EAHP represents over 30,000 hospital pharmacists across 37 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professional
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
Sponsor Channel
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Ignacio García Giménez, Natalia Martín Fernández, Olalla Montero Pérez, Ernesto Sánchez Gómez, Isabel María Carrión Madroñal
The aim is to implement a protocol to follow when these safety notes/alerts are released from the AEMPS. It comprehends the reception of the information, its registration and its communication, when needed, to the rest of the healthcare professionals.
A communication circuit of alerts and safety notes related to drugs coming from the “Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS)”.
At the reception of an alert from the AEMPS, the first step is to check if the drug has been acquired by the Pharmacy, and then act in accordance with the recommendations, informing the Departments in which the medication had been dispensed. If a drug must be retired and a stock break is generated, the healthcare professionals must be informed as well. Security notes from the AEMPS are published in the local hospital website, where the documents sent by the AEMPS can be found. If this medication is included in the Pharmacotherapeutic guide, a notification is shown when it is prescribed. Finally, all alerts and security notes, with the pharmacist intervention, are registered in a database.
Since the implementation of the circuit, 14 alerts and 9 security notes were sent from the AEMPS in a period of 6 months. No interventions regarding the alerts were needed. Healthcare professionals were informed when the security notes were released, pointing to the patients at risk, the precautions required and the alternative therapies available.
To incorporate it as an indicator of quality of care within the procedures performed by the pharmacy department and detect areas of improvement.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
virginia Silvari, Suzanne McCarthy , Gerry Allen
Before its establishment, patients were referred by primary and secondary care physicians to a general cardiology clinic, often resulting in delay of the initial assessment and/or commencement of treatment for AF by the ANP. The HP had no involvement in this care pathway. The AF clinic has shortened the referral pathway for patients; physicians now refer patients directly to the clinic. The HP is responsible for medication optimisation; counselling and education whilst clinicians can focus on clinical examinations, diagnostics and analysis of tests results.
The atrial fibrillation (AF) clinic was established in a tertiary referral hospital. The clinic is led by a hospital pharmacist (HP), with expertise in cardiology and anticoagulation, and an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) specialised in electrophysiology. Cardiologists’ input is available when required. In line with AF guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), patients attending the clinic receive full stroke risk assessment and are presented with different treatment options by the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT). These options include heart rate/ rhythm control and stroke prevention and where appropriate DC-cardioversion. Patient’s preferences guide management of the treatment.
Stakeholder engagement was essential in establishing the clinic and planning meetings were used to ensure seamless delivery of the service. Analysis of the process showed that the critical path (bottleneck) was access to diagnostics on the same day of attendance of the patient to the clinic. Therefore, the clinic was established on a day where the cardiac-physiology department had sufficient resources to accommodate the clinic. It was also necessary to ensure allocated time for the ANP and HP to deliver the service.
The HP has improved patient safety by conducting medication reviews, in particular optimisation of anticoagulants according to patients’ preferences (warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants) and their characteristics such as renal functions, body weight and age. HP also provides to the patients a one-to-one counselling session on their medications (focus on anticoagulants), adherence, drug interactions and side effects.
Having seen the benefits of this AF Clinic and the holistic service it delivers, it is recommended that hospitals establish an AF clinic to provide optimum treatment and prevent AF-related complications.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Anthony Hackett, Alice Oborne, Emma Ritchie, Caroline Broadbent, Rebecca Chanda, Karen Breen
Anticoagulants such as UFH are recognised as high risk drugs. UFH requires frequent monitoring of the activated partial thromboplastic time ratio (APTTr), ensuring therapeutic anticoagulation and minimising adverse effects. UFH infusions and the APTTr were recorded using a paper based system. Incident reporting identified by the paper system resulted in inappropriate monitoring and management of UFH infusions, and dose omissions which could have resulted in harm.
A Trust-wide electronic prescribing and medicines administration (EPMA) system was implemented in 2015. Complex infusions, e.g. unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions, remained on paper due to EPMA functionality limitations. The complex infusion function was added into later EPMA upgrades. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) involving nursing, medical and pharmacy staff working within anticoagulation, EPMA and medication safety sought to design UFH infusions in EPMA.
