The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
Implementation of a multidisciplinary circuit for the management of haematologic patients under treatment with bispecific antibodies
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Carla Noguera-Jurado, Alba Manzaneque, Gloria Molas, Genis Castells, Sandra Jara, Bernat Tenas, Jordi Nicolas
Why was it done?
Bispecific antibodies (BA) have the ability to specifically bind two different antigens, thereby presenting specificity for two different cells. Among the toxicities associated with these drugs are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immunoeffector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), the management of which requires multidisciplinary action. The purpose of this circuit is to ensure adequate management of these toxicities to guarantee patient safety.
What was done?
Creation of an action plan for haematological patients treated with bispecific antibodies for the detection and proper management of their toxicities.
How was it done?
A multidisciplinary team formed by Pharmacy, Haematology, Nursing, Intensive Care Medicine and Neurology was created and the healthcare professionals involved were specifically instructed. Moreover, an action circuit was implemented for the detection and management of these toxicities, and a specific protocol was created for the preparation and dispensing of tocilizumab. The protocol contemplated: centralisation of the preparation in the pharmacy department (within the pharmacy hours) or preparation in the hospitalisation ward by trained professionals using a kit previously prepared by the pharmacist (containing drug, serum and closed system dispositive for the preparation and administration of tocilizumab outside pharmacy hours).
What has been achieved?
From July 2022 to August 2023, a total of five patients have been treated with BA in our institution (elranatamab (4/5), and teclistamab (1/5)), including clinical trials and compassionate use, for Multiple Myeloma.
Three patients presented grade 1 CRS in the first cycle of treatment, which was resolved with symptomatic therapy, with no need for tocilizumab administration in any case. In addition, one also presented grade 1 ICANS, which only required monitoring without treatment.
The availability of the toxicity management circuit, in addition to staff training, allowed toxicities to be detected and resolved early and, if tocilizumab had been needed, the circuit would have ensured its immediate availability.
What next?
The implementation of a multidisciplinary care circuit led by pharmacy and haematology guarantees the adequate management of toxicities associated with the treatment, ensuring the best quality of care for the patients and their safety.
Preparation of monoclonal antibodies on the pharmacy benchtop – risk assessment and practical considerations
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Author(s)
Aidan Morris, Louise Byrne
Why was it done?
• mAbs were considered hazardous if handled by staff – prepared in a dedicated isolator in the PAU in TUH.
• No widely accepted standards for safe handling of mAbs, although more recent guidance allows preparation of some mAbs outside of PAUs once risks appropriately assessed.
• Significant reduction in production capacity in the PAU in early 2022 for planned repair work. Benchtop preparation of mAbs implemented to maintain patients’ treatment regimens and to reduce costs associated with outsourcing.
What was done?
• Preparation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) on the pharmacy benchtop temporarily introduced in the Pharmacy Aseptic Unit (PAU) of Tallaght University Hospital (TUH).
• Guidance from Ireland’s National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP) on Pharmacy Benchtop Preparation of mAbs reviewed and implemented.
• Risk assessment carried out for individual mAbs. List of mAbs suitable for benchtop preparation prepared.
How was it done?
• Implementation of the NCCP guidance on Pharmacy Benchtop Preparation of mAbs. Advice on risk assessments and safety, equipment and facilities, and staffing and training when preparing mAbs on the benchtop.
• Literature review of the hazards associated with handling mAbs – toxicity, immunogenicity, risk reduction measures. Individual mAbs assessed for suitability for benchtop preparation using Health Service Executive (HSE) risk assessment tool. This considered toxicity, immunogenicity and closed system transfer device (CSTD)-compatibility of mAbs, and personal protective equipment required.
• CSTD vial adaptor based on air cleaning (filter) technology replaced with vial adaptor with physical barrier (balloon) – additional safety measure. Dedicated area assigned for benchtop preparation – well-ventilated, clutter-free and easy-to-clean.
• Additional training on new vial adaptor provided to pharmacy technicians already experienced in aseptic compounding.
What has been achieved?
• List of mAbs suitable for benchtop preparation prepared. Conjugated antibody-drug complexes, mAbs of fully murine origin and mAbs not CSTD-compatible deemed unsuitable.
• mAbs prepared on the benchtop during period of reduced capacity, maintaining patients’ treatment regimens and reducing outsourcing costs, wastage.
• Facilitated by risk assessment and risk reduction using PPE, training and CSTDs.
What next?
• Although safety and handling requirements of mAbs not fully known, prudent to handle them with more care than most drugs but less than for cytotoxics.
