EAHP represents over 30,000 hospital pharmacists across 37 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professional
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
The Early Career Network aims to empower early-career pharmacists by sharing opportunities, insights, and success stories from across 25 member countries.
Together, we’re building a stronger, more connected hospital pharmacy community: one story, one country, one pharmacist at a time.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
Sponsor Channel
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
Steffen Amann, Rudolf Bernard, Georg Berndt , Meike Bindemann, Myga Brakebusch, Jörg Brüggmann, Frank Dörje, Miriam Gyalrong-Steur, Anita Kellermann, Markus Müller, Elfriede Nusser-Rothermundt, Rainer Riedel, Eva Tydecks
Given rising cost-pressure and increasing numbers of supply shortages, changes between generics have become daily practice in hospital pharmacies. To ensure constant treatment quality and patient safety, the equivalence of a potential new product with the current one must be guaranteed before changing brands. So far there has been no transparent, standardised tool for the comparison of generics workable in everyday clinical practice. Developing such a tool was our project’s aim.
We developed an Excel-based tool for the qualitative and pharmacoeconomical evaluation of generics before changing brands (aut-idem substitution) in hospitals.
A working-group of pharmacists from seven hospitals developed the “HERA” tool (HTA-evaluation of geneReric phArmaceuticals). Starting from a base version, 22 generic products were assessed with the tool during five evaluation rounds. Based on these results the instrument was gradually refined. Within HERA‘s Excel matrix a potentially to-be-used generic is compared with the current one. The economic evaluation is based on unit prices and prescription volumes, but also includes process costs associated with the product change. The assessment of pharmaceutical quality is based on 34 criteria from six areas (licensed uses, drug substance, dosage form and excipients, handling, safe design, packaging and storage). The objective quality evaluation is complemented by the assessment of hospital-specific features. Complex substitutions – e.g. associated with a handling change – require involvement of the medical staff using the product. The purchasing decision is taken based on the synopsis of pharmaceutical quality and economic evaluation.
The standardised evaluation of product differences before substitutions allows for the early identification of potential problems of brand changes and helps avoiding them for the benefit of patient safety. HERA also guarantees reproducibility and transparent, QM-compliant documentation of product changes. The pharmacies of our purchasing group now routinely use HERA for the assessment of generics before intended brand substitutions. Each evaluation is conducted in one pharmacy and shared with the others via data-cloud.
We have published a paper on HERA and presented it at the German Hospital Pharmacists congress in 2018. Our aim is to create a network of colleagues with shared access to all colleagues’ HERA product evaluations to reduce the workload for the individual pharmacies.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Arnaud Potier, Béatrice Demoré, Alexandre Dony, Emmanuelle Divoux, Emmanuelle Boschetti, Laure-Anne Arnoux, Cédric Dupont, Jean-Christophe Calvo, David Piney, Virginie Chopard, Nathalie Cretin, Edith Dufay
Drug iatrogenia costs global health systems $52 billion annually. The third global patient safety challenge aims at reducing the global burden of iatrogenic medication-related harm by 50% within 5 years [1]. Pharmaceutical analysis is a fundamental activity, a regulatory obligation in many countries but remains a challenge. This practice is highly variable. A graphic definition of the target pharmaceutical analysis has been formalised in December 2017 which sets the basis for its digitalisation, effectively implemented since January 2019. The aim is to build a corpus of the most relevant PA to facilitate clinical pharmacist practice.
A computerised clinical pharmacy tool is integrated into the health information system of our group of hospitals (5000 beds) to promote efficiency of pharmaceutical analysis in order to improve patient safety. Pharmaceutical algorithms (PA) are conceptualised to improve drug related problems (DRP) detection and their resolution through pharmaceutical intervention (PI) according to a defined conduct to be held: anamnesis of subjective and objective elements of appreciation, DRP characterisation and PI transmission. Pharmaceutical analysis is performed by the use of PharmaClass® (Keenturtle). This software has been interfaced with 5 health data flow of two health facilities (1000 of the 2000 beds were tested): identity and patient flow, medication data, laboratory results examination, medical history, physiological constants. PA are partially encoded as rules in Pharmaclass® that issues alerts analysed by a pharmacist.
