Author(s)

Marta Anghilieri, Vito Ladisa, Andrea Vingiani, Giancarlo Pruneri

Why was it done?

The new DNA sequencing techniques, globally defined “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)”, allow parallel sequencing of many samples producing a big amount of data. To give a comprehensive analysis of the data in order to develop new specific and clinically useful therapies, we have introduced the approach to evaluate the data by the MTB, where pharmacists are included as experts of drugs and their preparation and application.

What was done?

The integration of pharmacists into the first Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a multidisciplinary group, to select the most suitable therapy for oncological patients.

How was it done?

For every patient pharmacists, together with the members of MTB, study the results of NGS to identify known and unknown alterations utilizing a database available to all MTB members. These mutations represent the basic tool to select potential target therapies. The MTB meets weekly to discuss and integrate the alterations observed with the patient clinical history. At the end this approach allows to select the most suitable target therapy.

What has been achieved?

In this study 208 patients affected by No Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated. The tumor has an elevated mortality, even if many target drug available or in development, therefore a correct treatment approach is essential to improve the clinical outcome. The NSG identified 117 altered genes. After an extensive literature search, 15 genes were identified as potential target of drugs available. They marked 116 patients potentially tractable with target therapy: 47 patients were candidate to a target therapy already in clinical practice and 69 to a target therapy not in clinical practice. Comparing the two groups, in the candidates to drugs in clinical practice the treatment was started in 65% of cases and in 53% was continued, while in the other group the treatment was started in 23% of cases and in 69% continued.

What next?

• The MTB offers a valid support in the clinical practice
• It individuates a target therapy for a greater number of patients
• The selected therapy has a bigger chance to last longer
• The inclusion of Pharmacist in MTB allow a more aware use and a better selection of drugs

Author(s)

Nikolaus Lindner, Katharina Heitzeneder, Nora Hummer, Elisenda Pichler, Doris Haider

Why was it done?

Due to the lack of long-term safety data, the principal goal was to assure a safe and effective use of the available vaccines by coordinating stringent logistical operating procedures as well as by facilitating early detection and evaluation of possible safety signals. A further objective of this initiative was to increase the awareness among healthcare workers regarding the possible health risks associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19 vaccines as preventable countermeasures.

What was done?

A Covid-19 vaccination pharmacovigilance campaign was implemented in a clinical setting with the focus on patient safety and quality assurance as part of an employee vaccination rollout. The pharmacy department set up a pharmacovigilance service-point to assess vaccine safety as well as potential adverse events and assure patient care by close follow up.

How was it done?

Assessing and reacting to individual safety signals on time represented a critical challenge. Pharmacists designed questionnaires capturing possible adverse events. In order to lower the barriers for participation it was decided to take a paper-based approach instead of electronic distribution. A pharmacovigilance service-point was continuously managed by two pharmacists directly at the vaccination site to achieve a high response rate. Throughout the campaign the completed questionnaires were simultaneously evaluated, as rapid action was key to detect safety signals early and implement measures accordingly.

What has been achieved?

The results showed a high response rate to the questionnaire of 95% and 53% after the first and second dose, respectively. A significant increase of symptoms after the second dose compared to the first dose reflected the findings of the marketing authorisation study. Based on the analysis no further safety precautions were needed. However, appointments before night or weekend shifts had to be discouraged as well as the vaccination of the whole staff from one department on the same day. As a result, disruptions to patient care could be avoided successfully.

What next?

This initiative serves as a valuable model for upcoming vaccination campaigns and especially for pharmacovigilance projects aiming to assess adverse events of recently approved medicines. Moreover, the successfully implemented multi-disciplinary approach represents the basis for further hospital-wide pharmacy projects and may facilitate the implementation of pharmacist-provided vaccination services.

Pdf

Author(s)

Justine Touchard, Elisabeth Angelier, Isabelle Ferry, Marion Lafay, Jean-Stéphane Giraud, Caroline Giard, Mallory Friou, Laurence Escalup, Thomas Genevée

Why was it done?