• Contingency plan for benchtop preparation of mAbs in case of future reduced PAU capacity.
• Can be applied to other organisations experiencing periods of reduced capacity.
Sustainability initiative: dose banding of paclitaxel to minimise drug waste
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Author(s)
Peder Nygard, Helle-Brit Fiebrich-Westra, Elise Smolders
Why was it done?
The aim of this project was to reduce paclitaxel waste caused by cancellation of administrations. Standardised dose bands make interchangeability of already reconstituted paclitaxel bags easier, as more patients use the same dose. This could potentially save drug- and material waste and costs even as manpower.
What was done?
Paclitaxel fixed dose bands were created for patients treated with a weekly dose of 80 mg/m2.
How was it done?
In consultation with prescribers the dose bands for paclitaxel where created (see table). These dosages were implemented as a dose-rounding rules in the drug preparation software (Hix 6.2, ChipSoft BV). The maximum deviation for dose-rounding rules for paclitaxel in our hospital is 10% of the prescribed dose. Dosage ≤72mg or >200mg were rounded as normal.
Prescribed dose (mg) Dose-band (mg) m2 (dose 80 mg/m2
>72 ≤88 78 1.0
>88 ≤102 96 1.2
>102 ≤116 114 1.4
>116 ≤136 126 1.6
>136 ≤152 144 1.8
>152 ≤168 162 2.0
>168 ≤184 174 2.2
>184 ≤200 192 2.4
What has been achieved?
These rules were implemented in April 2022. Data from 1 May 2022 to 31 August 2022 is compared with the same time period in 2021. In 2022, a total of 729 infusions where prepared compared with 872 infusions in 2021.
In this 4 month time period in 2022 a total of 14 different dosages were prescribed, compared with 24 in the same time period in 2021. Additionally, interchangeability was improved as the top 3 dosages prepared by the pharmacy were: 144 mg (36%), 162 mg (22%), and 126 mg (19%) compared with 144 mg (17%), 138 mg (14%), and 126 mg (10%) in 2021.
Furthermore, in 2021 we discarded 33 prepared dosages of paclitaxel of which three infusions could be reused. Compared to 13 discarded dosages in 2022 of which eight were reused giving a reduction of 25 infusions less waste (83% reduction, savings ~2500 euros).
What next?
Pharmacists need to be instructed to adapt these rounding rules, which must decrease the variation in dosages and thus waste. Secondly, this project will be monitored the upcoming year and evaluated together with prescribers. The aim is to implement dose bands for paclitaxel dosages 175 mg/m2 and other chemotherapeutic drugs (eg, oxaliplatin, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide).
How robotics improved safety and working efficiency in a European premium cancer institute
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Author(s)
Mathilde Roche, Annabelle Angapin, Vincent Blazy, Alexandre Hyvert, Loretta Moriconi, Matteo Federici, Bintou Diawara, Cindy Monnel, Lison Ferreol, Assia Mitha, Hail Aboudagga, Romain Desmaris
Why was it done?
Initially, robot’s operations required prescription re-transcription and chemotherapy relabelling by technicians, leading to manual data entry risks. Robots are known for high-standardised procedures, great repeatability and limited human intervention: adding bidirectional interface enabled improvement of patient safety. Moreover, it shows significant benefits during the compounding process, streamlining pharmacy workflows and ensuring full and paperless traceability.
What was done?
In 2018, our chemotherapy production unit implemented an automated anticancer drugs compounding platform, embedding two APOTECAchemo robots. This aims to meet the increasing patient-specific chemotherapy demands (78,000 preparations/year). In order to minimise human risk and optimise work efficiency, implementation of a bidirectional interface between the robots and the hospital’s Electronic Prescribing Software (EPS) was considered as mandatory, to allow exchange and clinical information retrieval.
How was it done?
In 2020, pharmacists and the IT team defined the interface specifications. Bidirectional information flow was implemented using Health Level Seven (HL7) standards. Interface between EPS and APOTECAmanager was developed and a comparative robot performance analysis was undertaken by evaluating processed drug products, compounded preparation numbers and actual average usage time per day. The staff (i.e. two technicians) remained identical. Data were retrieved from robot’s embedded statistical tool over three months, before (March-May 2020) and after interface implementation (July-September 2020).
What has been achieved?
