EAHP represents over 30,000 hospital pharmacists across 37 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professional
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
Sponsor Channel
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
Christine Dinsen-Andersen, Hanne Fischer, Anita Gorm Pedersen, Dagmar Bertelsen, Marianne Hald Clemmensen
Before the NTF was established, each hospital pharmacy made their own assessments and solutions to CMS. This led to a lack of coordination in the national supply and knowledge sharing. As the number of CMS increased, a need for a coordinated national initiative became evident. The aim of the NTF is to secure better communication to healthcare professionals and to establish clearly defined rolls and responsibility in the supply chain from wholesaler to hospital pharmacy. Patient safety aspects should be included in all relevant steps of the process.
A National Task Force (NTF) for critical medicines shortages (CMS) have been established with the main objective to provide therapeutic and patient safety assessment of CMS on a national level. In addition to this the NTF takes considerations regarding the supply chain into account in the assessments.
To secure national engagement, members of the task force were appointed according to a consensus between the hospital pharmacies in Denmark. The NTF includes participants from 3 hospital pharmacies, the national wholesaler for hospital pharmacies and a patient safety organization. Based on challenges of geographical dispersion and different local practices, an effort was put into: • securing a systematic work flow, for the group; • creating a digital platform with access for members from different organizations; • agreeing on when a medicine shortage is critical.
• Early intervention – resulting in opportune solutions. • Agility in allocation of remaining stock between hospital pharmacies. • Optimisation of choice of alternative treatment during period of shortage. • Secure supply of alternative drugs on national level. • Initiate agreement between physicians on choice of alternative on a national level. • Attention to patient safety challenges – preventing adverse events.
Joined forces have resulted in coordinated and optimised solutions to managing CMS, enabling the hospital pharmacies to secure patient safety. Hence the NTF shall continue its work. Having a national unit as NTF provides the basis for coordinated initiatives and for corporation with health and medicines authorities and market authorization holders.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Oran Quinn, Anna Marzec
Errors of miscalculation, doses inappropriate for renal function and at extremes of weight were reported when doses of medication were written as ‘mg/kg’ without stating the dose to be given e.g. Gentamicin 5mg/kg, Vancomycin 15mg/kg and Enoxaparin 1.5mg/kg.
A quality improvement initiative to resolve issues with prescribing medications dosed by weight. Nursing staff were identified as ‘gate-keepers’ who could refuse to administer medication inappropriately prescribed. Identification, agreement, education and feedback were necessary to change prescribing practice and support nursing staff. Hospital doctors were required to calculate and prescribe the total dose to be given. Feedback was given by monthly bulletin.
Support from key stakeholders was sought to endorse the initiative. Verbal and written education was given to nursing, medical and pharmacy staff to implement the initiative on an agreed date. Refusal to administer medication unsafely prescribed was key to successful implementation. Patient’s weight was not always available and additional equipment was provided to overcome this problem. The risk of withholding treatment was considered and an escalating referral process was recommended contacting the Senior House Officer, then Registrar and ultimately the patients Consultant to avoid lengthy delays to patient treatment. Nurses felt supported in refusing to administer medication.
A point prevalence study of all inpatients was carried out monthly to ascertain the level of compliance Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 % of patients with total dose prescribed correctly 67.0 86.7 96.7 100.0 100.0 88.9 87.5. Results showed overall improvement from March to August and full compliance in May and June. Success was achieved through a multidisciplinary approach involving all key stakeholders, a forcing function and support from and for front line staff.
This initiative has been further developed to become ‘Monthly Safe Prescribing Metrics’.
Other prescribing metrics such as using ‘iu’ dosing for Insulin, prescribing appropriately for patients at extremes of weight and using the abbreviation ‘mcg’ for medications dosed in ‘micrograms’ were included. Initiatives to improve all metrics are ongoing.
