Author(s)

Mireia Iglesias Rodrigo, Júlia Pardo Pastor, Alba Manzaneque Gordon, Cristina Sangrador Pelluz, Núria Meca Casasnovas, Clara Sebastián Carrasco, Fernando Salazar Gonzalez, Gemma Garreta Fontelles, Jordi Nicolás Picó

Why was it done?

Due to the risk posed by the handling of Hazard Drugs (HD) in the healthcare field, it is necessary to implement circuits that guarantee the professional’s safety.

What was done?

Create an internal classification of HD based on the NIOSH List of Hazard Drugs in Healthcare Setting 2020, to optimize the circuit of its handling from its receiving to its administration.

How was it done?

Considering the HD included in the Pharmacotherapeutic Guide (PTG) of our center, the stages of reception and adaptation/preparation/dispensing/administration and other precautions were analyzed.
Categories were established, analyzing the needs of each stage according to: NIOSH level of danger, setting (inpatient/outpatient), pharmaceutical form, commercialized pharmaceutical specialties or available alternatives, and material/personal resources.
Prior to its implementation, e-learning training was carried out for the healthcare professional involved.

What has been achieved?

A total of 25.3% (379/1498) of the pharmaceutical specialties included in PTG were HD. Thirteen HD groups were identified. Due to the fact that in the outpatient setting the drug is dispensed to the patient in its original container, the actions implemented were only carried out for inpatients, representing these 9/13 of described groups. The established training was carried out by the 89% of professionals. Proposed measures for HD are summarized in Table 1.

What next?

Monitoring and evaluation of the circuit

Author(s)

Julia Santucci, Céline Vaesken, Guillaume Saint-Lorant

Why was it done?

FMT is a therapy introduced in 2016 at the hospital. It is indicated for the management of recurrent and refractory Clostridioides difficile (CD) infections. In November 2020, with the resumption of the activity, we note a lack of knowledge of the different actors on this circuit: physician, nurses, fellows, patients himself.
The objective of the study is to reinforce the understanding and safety of the FMT circuit in a university hospital after the evaluation of the knowledge of the different actors.

What was done?

Implementation of a document to represent the circuit of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in a French university hospital.

How was it done?

In this context, two questionnaires containing less than five questions on the functioning of the circuit were carried out with the nurse coordinators (NC) and the interns of the hepato-gastrology department. Subsequently, a document was drafted in consultation with the referring physician, the head of department and the pharmaceutical team to represent the FMT circuit.

What has been achieved?

With regard to the questionnaires, we obtained six answers from the NC, with 42% correct answers, 25% partial answers and 33% incorrect answers, and then six answers from the residents, with 20% correct answers, 7% partial answers and 77% incorrect answers.
These questions made it possible to draw up a diagram adapted to A4 format intended for all the actors in the circuit. It defines the different missions of all the actors with the corresponding deadlines and associated procedures.
In order to improve information, two interventions were carried out by the pharmacy: a staff meeting dedicated to the management of CD infections with the interns, co-hosted with the referring physician, and a presentation of the circuit to the NC.

What next?

Finally, this study made it possible to reinforce the safety of the FMT activity for the patient and to improve the management of the circuit for the various health professionals involved in this specialized therapy.

Author(s)

Vincent ARCANI, Stéphane HONORÉ, Guillaume HACHE

Why was it done?

Interprofessional collaboration as an effective means for improving healthcare outcomes. In order to achieve an effective level of collaborative healthcare practice, health care educators must focus attention on interprofessional education in undergraduate programs. Knowledge of professional role of others is a key competency for interprofessional practices and there is a lack of knowledge on hospital pharmacists’ roles among other health care professionals.

What was done?

We developed a workshop focused on the role of hospital pharmacists, to be integrated into the curricula of other health professionals.

How was it done?

The workshop was developed by a resident in hospital pharmacy and a senior hospital pharmacist, and we first targeted medical curriculum. The session integrated: students’ perception of hospital pharmacists’ role, didactic learning on the role of hospital pharmacists according to the European statements in hospital pharmacy, immersion in practice and evaluation. The assessment of the learning effect was performed by a pre-/post-workshop questionnaire, assessing satisfaction, metacognition and acquired knowledge. In addition, students provided open feedback on the workshop.

What has been achieved?

We implemented the workshop during the first year of clinical clerkship in medical education. Preliminary results highlighted (i) a high satisfaction, illustrating the relevance of the initiative; (ii) an increase in perceived knowledge and (iii) an increase in knowledge about hospital pharmacists’ roles, especially about pharmaceutical technologies and medical devices. Verbatim analysis of the feedback suggested that the workshop modified medical students’ perceptions on the role of hospital pharmacists, and that they may be more inclined to seek collaboration with hospital pharmacists.