For more than 15 years, within the Institut Curie, a pharmaceutical consultation (PC) has been offered to patients undergoing anticancer oral therapy, in addition to a medical announcement consultation and a nurse consultation. The pharmacist secures and optimises drug management through a pharmaceutical analysis of the prescription, an explanation to the patient of drug intake and management of the main side effects.

What was done?

The aim is to assess the Clinical Impact (CI) of Pharmaceutical Interventions (PI).

How was it done?

From 1 January 2020 to 17 March 2020, two types of PI could be collected during each PC. One concerned the prescriber and problems of prescription, while the other concerned patients. Patients could misunderstand some of the information explained by their oncologist. The evaluation of the CI of these PI has been documented by an oncologist based on the Cléo scale v3, validated by a French learned society, Société Française de Pharmacie Clinique. CI of each PI was classified as harmful , null, minor, moderate, major, vital, and not determined.

What has been achieved?

140 PC were carried out. 95% of patients were female and mean age was 62 (±13.73) years. 66 PI were recorded. 39 PI with the prescriber were identified. We noted, among others, 8 risks of possible drug interaction, 9 lacks of prescriptions of support treatment, 3 lacks of drug intake advice and 3 lacks of prescription for blood monitoring.
27 PI with the patient were identified and 21 were relevant. We noted that 7 patients misunderstood drug intake, 5 patients did not know that the previous treatment should have been interrupted, 5 patients misunderstood the monitoring and 4 others were not aware of possible side effects related to their treatment.
The CI was assessed for 83% (n=55) of PI. CI was considered to be minor for 20%, moderate for 53%, major for 14% and vital for 13%. Two prescription errors were associated with vital CI. The first referred to a risk of drug interaction between a proton pump inhibitor and capecitabine. The other error was the risk of loperamide overdosage.

What next?

PC help secure medical care of patients. These results will be presented to our oncologists to improve medical practices.

Author(s)

Connor Thompson, Alison Orr

Why was it done?

Surgical patients are at risk of medication-related adverse events, with some of these patients having co-morbidities requiring long-term medications prior to surgery. Published data suggests pharmacist interventions can reduce adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and medication errors and reduce hospital length of stay.

What was done?

The effect of implementing a pharmacist into the HpB surgical ward round (WR) was unknown, this would also support ongoing service development projects in liver pharmacy on patient pathways.

This study aimed to establish the range and clinical impact of interventions made by the specialist pharmacist when attending HpB post-surgical WR as part of ongoing pharmacy engagement and service development.

How was it done?

A prospective study looking at interventions of a specialist pharmacist on WR over a one-month period, attending two WR per week. Review of all post-surgical HpB on an inpatient ward. All interventions collated and categorised based on commonality.

What has been achieved?

Over the course of data collection, the pharmacist reviewed 140 patients and made 477 interventions as part of the WR. This included 45 history medications being started, identification of 32 ADRs to current treatment, 16 instances of vancomycin dose adjustments, confirmation of anticoagulation for 17 patients and addition of 101 antibiotic stop dates contributing to better antimicrobial stewardship. There were also 70 instances of a nurse/doctor/patient requiring additional information on medication treatments.

What next?

This has highlighted the scale of interventions a pharmacist can make on a WR. Emphasising not only adjustment of medications but also the need for medication related information by healthcare professionals and patients alike.

Moving forward a pharmacist will attend at least two WR per week, with potential scope for support in pre-assessment and post-operative clinics to review weaning of analgesia and long-term management of pancreatic replacement for example.

With the recent announcement regarding new standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists in the UK, it would be valuable to assess the impact of a prescribing pharmacist on these WR.

Author(s)

Natalia Toledo Noda, Víctor Quesada Marqués, Laura Majuelos Aicart, Milagros Varela González, Maria Victoria Morales León

Why was it done?

Despite advances in the control of HIV infection, the number of people who become infected annually in the island (European ultra-periphery region) remains high. The implementation of a PrEP dispensing program would prevent many of these infections since it is known that there is a high number of undiagnosed infected people. In addition, the implementation would allow legally access to this therapy, being an effective, cheap and easily to use therapy.

