Skip to content

Medication reconciliation practice at transitions of care: a new challenge or opportunity for the clinical pharmacist?

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Clinical Pharmacy Services

Author(s)

Elisabetta Volpi, Giuseppa Lo Surdo, Sara Tonazzini, Stefania Alduini, Maurizio Mangione, Umberto Paradossi, Monica Baroni, Sergio Berti, Stefania Biagini

Why was it done?

Several data suggest that pharmacists and physician collaboration, direct pharmacist interaction with patients or caregivers through medication reconciliation and discharge counselling decreases the number of adverse drug events (ADEs) and plays an overall positive role in transitional care. Our aim is to demonstrate the constant necessity of pharmacist led medication reconciliation in order to maintain a high standard of care and safe medication use.

What was done?

Medication reconciliation at hospital discharge is essential for the prevention of medication discrepancies and patient harm. Hospital pharmacists are recognised as one of main healthcare providers that can support the physicians in this activity.
Since 2016, the medication reconciliation process has been performed by physicians and clinical pharmacists before home discharge from the Heart Hospital, Fondazione Toscana G.Monsaterio in Italy.

How was it done?

We analysed the medication reconciliation activity performed in our hospital over time and we observed that the number of unintentional discrepancies was always around 20%.
A shared pre-discharge prescription review programme has been activated with all doctors, so when the final lists of drug prescriptions are ready, the pharmacist examines them and suggests improvements or corrections to the doctor before the discharge letter is delivered to patients. Among the unintentional discrepancy observed, the most frequent were omissions of chronic therapy, lack of information about suspension for low molecular weight heparin or antibiotics.

What has been achieved?

A strong collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists has been achieved as we shared the results of this improvement. The same activity has been required and extended to the paediatric ward where the demand of simple, clear and complete information is even more crucial given the particular inter-individual variability and fragility of this population.

What next?

We would like to improve the prescription review programme also at admission in order to minimise drug omissions and at transition between different wards or different hospitals with the aim of improving communication between health care settings.

Safety Team, a team to promote a safety culture in the Pharmacy Service

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

Laura Doménech Moral, Raquel López Martínez, Maria Eugenia Palacio Lacambra, Emili Vallvé Alcon, Ángel Arévalo Bernabé, María Guerra González, Maria Queralt Gorgas Torner

Why was it done?

At PS Vall d’Hebron, one of our strategic objectives is to enhance the patient safety culture internally and externally within PS.

What was done?

Establishment of a core safety team within the Pharmacy Service (PS) with representatives from various areas and positions, along with established activities and indicators: the Safety Team.

How was it done?

By organising internal meetings of the Safety team to manage, lead, and plan activities related to medication safety. These activities include:
Advising on and/or managing medication safety incidents reported to the Patient Safety Incident Notification System of Catalonia (SNiSP) Vall d’Hebron.
Conducting biweekly “5 minutes of safety” meetings between pharmacy technicians and a member of the Safety team in the General, Maternal-Infant, Trauma, Outpatient, and Oncology-Haematology areas. In each meeting, the minutes from the previous one are reviewed to report on agreements and progress related to the topics discussed. Incidents reported to SNiSP related to medication dispensing and logistics are discussed, and there is an open discussion for technicians to share safety issues, questions, and medication-related incidents. These situations (reported incidents and those detected by technicians) are collectively analysed to propose prevention measures. Minutes of each meeting are documented and made available in a shared resource.
Weekly “safety pearls” presentations where sentinel medication incidents are presented, along with root cause analysis, by a representative of the Safety team. Situations that have led to medication incidents/errors in prescription and treatment validation are also discussed, along with proposed prevention measures by other PS members.
Conducting sessions related to safety during PS Sessions to present the actions taken by the safety core team and its collaboration with the Hospital’s Error Prevention Subcommittee.

What has been achieved?