Safe prescribing metrics could help to positively influence prescribing culture in other healthcare settings.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
Steffen Amann, Rudolf Bernard, Georg Berndt , Meike Bindemann, Myga Brakebusch, Jörg Brüggmann, Frank Dörje, Miriam Gyalrong-Steur, Anita Kellermann, Markus Müller, Elfriede Nusser-Rothermundt, Rainer Riedel, Eva Tydecks
Given rising cost-pressure and increasing numbers of supply shortages, changes between generics have become daily practice in hospital pharmacies. To ensure constant treatment quality and patient safety, the equivalence of a potential new product with the current one must be guaranteed before changing brands. So far there has been no transparent, standardised tool for the comparison of generics workable in everyday clinical practice. Developing such a tool was our project’s aim.
We developed an Excel-based tool for the qualitative and pharmacoeconomical evaluation of generics before changing brands (aut-idem substitution) in hospitals.
A working-group of pharmacists from seven hospitals developed the “HERA” tool (HTA-evaluation of geneReric phArmaceuticals). Starting from a base version, 22 generic products were assessed with the tool during five evaluation rounds. Based on these results the instrument was gradually refined. Within HERA‘s Excel matrix a potentially to-be-used generic is compared with the current one. The economic evaluation is based on unit prices and prescription volumes, but also includes process costs associated with the product change. The assessment of pharmaceutical quality is based on 34 criteria from six areas (licensed uses, drug substance, dosage form and excipients, handling, safe design, packaging and storage). The objective quality evaluation is complemented by the assessment of hospital-specific features. Complex substitutions – e.g. associated with a handling change – require involvement of the medical staff using the product. The purchasing decision is taken based on the synopsis of pharmaceutical quality and economic evaluation.
The standardised evaluation of product differences before substitutions allows for the early identification of potential problems of brand changes and helps avoiding them for the benefit of patient safety. HERA also guarantees reproducibility and transparent, QM-compliant documentation of product changes. The pharmacies of our purchasing group now routinely use HERA for the assessment of generics before intended brand substitutions. Each evaluation is conducted in one pharmacy and shared with the others via data-cloud.
We have published a paper on HERA and presented it at the German Hospital Pharmacists congress in 2018. Our aim is to create a network of colleagues with shared access to all colleagues’ HERA product evaluations to reduce the workload for the individual pharmacies.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Meenal Patel, Sheena Patel, Peta Longstaff
• Initiative introduced and on-going since 2017
• To increase and embed medication safety awareness
• To address under-reporting of medication-related incidents, with feedback
• To embed medication safety in education programmes and clinical practice
A local medication safety agenda implemented across two hospital sites in response to World Health Organisation (WHO) patient safety challenge ‘Medication without Harm’.
• Medication safety group (MSG) introduced with local strategy, involving junior medical staff for frontline feedback • Medication safety metrics changed to allow benchmarking with peers as per NHS Improvement’s Model Hospital data • ‘Plan, Do, Study, Act’ model applied to improve transfer of care from hospital to rehabilitation unit following external incidents • Monthly analysis of incidents with harm, exploring reasons for under-reporting • Optimisation of incident reporting system to improve staff feedback following investigations • Near miss error log introduced in pharmacy with shared learning • Mitigation of medication-related risks e.g. medications safe storage action plan • Medication safety bulletins, patient safety newsletters and top tips guide introduced covering focal themes • ‘Safe prescribing’ mandatory induction training for junior doctors to support prescribing of high risk medicines and compliance to patient safety alerts • Hospital-wide education on lessons learnt from incidents • Medication safety resources for staff to access • Nursing quality round on medication safety • Electronic missed doses realtime report developed to tackle omitted/delayed critical medication doses • Medication safety awareness (MSA) week held to increase awareness on focal themes
• Multidisciplinary MSG with assurance on meeting WHO global challenge. • Monthly analysis of medication safety data to allow learning, collaboration and benchmarking against peers. • Positive staff feedback on bulletins/newsletters with staff involvement/engagement. • Training programmes embedded with safe prescribing education. • Improved hospital safety metrics: Following MSA week, a 5% and 21% increase in medication-related incident reporting occurred at each site which has been sustained. Reporting rates doubled at one site following success of MSA week. • In 2018-19, local target achieved for reported medication-related incidents per 100,000 finished consultant episodes and medication-related incidents with harm
• Collaborative multidisciplinary working raising the profile of pharmacists acting as medication safety officers
• Implementing medication safety measures from NHS Patient Safety Strategy 2019
• Initiatives for safer culture, safer systems and safer patients
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Alison Brown, Gillian Cavell, Nikita Dogra, Cate Whittlesea
Anticoagulants are high-risk drugs. An NHS England Patient Safety Alert was published in 2015 highlighting harm from inappropriate co-prescription of anticoagulants1.
