The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
Flashpharma: a training tool to ensure quality medication management
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Samantha HUYNH, Catarina GONCALVES BARROSO, Sophie PATERNOTTE, Sofia DA SILVA MENDES, Claire JUDEL, Elvire MARTIN-LEMAIRE, Georges NICOLAOS, Chloé DUPONT, Nicolas CORNILLET
Why was it done?
Raising awareness and ongoing training of healthcare professionals is a crucial criterion for High Authority for Health certification. Flashpharma provides reliable information, particularly for night-shift nurses. This becomes critical in a context of reduced physician presence and absence of pharmacists, and the increasing presence of temporary nurses due to staffing shortages.
What was done?
The pharmacy department developed FlashPharma, an innovative training tool to enhance medication management within healthcare units. For instance, it contributes by promoting the proper use of high-risk medications (HRM) and risky medications (RM) by providing information to care teams as close to the patient as possible.
How was it done?
A working group created eleven sheets based on literature and adapted to the practices of adult hospitalization departments. Validated by medical experts and institutional committees, they include points to watch and key figures. They link up with our institutional protocols, our prescribing software and the points addressed by the visiting experts during the mock certification. Accessible by flashing QR codes strategically positioned or on our web platform, they serve as a basis for discussion with caregivers. Trainers included pharmacists, a pharmacy intern, and a hospital quality manager. Anonymous written questionnaires were used to gather feedback.
What has been achieved?
Two QR codes are placed on automated dispensing cabinets and mobile medical carts, linking to sheets on MHR, RM, and guidelines for proper drug crushing and administration via an enteral feeding tube. Another QR code on refrigerators provides information on drug storage and temperature alerts management. A label provides information on drugs prescribed outside the booklet, with six therapeutic equivalence tables validated by doctors.
Three sessions were attended by nurses, healthcare managers, orderlies, and doctors (n=18). Fifteen (83%) participants strongly agreed, and 3 (17%) agreed that they acquired new knowledge. All participants would recommend these sheets; 16 (89%) strongly expressed their willingness to participate in a second session.
What next?
Positive feedback highlighted the need for further education in various hospital units. Feedback on the use of QR codes by day and night teams will be sought during subsequent sessions and quantified using analytical dashboards. Appropriate continuing education initiatives will be implemented in paediatrics, intensive care and operating room departments.
FarmaCenter: a platform for resolving pharmacotherapeutic queries after discharge from the emergency department
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
BEATRIZ TORROBA-SANZ, CRISTINA ORTEGA-NAVARRO, ANA DE LORENZO-PINTO, CARMEN REDONDO-GALAN, JUAN ANTONIO ANDUEZA-LILLO, MARTA SANCHEZ-CELAYA POZO, ANA HERRANZ-ALONSO, MARÍA SANJURJO-SAEZ
Why was it done?
Almost half of the patients discharged from the ED receive incomplete information at discharge and they forget approximately 60% of the medical information received when they leave the hospital. All these hinders the proper management of medication at home, generating anxiety to patients and favoring the appearance of adverse events and new visits to the hospital.
What was done?
We have designed, implemented and evaluated a tool to resolve pharmacotherapeutic queries of patients discharged from the Emergency Department (ED).
How was it done?
Patients with doubts about the pharmacological treatment prescribed upon discharge can contact FarmaCenter through the instructions included in the discharge report (telephone/email). The pharmacist will then analyze each query, gathering information from the clinical history and, if necessary, contact the care-team for resolution. Finally, the pharmacist will contact the patient, resolve the query and offer the opportunity to complete a satisfaction survey.
What has been achieved?
766 consultations were received (November 2022- 31 August 2023), mean age was 49.8 years and 49.3% were men. The majority (96%) contacted by telephone and the mean time of resolution was 1.5 hours. Half of the cases (53.7%) were resolved by the hospital pharmacist without the necessity of contacting the rest of the healthcare team. The main reasons for consultation were: medication not prescribed (28.3%), drug administration (8.7%), management of adverse reactions (6.9%), shortages (6.8%), dosage (5.9%) and duration of treatment (5.7%). 15.5% of consultations were not related to medication. The satisfaction survey was sent to 288 patients and 40% responded. The overall rating was 4.9/5 and the most highly valued aspects were the individualized attention, fast resolution of the query and the pharmacist’s kindness. In addition, 95% of patients considered that FarmaCenter had helped them to avoid a visit to a healthcare center.
What next?
Developing improvement strategies to reduce the number of patients with medication-related concerns from the ED.
ANTIMICROBIAL DOSING IN OBESE PATIENTS: ADJUSTMENT GUIDE TO HELP IN PRESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
ANA CASTRO BALADO, MARÍA TERESA RODRÍGUEZ JATO, IRIA VARELA REY, MANUEL BUSTO IGLESIAS, FRANCISCO CAJADE PASCUAL, MARIA PUENTE IGLESIAS, IRENE ZARRA FERRO
Why was it done?