Health data are lacking of semantic interoperability which Pharmaclass® aims at overcoming from Electronical health record (EHR) queries in real time. A corpus of PA has been structured integrating the conduct to be held. PA were created by modeling the pharmaceutical experiment with the thread of criticality. PA were validated by consensus.
80 PA were encoded into Pharmaclass®: 40 are targeting serious adverse drug events. 1516 alerts were analysed and 539 PI transmitted during the 9-month test period.
This practice is applicable to any pharmaceutical analysis that uses data from an EHR. Clinical pharmacy societies should host and take care of updating corpus of PA. Its educational interest should be exploited. A European interest group for artificial intelligence in clinical pharmacy is being created.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Thewodros Leka, iun Grayston, Mashal Kamran, Biljana Markovic
The Carter report recommended that about 80% of hospital pharmacist time should be spent on the wards to provide clinical pharmacy services. However, in our hospital’s surgical specialty at the time of this report, it was found that only 33% of pharmacist’s time was spent on clinical pharmacy services. This had a negative impact on:
• rate of medication errors and near misses
• supply of critical medicines
• pharmacist participation in productive ward rounds
• timely discharge of patients home
The Pharmacy department made a successful business case to the Hospital executives to open a Satellite pharmacy to serve 4 surgical wards. The proposal was to recruit a dedicated clinical pharmacist and Medicines Management Technician, and set-up a dispensing satellite pharmacy.
The business case indicated that if funded, the new satellite pharmacy team would: • improve clinical pharmacy key performance indicators • improve patient safety • deliver a potential cost benefit Funding limitation was an obstacle and we have to convince the board.
We achieved 60−90% improvement in the objectives set in the business case as illustrated in Table 1 and 2. The pharmacy team won the annual quality improvement award of 2018. Table 1: Clinical Pharmacy Service improvement Clinical pharmacy services Service rate pre-satellite pharmacy Service rate post satellite pharmacy % of service improvement Medication errors 16/month 6/month 63% Pharmacist interventions 20/month 80/month 75% Pharmacist participation in ward round 6/month 50/month 88% Time to dispense discharge summaries 90 minutes/discharge summary 20 minutes/discharge summary 77% Number of patients counselled 15/month 75/month 80% Pharmacist available in the ward 1.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day 80% Time taken to supply critical medicines 1 hour 5 minutes 91% Table 2: Potential Cost-benefit savings achieved Activities Cost-benefit savings/year (€) Reducing length of stay of patients €17,000 Reducing repeat dispensing €16,000 Effective use of nursing time €11,000 Reducing prescribing errors €103,000 Total Savings €147,000.
• Weekend working.
• Service improvements can be transferred to acute medical units and downstream medical wards. Reference Carter report.
Production and Compounding
ADRIANA DURCANSKA
The quality and safety standards of pharmacy preparations are not harmonised throughout Europe. They fall under the national competencies of individual European countries.
The quantitative risk assessment of the pharmacy preparations for stock in hospital pharmacies (HPs) in accordance with Resolution EDQM CM / Res (2016) 1; to specify the decision criteria for the risk assessment; the risk management of the pharmacy preparations for stock in the country; to design a check list of the risk assessment for extempore preparations.
Out of the total number of 53 hospital pharmacies contacted, 5 pharmacies sent a suitable file.
A total of 170 types of medicines are being prepared in HPs. One HP had the result of the risk ≥ 100 when preparing ophthalmic medicines. Annex A is a check list designed to assess the risk of extempore preparations.