Baseline audit (Paper-March 2016): Patients prescribed UFH infusions (n=14) were identified using SharePoint (e-reporting) by searching for the UFH infusion placeholder. Performance was measured against eight audit standards.
Re-audit (EPMA-March 2019): Patients prescribed UFH infusions (n=26) were identified using SharePoint by searching for those prescribed a UFH infusion on EPMA. Performance was measured against the same eight audit standards.
Chi square applied to results to test for statistical significance.
Incident rate per prescription: The Datix system was searched to identify heparin incidents reported during the data collection periods.
Audit standard 2016 audit v 2019 audit
1-Baseline APTTr checked before starting infusion 93% v 100%, p=0.1
2-Received correct loading dose of heparin based on APTTr 79% v 96%, p=0.07
3-APTTr checked 6 hours after infusion started 72% v 100%, p<0.05
4-APTTr checked 6 hours after infusion titrations 86% v 96%, p=0.2
5-APTTr in target range within 24 hours 50% v 70%, p=0.2
6-APTTr checked 24 hourly after 2 consecutive APTTr’s in range 100% v 100%=no change
7-Patient receives a medical review 24 hrly 65% v 100%, p<0.05
8-Heparin syringe and giving set changed 24 hrly 65% v 100%, p<0.05
UFH related incidents reduced from one incident per 1.6 infusions, to one incident per 6.5 infusions following the implementation of an EPMA system.
UFH incidents as a proportion of all anticoagulant incidents reduced from 43% (March-2016) to 20% (March-2019).
Electronic solution’s for high-risk, complex infusions such as heparin prescribing and monitoring improved care, quality and safety. Further high-risk infusions such as insulin are being developed
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Oran Quinn, Anna Marzec
Errors of miscalculation, doses inappropriate for renal function and at extremes of weight were reported when doses of medication were written as ‘mg/kg’ without stating the dose to be given e.g. Gentamicin 5mg/kg, Vancomycin 15mg/kg and Enoxaparin 1.5mg/kg.
A quality improvement initiative to resolve issues with prescribing medications dosed by weight. Nursing staff were identified as ‘gate-keepers’ who could refuse to administer medication inappropriately prescribed. Identification, agreement, education and feedback were necessary to change prescribing practice and support nursing staff. Hospital doctors were required to calculate and prescribe the total dose to be given. Feedback was given by monthly bulletin.
Support from key stakeholders was sought to endorse the initiative. Verbal and written education was given to nursing, medical and pharmacy staff to implement the initiative on an agreed date. Refusal to administer medication unsafely prescribed was key to successful implementation. Patient’s weight was not always available and additional equipment was provided to overcome this problem. The risk of withholding treatment was considered and an escalating referral process was recommended contacting the Senior House Officer, then Registrar and ultimately the patients Consultant to avoid lengthy delays to patient treatment. Nurses felt supported in refusing to administer medication.
A point prevalence study of all inpatients was carried out monthly to ascertain the level of compliance Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 % of patients with total dose prescribed correctly 67.0 86.7 96.7 100.0 100.0 88.9 87.5. Results showed overall improvement from March to August and full compliance in May and June. Success was achieved through a multidisciplinary approach involving all key stakeholders, a forcing function and support from and for front line staff.
This initiative has been further developed to become ‘Monthly Safe Prescribing Metrics’.
Other prescribing metrics such as using ‘iu’ dosing for Insulin, prescribing appropriately for patients at extremes of weight and using the abbreviation ‘mcg’ for medications dosed in ‘micrograms’ were included. Initiatives to improve all metrics are ongoing.