More than 100 medication incidents reported to SNiSP have been managed.
Over 50 meetings with PS technicians, resulting in more than 45 improvement actions derived from notifications and detected issues, such as creating infographics for proper medication identification (everolimus, vitamin D), improving the urgent medication dispensing process without a prescription, or enhancing the management of “off-label” medications.
Around 20 safety pearls involving all pharmacists, leading to the creation of protocols, default guidelines, and updates to prescription and administration advice in the prescription programme.
Two annual patient safety-related sessions.

What next?

Continuing to enhance the safety culture through sessions and meetings involving various stakeholders, implementing an online medication error prevention course, and expanding the team.

Integration of Farmis-Oncofarm ® and Oncosafety RC® pharmacy software to improve safety in the administration of antineoplastic drugs with intelligent infusion pumps

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

MARÍA ELENA CÁRDABA GARCÍA, SILVIA FERNÁDEZ PEÑA, AMPARO SALVADOR PALACIOS, MERCEDES FERNÁNDEZ PRIETO, CLAUDIA GONZÁLEZ GONZÁLEZ, MARÍA TERESA SÁNCHEZ SÁNCHEZ

Why was it done?

Antineoplastic drugs, chemotherapy specifically, are a clear example of “high risk” medications. The drug administration phase, within the drug utilisation circuit, is where the highest incidence of errors has been detected, ranging between 38%-81%, so the development and implementation of tools aimed at improving security at this stage is very important.

What was done?

The integration of Farmis-Oncofarm ® and Oncosafety-RC® pharmacy software was done, in order to improve the prevention, detection and reduction of medication errors in the administration phase of antineoplastic treatment in the Onco-Haematology Day Hospital (OHDH).

How was it done?

A Drug Library was created in Farmis-Oncofarm® software (v.4.0.11.107). Dosage units, stability, standard concentrations, maximum and minimum doses, time and infusion rate, and preparation and administration recommendations were parameterised and standardised. Parameters for the implantation of Oncosafety-RC® software (accepted percentage of volume deviation in the mixtures, types of intravenous lines, possible adverse reactions, drugs to be used in case of extravasation) were also defined. When the connectivity between Farmis-Oncofarm® and Oncosafety RC® was validated, Oncosafety RC® was implemented in the OHDC.
To evaluate the results of the implementation of this strategy, a retrospective study from May 2022 to May 2023 was carried out. Collected data, obtained from Oncosafety RC® software were: number of mixtures (antineoplastic, supportive drugs and intravenous fluid therapy) and treatments administered, dose deviations, adverse events, incorrect infusion rates, errors avoided due to incorrect medication.

What has been achieved?

12,294 treatments (44,898 mixtures) have been administered in OHDC.
Dose deviations were registered in the 0.01% of the mixtures, due to adverse events that required termination of the infusion. Only three adverse events happened in the study period.
The infusion rate was incorrect in the 0.5% of the mixtures; this information is useful to improve drugs administration and prevent infusion-associated reactions.
This strategy prevented errors due to incorrect medication on 2,499 occasions.

What next?

The integration between Farmis-Oncofarm® and Oncosafety RC® has improved the security in the administration of onco-haematological treatments, allowing the reduction of administration and medication errors. This strategy can be implemented in hospitals that have assisted electronic prescription software and information management software between different clinical management systems and infusion pumps.

Implementation of automated alert system in high-alert medications in a network of hospitals

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

ROSALIA FERNANDEZ CABALLERO, ALMUDENA GARCÍA GARCÍA, MARTA HERNÁNDEZ SEGURADO, MARTA GÓMEZ PÉREZ, CARMEN MAYO LÓPEZ, ARACELI HENARES LÓPEZ, VIRGINIA COLLADOS ARROYO

Why was it done?

Our aim was to improve the safety of HAM appointed by ISMP Spain (Institute for Safe Medication Practices) specially restricting the prescription, creating automated alerts and advising in administration.

What was done?

The main objective was to identify and standardise in prescription and administration the high-alert medications (HAM), included in pharmacotherapeutic guide (PG) in a network of Spanish hospitals with about 1.330 beds.

How was it done?