What next?

To integrate the workshop into the curricula of the other professions in order to raise awareness on hospital pharmacy and promote interprofessional teamwork.

Author(s)

Françoise LONGTON, Olivia Polinard, Linda Mattar, Anna Pauels, Mireille Bourton, Michel Mattens

Why was it done?

A thorough medication history at admission reduces medication errors. The presence of a clinical pharmacist in the preoperative clinic increases the number of inpatients who receive a standardized medication history by a pharmacist.

On admission, the adaptation of home medications to the hospital formulary can also be a source of error or delay. The fact that the patient is seen by a pharmacist prior to hospitalization makes it possible to anticipate drug substitutions and possible orders for non-formulary drugs.

Moreover, surgeons do not always have the possibility to prescribe medications taken at home upon admission, which results in a delayed availability of the medication. Thanks to this multidisciplinary project the continuity of treatment is assured.

What was done?

During the preoperative consultation, a pharmacist takes a medication history and enters it into the computerized medical record, making it available for the anaesthetist.

Upon admission of the patient, the continuity of the medication is ensured by the pharmacy.

Indeed, during the admission, the nurse follows a procedure that informs the pharmacy of any medication changes since the preoperative consultation. Afterwards, the pharmacy encodes the treatment into the computerized intra-hospital prescription and delivers it to the department.

Before any drug administration, this treatment is signed by the doctor responsible for the patient.

How was it done?

Preoperative consultations had to be structured so that each patient was first seen by the pharmacist, second by a nurse and third by the anaesthetist.

Thus, the main obstacle was organizational and it was overcome through the centralized management of preoperative clinic appointments.

What has been achieved?

In 2020, 54% of patients admitted for surgery (elective or emergency surgeries) were seen in the preoperative clinic.

What next?

This is an example of good practice as it ensures a standardized medication history and admission management.

Author(s)

Marta Anghilieri, Vito Ladisa, Andrea Vingiani, Giancarlo Pruneri

Why was it done?

The new DNA sequencing techniques, globally defined “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)”, allow parallel sequencing of many samples producing a big amount of data. To give a comprehensive analysis of the data in order to develop new specific and clinically useful therapies, we have introduced the approach to evaluate the data by the MTB, where pharmacists are included as experts of drugs and their preparation and application.

What was done?

The integration of pharmacists into the first Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a multidisciplinary group, to select the most suitable therapy for oncological patients.

How was it done?

For every patient pharmacists, together with the members of MTB, study the results of NGS to identify known and unknown alterations utilizing a database available to all MTB members. These mutations represent the basic tool to select potential target therapies. The MTB meets weekly to discuss and integrate the alterations observed with the patient clinical history. At the end this approach allows to select the most suitable target therapy.

What has been achieved?

In this study 208 patients affected by No Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated. The tumor has an elevated mortality, even if many target drug available or in development, therefore a correct treatment approach is essential to improve the clinical outcome. The NSG identified 117 altered genes. After an extensive literature search, 15 genes were identified as potential target of drugs available. They marked 116 patients potentially tractable with target therapy: 47 patients were candidate to a target therapy already in clinical practice and 69 to a target therapy not in clinical practice. Comparing the two groups, in the candidates to drugs in clinical practice the treatment was started in 65% of cases and in 53% was continued, while in the other group the treatment was started in 23% of cases and in 69% continued.

What next?

• The MTB offers a valid support in the clinical practice
• It individuates a target therapy for a greater number of patients
• The selected therapy has a bigger chance to last longer
• The inclusion of Pharmacist in MTB allow a more aware use and a better selection of drugs

Author(s)

Nikolaus Lindner, Katharina Heitzeneder, Nora Hummer, Elisenda Pichler, Doris Haider

Why was it done?

Due to the lack of long-term safety data, the principal goal was to assure a safe and effective use of the available vaccines by coordinating stringent logistical operating procedures as well as by facilitating early detection and evaluation of possible safety signals. A further objective of this initiative was to increase the awareness among healthcare workers regarding the possible health risks associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19 vaccines as preventable countermeasures.

What was done?

A Covid-19 vaccination pharmacovigilance campaign was implemented in a clinical setting with the focus on patient safety and quality assurance as part of an employee vaccination rollout. The pharmacy department set up a pharmacovigilance service-point to assess vaccine safety as well as potential adverse events and assure patient care by close follow up.

How was it done?

