, health care must be as comprehensive as possible on the comorbidities’ registration. As part of prescription validation, the clinical pharmacist can easily highlight comorbidities associated with specific treatments, in order to improve their codification and consequently to better valorise hospital stays.
What was done?
This work involves evaluating the ability of the clinical pharmacist to detect comorbidities related to certain treatments.
How was it done?
Six comorbidities, associated with the prescription of specific therapies, were chosen: – Dyskalaemia (potassium or polystyrene sulfonate prescriptions); – Neuropathic pain (NP) or anxio-depressive disorder (ADP) (amitriptyline, anafranil, pregabalin, gabapentin, duloxetine or capsaicin prescriptions); – Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) (injectable iron prescriptions); – Hypovolaemia (HV) (ringer Lactate, serum albumin or gelatin prescriptions); – Hypercalcaemia (HC) (bisphosphonate and/or calcitonin prescriptions); – Severe infection (Inf) (linezolid, daptomycin, teicoplanin, aztreonam and carbapenem prescriptions). Retrospectively, all stays ending between 01/01/2019 and 31/03/2019, and containing at least one prescription of the previously mentioned therapies, were considered. Then, the medical records were analysed to verify the presence of the comorbidity corresponding to the prescribed drug(s). The coding was checked, otherwise, the comorbidity was added. Finally, the revaluation of the stays’ cost has been estimated.
What has been achieved?
The number of stays by suspected comorbidity, based on prescribed treatments, is : – 175 dyskalaemia; – 231 NP or ADP; – 155 IDA; – 124 hypovolaemia; – 41 hypercalcaemia; – 16 severe infection hypovolaemia and severe infection were quickly set apart because of the difficulty to confirm these comorbidities with the only retrospective medical record information. No stay with IDA or hypercalcaemia has been revalorised. The price of a single stay with dyskalaemia has been increased, by €530. However, NP or ADP has increased the cost of 6 to 13 stays, resulting in a total revaluation of €6000 to €11,000.
What next?
The stays’ remuneration is the hospitals’ main source of income. This work makes it possible to quickly determine if the clinical pharmacist can bring added value in the field of hospital stays’ pricing. The next step is the transition to forward looking. It would also be possible to assess other comorbidities.