Pdf

Author(s)

Aina Oliver Noguera, Luis Pérez de Amezaga Tomáss, Margarita Nigorra Caro, Fernando Do Pazo Oubiña, Esther Falcó Ferrer, Teresa Fernández Rodriguez, Maria Fiorella Sarubbo, Antònia Obrador de Hevia, Montserrat Vilanova Boltó

Why was it done?

Treatment with fluoropyrimidine produces severe toxicity in about 30% of the patients. This toxicity has been related to a reduction in the activity of DPD, the rate-limiting enzyme for fluoropyrimidine catabolism. This is due to certain genetic variants of DPYD, the gene encoding DPD. For this reason, regulatory agencies such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommend determining DPD deficiency in all patients who are candidates for treatment with fluoropyrimidines.

What was done?

Design of a protocol for the Implementation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype tests in our hospital so that the results can be clinically interpreted by the pharmacists, and then used to guide physicians in the dosing of fluoropyrimidines (5-fluorouracil/capecitabine). The project was done with the collaboration of the Genetic and Genomic Laboratory (GGL) located in the reference hospital of our territory.

How was it done?

The elaboration of the protocol took place as follows, coordinated by the oncology pharmacist:
– Informatics. They created a formulary at the electronic prescription programme (HP-HCIS®) for the inclusion of the patients in the testing protocol.
– Oncologists and nursing service. They were trained in the implementation of this new determination, as well as in the procedure for obtaining and sending samples to the GGL.
– GGL. They conducted the DPYD genotype tests and report the results to the oncology pharmacist.
– Oncology pharmacist. They did the clinical interpretation of the result based on the following European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommendations for heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers:
-DPYD*2A (rs3918290): dose reduction of 50%
-c.1679T>G (rs55886062): 50%
-c.2846A>T (rs67376798): 25%
-c.1236G>A/HapB3 (rs56038477): 25%

What has been achieved?

Since the implementation of the protocol, 73 determinations of DPYD polymorphisms have been performed (November 202 to August 2022). Three patients (4.1%) were found to be heterozygous DPYD gene variant carriers (two DPYD*2A and one c.2846A>T).
The average time for obtaining the results was 17.5 days. For this reason, in most cases the treatment was started before the result was obtained.

What next?

We are working on the implementation of a new fluorescence technique that will allow us to shorten the time of obtaining the genotype result.

Author(s)

Luis Díaz Suárez, Elena Sánchez-Yanez , Raquel López Escoz, Mercedes Gómez Delgado, Nuria Martínez Casanova, Isabel Moya Carmona

Why was it done?

The hospital pharmacist plays a role obtaining therapeutic success by improving the adherence. Our unit attends around 1900 HIV patients, so the interventions we make to improve adherence will have a positive impact on patients and community.

What was done?

The Pharmacy Service has developed a protocol for the identification of non-adherent HIV patients to treatment along with the pharmaceutical attendance strategies designed to improve the adherence to ART.

How was it done?

The protocol was drawn up with the recommendations of the National AIDS Plan(PNS), the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy(SEFH) and the AIDS Study Group(GeSIDA). Thus, we wanted to provide a multidisciplinary approach for non-adherent patients. The relevant aspects of the protocol are described below:

1.-Identification of patients: Technical staff and pharmacists identify patients with poor adherence through dispensing records, a history of previous voluntary abandonment of ART or the presence of risk factors for poor adherence to ART.

2.-Pharmaceutical attendance following the CMO model.

· Data such as viral load, CD4, prescribed ART, pharmacotherapeutic complex index, home medication, polypharmacy, pluripathology and risk factor have
been collected. Adherence was calculated using dispensing records and adherence questionnaire(SMAQ).

· Health education and motivational interviewing.

· Personalised planning of patient care following face-to-face and non-face-to-face programs. Every 6months adherence will be re-evaluated to assess the
success of the pharmaceutical care offered.

What has been achieved?