Assessing and reacting to individual safety signals on time represented a critical challenge. Pharmacists designed questionnaires capturing possible adverse events. In order to lower the barriers for participation it was decided to take a paper-based approach instead of electronic distribution. A pharmacovigilance service-point was continuously managed by two pharmacists directly at the vaccination site to achieve a high response rate. Throughout the campaign the completed questionnaires were simultaneously evaluated, as rapid action was key to detect safety signals early and implement measures accordingly.

What has been achieved?

The results showed a high response rate to the questionnaire of 95% and 53% after the first and second dose, respectively. A significant increase of symptoms after the second dose compared to the first dose reflected the findings of the marketing authorisation study. Based on the analysis no further safety precautions were needed. However, appointments before night or weekend shifts had to be discouraged as well as the vaccination of the whole staff from one department on the same day. As a result, disruptions to patient care could be avoided successfully.

What next?

This initiative serves as a valuable model for upcoming vaccination campaigns and especially for pharmacovigilance projects aiming to assess adverse events of recently approved medicines. Moreover, the successfully implemented multi-disciplinary approach represents the basis for further hospital-wide pharmacy projects and may facilitate the implementation of pharmacist-provided vaccination services.

Author(s)

MV VILLACAÑAS PALOMARES, CM VALENCIA SOTO, A GARCIA-AVELLO FERNANDEZ-CUETO, M MARTIN LOPEZ, S BARBADILLO VILLANUEVA, M OCHAGAVIA SUFRATEGUI, V MARTINEZ CALLEJO, M RIOJA CARRERA, P DEL RIO ORTEGA, M VALERO DOMINGUEZ

Why was it done?

This drug is administered continuously during a 28 days infusion. Due to the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) it is initially administered in the inpatient setting and then transitioned to the outpatient, requiring an important interdisciplinary coordination to optimize the process.
Home-based chemotherapy offers several potential benefits: reduced exposure to hospital infections, less disruption of routine and family life, lower health care cost, …

What was done?

Pharmacy and haematology services designed a workflow for the outpatient administration of blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager approved for relapsed ALL.
Here, we describe our experience transitioning from inpatient to outpatient setting.

How was it done?

First step was to review blinatumomab stability, as well as material compatibility and transfer set necessaries for both hospital and domiciliary administration.
Reconstituted blinatumomab may be stored at refrigerated (2-8°C) for up to 24 hours. Prepared infusion bag (with preservative) may be stored at room temperature (up to 27°C) for up to 96 h and for up to 10 days refrigerated (2-8ºC).
Second step was to establish with the haematology service the patient´s scheduled visits to the hospital to ensure maximum stability of the blinatumomab preparation.
We decided to prepare the blinatumomab infusion bag every three- or four-days beginning on Monday, Thursday or Friday avoiding visits on weekends.
In order to take advantage of the rest of the vial, we diluted itn a new bag with stabilizer solution but without in-line filter for the next preparation. We noted the date of elaboration and the amount of medication remaining.
We used this preparation initial in each new visit add the dose necessary and an in-line filter. We primed the filter with the prepared solution for infusion

What has been achieved?

Out of the four patients who have received blinatumomab in our hospital(May 2020 – September 2021), three have benefited from this circuit.18 doses were administered at home, avoiding 68 days of hospital admission.

What next?

Outpatient administration could reduce health expenditure, therefore allowing for additional investments in new therapies.
Since the use of blinatumomab is not very common and there is not much evidence at this respect, our experience can help other Pharmacy Services to implement this circuit.

Pdf

Author(s)

Justine Touchard, Elisabeth Angelier, Isabelle Ferry, Marion Lafay, Jean-Stéphane Giraud, Caroline Giard, Mallory Friou, Laurence Escalup, Thomas Genevée

Why was it done?

For more than 15 years, within the Institut Curie, a pharmaceutical consultation (PC) has been offered to patients undergoing anticancer oral therapy, in addition to a medical announcement consultation and a nurse consultation. The pharmacist secures and optimises drug management through a pharmaceutical analysis of the prescription, an explanation to the patient of drug intake and management of the main side effects.

What was done?

The aim is to assess the Clinical Impact (CI) of Pharmaceutical Interventions (PI).

How was it done?

From 1 January 2020 to 17 March 2020, two types of PI could be collected during each PC. One concerned the prescriber and problems of prescription, while the other concerned patients. Patients could misunderstand some of the information explained by their oncologist. The evaluation of the CI of these PI has been documented by an oncologist based on the Cléo scale v3, validated by a French learned society, Société Française de Pharmacie Clinique. CI of each PI was classified as harmful , null, minor, moderate, major, vital, and not determined.

