EAHP represents over 30,000 hospital pharmacists across 37 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professional
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
Sponsor Channel
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
ANAIS AMAR, SIMON CLAUTRIER, MORGANE GIOVANELLI, REGINE CHEVRIER
The phytotherapy market has continued to grow for several years. However, in oncology, concomitant use of plants with oral or injectable chemotherapies can be harmful. Plants can interact with many cytochromes (CYP), impacting on the biotransformation and kinetics of drugs. While grapefruit or St John’s wort are already recognised as interfering with many therapies, the impact of many plants remains unknown for healthcare professionals. Tools exist to evaluate their effects on drug metabolism, but the multiplication of sources delays and complicates the advice of pharmacists.
Centralise information on plant metabolism on a single support by creating a database. Facilitate pharmacist’s expertise about interactions between plants and anticancer drugs.
To create the database, it was necessary to establish an exhaustive list of plants. Three sources of information have been used:
– Inventory of phytotherapy products marketed in 4 drugstores
– Census of plants consumed by patients seen in pharmaceutical consultation (PC)
– Consultation of websites specialized in phytotherapy
Then, an Excel table has been developed:
– each line corresponds to a plant
– each column corresponds respectively to 17 CYP, a transport protein (Pgp), estrogen-like (EL) and antioxidant (AO) properties of the plant.
A colour code has been defined according to the inhibitory (yellow), inductive (blue), EL (purple) and AO (red) action of the plant. If there is no interaction, the box remains blank.
Plant effects data were collected from Hedrine®, Oncolien®, MSKCC, RX list and Drugs.com websites.
Finally, 174 plants have been accounted in drugstores, 82 were identified during PC and 129 found on websites. If 10% of plants have an EL action and 16% an AO effect, approximately 30% have inductive and/or inhibitory action of at least one CYP and/or PgP. Since the tool’s creation: 91% of answers could be given immediately to patients compared to only 9% delayed (plants still unreferenced).
This database is an essential tool for answering questions from patients with anticancer drugs. It saves precious time and responsiveness during PC, but also during patient phone calls. However, critical work with divergent information between sources is to be expected. Currently, as a precaution, we don’t recommend the use of plants subject to such a contradiction.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Martin Breuling, Ina Geist
In the context of antibiotic stewardship, rapid oralisation of a parenteral antibiotic is recommended in many antibiotic stewardship guidelines. Such a sequence therapy is easy to implement if both application pathways lead to comparable efficacy levels at the site of infection. However, this does not apply to all anti-infectives, in particular some beta-lactam antibiotics represent a challenge in therapy. Additionally, the information about this topic is very sparse in the literature.
In order to achieve an improvement in antimicrobial prescriptions, we have addressed possible problems regarding oralisation of antibiotics. For this purpose, we graphically compared the simulated efficacy levels of parenteral and oral forms of beta-lactams.
We programmed a computer based procedure that allows a simulation of plasma levels of antibiotics upon intravenous versus oral administration. Based on the obtained data and EUCAST-based MIC-distributions for a set of bacteria, we assessed the respective putative clinical actions.
Our simulations show that some oral beta-lactams do not reach the PK/PD condition of a sufficient therapy (fT>MHK) in the approved dosage. The simulations have been used for education seminars with physicians and partly led to an improvement in oralisation procedures. Additionally, an oralisation standard has been established.
Our next step is to develop a special prescription form for oral antibiotics which will enable us to control prescription behaviour even more effectively. We plan to monitor the prescription habits for anti-infectives more closely before and after establishing the prescription form.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
VERA DOMINGOS, VERA PIRES, SÍLVIA SANTOS, PATRÍCIA TRINDADE, ANA INÁCIO, ELZA CANDEIAS, SUSANA SIMÕES, PAULO PAIXÃO, NUNO MIRANDA, ANTÓNIO GOUVEIA
Personalized BU dosing is considered because BU has a narrow therapeutic index and exposure have been associated with important clinical outcomes. High exposures have been associated with an increased risk of toxicities (acute graft-versus-host disease and veno-occlusive disease) and low exposures with graft rejection and relapse.
For this reason, in a multidisciplinary working group, we identified an opportunity to improve the treatment of your patients.
Implementation of a TDM procedure for Busulfan (BU) in conditioning therapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Study variability in PK parameters and evaluate TDM efficacy. From this initial period, we perform TDM on all patients under Bu conditioning.
The steps followed were:
1. Pre-implementation: bibliographic research, identify reference centers to perform BU plasma assay. Development and validation of a LC-MS / MS method by the National Institute of Forensic Medicine. PK analysis using ADAPT-5 software.
2. Pilot: Trial and assess the feasibility of the procedure. Cross-validation of the results with UMC Utrecht.
3. Implementation: clinical practice, doing the necessary dose adjustments. Prospective collection of clinical and PK data.
The main obstacle is the lack of analytical methodology in our center and the turnaround time.
We performed a preliminary analysis with 21 patients. Mean clearance (CL) was 0,19L/h*kg±0,05L/h*kg and volume of distribution 0,65L*kg±0,22L*kg. Body weight was the most predictive covariance.
CL was significantly different between patients 10 years old (p = 0,024) and over treatment (p=0,0191). The type of conditioning regimen didn’t show relation with the BU CL (p=0,0514).
TDM increased the number of patients with an optimal exposure (target AUC ±10%) from 42% to 83%.Dose was reduced in 10 patients (max 37%) and increased in 3 (max 19%). 1 patient maintained the prescribed dose.
TDM increased significantly the number of patients with optimal exposure to BU.
This procedure is pioneer at a national level and it relies on a strict protocol which includes collaboration with several hospital departments and other highly-specialized external centers. This can be used as a tool for other drugs and to empower the pharmacist as an active agent in the clinical setting.