What was done?

Development and implementation of a medication dispensing program for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in adults.

How was it done?

In 2016, the European Medicines Agency authorized the indication of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 245mg + emtricitabine 200mg as a preventive treatment. In December 2019 the Ministry of Health incorporated it into the National Health System for people who met certain minimum criteria. The hospital was formed since then with the aim of establishing a prescription and dispensing circuit.

What has been achieved?

The following circuit was established:
1. The primary care physician will screen candidates who want to apply to the program and request an initial study. If the candidate meets the criteria, he will consult the infectious diseases unit.
2. The unit value the entry into the program and carry out clinical follow-up. The request for outpatient dispensing is generated for the Pharmacy Service.
3. The Pharmacy Service informs about how to take the medication and its adverse effects. It is dispensed for a maximum period of 3 months. If any problem related to the drug or lack of adherence is detected, it will be communicated to the doctor.
4. A clinical and analytical follow-up is carried out every 3 months to assess the correct use of the medication as well as the appearance of safety problems (renal function and bone involvement). The continuity in the program is evaluated annually.

Since then, the Pharmacy Service has dispensed medication to 20 users and only one discontinued due to lack of adherence.

What next?

Achieve a reduction in the incidence of HIV, which for years has remained stable. Contribute to generate data that support the efficacy and safety of these therapies in real life. Avoid the illegal sale of these drugs.

Author(s)

Natalia Toledo Noda, Víctor Quesada Marqués, María Leonor Oliva Hernández, Nayra Sangil Monroy, Marta María Piñero González, María Victoria Morales León

Why was it done?

The implementation would allow access to this novel therapy to patients who have already exhausted all lines of treatment. The Ministry of Health decides to establish an administration point in the hospital, since due to its geographical location (European ultra-periphery) it would avoid the transfer of patients to other reference centers.

What was done?

Development and implementation of a CAR-T cell therapy administration program in adults.

How was it done?

In November 2018, the Ministry of Health authorized the center to use CAR-T treatment in adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The hospital was prepared to meet specific quality criteria (JACIE Accreditation). Interhospital protocols were developed for the referral, transport, and study of candidate patients from other centers.

What has been achieved?

1. A multidisciplinary team was created made up of professionals from Hematology, Intensive Care Medicine, Neurology and Pharmacy Services, with the aim of assessing candidate patients. A qualified team oversees the clinical management, follow-up, analysis of adverse effects and results obtained.
2. The professionals involved were trained to ensure safe administration and to identify and treat possible complications.
3. Due to the special storage conditions of the drug, a circuit was established. It is storage in the Hematology Service under the supervision of the hospital pharmacist specialized in onco-hematology.
4. One of the most frequent complications of the therapy is cytokine release syndrome. Depending on the gravity, drugs such as tocilizumab should be given as soon as possible. To ensure its availability, the Pharmacy Service permanently reserves two doses. At the time of performing a CAR-T, the automated dispensing system of the hematology ward is provided with the first dose, along with a preparation sheet and its corresponding label in order not to delay its administration. The second dose remains in the Pharmacy Service.

To date, 8 infusions have been made. 100% of the patients had diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

What next?

Facilitate access to this therapy to more patients. Generate data that support its efficacy and safety in real life.
Obtain the accreditation of the center to use the new therapies authorized by the European Medicines Agency.

Author(s)

Anna Esposito, Claudia Panico , Loretta Cervi, Emilio Albamonte, Alice Zanolini, Valeria Sansone

Why was it done?

This allows a standardized and safe access to this therapeutic opportunity in close collaboration with the NT formed by child neurologist and neurologists.

What was done?

The hospital pharmacist (HP) supports the neuromuscular team (NT) in submitting the request to access compassionate use with Risdiplam in patients affected by spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Risdiplam is an orally administered, survival motor neuron 2-directed RNA splicing modifer for the treatment of SMA.1 The HP is involved in Ethics Committee (EC) approval, is responsible for reconstituting and storage of oral solution and is also responsible of re-supply and pharmacovigilance surveillance. This allows a standardized and safe access to this therapeutic opportunity in close collaboration with the NT formed by child neurologist and neurologists.