The management is and will be forced to consider its introduction or to use another model: hospital – GMP / outsourcing / central pharmacy preparing and distributing. The aim of using the document in hospital pharmacies of the country.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Meenal Patel, Sheena Patel, Peta Longstaff
• Initiative introduced and on-going since 2017
• To increase and embed medication safety awareness
• To address under-reporting of medication-related incidents, with feedback
• To embed medication safety in education programmes and clinical practice
A local medication safety agenda implemented across two hospital sites in response to World Health Organisation (WHO) patient safety challenge ‘Medication without Harm’.
• Medication safety group (MSG) introduced with local strategy, involving junior medical staff for frontline feedback • Medication safety metrics changed to allow benchmarking with peers as per NHS Improvement’s Model Hospital data • ‘Plan, Do, Study, Act’ model applied to improve transfer of care from hospital to rehabilitation unit following external incidents • Monthly analysis of incidents with harm, exploring reasons for under-reporting • Optimisation of incident reporting system to improve staff feedback following investigations • Near miss error log introduced in pharmacy with shared learning • Mitigation of medication-related risks e.g. medications safe storage action plan • Medication safety bulletins, patient safety newsletters and top tips guide introduced covering focal themes • ‘Safe prescribing’ mandatory induction training for junior doctors to support prescribing of high risk medicines and compliance to patient safety alerts • Hospital-wide education on lessons learnt from incidents • Medication safety resources for staff to access • Nursing quality round on medication safety • Electronic missed doses realtime report developed to tackle omitted/delayed critical medication doses • Medication safety awareness (MSA) week held to increase awareness on focal themes
• Multidisciplinary MSG with assurance on meeting WHO global challenge. • Monthly analysis of medication safety data to allow learning, collaboration and benchmarking against peers. • Positive staff feedback on bulletins/newsletters with staff involvement/engagement. • Training programmes embedded with safe prescribing education. • Improved hospital safety metrics: Following MSA week, a 5% and 21% increase in medication-related incident reporting occurred at each site which has been sustained. Reporting rates doubled at one site following success of MSA week. • In 2018-19, local target achieved for reported medication-related incidents per 100,000 finished consultant episodes and medication-related incidents with harm
• Collaborative multidisciplinary working raising the profile of pharmacists acting as medication safety officers
• Implementing medication safety measures from NHS Patient Safety Strategy 2019
• Initiatives for safer culture, safer systems and safer patients
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Sheena Patel, Sima Purohit, Jennifer Hanna
• VTE remains the leading cause of direct maternal death, with no evidence of a consistent decrease in mortality over the past 20 years.
• Alongside changes in national guidelines, the maternity population and interventions are changing e.g. women giving birth are now older with more risk factors for thrombosis e.g. obesity. More interventions e.g. caesarean section are undertaken placing women at higher risk of VTE.
• VTE prevention measures were introduced in 2010, and nearly 10 years on further changes were implemented to reduce mortality and morbidity.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention measures introduced and embedded for women in pregnancy and the puerperium, with an aim to reduce potentially preventable hospital-associated events
• Electronic VTE risk assessment introduced with mandatory alerts at relevant time-points e.g. at booking, on admission, post-delivery • Simplification of the national VTE risk scoring system to ensure accurate completion of assessment and user-ability • Clear hospital guidance on VTE prevention for pregnant women, including a pocket guide covering risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis • Staff education on mechanical thromboprophylaxis for correct use and monitoring to avoid adverse effects • VTE patient information leaflet covering signs and symptoms of VTE and when to seek urgent medical attention • Introduction of a ‘mum and baby’ app with information during pregnancy and postpartum • Root cause analysis performed on hospital associated VTE events, with shared learning of root causes and actions to prevent recurrence to multidisciplinary teams • VTE education introduced in medical, midwifery and pharmacy staff training programmes, with regular updates in the maternity risk newsletter
• Over 95% of women with VTE risk assessments on admission, with weekly and monthly performance reports for local monitoring • Pharmacy staff perform quarterly audits on appropriate thromboprophylaxis. 97% inpatients received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, and 88% inpatients were wearing anti-embolism stockings • Pre-printed VTE management plan in maternity documentation to assist with transfer of care • Development of an ‘app’ to provide patient information • Patients counselled on anticoagulant therapy to support medication compliance • VTE education embedded in training programmes • VTE ward rounds for ongoing stewardship
• Staff engagement to embed VTE prevention measures in practice
• Increasing patient education on VTE prevention
• Robust and sustainable interventions improving patient outcomes
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Alison Brown, Gillian Cavell, Nikita Dogra, Cate Whittlesea
Anticoagulants are high-risk drugs. An NHS England Patient Safety Alert was published in 2015 highlighting harm from inappropriate co-prescription of anticoagulants1.