During these six months, 13,746 preparations were compounded, with 95% infusion bags and 5% elastomeric pumps. Most of these preparations were produced in advance (administration on day+2 or day+3). After interface implementation, the average production raised by 40.5% (from 1,905 to 2,676/month). Interface implementation increased also the average robot operating hours from 3.6 hours/day/robot to 5.8 hours/day/robot (+61.1%). In total, 19 different molecules were compounded, including conventional anticancer drugs and monoclonal antibodies with the number of reconstituted drug vials increasing by 38.1% (from 625 to 863).
What next?
Interface between robots and the EPS was successfully implemented, thereby enabling improved safety and efficiency. Today, syringes and paediatric preparations are still made manually. They require visual and analytical controls to verify their conformity. Mid 2021, a third robot customized for syringes and paediatric preparations will be installed in the compounding unit, to secure these preparations in a more efficient way.
Good Manufacturing Practice and chemotherapy preparation: A case study on implementation of a robotic system in a Danish hospital pharmacy.
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Why was it done?
In 2017, the hospital pharmacy has started a project for automated chemotherapy preparation aimed at managing the increasing workload, while ensuring highest level of quality and healthcare workers safety. In Denmark, the authorities expect hospital pharmacy preparation to be GMP compliant. To achieve the best implementation of APOTECAchemo, go-live was preceded by thorough qualification process and followed by robot performance evaluation in a GMP-pharmacy.
What was done?
A robotic system for aseptic preparation of cytotoxic drugs was implemented in the pharmacy-based, Grade C cleanroom compliant with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). Specific work organisation allowed the integration of APOTECAchemo into the pharmacy workflow, thereby steadily improving the robot productivity.
How was it done?
A multidisciplinary team defined 228 User Requirements Specification (URS) addressed in the tender and associated to GMP regulations to assess that the technology complied with the intended purpose. APOTECAchemo passed through all qualification stages: design qualification (DQ), factory-acceptance testing (FAT), installation qualification (IQ), site-acceptance testing (SAT), operational qualification (OQ), performance qualification (PQ). The implementation of robot was evaluated in terms of doses prepared, active ingredients processed, and % of the total production compounded. Data were taken from the management software and examined from June 2019 to September 2020.
What has been achieved?
The qualification process was completed in 13 months (from April 2018 to May 2019). APOTECAchemo fulfilled the requirements set in accordance with GMP regulations and went live in May 2019. In the first 15 months of operation, 20,968 doses were prepared with the robot, of which 18,242 infusion bags (87%) and 2,726 elastomeric pumps (13%). The number of active ingredients processed were 21, of which five (5-fluorouracil, calciumfolinate, irinotecan, gemcitabine, carboplatin) covered 58% of the total production. Average production of the robot increased by 39%, from 963 doses/month in 2019 to 1,582 doses/month in 2020. The % of the total production operated by APOTECAchemo rose from 20.9% (2019) to 46.4% (2020).
What next?
APOTECAchemo robot was successfully implemented in a fully GMP-compliant hospital pharmacy, thereby enabling the automation of the preparation process and the reduction of the manual operations. Through the evaluation performed, the hospital pharmacy decided to install a second robotic system to further enhance the automated production.
MICROBIOLOGICAL CLEANLINESS IN A CHEMOTHERAPY ROBOT DEPENDING ON DIFFERENT INTERVALS OF INTENSIVE CLEANING IN THE WORKING AREA (submitted in 2019)
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Author(s)
Jannik Almasi, Irene Krämer
Why was it done?
Aim of the study was to evaluate if the microbiological cleanliness of the working area of APOTECAchemo® is affected by extending the interval of intensive cleaning from biweekly to monthly cleaning intervals.
What was done?
Automated preparation of ready-to-administer chemotherapy products with the APOTECAchemo® robot is well established in a number of pharmacy departments. One of the few disadvantages is the time-consuming, intensive cleaning and disinfection of the working area (clean room class A) by wiping with cleaning and disinfection solutions.
How was it done?
Every two weeks (period 1: 07-12/2018) or every four weeks (period 2: 01-06/2019) all surfaces in the working area of APOTECAchemo® were wiped with ethanolic NaOH solution in order to inactivate or remove cytotoxic spillages. In a second work step all surfaces are disinfected by wiping with spore-free alcohol. The procedure lasts about one hour. The working area is at the end of each working session irradiated with UV light for 4 hours. Microbiological monitoring of the working area is done weekly in operation by passive air sampling (2 settle plates at predefined locations S1, S2) and surface sampling (3 contact plates at predefined locations O1, O2, O3) and colony-forming units (CFU) are counted after incubation. Results of the microbiological samples (CFU ± standard deviation) were compared for period 1 and 2. On average, 0 CFU (n=52) were detected (period 1) and 0.04±0.2 CFU (n=44) (period 2) on settle plates. During period 1 on average 0.04±0.19 CFU were found at O1, 0 CFU on O2, and 0.81 CFU±4.23 at O3 (n=27 each). During period 2, 0 CFU were detected at O1, O2 and 0.04±0.2 CFU at O3 (n=25 each). The extended interval for the intensive cleaning process did not affect the microbiological cleanliness. The CFU limits set for clean room class A were met.