The prevalence of obesity has increased considerably in last decades. Pathophysiological changes in obese patients (body mass index >30kg/m2) produce pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations that can condition the correct exposure to drugs if standard dosages are used. Incorrect dosing in obese patients can lead to toxicity or therapeutic failure. Usually, it is difficult to find information on drug dosing in this population, being sometimes contradictory.
What was done?
To develop an antimicrobial dosage infographic guide for obese patients to facilitate the correct prescription and validation in our hospital.
How was it done?
Initially, the pharmacy service established the antimicrobial groups to be included in the infographic guide, and within each of them, the most used in hospitalized patients were identified. A bibliographic search was carried out using the keywords “obese”, “dosing”, “antimicrobial” and “patient”. Technical data sheets, PubMed, Google Scholar, UpToDate, Micromedex and other hospital guidelines were consulted. A peer review was carried out and a table with antimicrobial groups and subgroups was designed, stablishing the body weight recommended for the adjustment if needed (total weight (TBW), ideal weight (IBW) and adjusted weight (ABW)), doses, and observations (monitoring of plasma levels, administration in extended/continuous infusion and/or special considerations). The table consisted of a total of 38 antibiotics, 10 antifungals, 6 antivirals and 4 antituberculous drugs. Of the total antimicrobials reviewed, 40% were dosed in obese patients by maximum dose, 38% were dosed based on weight (21% by ABW, 10% by IBW, and 7% by TBW) and 22% by standard doses. Equations for body weight descriptors were added in the infographic.
What has been achieved?
The protocol was validated by the hospital’s infectious diseases commission. Dosing information was then entered into the hospital’s electronic prescribing program facilitating the correct antimicrobial prescription and validation in obese patients. Training was provided in the intensive care unit, and the final document was disseminated through the hospital intranet and via email to all prescribing physicians in the center, being well embraced.
What next?
We will continue making formative sessions, as well as possible updates that may be beneficial for a better antimicrobial dosing in obese patients to avoid toxicities and/or therapeutic failure.
THE LABOUR OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY SERVICES IN THE COVID-19 HEALTH CRISIS
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
CLARA NOTARIO DONGIL, PATRICIA ARAQUE ARROYO, MARÍA MAR ALAÑÓN PARDO, ALEJANDRO MARCOS DE LA TORRE, MARÍA CARMEN GARCÍA CONDE, BEATRIZ PROY VEGA
Why was it done?
The circuit was designed during the pandemic period responding to the COVID-19 situation. The aim was providing the best service to hospitalized patients. The activity began on March 10, 2020.
What was done?
Due to the current pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, our Pharmacy Service (PS) has been reorganized and adapted its activity by areas according to the needs of a given situation.
How was it done?
1.- Priority areas were set up.
2.- Main activities to develop in each section were defined.
3.- There was a redeployment of the PS staff.
What has been achieved?
Pharmaceutical assistance: PS developed pharmacotherapeutic protocols, collaborated giving advice to medical staff selecting appropriated treatments and detecting the most important interactions between drugs. It also advised regarding to compatibility and stability of medication, providing in addition written information through tables and triptychs elaborated.
Pharmacotechnics: 1,320L of hydroalcoholic solution were elaborated and 1,161L that were donated to the hospital were repackaged; 5.3L of hydroxychloroquine 25 mg/mL oral suspension were prepared for patients in the Intensive Care Units (ICU).
Parenteral preparations: Perfusion elaboration was centralized in the PS; 495 infusions of midazolam 1.6 mg/mL and 1,570 of fentanyl 0.012 mg/mL were formulated to ICU. Individualized doses of intravenous tocilizumab belonged to 31 patients were elaborated.
Management and acquisition of medicines: Two new hospitalization areas and three new ICUs were set up, equipped with medication kits. We increased the frequency of medication replacement and the stock of medication in the hospitalization units was adapted. We made a continuous review of medication stocks due to high stocks turnover because an elevated demand. To guarantee the supply of medicines related to SARS-CoV-2, medication was requested through the application of “management of medicines in special situations” of the Ministry of Health. 45 applications were processed.
What next?
The project is applicable to whatever PS, a defining figure in SARS-CoV-2 health crisis´s management, giving priority to essential services.
A PHARMACOGENETIC CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (CDSS)
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Xando Díaz-Villamarín, Ana Pozo-Agundo, Paloma García-Navas, Alba Antúnez-Rodríguez, Celia Castaño-Amores, Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo
Why was it done?
Nowadays, it is known that at least 33% of patients show variable response to drugs. Of those, genetic polymorphisms explain around 15-30% of these cases, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) being the genetic markers most clinically relevant. In 2013, 40 million SNPs were identified in humans and some have been observed to determine drug response. These observations lead to the incorporation of genotyping some of these SNPs as a recommendation in many drug labels before treatment initiation.
Since patient´s drug response may be determined by certain SNPs in different genes it is necessary to develop CDSS based on pharmacogenetic (PGx) information that makes feasible its application in clinical routine, translating genotypes into phenotypes and dosing recommendations.
What was done?
We have developed a local Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that informs the physician on the availability of a PGx test in our hospital for certain prescribing drugs. This system will also be able to translate the genetic information into dosing recommendations.