Literature about HAM and recommended strategies was reviewed. We divided these drugs into two groups: HAM (heightened risk of causing significant patient harm when they are used in error) and very HAM (an error could cause death of patient). We identified both groups in electronic prescription system as follows:
– HAM: all prescribers are able to prescribe these drugs and they find yellow warning sign in left side of the drug in prescription screen and nursing electronic work plan for administration.
– Very HAM: these drugs need tracheal intubation or monitoring measures when they are administered to patients. Only prescribers in intensive care (ICU) and surgery units (SU) are able to prescribe them. For certain drugs, needed in medical hospitalisation units, all prescribers are able to prescribe them and they must confirm the prescription with confirmation message: “You are prescribing a HAM, an error could cause significant patient harm. Are you sure to continue?”. They find red warning sign in prescription screen and nursing electronic work plan.
Alerts were configured by systems team in our electronic prescription system.

What has been achieved?

We have identified 379 drugs as HAM. 324 drugs were configured with yellow warning sign.
Sixty-five drugs were identified as very HAM. Fifty-eight drugs were disabled to prescribe by all prescribers (only in ICU and SU).
Seven drugs were configured with red warning alert and confirmation message: dobutamine, isoprenaline, ketamine, labetalol, levosimendan, carboprost and methylergometrine.

What next?

As next phase of our project, we must develop a procedure to identify and create alerts in new drugs added to our PG as systematic risk assessment process. Moreover, we must evaluate the real impact of our alert system in prescribers and nurse team, to reduce alert fatigue. We will work in automatic reports with ignored alerts.

Automated dispensing systems: improving and digitising medicines optimisation

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

Easter Mark

Why was it done?

Medicines storage was low tech in a new high tech Private Finance Initiative (PFI) hospital and security was operationally heavy on nursing teams. The trust was on a journey to Electronic Patient Records (EPR). What was needed was a solution that bought both challenges together – how we implement improved medicines storage that fully leverage the power of a hospital EPR system.

What was done?

Trust-wide implementation of Automated Dispensing Systems, initially to drive safer and legislative compliance with storage. Since implementation, we have improved management of medicines during shortages, taken waste out of operational delivery around supply of medicines, informed teams around medicines safety during heat waves, and we are on a journey to closed loop medicines administration.

How was it done?

A business case recognising the reputational impact of poor Care Quality Commission (CQC) assessment of security, nurse led audit work recognising the impact of medicines handling on Time to Care and recruiting enthusiasts to support the programme.

What has been achieved?

All wards and departments have automated dispensing systems for medication storage – 72 units, including two in pharmacy for controlled drugs and after-hours support.
Medication Safety officer (MSO) used live view to track high risk medicines throughout Covid-19 and beyond. Never missed a dose of high risk medicines by utilising this technology over the Covid period.

Temperature monitoring gives an overview of real time temperature of all stock areas to support informed decision-making during hot and warm weather. Digital ordering by automated dispensing systems has reduced nurse time handling medicines by using pharmacy team time saved from ordering medicines redeployed to fill cabinets instead of nurses.
Increasing breadth of stock holding as top up thrice or more weekly rather than just weekly across Trust.

What next?

Planning benefits of integrating a robot dispensing system and hospital information system next spring. Robotic storage supporting real-time medicines management from stock to temperature all with enhanced security and removes process waste from process especially when combined with other digital initiatives. Trust Go-Live with Cerner in spring 2023 and use of cabinets to support closed loop administration.

Implementation of a standardised parenteral nutrition solution on a neonatal ward

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

Isabelle Sommer, Farshid Sadeghipour

Why was it done?

PN can be composed of 14 different ingredients, including an amino acids admixture. Therefore, PN represents a complex and high risk preparation. Medication errors (ME) are often related to PN management and may include prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration errors. As the treatment with PN is essential for a good cerebral and neurologic development and a postnatal weight gain, ME can result in growth retardation, developmental disturbances, and infections. The implementation of the standardised PN aimed to achieve a reduction of ME having an impact on vulnerable newborns and to improve the security and quality of their nutritional treatment.

What was done?