Safe prescribing metrics could help to positively influence prescribing culture in other healthcare settings.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Arnaud Potier, Béatrice Demoré, Alexandre Dony, Emmanuelle Divoux, Emmanuelle Boschetti, Laure-Anne Arnoux, Cédric Dupont, Jean-Christophe Calvo, David Piney, Virginie Chopard, Nathalie Cretin, Edith Dufay
Drug iatrogenia costs global health systems $52 billion annually. The third global patient safety challenge aims at reducing the global burden of iatrogenic medication-related harm by 50% within 5 years [1]. Pharmaceutical analysis is a fundamental activity, a regulatory obligation in many countries but remains a challenge. This practice is highly variable. A graphic definition of the target pharmaceutical analysis has been formalised in December 2017 which sets the basis for its digitalisation, effectively implemented since January 2019. The aim is to build a corpus of the most relevant PA to facilitate clinical pharmacist practice.
A computerised clinical pharmacy tool is integrated into the health information system of our group of hospitals (5000 beds) to promote efficiency of pharmaceutical analysis in order to improve patient safety. Pharmaceutical algorithms (PA) are conceptualised to improve drug related problems (DRP) detection and their resolution through pharmaceutical intervention (PI) according to a defined conduct to be held: anamnesis of subjective and objective elements of appreciation, DRP characterisation and PI transmission. Pharmaceutical analysis is performed by the use of PharmaClass® (Keenturtle). This software has been interfaced with 5 health data flow of two health facilities (1000 of the 2000 beds were tested): identity and patient flow, medication data, laboratory results examination, medical history, physiological constants. PA are partially encoded as rules in Pharmaclass® that issues alerts analysed by a pharmacist.
Health data are lacking of semantic interoperability which Pharmaclass® aims at overcoming from Electronical health record (EHR) queries in real time. A corpus of PA has been structured integrating the conduct to be held. PA were created by modeling the pharmaceutical experiment with the thread of criticality. PA were validated by consensus.
80 PA were encoded into Pharmaclass®: 40 are targeting serious adverse drug events. 1516 alerts were analysed and 539 PI transmitted during the 9-month test period.
This practice is applicable to any pharmaceutical analysis that uses data from an EHR. Clinical pharmacy societies should host and take care of updating corpus of PA. Its educational interest should be exploited. A European interest group for artificial intelligence in clinical pharmacy is being created.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Thewodros Leka, iun Grayston, Mashal Kamran, Biljana Markovic
The Carter report recommended that about 80% of hospital pharmacist time should be spent on the wards to provide clinical pharmacy services. However, in our hospital’s surgical specialty at the time of this report, it was found that only 33% of pharmacist’s time was spent on clinical pharmacy services. This had a negative impact on:
• rate of medication errors and near misses
• supply of critical medicines
• pharmacist participation in productive ward rounds
• timely discharge of patients home
The Pharmacy department made a successful business case to the Hospital executives to open a Satellite pharmacy to serve 4 surgical wards. The proposal was to recruit a dedicated clinical pharmacist and Medicines Management Technician, and set-up a dispensing satellite pharmacy.
The business case indicated that if funded, the new satellite pharmacy team would: • improve clinical pharmacy key performance indicators • improve patient safety • deliver a potential cost benefit Funding limitation was an obstacle and we have to convince the board.
We achieved 60−90% improvement in the objectives set in the business case as illustrated in Table 1 and 2. The pharmacy team won the annual quality improvement award of 2018. Table 1: Clinical Pharmacy Service improvement Clinical pharmacy services Service rate pre-satellite pharmacy Service rate post satellite pharmacy % of service improvement Medication errors 16/month 6/month 63% Pharmacist interventions 20/month 80/month 75% Pharmacist participation in ward round 6/month 50/month 88% Time to dispense discharge summaries 90 minutes/discharge summary 20 minutes/discharge summary 77% Number of patients counselled 15/month 75/month 80% Pharmacist available in the ward 1.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day 80% Time taken to supply critical medicines 1 hour 5 minutes 91% Table 2: Potential Cost-benefit savings achieved Activities Cost-benefit savings/year (€) Reducing length of stay of patients €17,000 Reducing repeat dispensing €16,000 Effective use of nursing time €11,000 Reducing prescribing errors €103,000 Total Savings €147,000.
• Weekend working.