A ‘duplicate anticoagulant alert’ (Anticoagulant MLM) was implemented within our electronic prescribing system (EPMA) to alert prescribers if co-prescription of two or more anticoagulants was attempted, with the intention of preventing the completion of a potentially harmful prescription. We conducted a retrospective review of the impact of the Anticoagulant MLM on preventing co-prescription of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS)
The study took place in a 950 bed UK acute teaching hospital. A report of all Anticoagulant MLM alerts generated for adult inpatients between 26th June 2017 and 8th October 2018 was extracted from EPMA. Data on drugs prescribed, alert acceptance or override and duplicate anticoagulant administration were collected. Where alerts were overridden, appropriateness of the override was assessed by an anticoagulation specialist pharmacist. Ethics approval was not needed.
The Anticoagulant MLM triggered on 894 occasions; 113 in response to attempted prescription of a LMWH for a patient already prescribed a DOAC. 65 of 113 alerts were overridden (duplicate prescription completed). 48 alerts were accepted (duplicate prescription avoided). Of the 65 overridden alerts, consecutive doses of both anticoagulants were scheduled appropriately. No duplicate doses were administered in 44 cases (44/65, 67.7%). 15 duplicate prescriptions were either cancelled before administration or not administered concurrently (15/65, 23.1%). Duplicate doses were administered against 6 prescriptions (6/65, 9.2%), on 3 occasions. No patient harm was identified. The alert prevented inappropriate co-prescription of anticoagulants to 48 patients. Overrides were justified in 44 cases. Anticoagulants were correctly prescribed for 92/113 (81.4%) patients. It was outside the scope of this project to investigate why alerts were overridden. ‘Alert fatigue’2 and alert frequency3 are recognised factors limiting the effectiveness of electronic alerts in changing a planned course of action.
The alert remains in place as a barrier to error. Further work is needed to identify reasons for anticoagulant alert overrides.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
saif salah
In Carmel Medical Center, the infusion pack is delivered by a pharmacist according to the prescription given from PN staff, and afterwards the infusion instructions are recorded by one of the department physicians in the patient EHR. Recently there have been several mistakes that have been reported, which made it urgent to check matching between PN staff decision and the record of instructions in the EHR.
Recognise the mismatch between the electronic health record (EHR) instructions for delivery of parenteral nutrition (PN), against the actual delivery by the pharmacy according to prescription from PN staff and characterisation of these cases in terms of mismatching.
Issuing a report of the PN doses delivered by the electronic system called “UNIT-DOSE” in the pharmacy according to the name of patient and days of treatment of 2018 vs. electronic instructions that have been recorded by one of the department physicians in the “Kamelyon” system or “Meta Vision ” The parameters examined were: type of solution, composition, volume, supplements-additives (electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements), infusion rate and method of infusion (central / peripheral). Infusion rate was examined separately as a follow-up by a nutritionist.
From our research, we found a significant difference between computerised recording of PN instructions and what the patient actually received. This is due to the separation between the hand-written prescription by the PN staff and the computerised instruction recording by the treatment team. This may constitute a danger to patients.
Examination and follow-up by the pharmacist is important for identifying and treating errors of this nature appropriately. Guidance sessions for the treating staff should be conducted in the different departments. The prescription must be matched by the PN staff to the computerised instruction by placing a prescription pattern. Set up protocols in the computerised system that guide the treatment staff in the department to record the correct instructions.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Gillian Cavell
Despite the availability of RTU and RTA formulations of high-risk injectable medicines they were not always used. We developed the metric, to compare the use of RTU and RTA injectable medicines with the use of concentrates requiring further dilution or manipulation prior to administration e.g. dilution of morphine 10 mg/ml to 10 mg/10 ml prior to intravenous administration, e.g. withdrawal of 5 x 10 ml fentanyl 500 mcg/10 ml into a 50 ml syringe for continuous infusion, and identify areas for improvement.