How was it done?

HP is involved from the initial phases of the compassionate use of the drug. The NT that screens and enrolls the patients in the compassionate use program with Risdiplam by submitting a formal request to the EC. The teams of the EC, which includes the HP, evaluates the appropriateness and inclusion criteria for each patient. Once the patient is considered eligible, and treatment is approved, the HP receives the drug from Pharma, provides quality control and assigns the drug for each patient. HP prepares the oral solution and stores the products at 2-8°C until dispensing. After the initial dispensation it is the HP’s responsibility to work closely with the NT in order to maintain treatment over time, ensuring the right timing for re-supply of the drugs and medical devices.

What has been achieved?

There are currently 30 patients on therapy and they are monitored to ensure re-supply and reporting of any adverse events. Home delivery procedure was implemented in agreement with EC in cases where outpatient dispensing was difficult, especially due to logistical difficulties caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, if clinical conditions were stable. In addition, a strong collaboration between the HP and NT was implemented in order to provide access to an increasing number of patients.

What next?

Risdiplam has recently been approved and the HP is involved in the procurement and maintenance of ongoing therapies and ensures supply to new patients. The drug is under negotiation and HP will be involved in contracting procedures based on the expected number of patients and definitive inclusion criteria to access the drug

Author(s)

CAROL ANN JONES, NANNA CHRISTIANSEN

Why was it done?

Starting in mid-April 2020 as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic, a cluster of patients displaying multisystem inflammation and shock were admitted to our hospital. Similar cohorts have subsequently been reported internationally. Over a 6 week period, in which our institution cared for over 70 children with the newly described PIMS-TS, we developed new pharmacological treatment guidelines. Due to the novelty of the disease, treatment options were unclear and decisions were made by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of clinicians and pharmacists.

What was done?

This good practice initiative describes the rapid and iterative development of a treatment pathway for the newly described Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome – Temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS). Due to the similarity to Kawasaki disease and septic shock, the routine treatments for these conditions were considered as well as the experience of our adult colleagues, especially in terms of anticoagulation and hyper-inflammation seen in patients presenting with COVID-19. This ensured holistic management plans could be made to provide the highest quality of care.

How was it done?

A MDT of clinicians (intensivists, infectious diseases, cardiologists, rheumatologist, haematologists, endocrinologists) and pharmacists arranged daily meetings to discuss admitted patients as well as pulling together information to formulate a treatment guideline to enable the safe management of these patients. Version one of the treatment pathway was approved in April 2020, by beginning of June version 6 was published. The final treatment pathway included intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin, IV methylprednisolone, aspirin, venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and immunomodulation therapy including tocilizumab, infliximab and anakinra.

What has been achieved?

A total of 74 patients have been successfully treated against the treatment pathway, and discharged from hospital. Managing a new condition with no published evidence on treatment was a huge challenge, especially given the large numbers and high acuity of patients. Collaborative learning and reflection has enabled us to develop a robust treatment pathway for our patients. We have witnessed MDT working at its best, united with the sole aim of combating this rare condition.

What next?

An ongoing coordinated effort is required to undertake paediatric research to understand PIMS-TS and establish the most effective treatment for this novel disease.

Pdf

Author(s)

A. Sonnleitner-Heglmeier, M. Jeske, C. Petter, S. Grimm, S. Kerndler, U. Horvath

Why was it done?

The aim of this initiative was to assess, from December 14, 2018 to February 7, 2019, the practices associated with six high-risk drug classes – opioids, insulin, anticoagulants, methotrexate for non-oncological indications, muscle relaxants, chemotherapeutics – and high-risk drugs in general at the Unversity Hospital Innsbruck using the ISMP Medication Safety Self Assessment® for high-risk drugs. A further reason was to build up a strong and active cooperation amongst interdisciplinary teams with the focus on clinical pharmacy to raise awareness towards the competencies of clinical pharmacists.