• Service improvements can be transferred to acute medical units and downstream medical wards. Reference Carter report.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Meenal Patel, Sheena Patel, Peta Longstaff
• Initiative introduced and on-going since 2017
• To increase and embed medication safety awareness
• To address under-reporting of medication-related incidents, with feedback
• To embed medication safety in education programmes and clinical practice
A local medication safety agenda implemented across two hospital sites in response to World Health Organisation (WHO) patient safety challenge ‘Medication without Harm’.
• Medication safety group (MSG) introduced with local strategy, involving junior medical staff for frontline feedback • Medication safety metrics changed to allow benchmarking with peers as per NHS Improvement’s Model Hospital data • ‘Plan, Do, Study, Act’ model applied to improve transfer of care from hospital to rehabilitation unit following external incidents • Monthly analysis of incidents with harm, exploring reasons for under-reporting • Optimisation of incident reporting system to improve staff feedback following investigations • Near miss error log introduced in pharmacy with shared learning • Mitigation of medication-related risks e.g. medications safe storage action plan • Medication safety bulletins, patient safety newsletters and top tips guide introduced covering focal themes • ‘Safe prescribing’ mandatory induction training for junior doctors to support prescribing of high risk medicines and compliance to patient safety alerts • Hospital-wide education on lessons learnt from incidents • Medication safety resources for staff to access • Nursing quality round on medication safety • Electronic missed doses realtime report developed to tackle omitted/delayed critical medication doses • Medication safety awareness (MSA) week held to increase awareness on focal themes
• Multidisciplinary MSG with assurance on meeting WHO global challenge. • Monthly analysis of medication safety data to allow learning, collaboration and benchmarking against peers. • Positive staff feedback on bulletins/newsletters with staff involvement/engagement. • Training programmes embedded with safe prescribing education. • Improved hospital safety metrics: Following MSA week, a 5% and 21% increase in medication-related incident reporting occurred at each site which has been sustained. Reporting rates doubled at one site following success of MSA week. • In 2018-19, local target achieved for reported medication-related incidents per 100,000 finished consultant episodes and medication-related incidents with harm
• Collaborative multidisciplinary working raising the profile of pharmacists acting as medication safety officers
• Implementing medication safety measures from NHS Patient Safety Strategy 2019
• Initiatives for safer culture, safer systems and safer patients
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Sheena Patel, Sima Purohit, Jennifer Hanna
• VTE remains the leading cause of direct maternal death, with no evidence of a consistent decrease in mortality over the past 20 years.
• Alongside changes in national guidelines, the maternity population and interventions are changing e.g. women giving birth are now older with more risk factors for thrombosis e.g. obesity. More interventions e.g. caesarean section are undertaken placing women at higher risk of VTE.
• VTE prevention measures were introduced in 2010, and nearly 10 years on further changes were implemented to reduce mortality and morbidity.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention measures introduced and embedded for women in pregnancy and the puerperium, with an aim to reduce potentially preventable hospital-associated events
• Electronic VTE risk assessment introduced with mandatory alerts at relevant time-points e.g. at booking, on admission, post-delivery • Simplification of the national VTE risk scoring system to ensure accurate completion of assessment and user-ability • Clear hospital guidance on VTE prevention for pregnant women, including a pocket guide covering risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis • Staff education on mechanical thromboprophylaxis for correct use and monitoring to avoid adverse effects • VTE patient information leaflet covering signs and symptoms of VTE and when to seek urgent medical attention • Introduction of a ‘mum and baby’ app with information during pregnancy and postpartum • Root cause analysis performed on hospital associated VTE events, with shared learning of root causes and actions to prevent recurrence to multidisciplinary teams • VTE education introduced in medical, midwifery and pharmacy staff training programmes, with regular updates in the maternity risk newsletter
• Over 95% of women with VTE risk assessments on admission, with weekly and monthly performance reports for local monitoring • Pharmacy staff perform quarterly audits on appropriate thromboprophylaxis. 97% inpatients received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, and 88% inpatients were wearing anti-embolism stockings • Pre-printed VTE management plan in maternity documentation to assist with transfer of care • Development of an ‘app’ to provide patient information • Patients counselled on anticoagulant therapy to support medication compliance • VTE education embedded in training programmes • VTE ward rounds for ongoing stewardship
• Staff engagement to embed VTE prevention measures in practice
• Increasing patient education on VTE prevention
• Robust and sustainable interventions improving patient outcomes
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Alison Brown, Gillian Cavell, Nikita Dogra, Cate Whittlesea
Anticoagulants are high-risk drugs. An NHS England Patient Safety Alert was published in 2015 highlighting harm from inappropriate co-prescription of anticoagulants1.