A multidisciplinary development of a hospital’s neonatology and pharmacy departments as well as of an industrial manufacturer resulted in a standardised parenteral nutrition (PN) solution for neonatal patients. This PN solution was implemented as “standard-of-care” for newborn term and preterm infants requiring nutritional treatment within their first days of life.

How was it done?

The standardised PN solution for a peripheral administration route was developed in accordance with ESPGHAN guidelines (2018).
The neonatologists defined internal guidelines for the PN administration and trained the concerned personnel (physicians and nurses).
The industrial manufacturer delivered the ready-to-use PN solution as a sterile double-chamber infusion bag in accordance with Swiss and European regulatory.

What has been achieved?

The ready-to-use PN solution with a 24/7 availability on ward by means of an 18 months stability at room temperature allowed a considerable reduction (-80%) of on ward preparation of nutritional solutions by nurses.
One-third of individual PN solutions being prepared at the hospital’s pharmacy has been replaced by the standardised PN solution.
This high-quality PN solution allows a secured administration to the vulnerable patients as well as a reduction of ME related the whole PN management resulting in an improvement of the nutritional treatment of neonates and its outcomes on their development.

What next?

This special PN solution is already implemented in two Swiss university hospitals and others will follow. Further standardised PN for a central venous administration to neonates need to be developed to allow the completion of a safe nutritional treatment. On ward PN preparations must be prohibited to prevent undetectable ME.

A prospective observational study of medication prescribing errors in an Emergency Department.

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

Carmen Ortí Juan, Cristina Toro Blanch, Maria Àngels Gispert Ametller, Ana Perez Plasencia, Cristina Lecha Ochoa, Anna Dordà Benito, Rosa Sacrest Güell

Why was it done?

Prescribing errors (PE) are an important cause of medication-related adverse events in the Emergency Departments (ED) but limited data are available in ED with electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) systems. Knowing the frequency and types of PE can help healthcare professionals to prevent and reduce the risk of them occurring.

What was done?

To determine the rate of PE in the ED, to classify incident types and to identify critical points where measures should be implemented to improve patient safety.

How was it done?

Prospective, observational and cross-sectional study in an ED with ePA system during 6 working days (May-June 2021). The inclusion criteria were patients stayed more than 8 hours in the ED and all patients awaiting hospitalization. Prescriptions were analyzed by a multidisciplinary team made up of two pharmacists, an emergency physician and the person in charge of the hospital’s medication errors committee. PE were reported to the hospital’s patient safety-related incident notification system.

What has been achieved?

Of the 65 prescriptions revised during the study period, PE were reported in 84 cases and 15 situations with the capacity to cause errors were detected. The average age of patients was 67 ± (SD=17,9) years and each prescription had an average of 8.4 medications. The rate of PE was 1.52 errors per patient, being higher in less severe patients than monitored patients (1.09 vs 2.0 PE per patient, respectively). The most common types of EP were omission of the usual medication (60.7%), wrong dose (15.5%), wrong frequency (7.1%) and drug is not indicated (7.1%). No adverse reactions related to EP were detected. According to the Spanish consensus about Medication Reconciliation in Emergency Units, 47.1% of omissions of usual medication were drugs that should be reconciled during the first 4 hours in the ED. The results of the study and the importance of medication reconciliation are highlighted in a session in the ED.

What next?

The PE rate in the ED was 1.52 per patient and the main type was omission of the usual medication. A cross sectional study will be made in the future and compared to the current one to establish the impact of the implemented measures on the PE rate.

Assessing the Application of Essential Medication Errors Prevention Strategies in Healthcare Institutes: STOP Medication Error Project

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

Monira Alwhaibi

Why was it done?

This study is the first project of the STOP ME projects which aims to develop a tool that can assess the application of the essential strategies that can stop or minimize MEs in healthcare institutes in Saudi Arabia. Consequently, stakeholders in the healthcare system can identify current gaps that need feature improvement to enhance patient safety

What was done?

Medication Errors (ME) are defined as unintentional drug-induced harm that led to morbidity and mortality. The STOP (ME) project is a comprehensive series of research studies that aim to explore MEs in Saudi Arabia and how to stop such harmful events.

How was it done?