The protocol was implemented in March-2021, and to date, 68patients have been included. 73.5%(n=50) of them have been followed for more than 6 months. 88% of whom(n=44) improved their adherence to both ART, all of them achieving an undetectable viral load and an elevation of the CD4 count.

What next?

Our desire is to continue detecting patients and to contribute to the improvement of the adherence to their treatment. We are aware of the challenge that lies ahead in the near future, as the progressive ageing of the HIV population means an increase in associated comorbidities and polypharmacy, which may have a negative impact on the adherence.

Author(s)

Helen Cooper, Sheatha Abumehdi

Why was it done?

A lack of licensed formulations for children means that use of unlicensed and off-label medicines is often the only appropriate alternative [1]. Local prescribing data demonstrates wide variability in concentrations of unlicensed specials supplied, at significant cost. This project aims to standardise medicines prescribing for children, improve patient safety by reducing inadvertent dose misadministration due to varying concentrations, reduce spend, and improve the effectiveness of working relationships between hospital and community healthcare teams.

What was done?

Prescribing and procurement data were used to analyse, review and harmonise paediatric prescribing practices in a UK clinical commissioning group, with focus on rationalising use of unlicensed specials.

How was it done?

A target list of ten medicines was identified, based on variability of strengths and formulations available, and cost. A team of two dedicated specialist paediatric hospital pharmacists was funded to set out strategies to standardise prescribing of those target medicines, and to improve understanding of prescribing and supply of unlicensed medicines to children. Various methods were used, including; email communications advertising the roles and support offered; establishing a Paediatric Formulary Group; promoting the local Paediatric Formulary; creating paediatric prescribing pathways; reviewing specials prescribing and supporting switches to alternative formulations; and delivering a paediatric prescribing webinar.

What has been achieved?

Reviews of specials prescribing were initially undertaken in two of the six boroughs in the region. 138 switches to a preferred formulation for safety and/or cost-effectiveness were identified and discussed between July-October 2021. Risks associated with prescribing multiple concentrations of liquid medicines were identified and measures were put in place to prevent patient harm. The webinar was well attended, and although it cannot be quantified, awareness of the Paediatric Formulary has improved. The project is on-going and at this time the impact on spend cannot be shown but will be reported later this year.

What next?

The specific knowledge and skills of specialist paediatric hospital pharmacists are highly valuable in driving specials medicines rationalisation for children in the community. Future plans for expanding the project include extending the service to other boroughs in the region and widening the target list of medicines.

References: 1.Rawlence E et al. Is the provision of paediatric oral liquid unlicensed medicines safe? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2018;103(6):310-3. 2.Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group. Position Statement 18-01 Using Standardised Strengths of Unlicensed Liquid Medicines in Children. Version 5, April 2020.

Author(s)

François TISSERAND, Pierre MENAGER, Alexandre NAVID, Léa ROUSSET, Adeline BANNIER, Julie MORIO, Hélène PERRIER, Elsa JOUHANNEAU

Why was it done?

The geriatricians contacted the pharmacy to deliver training courses to the geriatric residents. This has enabled pharmacists to develop a close relationship with geriatricians to offer them clinical pharmacy activities in their ward. Geriatricians were familiar with clinical pharmacy, in particular the medication reconciliation, which is used to perform the former in other hospitals. Geriatricians are concerned with iatrogenic illness and therefore see medication reconciliation and pharmaceutical analysis as a relevant approach to clinical pharmacy.

What was done?

A successful model of partnership between Geriatrics and Pharmacy has been created and developed.

How was it done?

A first meeting was held between geriatricians and pharmacists. It was decided a pharmacy resident would be dedicated to a given geriatrician. This first resident’s objectives are to follow the medical rounds and to carry out medication reconciliations upon admission and discharge. Pharmaceutical support has enabled real-time validation for the prescription of the appropriate drugs. As the internship progressed, the resident became the privileged interlocutor for a Pharmacy-Unit relationship.

What has been achieved?