We have developed a series of metrics to measure compliance with national guidance for the safe use of injectable medicines. The guidance recommends use of ready-to-use (RTU) or ready-to-administer (RTA) injectable products, where these are available, to reduce the risk of patient harm from errors in the preparation of injections and infusions on hospital wards.
The metric utilises pharmacy-issue data to compare the number of units of RTU or RTA formulations issued to wards and clinical areas with the numbers of units of alternative products of the same drug entity. Expressed as a percentage the metric informs the organisation of the extent to which safer injectable medicines are being used, providing a baseline against which to review practice and reinforce the need to use alternative, safer formulations. A high percentage indicates good compliance.
The metrics have been used to successfully maximise the use of a range of safer formulations including RTA potassium chloride, RTU fentanyl 2500 mcg/50 ml vials for critical care infusion, 100 mg/10 ml paracetamol in neonatal units and RTU magnesium sulphate 20% (50 ml vials) for obstetric emergencies. Since the introduction of the metrics in 2016 a monthly scorecard of performance is reviewed by the Hospital Medication Safety Committee to identify and account for deviations.
The metrics are being shared with other organisations to benchmark performance. Ideas to promote implementation and business cases can be shared between organisations who may find implementing RTA and RTU injectable medicines challenging, especially where these are more expensive than formulations in established use.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Karin Larmene-Beld, Rommert Wijnsma, Gerrit de Weerd, Maarten Postma, Erik Frijlink, Katja Taxis
Medication administration errors are common in hospital practice. Meta-analyses suggest that about 10% of administrations are erroneous, with much higher error rates occurring during intravenous drug administrations. It has been demonstrated that 21% of the errors can be eliminated when prepared syringes are used. Many countries struggle with the problem of optimising the process of safe parenteral medication in hospitals. Different guidelines across countries outline how preparation of parenteral medication in the clinical environment should be done. Recently the Council of Europe published a resolution about preparation of medication which encourage the supply of ready-to-administer products by the pharmacy. Moving the activities of preparation of medication from the clinical environment to the pharmacy requires investments in pharmacy equipment but will result in efficacy, better quality and reduction in preparation medication errors in the hospital.
Development and implementation of sterilisable plastic syringes produced in the hospital pharmacy for large-scale production of ready-to-administer products.
A new development in this area are ready-to-administer pre-filled sterilised syringes (PFSS) produced by the pharmacy. PFSS are produced on stock under GMP conditions by the hospital pharmacy using (semi) automatic filling and closing machines whereby quality and safety are embedded in the whole process of manufacturing. A total cost of ownership analysis is performed showing PFSS prepared in the hospital pharmacy yielded cost savings compared to conventional preparation on the ward. The process of production, filling, closing and sterilisation has been validated using newly acquired equipment. With the introduction of the cyclic olefin polymer (COP) syringes a new type of primary container is implemented in the pharmacy. To ensure patient safety and product quality a science- and risk-based strategy has been developed for testing extractables and leachables to qualify the new container as primary packaging material.
Introducing PFSS is cost saving for the healthcare system:– COP syringes are suitable as primary packaging material; –enhancement styles for better readability of labels are established; and – already, 15 products are validated and available for use in the hospital.
1. KHM Larmené-Beld KHM, Touwen-Spronk J, Luttjeboer J, et al. A cost minimization analysis of ready-to-administer pre-filled sterilized syringes in a Dutch hospital.. Submitted for publication in Clinical Therapeutics.
2. Larmené-Beld K, Kuiper A, van Berkel S, et al. A science- and risk-based strategy to qualify sterilized prefilled syringes as primary packaging material in a hospital pharmacy. Abstract submitted for 24th EAHP Congress.
3. Larmené-Beld KHM, Kim Alting E, Taxis K. A systematic literature review on strategies to avoid look-alike errors of labels. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2018 74:985–93.