What has been achieved?

140 PC were carried out. 95% of patients were female and mean age was 62 (±13.73) years. 66 PI were recorded. 39 PI with the prescriber were identified. We noted, among others, 8 risks of possible drug interaction, 9 lacks of prescriptions of support treatment, 3 lacks of drug intake advice and 3 lacks of prescription for blood monitoring.
27 PI with the patient were identified and 21 were relevant. We noted that 7 patients misunderstood drug intake, 5 patients did not know that the previous treatment should have been interrupted, 5 patients misunderstood the monitoring and 4 others were not aware of possible side effects related to their treatment.
The CI was assessed for 83% (n=55) of PI. CI was considered to be minor for 20%, moderate for 53%, major for 14% and vital for 13%. Two prescription errors were associated with vital CI. The first referred to a risk of drug interaction between a proton pump inhibitor and capecitabine. The other error was the risk of loperamide overdosage.

What next?

PC help secure medical care of patients. These results will be presented to our oncologists to improve medical practices.

Author(s)

Connor Thompson, Alison Orr

Why was it done?

Surgical patients are at risk of medication-related adverse events, with some of these patients having co-morbidities requiring long-term medications prior to surgery. Published data suggests pharmacist interventions can reduce adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and medication errors and reduce hospital length of stay.

What was done?

The effect of implementing a pharmacist into the HpB surgical ward round (WR) was unknown, this would also support ongoing service development projects in liver pharmacy on patient pathways.

This study aimed to establish the range and clinical impact of interventions made by the specialist pharmacist when attending HpB post-surgical WR as part of ongoing pharmacy engagement and service development.

How was it done?

A prospective study looking at interventions of a specialist pharmacist on WR over a one-month period, attending two WR per week. Review of all post-surgical HpB on an inpatient ward. All interventions collated and categorised based on commonality.

What has been achieved?

Over the course of data collection, the pharmacist reviewed 140 patients and made 477 interventions as part of the WR. This included 45 history medications being started, identification of 32 ADRs to current treatment, 16 instances of vancomycin dose adjustments, confirmation of anticoagulation for 17 patients and addition of 101 antibiotic stop dates contributing to better antimicrobial stewardship. There were also 70 instances of a nurse/doctor/patient requiring additional information on medication treatments.

What next?

This has highlighted the scale of interventions a pharmacist can make on a WR. Emphasising not only adjustment of medications but also the need for medication related information by healthcare professionals and patients alike.

Moving forward a pharmacist will attend at least two WR per week, with potential scope for support in pre-assessment and post-operative clinics to review weaning of analgesia and long-term management of pancreatic replacement for example.

With the recent announcement regarding new standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists in the UK, it would be valuable to assess the impact of a prescribing pharmacist on these WR.

Why was it done?

Due to the increased risk of infection to asplenic patients by encapsulated bacteria, national guidance states the following vaccinations should be administered at least two weeks prior to elective splenectomy: influenza, meningococcal (meningitis B and meningitis ACWY), Neisseria meningitides group B, and pneumococcal. Anecdotally this does not happen, resulting in administration in the hospital setting. This adds complication to the discharge process and leaves the patient with follow-up to arrange at home, whilst also having a cost burden to the hospital.

What was done?

An audit was carried out to assess compliance with national guidance on administration of vaccinations in primary care prior to elective splenectomy.

How was it done?

A report was run to generate a list of all patients who underwent a splenectomy over a 5-year period between 2015 and 2020. The records of patients admitted for elective splenectomy were investigated. It was ascertained whether medication and vaccination histories had been completed by pharmacy, whether vaccinations were given whilst in the secondary care setting, and whether the appropriate follow-up information was given to the general practitioner (GP) on discharge.

What has been achieved?

Only 6% of patients admitted for elective splenectomies across the 5-year period had received the required vaccinations in primary care prior to admission. If not administered by their GP prior to admission, only 69% of patients received the required vaccinations following splenectomy before discharge from hospital. Inclusion of the required information regarding long-term management in the discharge notification was completed in 76% of cases. Often this was included by the screening pharmacist in the pharmacy section of the discharge summary, where this was omitted by the discharging doctor. These results were submitted to the quality improvement team with recommendations to improve future practice.

What next?

This audit highlighted the need for a substantial improvement in communication between hospital and GP settings, utilising the new electronic era. In the hospital setting, poster reminders and regular teaching sessions for new and regular staff on the importance of these vaccinations will be implemented. Re-audit should then take place, with an additional component looking at communication processes and implementation by GPs of suggestions made on discharge.