A ‘duplicate anticoagulant alert’ (Anticoagulant MLM) was implemented within our electronic prescribing system (EPMA) to alert prescribers if co-prescription of two or more anticoagulants was attempted, with the intention of preventing the completion of a potentially harmful prescription. We conducted a retrospective review of the impact of the Anticoagulant MLM on preventing co-prescription of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS)
The study took place in a 950 bed UK acute teaching hospital. A report of all Anticoagulant MLM alerts generated for adult inpatients between 26th June 2017 and 8th October 2018 was extracted from EPMA. Data on drugs prescribed, alert acceptance or override and duplicate anticoagulant administration were collected. Where alerts were overridden, appropriateness of the override was assessed by an anticoagulation specialist pharmacist. Ethics approval was not needed.
The Anticoagulant MLM triggered on 894 occasions; 113 in response to attempted prescription of a LMWH for a patient already prescribed a DOAC. 65 of 113 alerts were overridden (duplicate prescription completed). 48 alerts were accepted (duplicate prescription avoided). Of the 65 overridden alerts, consecutive doses of both anticoagulants were scheduled appropriately. No duplicate doses were administered in 44 cases (44/65, 67.7%). 15 duplicate prescriptions were either cancelled before administration or not administered concurrently (15/65, 23.1%). Duplicate doses were administered against 6 prescriptions (6/65, 9.2%), on 3 occasions. No patient harm was identified. The alert prevented inappropriate co-prescription of anticoagulants to 48 patients. Overrides were justified in 44 cases. Anticoagulants were correctly prescribed for 92/113 (81.4%) patients. It was outside the scope of this project to investigate why alerts were overridden. ‘Alert fatigue’2 and alert frequency3 are recognised factors limiting the effectiveness of electronic alerts in changing a planned course of action.
The alert remains in place as a barrier to error. Further work is needed to identify reasons for anticoagulant alert overrides.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
saif salah
In Carmel Medical Center, the infusion pack is delivered by a pharmacist according to the prescription given from PN staff, and afterwards the infusion instructions are recorded by one of the department physicians in the patient EHR. Recently there have been several mistakes that have been reported, which made it urgent to check matching between PN staff decision and the record of instructions in the EHR.
Recognise the mismatch between the electronic health record (EHR) instructions for delivery of parenteral nutrition (PN), against the actual delivery by the pharmacy according to prescription from PN staff and characterisation of these cases in terms of mismatching.
Issuing a report of the PN doses delivered by the electronic system called “UNIT-DOSE” in the pharmacy according to the name of patient and days of treatment of 2018 vs. electronic instructions that have been recorded by one of the department physicians in the “Kamelyon” system or “Meta Vision ” The parameters examined were: type of solution, composition, volume, supplements-additives (electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements), infusion rate and method of infusion (central / peripheral). Infusion rate was examined separately as a follow-up by a nutritionist.
From our research, we found a significant difference between computerised recording of PN instructions and what the patient actually received. This is due to the separation between the hand-written prescription by the PN staff and the computerised instruction recording by the treatment team. This may constitute a danger to patients.
Examination and follow-up by the pharmacist is important for identifying and treating errors of this nature appropriately. Guidance sessions for the treating staff should be conducted in the different departments. The prescription must be matched by the PN staff to the computerised instruction by placing a prescription pattern. Set up protocols in the computerised system that guide the treatment staff in the department to record the correct instructions.