Introducing more drugs as ready-to-administer products. Optimising the label of ready-to-administer syringes to avoid look-alike errors based on the results of the review.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Linda Jeffery
The primary aim was to increase patient safety by quality-assuring ESPs and guiding clinicians to rational and safe prescribing. The Central Denmark Region (1.3 million citizens) has five hospitals, each with their own hospital and ward management. ESPs were previously set up and maintained locally, often by clinicians at ward level, resulting in several thousand, and a huge variety of ESPs for the same indication/treatment. Often only small differences separated these, but larger differences were also observed. Both patients and clinicians move around hospitals within the region. Varying ESPs from hospital to hospital confused clinicians and compromised patient safety.
The regional Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) commissioned the Hospital Pharmacy, Central Denmark Region to take over management of electronic standard prescriptions (ESP) in the shared Electronic Prescribing System (EPS). The pharmacy was also commissioned to lead the unification of local to regional ESPs, in collaboration with clinical specialists. ESPs are electronic ‘packages’ of one or more prescriptions, set up for treatment of defined conditions/procedures e.g. knee-replacement. When the clinician prescribes an ESP, the predefined prescriptions appear automatically in the patient’s medicines list.
The Hospital Pharmacy highlighted clinical areas/treatments with several variations of the same ESP. The DTC appointed relevant clinicians to work with a pharmacist on unifying these, to one (or more) standardised ESPs, to be used in the whole region. The pharmacist was coordinator for the ad-hoc working groups. After approval by the DTC, these ESPs replaced the existing. If a department wanted an ESP that differed from the regional ESP, this had to be approved by the DTC.
Regional ESPs have been approved for:
• Abortion (reduced from 17 to six).
• Helicobacter pylori eradication (reduced from 28 to two).
• Treatment of paracetamol-overdosage.
Many new ESPs have been approved, promoting:
• Safe prescribing of complicated regimes e.g. fosphenytoin loading/maintenance.
• Use of regional formulary drugs e.g. antibiotics for pneumonia/urosepsis.
We continue to work on other regimes that can be unified e.g. treatment of Wernickes prophylaxis/syndrome and parenteral nutrition. We recently met with pharmacists from two other regions that use the same EPS as us – maybe we can share ESPs nationwide in future.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Mohammed Almeziny, Fahad Alkharji , Ali Alkhudair , Jameel Al Mutairi
Poor allergies’ documentation may cause harm to the patients, if the concerned medication reaches them. The hospital is planning to implement a new Health Information System, which includes a Computerised Provider Order Entry. However, this is a long-term project, so in order to minimise that risk, the hospital administration gave the pharmacists the privilege to do so. The percentage of documented drug allergies was 14%. The issue of compliance from the medical, nursing and pharmacy staff was a major obstacle in allergies’ documentation. For that reason, the pharmaceutical services initiated an improvement project to enhance allergies’ documentation. it is the responsibility of the physician to document any allergy on the inpatient prescription form (IPPF). On the other hand, it is the responsibility of the nurse to ensure that all information is completed on the IPPF before it is sent to the pharmacy. The role of the pharmacist is to document the patient’s allergy in the pharmacy system.
Increase the allergy documentation from 14% to 96%.
The FOCUS PDCA was adopted. Find: It was found that the compliance rate was not satisfactory. Patients might receive a medication that is known to cause an allergic reaction, because the allergy was not documented and communicated with other healthcare providers. Organise: The team consisted of all involved departments. Clarify: Some IPPF may not contain allergies and some pharmacy staff do not document the allergy in the pharmacy system. Understand: The factors that may influence the process were identified, although some healthcare professionals consider the documentation as a time-consuming process. The pharmacy system is an old system which does not support enforcing function. Select: The targeted outcome was 90% within 1 year of its inception, July 2017 to July 2018. Plan: All allergies MUST be assisted, and the pharmacy will act as the enforcing body. Do the plan: All pharmacists were reminded to enforce hospital policies by not accepting any incomplete prescription and document all drug allergies in the pharmacy system. Check: Statistics regarding compliance were presented in monthly meetings to highlight the challenges, difficulty or any serious issue. It is a proactive meeting and members can freely suggest any tools required to improve the situation.
There was a significant improvement from 14% to 96%.
Start e-prescription to enforce the documentation of allergies.