How was it done?
We selected all the SNPs affecting drug response for which there is already a PGx test available in our hospital. All of them have been previously validated, and, only genes/SNPs related to drug response with the highest level of evidence, available in the Dutch Pharmacogenomics Working Group (DPWG) and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) dosing guidelines with a minor allele frequency higher than 0,1% in our population have been included. We have considered all the different genotypes according to the SNPs included and linked them to a phenotype and dossing recommendation according to CPIC/DPWG guidelines.
What has been achieved?
Our CDSS connects different drugs with available PGx test in our unit, showing which gene should be genotyped before prescription. It translates genotypes into phenotypes and also provides dosing recommendations once PGx results are received, according to the CPIC and/or DPWG guidelines. Nowadays, this system facilitates the workflow for the implementation of pharmacogenetic tests in our hospital.
What next?
We have developed a CDSS that manages PGx information facilitating the implementation of pharmacogenetics in daily clinical routine. It will also allow us to expand our services to other medical departments within our hospital.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST MEDICINES INFORMATION SERVICE IN BELGIUM
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Elise Deyaert, Hilde Collier, Pieter-Jan Cortoos, Claudine Ligneel
Why was it done?
Medication errors are often caused by insufficient knowledge among healthcare professionals. Given limited clinical pharmacists’ presence on Belgian hospital wards, a pharmacy-led MIS can efficiently provide fast, accurate and objective medication-related information.
What was done?
We implemented the first Belgian Medicines Information Service (MIS) in our university hospital. In several countries, a MIS is common in most hospitals but until our project, no such MIS was available
in Belgian hospitals.
How was it done?
Best practices were researched through literature review and site visit at Charing Cross Hospital (London, UK). Secondly, in order to customize activities, all nurses and physicians were surveyed on medicines information needs. Our MIS was set up to centrally (1 dedicated pharmacist, phone number and e-mail address) receive medication-related questions from healthcare workers with the option to request additional clinical-pharmaceutical interventions (e.g. drug review). Implementation was accompanied by mailings, posters, business cards and presentations. All enquiries were registered in the MiDatabank® (UKMi National Medicines Information) and evaluated after 4 months, together with user satisfaction.
What has been achieved?
221 respondents (113 physicians, 103 nursing) to our survey found ‘drug administration/dosing’ (79.7%), interactions (69.6%) and ‘tablet crushing’ (49.7%) major problematic topics. Physicians rated the MIS to be useful for drug review, counselling and interactions while nursing preferred support on drug administration and tablet crushing. 96.8% intended to use the MIS.
Between 09/01 and 09/05/2017, our MIS received 247 enquiries (45.5% residents, 34.0% nursing, 13.8% clinical staff). Drug administration/dose-related questions (43.3%) was the most important category, followed by drug choice/indication (10.5%) and interactions (9.7%). 80.2% were answered within 1 hour (median: 11min). 81% of users mentioned the MIS improving their knowledge, with 59% and 56% reporting positive patient outcomes and time savings. Our MIS scored high on accessibility, timeliness, comprehensiveness and quality (average 4.34, 4.29, 4.42 and 4.47 on 5-point scale). MIS activity corresponded to 0.4FTE pharmacist with an average cost of €15.4/enquiry.
What next?
Our project shows that fast and reliable medication-related information is greatly needed. For the future, this service should be organized with other hospitals as to optimally use resources, share information and increase expertise. Also providing such service to primary care and patients will have be explored.
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PHARMACY ROTATION, WHAT IS A PHARMACY RESIDENT DOING HERE?
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Nuria Monteagudo-Martínez, Ana Valladolid-Walsh, Gregorio Romero-Candel, Esther Domingo-Chiva, Jose Marco-del Río, Marca Diaz-Rangel, Francisca Sanchez-Rubio
Why was it done?
To acquire clinical skills in this setting and detect and prevent medication errors. It is also an area in which pharmacists had previously never participated in our hospital and it was an opportunity to integrate in this multidisciplinary team.
What was done?
Hospital pharmacy specialization programs include one year of rotations in clinical areas. The emergency department (ED) was chosen in order to develop a program to detect and prevent medication errors as a part of a multidisciplinary team.
Other tasks such as organizing drug storage, drug labelling and conservation, nurse counselling and education on issues related to medication were developed.
How was it done?
The pharmacy resident completed a rotation period based on the national educational program in clinical areas. Over a two month rotation period she reviewed treatments (61 patients, detecting 67 medication errors), organized and labelled drug storage, listed and identified thermolabile drugs, participated in a protocol design,…
What has been achieved?
The resident was able to improve care in acute patients in the ED. The most common errors found and prevented were: missed doses (25.3%); incorrect form to administer the drug (incompatibility diluent, infusion rate…) (13.4%); drug interaction/incompatibility (8.9%) and others.
The resident was able to organized refrigerator drug stored and developed a protocol to explain how to act in case of fridge failure.
What next?
To try to implement an ED-based clinical pharmacist program in order to detect and manage medication errors to improve safety in drug therapy, as well as to contribute to patient care with a different point of view from clinicians.