A ‘duplicate anticoagulant alert’ (Anticoagulant MLM) was implemented within our electronic prescribing system (EPMA) to alert prescribers if co-prescription of two or more anticoagulants was attempted, with the intention of preventing the completion of a potentially harmful prescription. We conducted a retrospective review of the impact of the Anticoagulant MLM on preventing co-prescription of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS)
The study took place in a 950 bed UK acute teaching hospital. A report of all Anticoagulant MLM alerts generated for adult inpatients between 26th June 2017 and 8th October 2018 was extracted from EPMA. Data on drugs prescribed, alert acceptance or override and duplicate anticoagulant administration were collected. Where alerts were overridden, appropriateness of the override was assessed by an anticoagulation specialist pharmacist. Ethics approval was not needed.
The Anticoagulant MLM triggered on 894 occasions; 113 in response to attempted prescription of a LMWH for a patient already prescribed a DOAC. 65 of 113 alerts were overridden (duplicate prescription completed). 48 alerts were accepted (duplicate prescription avoided). Of the 65 overridden alerts, consecutive doses of both anticoagulants were scheduled appropriately. No duplicate doses were administered in 44 cases (44/65, 67.7%). 15 duplicate prescriptions were either cancelled before administration or not administered concurrently (15/65, 23.1%). Duplicate doses were administered against 6 prescriptions (6/65, 9.2%), on 3 occasions. No patient harm was identified. The alert prevented inappropriate co-prescription of anticoagulants to 48 patients. Overrides were justified in 44 cases. Anticoagulants were correctly prescribed for 92/113 (81.4%) patients. It was outside the scope of this project to investigate why alerts were overridden. ‘Alert fatigue’2 and alert frequency3 are recognised factors limiting the effectiveness of electronic alerts in changing a planned course of action.
The alert remains in place as a barrier to error. Further work is needed to identify reasons for anticoagulant alert overrides.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
saif salah
In Carmel Medical Center, the infusion pack is delivered by a pharmacist according to the prescription given from PN staff, and afterwards the infusion instructions are recorded by one of the department physicians in the patient EHR. Recently there have been several mistakes that have been reported, which made it urgent to check matching between PN staff decision and the record of instructions in the EHR.
Recognise the mismatch between the electronic health record (EHR) instructions for delivery of parenteral nutrition (PN), against the actual delivery by the pharmacy according to prescription from PN staff and characterisation of these cases in terms of mismatching.
Issuing a report of the PN doses delivered by the electronic system called “UNIT-DOSE” in the pharmacy according to the name of patient and days of treatment of 2018 vs. electronic instructions that have been recorded by one of the department physicians in the “Kamelyon” system or “Meta Vision ” The parameters examined were: type of solution, composition, volume, supplements-additives (electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements), infusion rate and method of infusion (central / peripheral). Infusion rate was examined separately as a follow-up by a nutritionist.
From our research, we found a significant difference between computerised recording of PN instructions and what the patient actually received. This is due to the separation between the hand-written prescription by the PN staff and the computerised instruction recording by the treatment team. This may constitute a danger to patients.
Examination and follow-up by the pharmacist is important for identifying and treating errors of this nature appropriately. Guidance sessions for the treating staff should be conducted in the different departments. The prescription must be matched by the PN staff to the computerised instruction by placing a prescription pattern. Set up protocols in the computerised system that guide the treatment staff in the department to record the correct instructions.