What has been achieved?
Maintaining the daily cleaning procedure, the interval of intensive cleaning can be extended to one month without increasing the microbiological contamination risk and saving two hours of cleaning.
What next?
Monthly intensive cleaning will be attended by trending the microbiological results.
DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTER APPLICATION TO REDUCE THE RISK OF ERRORS IN RECONSTITUTION OF CYTOTOXIC DRUGS
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Why was it done?
The preparation of cytotoxic drugs perfusions can be accompanied by errors that can be fatal to some patients. Several methods were tested to minimise the risk of errors associated with reconstitution of cytotoxic perfusions (camera, HPLC, analytical balance, the presence of a second technician to monitor his colleague). All of these methods can be expensive and are not available to all hospital pharmacists.
What was done?
We present a simple and effective method that we have developed in our hospital to solve the problem of reconstitution errors.
How was it done?
Errors of cytotoxic drugs reconstitution can have catastrophic consequences for patients. Some studies have found that the incidence of major and minor errors were, respectively, 0.19% and 0.26%. Reconstitution control methods are numerous but not always accessible to all hospital pharmacists and preparers, particularly in developing countries.
This work involves the development of a computer application developed from an Open Source voice recognition software. The daily chemotherapy protocols are entered in the application that dictates to a technician the protocol prescribed by the physician, product by product, for all patients. The technician performs the cytotoxic preparations in the order in the centralised pharmaceutical unit for the preparation of cytotoxic drugs and he communicates with the application manually or by speaking.
The application begins with the patient’s ID, name and surname, the first drug, the dosage, the dilution solution and the volume of this solution. Then, it passes to the second product and so on. In the case of an observation, the application warns the technician to take this observation into account.
What has been achieved?
This application has helped provide better assistance to the technicians and pharmacists in the reconstitution of cytotoxic drugs, and no event or error has been detected to date.
What next?
To make a large number of reconstructions using this application to assess its effectiveness and install it in other hospitals who handle cytotoxic drugs.
PHARMACEUTICAL INITIATIVE FOR APPROPRIATE HANDLING WITH CYTOTOXIC DRUG ON NON-ONCOLOGY DEPARTMENT AT OUR CLINICAL HOSPITAL
European Statement
Introductory Statements and Governance
Author(s)
T. DIMITROVSKA MANOJLOVIKJ
Why was it done?
To highlight the classification of this drug, its dangerous side effects even to those patients not receiving it, due to intoxication when handled inappropriate, and the precautions and measures that should be undertaken to minimise the risk/danger of occupational exposure and environmental pollution with inappropriate managing of the waste and spill.
What was done?
These 4 written statements were created: (1) Notification/instructions for handling cytotoxic agentS, (2) instructions for hygienic use of the toilets by patients receiving cytotoxic therapy and disposal of toxic waste on gynaecology and obstetrics wards, (3) instructions for a woman receiving methotrexate injection and (4) standard operating procedure for intramuscular application of methotrexate for nurses in the gynaecology-obstetric ward.
All statement were copied and disseminated to all departments on the ward. In November 2014 during verification of daily drug supplies to the gynaecology-obstetrics ward, I detected a package of methotrexate injections in the transporting container together with other drugs. I immediately contacted the head ward nurse and took control of the handling of the drugs on the ward, especially in the department for pathological pregnancy. The young departmental nurse responsible nurse was not aware of the classification of nethotrexate as a hazardous cytotoxic drug that should be handled with special care. Even though a drug is not given for cancer, it should still be treated as hazardous. Explanations were given to all those present at the time: nurses, gynaecologists and hygiene maintenance staff in the department.
How was it done?
Difficulties in persuading departmental staff of the occupational hazard, intoxication by other patients not receiving the drug and environmental pollution, particularly the danger of extravasation in this class of drugs when handled inappropriately, were overcome by repeating the explanations several times and disseminating the 4 statements.
What has been achieved?
Appropriate handling of cytotoxic drugs, improvement in patient care and protection from pollution of the environment.
What next?
Frequent controls on drug handling on all hospital wards for prevention of irregularities and to ensure safe medicines application.