What was done?

We translated, adjusted and introduced the Medication Safety Self Assessment® for High-Alert Medications from the Institute for Safe Medication Practice (ISMP) – U.S.A. to our university hospital. With a clinical pharmaceutical approach in multidisciplinary teams, we revealed challenges on different wards in the hospital and discussed and planed appropriate solutions.

How was it done?

The first step was to find an appropriate assessment accreditation programm which was found by the ISMP Medication Safety Self Assessment® for High-Alert Medications. This tool offers the opportunity to assess the safety of systems and practices associated with up to 11 categories of high-alert medications. As the assessment was written in english it had to be translated by us into german for a better basis for discussions. Further, as the ISMP assessment is implemented in the U.S.A., words and processes had to be adjusted to the work in an austrian university hospital. To optimize the outcome of the ISMP, the drug therapy pharmacy department, health care practitioners, and care management, jointly implemented a quality assurance project.

What has been achieved?

Different hazardous workflows and medication handling processes beginning from pharmacy despensing until receiving patients got identified and discussed. The urgent need of a patient data management system was emphasized to safely ensure a closed loop medication management. This would allow a clear and trackable communication in and between different wards and reduction in errors made by clincal staff.

What next?

The foundation was built for compulsory personal trainings done by clinical pharmacists on different wards. The awareness towards the importance of clinical pharmacy was strongly increased leading to more inclusion e.g. developing guidelines.

Pdf

Author(s)

Rebeca Iglesias-Barreira, Emilio Rubén Pego-Pérez, Carlos Sandoval-Aquino, Cristina López-Pardo y Pardo, Maria Jesús Rodríguez-Gay

Why was it done?

To guarantee workers safety as well as optimize the use of PPE in the hospital.

What was done?

To develop a protocol for placement and removal of personal protective equipment (PPE), established for contact with possible or confirmed coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, taking into account the medical devices (MD) available during the pandemic. Alternatives and strategies were also proposed for resources optimization. Final protocol resulted from a multidisciplinary team work (Hospital Pharmacy Service team and Emergency Service workers). It was finally revised and approved by the Medical and Quality Direction.

How was it done?

1)A systematic bibliographic review was made, for articles selection on the placement / removal of PPE. Technical specifications of the available MD and the sanitary recommendations of the competent organitations were reviewed.
2)Establishment of PPE components, and the order of placement and removal:
a. PPE placement:1-Wash hands (WH).2-Place shims.3-WH.4-Put on the first pair of gloves.5-Put on FFP2 mask.6-Wear waterproof protective overalls from the feet.7-Place garbage bags on feet and adjust them on legs.8-Wash gloves with a hydroalcoholic solution (HS).9-Put on second pair of gloves.10-Put on a standard/reinforced surgical gown.11-Wash HS.12-Put on surgical mask.13-Put on disposable gown.14-Put on third pair of gloves.15-Put on face protection screen. 16-Put on surgical cap and fit it over a face shield.
b. PPE removal: a) Before leaving the isolation room: 1-Remove and discard bags from both feet.2-Remove and discard disposable gown.3-Remove and discard the outermost gloves. b) Outside the isolation room: 1-Wash HS.2-Remove surgical cap and screen (reserve screen).3-Remove and discard surgical mask.4-Wash HS.5-Remove the standard/reinforced surgical gown and reserve it.6-Remove second pair of gloves.7-Wash HS.c) Before entering the clean area:1-Remove shoes.2-Remove third pair of gloves.d)Go to the clean area:1-Disinfect footwear.2-Wash HS.3-Remove monkey and if necessary reserve it. 4-Wash HS.5-Remove FFP2 mask and reserve it if necessary.6-WH.
c. A team member read and check all steps carried out during the all steps procedure.

What has been achieved?

The protocol was followed by 54 (100%) workers. Since its implantation, on March 16 th, only the 3,7% (n=2) of workers were infected by SARS-CoV-2.

What next?

The protocol is under constant revision and modification to adapt it to the available MD in every moment.