Education and Research
ANTONIO PIRRONE, FEDERICA MILANI, LUCA CANCANELLI, VALENTINA MARINI , DANIELE MENGATO , ROBERTO LANGELLA , NICOLA REALDON
On October 5, 2017 the National Network of Italian Hospital Pharmacy School Students (ReNaSFO) was born with the aim to face the various critical aspects of post-graduate Hospital Pharmacy School (SHP), such as the need to make the different paths homogenous among regional SHPs, improve dialogue between colleagues and encourage a more informed approach focused to the training pathway for specialisation. In particular, little official information is available and hard to find about the different realities present in Italy.
“Compendium” project is designed to fill this lack and to gather information on post-graduate SHPs operating in Italy. In addition to outlining a summary description of the SHPs, the Compendium is configured as an official tool to respond and provide targeted information to near-graduates and graduates in Pharmacy (who often contact ReNaSFO) interested to approach the SHPs path.
Two project coordinators prepared a list of items submitted to representative ReNaSFO student in every 21 operating SHPs. The items refer to: available places and admission requirements, type of entry test, organisation of didactic lessons, exams and residency training, health facilities affiliated with SHP, potential availability of scholarships, useful links of the SHP or university. The help of universities was fundamental, in particular the helpfulness of SHP directors to collaborate with students.
As many as 18 SHPs out of 21 (85.71%) have joined the project: Bari, Bologna, Catania, Catanzaro, Camerino, Genoa, Florence, Milan, Modena and Reggio Emilia, Messina, Naples, Padua, Parma, Pisa, Rome, Siena, Turin and Sassari; of these, 14 schools have already sent their finished “Compendium” form.
Thanks to the widespread presence of associated ReNaSFO students, the initiative has immediately found interest and participation, reconfirming once again the active and unconditional collaboration between SHP students throughout Italy. Despite a heterogeneous situation between different SHPs, we keep working together hopeful to achieve national uniformity of SHPs and to improve educational objectives and training pathways.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Gillian Cavell
Despite the availability of RTU and RTA formulations of high-risk injectable medicines they were not always used. We developed the metric, to compare the use of RTU and RTA injectable medicines with the use of concentrates requiring further dilution or manipulation prior to administration e.g. dilution of morphine 10 mg/ml to 10 mg/10 ml prior to intravenous administration, e.g. withdrawal of 5 x 10 ml fentanyl 500 mcg/10 ml into a 50 ml syringe for continuous infusion, and identify areas for improvement.
We have developed a series of metrics to measure compliance with national guidance for the safe use of injectable medicines. The guidance recommends use of ready-to-use (RTU) or ready-to-administer (RTA) injectable products, where these are available, to reduce the risk of patient harm from errors in the preparation of injections and infusions on hospital wards.
The metric utilises pharmacy-issue data to compare the number of units of RTU or RTA formulations issued to wards and clinical areas with the numbers of units of alternative products of the same drug entity. Expressed as a percentage the metric informs the organisation of the extent to which safer injectable medicines are being used, providing a baseline against which to review practice and reinforce the need to use alternative, safer formulations. A high percentage indicates good compliance.
The metrics have been used to successfully maximise the use of a range of safer formulations including RTA potassium chloride, RTU fentanyl 2500 mcg/50 ml vials for critical care infusion, 100 mg/10 ml paracetamol in neonatal units and RTU magnesium sulphate 20% (50 ml vials) for obstetric emergencies. Since the introduction of the metrics in 2016 a monthly scorecard of performance is reviewed by the Hospital Medication Safety Committee to identify and account for deviations.
The metrics are being shared with other organisations to benchmark performance. Ideas to promote implementation and business cases can be shared between organisations who may find implementing RTA and RTU injectable medicines challenging, especially where these are more expensive than formulations in established use.