To date, 37 medication reconciliations were carried out, where the resident followed 2 medical rounds per week over 17 weeks. All unintentional discrepancies were corrected (n=13). Concerning the appropriateness of prescriptions, 16 inappropriate medications were stopped. During the medical rounds, 34% of the therapeutic problems (n=35) were related to inappropriate drug according to guidelines, 17% to dosing errors, 14% to drugs without indication. More than 50% of pharmaceutical interventions were judged capable of preventing harm that requires increased monitoring or treatment or lengthening of the hospital stay (63%). During this period, 54 questions were asked and discussed between the resident and the geriatrician to improve patient care. At the geriatricians’ request, two courses were organized about non mastered topics. On the ward, the resident acted as a go-between for a number of issues such as referencing medical devices, rearranging the storage of medicines or finding the right contact person for information activities.

What next?

What has been done needs to be continued and improved. A pharmacist-geriatrician cross-training should be implemented soon. New activities with pharmacist-geriatrician interactions are being created, such as day hospitalization for falls in the elderly population and a geriatric emergency unit.

Author(s)

Sonja Guntschnig, Aaron Courtenay, Ahmed Abuelhana, Michael Scott

Why was it done?

The service was established as part of the implementation of a new pharmacy into the hospital. The aim of this good practice initiative was to introduce multidisciplinary work on the wards and provide clinical pharmacy support for the ward personnel. Furthermore, it determined what types of clinical pharmacy interventions are needed at a rural 360-bed hospital in Austria, and assessed the physicians’ acceptance rate of the pharmacists’ suggestions.

What was done?

A new clinical pharmacy service (CPS) was introduced into Tauernklinikum Zell am See.

How was it done?

Data on 550 interventions made by one clinical pharmacist were collected by convenience sampling over a one-year period and rated on a six-point clinical significance scale. A subset of 26 interventions was rated for clinical significance by four independent physicians to determine inter-rater reliability (IRR). A two-way model inter-rater reliability analysis was performed for the four different physician assessments using SPSS to determine intra-class correlation (ICC).

What has been achieved?

Prompt acceptance rate by the physicians involved was 71.3% (392/550). In 26.9% (148/550) of all cases, the physician considered a change. The overall average score for all 550 clinical pharmaceutical interventions taken was 2.2. ICC significance scores were correlated with the pharmacist’s scores, ICC for consistency was 0.732 and 0.732 for absolute agreement, thus both can be considered as “good”. Potential for cost reduction associated with the recommended pharmaceutical changes, namely with medication being stopped or dose reduction was 32.7% (180/550) and 25.1% (138/550), respectively.

What next?

There is great potential and a definite need for the expansion of CPS in Austria. Only 15.8% of Austrian hospitals have a pharmacy department with even less offering CPS. Many countries have demonstrated the benefits of CPS in hospitals over the past 30 and more years. The need for increased pharmacist staffing in Austrian hospitals needs to be demonstrated to Austrian stakeholders.

Author(s)

Mapi Fleury, Januska De Maria-Lee, Alessandra Taiana, Yvan Bourgeois, Sophie Voruz, Olivier Spertini, Pierre-Yves Bochud

Why was it done?

In 2019, procedural changes within unit treating malignant haemopathies raised awareness about unsatisfactory management of NV, particularly CINV. We identified a lack of departmental consensus, leading to heterogeneous therapeutic practices, confusion over the aetiologies of NV and feelings of powerlessness among healthcare professionals. We decided to improve the whole process, from prophylaxis to treatment, by addressing specific knowledge gaps concerning CINV, improving pathophysiological and pharmacological knowledge, and implementing interprofessional management and MASCC/ESMO guidelines.

What was done?

Patient nausea and vomiting (NV)—particularly chemotherapy-induced NV (CINV) in malignant haemopathies—was managed by an interprofessional team.

How was it done?