Extensive search of the literature review for the essential strategies to stop or minimize MEs was carried by the research team to develop a draft of the aimed tool. The survey tool was sent in round 1 to the Delphi experts’ panel for review. Based on received recommendations, the tool was updated and sent for round 2 review and consensus. The developed tool was then piloted to test the practicability of the tool before running the survey on large sample size (second project). The study was approved by the King Saud University Medical Centre IRB ethics committee [20/0153/IRB].

What has been achieved?

After using the Delphi technique two major changes happened to the survey. 1) Section A was removed (high alert medications). 2) A new section was added (ISMP publications) with some minor changes. Launching a pilot survey on thirty healthcare practitioners (physicians n=11, pharmacists n=10, nurses n=9) resulted in further minor changes by adding two new columns. The final tool was a survey consists of six sections including Demographics, Prescription, Dispensing, Administration, Monitoring and Quality, and Targeted Medication Safety Best Practices for Hospitals. All combined 86 questions with the determined time to answer the survey is in the range of 25-30 minutes. Overall feedback of the pilot survey was good.

What next?

This initiative “STOP ME” will have a significant impact in the field of medication safety research and will build awareness among institutes in Saudi Arabia that are lacking important strategies that prevent MEs

Adequacy and effectiveness of thromboembolic prophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients treated with inmunomodulatory drugs.

European Statement

Clinical Pharmacy Services

Author(s)

Alba María Fernández Varela, Laura López Sandomingo, Nieves Valcarce Pardeiro, Isaura Rodríguez Penín

Why was it done?

.

What was done?

.

How was it done?

.

What has been achieved?

.

What next?

.

Quality Improvement Project of Clozapine Prescribing Process in a Mental Health Unit

European Statement

Clinical Pharmacy Services

Author(s)

Charlotte Stafford, Aoife Delaney, Virginia Silvari, Thomas Cronin, Deirdre Lynch

Why was it done?

The Pharmacy Department dispenses clozapine to 142 patients. A new prescription was issued each time a patient was dispensed clozapine (approximately 40 new prescriptions per week). From January 2019 to June 2020 there were 42 clozapine incidents (incidents/month= 2) reported by the Pharmacy Department to the MHU. A four week review also showed that prescription queries (dose changes and transcription errors) consumed 6 hours of pharmacy staff time. The new 6-monthly, electronically stored prescription and the dedicated email address should address these issues.

What was done?

A newly devised proforma clozapine prescription has been developed by the Pharmacy Department and has become valid for 6 months for patients on 4-weekly blood monitoring. A copy of each patient’s prescription is stored electronically in the Mental Health Unit (MHU) share drive. A new dedicated pharmacy clozapine email address has been generated for all clozapine dose changes to be communicated to.

How was it done?

Four new clozapine prescriptions were developed by the Pharmacy Department:
– a maintenance dose prescription
– standard titration days 1 to 8
– standard titration days 8 to 15
– blank titration prescription.
The new prescriptions for patients on 4-weekly blood monitoring, valid for 6 months, are now stored in the MHU share drive to reduce the risk of transcribing errors.

What has been achieved?

Once the new system had been established, a further 4 week review showed that only 10 minutes over 4 weeks was spent by pharmacy staff dealing with a prescription query. All dose changes were now communicated by email. Incident reporting has decreased, with 5 clozapine incidents being reported by the Pharmacy Department between January to June 2021 (incident/month <1).

What next?

A business case highlighting the importance of a dedicated Clozapine Pharmacist has been submitted to further develop the clinic and ensure safety of this vulnerable cohort of patients.

×

EAHP Forum

All the EAHP team is working on providing a Forum that can help connect all the members in Conversations and Groups to talk about important matters for the European Hospital Pharmacist.

The Forum will be accessible for all the EAHP members, you don’t have to create a new account to browse and participate.

Conversations and groups

The Conversations will be moderated by our team to provide documents and relevant topics for the community.

The Groups will connect all members that share a category. Members who work on the same assocation, on the same hospital, that have the same role, etc.

Stay tuned for the realase of the forum. Soon on EAHP.