Pdf

Author(s)

Noelia Vicente Oliveros, María Muñoz García, Álvaro Ruigomez Saiz, Montserrat Ferre Masferrer, Teresa Bermejo Vicedo, Eva Delgado Silveira, Lucía Quesada Muñoz, Ana María Alvarez-Diaz

Why was it done?

An analysis of the indicators of the perioperative process reflected the need to improve their quality. One of the causes of scheduled surgery cancellation was the lack of the follow up of the anaesthetist’s medication recommendations. Medications need to be carefully managed to prevent perioperative complications.

What was done?

We designed and implemented a flow chart to ensure the patient compliance of anesthetist’s medication recommendations prior to surgery. We designed a protocol for the perioperative medication management.

How was it done?

A multidisciplinary group was formed with the management of the hospital and representatives of all the services involved in the perioperative process. The group designed the flow chart of the process by consensus. Patients were candidates to enter in this process if they were on treatment with anticoagulant or 2 or more medications from the following groups: antiplatelet, antihypertensives, antidiabetics. A pharmacist called by phone three times (the day before, the day of medication change, and the day after) to the patient to ensure the compliance of anaesthetist recommendations. If there was a lack of compliance, the pharmacist contacted the surgeon who was in charge of deciding if the surgery procedure continued as scheduled. Moreover, the domiciliary medication of these patients were reconcilliated and recorded in their health record. Healthcare professionals could consult it during hospital stay. The group designed a protocol for the perioperative medication management with different medical specialists.

What has been achieved?

The project started in April 2019. The pharmacist called patients with scheduled surgery of lower limbs. A total of 31 patients benefited from the new flow chart. The pharmacist detected 38 medication errors; two involved errors concerning the suspension of anticoagulant drugs prior to surgery and four implied antihypertensive drugs. Once, it was necessary to contact the surgeon. In this case, the surgeon decided to continue with the surgery as schedule. Fifty-seven medications suffered a change in the period between the anaesthestic visit and the surgery, nine of them belonged to the monitored medication group. 

What next?

The next steps are to spread the flow chart to other patients, to distribute the protocol among hospital healthcare professionals and to implement a procedure for the reintroduction of the modified medication.

Pdf

Author(s)

Janne Kutschera Sund, Martin Grotnes, Ingvild Klevan, Lene Lilleaas, Johan Fredrik Skomsvoll

Why was it done?

Lack of comprehensive strategies and funding has made it difficult to develop and implement extensive clinical pharmacy services in our hospital. It has been challenging to secure hospital involvement. A new financial model securing funding from the regional health authority made way for a new joint approach.

What was done?

A dialog based process involving hospital management, clinicians and the pharmacy led to a large increase in clinical pharmacy services in our university hospital.

How was it done?

A literature review was conducted. Based on this, a multidisciplinary project group decided that all clinics and wards were eligible for clinical pharmacy services and should receive extensive information on the topic. As there were limited resources allocated, all clinics were asked to apply for the service. The hospital management received applications three times the number of funded clinical pharmacists.
Prioritizing was based on the following criteria; use of the Integrated Medicines Management (IMM)-method, patient flow, evaluation and research, in- or out –patient clinics, continuation of established services, localization and time schedules on the wards.

What has been achieved?

The long term funding of clinical pharmacy in the health region enabled the hospital pharmacy to recruit and educate highly competent clinical pharmacists.
In less than a year, the number of clinical pharmacists has increased from three to twelve. The number of wards receiving clinical pharmacy services has also grown from three to twelve and there are still plans for further implementation.

The hospital and the ward managements are much more involved in evolving a common patient safety strategy with focus on medication. Specific quality indicators for each patient population and ward are being developed, and clinical pharmacists are now important members of multidisciplinary teams all over the hospital. Pharmacists are integrated in ongoing clinical research projects and publishing.

User surveys show that clinical pharmacy is assessed as a highly beneficial service by both nurses and physicians.

What next?

Develop the IMM-model to include the clinical pharmacists in standard patient care in every clinic and department. We plan to perform follow-up studies on the effects of clinical pharmacy services in different settings.

Pdf

Author(s)

Ane Hornbaek Mortensen

Why was it done?

Previously, a quarterly report showing adherence to national treatment guidelines was issued to all hospital administrations in our region. It was their responsibility to forward this to the appropriate specialists/consultants. This often failed and even when it was done, our experience showed that it wasn’t read by the consultants. Consequently, prescription patterns didn’t change despite the report highlighting the wards that weren’t complying with the national treatment guidelines.

What was done?

Short newsletters including graphs/tables showing the ward’s degree of adherence to national treatment guidelines were emailed to the chief consultant of the specific ward.

How was it done?

In our region a 6-person analytical team, which includes 3 hospital pharmacists, monitors adherence to national treatment guidelines issued by our national council for the use of expensive hospital medicines (RADS). Based on the results, the analytical team decides which newsletters to write. The hospital pharmacists in the analytical team are responsible for writing the newsletters and emailing them direct to the relevant specialist/consultant.

What has been achieved?

It seems as if the introduction of more targeted information has led to more rapidly changing prescription patterns. One example is oral iron chelating agents to hematological patients where a RADS guideline was issued recommending that all new patients should receive deferipron instead of deferasirox. This information was initially issued through the usual channels (via hospital administration) but no change in the use of deferipron/deferasirox was seen. This only happened after emailing a newsletter directly to the chief consultants of the three hematology wards in our region, showing the current use of deferipron/deferasirox and the potential cost reduction. Nine months and three newsletters later the percentage of deferipron use on the hematology wards increased from 2% to 27%, leading to a 22% cost reduction. Target was 25% deferipron (the guideline only covered new patients). The total increase in the percentage of deferipron use on hospitals in our region was 351% compared to an increase of between 0 and 19% in the other four national regions.

What next?

Continued and increased use of targeted communication in the health care system is required to ensure that specific information reaches the relevant players.