A multidisciplinary working group was established to create a comprehensive, patient-centred NV management programme. Work sessions focussed on attaining a therapeutic consensus and adapting international guidelines to our context. Different professions learnt about each other’s needs and fields of competency, enabling each to be heard and creating mutual benefits through sharing expertise and knowledge. Pathophysiological/pharmacological leadership was given to clinical pharmacist, including developing and teaching specific protocols and supervising complex clinical situations in the field.

What has been achieved?

Interprofessional consensus was reached, documentation and techniques were implemented including clinical evaluation checklists at patient admission. CINV therapeutic regimens were completely updated and immediately and automatically included in cancer treatment protocols. The clinical pharmacist and specialist nurses give initial interprofessional training to new colleagues and ensure continuous on-site supervision. This transversal work has resulted in fewer patients suffering from NV and better team understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, differential diagnoses and adverse drug effects—this also ended the use of unsuitable medications and dosages. Overcoming this critical situation also allowed us to begin non-pharmacological integrative care.

What next?

Interprofessional working group proved indispensable to this approach. Including CINV pharmacotherapy directly into cancer treatment plans is one of programme’s strong points and contributes to high adherence to guidelines. Team feels more relaxed and more in control. Monitoring is now done by tracking files and oral feedback, but we aim to implement systematic follow-up of interventions, care evaluations and NV to assess programme’s impact. Next stage will also include patient feedback.

Author(s)

Mireia Iglesias Rodrigo, Júlia Pardo Pastor, Alba Manzaneque Gordon, Cristina Sangrador Pelluz, Núria Meca Casasnovas, Clara Sebastián Carrasco, Fernando Salazar Gonzalez, Gemma Garreta Fontelles, Jordi Nicolás Picó

Why was it done?

Due to the risk posed by the handling of Hazard Drugs (HD) in the healthcare field, it is necessary to implement circuits that guarantee the professional’s safety.

What was done?

Create an internal classification of HD based on the NIOSH List of Hazard Drugs in Healthcare Setting 2020, to optimize the circuit of its handling from its receiving to its administration.

How was it done?

Considering the HD included in the Pharmacotherapeutic Guide (PTG) of our center, the stages of reception and adaptation/preparation/dispensing/administration and other precautions were analyzed.
Categories were established, analyzing the needs of each stage according to: NIOSH level of danger, setting (inpatient/outpatient), pharmaceutical form, commercialized pharmaceutical specialties or available alternatives, and material/personal resources.
Prior to its implementation, e-learning training was carried out for the healthcare professional involved.

What has been achieved?

A total of 25.3% (379/1498) of the pharmaceutical specialties included in PTG were HD. Thirteen HD groups were identified. Due to the fact that in the outpatient setting the drug is dispensed to the patient in its original container, the actions implemented were only carried out for inpatients, representing these 9/13 of described groups. The established training was carried out by the 89% of professionals. Proposed measures for HD are summarized in Table 1.

What next?

Monitoring and evaluation of the circuit

Author(s)

Julia Santucci, Céline Vaesken, Guillaume Saint-Lorant

Why was it done?

FMT is a therapy introduced in 2016 at the hospital. It is indicated for the management of recurrent and refractory Clostridioides difficile (CD) infections. In November 2020, with the resumption of the activity, we note a lack of knowledge of the different actors on this circuit: physician, nurses, fellows, patients himself.
The objective of the study is to reinforce the understanding and safety of the FMT circuit in a university hospital after the evaluation of the knowledge of the different actors.

What was done?

Implementation of a document to represent the circuit of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in a French university hospital.

How was it done?

In this context, two questionnaires containing less than five questions on the functioning of the circuit were carried out with the nurse coordinators (NC) and the interns of the hepato-gastrology department. Subsequently, a document was drafted in consultation with the referring physician, the head of department and the pharmaceutical team to represent the FMT circuit.

What has been achieved?

With regard to the questionnaires, we obtained six answers from the NC, with 42% correct answers, 25% partial answers and 33% incorrect answers, and then six answers from the residents, with 20% correct answers, 7% partial answers and 77% incorrect answers.
These questions made it possible to draw up a diagram adapted to A4 format intended for all the actors in the circuit. It defines the different missions of all the actors with the corresponding deadlines and associated procedures.
In order to improve information, two interventions were carried out by the pharmacy: a staff meeting dedicated to the management of CD infections with the interns, co-hosted with the referring physician, and a presentation of the circuit to the NC.

What next?

Finally, this study made it possible to reinforce the safety of the FMT activity for the patient and to improve the management of the circuit for the various health professionals involved in this specialized therapy.

Author(s)

Vincent ARCANI, Stéphane HONORÉ, Guillaume HACHE

Why was it done?

Interprofessional collaboration as an effective means for improving healthcare outcomes. In order to achieve an effective level of collaborative healthcare practice, health care educators must focus attention on interprofessional education in undergraduate programs. Knowledge of professional role of others is a key competency for interprofessional practices and there is a lack of knowledge on hospital pharmacists’ roles among other health care professionals.

What was done?

We developed a workshop focused on the role of hospital pharmacists, to be integrated into the curricula of other health professionals.

How was it done?

The workshop was developed by a resident in hospital pharmacy and a senior hospital pharmacist, and we first targeted medical curriculum. The session integrated: students’ perception of hospital pharmacists’ role, didactic learning on the role of hospital pharmacists according to the European statements in hospital pharmacy, immersion in practice and evaluation. The assessment of the learning effect was performed by a pre-/post-workshop questionnaire, assessing satisfaction, metacognition and acquired knowledge. In addition, students provided open feedback on the workshop.

What has been achieved?

We implemented the workshop during the first year of clinical clerkship in medical education. Preliminary results highlighted (i) a high satisfaction, illustrating the relevance of the initiative; (ii) an increase in perceived knowledge and (iii) an increase in knowledge about hospital pharmacists’ roles, especially about pharmaceutical technologies and medical devices. Verbatim analysis of the feedback suggested that the workshop modified medical students’ perceptions on the role of hospital pharmacists, and that they may be more inclined to seek collaboration with hospital pharmacists.

What next?

To integrate the workshop into the curricula of the other professions in order to raise awareness on hospital pharmacy and promote interprofessional teamwork.

Author(s)

Françoise LONGTON, Olivia Polinard, Linda Mattar, Anna Pauels, Mireille Bourton, Michel Mattens

Why was it done?

A thorough medication history at admission reduces medication errors. The presence of a clinical pharmacist in the preoperative clinic increases the number of inpatients who receive a standardized medication history by a pharmacist.

On admission, the adaptation of home medications to the hospital formulary can also be a source of error or delay. The fact that the patient is seen by a pharmacist prior to hospitalization makes it possible to anticipate drug substitutions and possible orders for non-formulary drugs.

Moreover, surgeons do not always have the possibility to prescribe medications taken at home upon admission, which results in a delayed availability of the medication. Thanks to this multidisciplinary project the continuity of treatment is assured.

What was done?

During the preoperative consultation, a pharmacist takes a medication history and enters it into the computerized medical record, making it available for the anaesthetist.

Upon admission of the patient, the continuity of the medication is ensured by the pharmacy.

Indeed, during the admission, the nurse follows a procedure that informs the pharmacy of any medication changes since the preoperative consultation. Afterwards, the pharmacy encodes the treatment into the computerized intra-hospital prescription and delivers it to the department.

Before any drug administration, this treatment is signed by the doctor responsible for the patient.

How was it done?

Preoperative consultations had to be structured so that each patient was first seen by the pharmacist, second by a nurse and third by the anaesthetist.

Thus, the main obstacle was organizational and it was overcome through the centralized management of preoperative clinic appointments.

What has been achieved?

In 2020, 54% of patients admitted for surgery (elective or emergency surgeries) were seen in the preoperative clinic.

What next?

This is an example of good practice as it ensures a standardized medication history and admission management.