Author(s)

Paula Hernando Martínez, María Antonia Meroño Saura, Caridad Marti Gil, Lidia Martínez Valdevieso, Jaime Fernández-Bravo Rodrigo, Dolores Barreda Hernández

Why was it done?

There is a wide bibliography on how human errors related to drugs put the patient’s health at risk. Drug preparation and administration errors, dose calculation errors, lack of knowledge about drugs or interactions, to name but a few. There must be protocols to ensure that drugs are safe for patients, including procedures which professionals should fulfill in order to reduce those errors in processes and guarantee, in such cases, that they will not have adverse effects on patients.

What was done?

Development of infographics for assembling drugs which are susceptible to a higher rate of errors in their preparation and administration to hospitalized patients.

How was it done?

During September 2021, a working group was formed in the pharmacy department (PD). Through the nominal group technique, the design and content of drug infographics was proposed as a solution to the raised problem. Subsequently, a bibliographic research of susceptible drugs to human errors during administration or preparation and those which requiring special handling was reviewed through the list of high-alert medication from National Institute for the Safe Use of Medications website and NIOSH list of hazardous drugs. To this end, the PD databases were analysed, obtaining the drugs that required the greatest number of pharmacotherapeutic consultations made by nursing staff on drug administration and recommendations made during pharmaceutical validation.

What has been achieved?

An infographic model has been designed which includes the description of the drug (name of drug, excipients, dose, pharmaceutical form, dosage regimen, route of administration, concentration), the preparation and administration protocol (reconstitution, dilution, infusion rate, premedication), observations (maximum doses, conditioning, incompatibilities, alerts) and storage conditions (conservation and stability). Infographics on dantrolene, intravenous phenytoin solution, intravenous nimodipine solution and potassium chloride solutions are currently being distributed. These documents are available at the nursing controls and on the hospital’s internal website.

What next?

To increase the availability of drug’s infographics and to update those that have already been developed when necessary. In addition, from the PD, the preparation of administration kits for the solicited drugs is proposed so as to ensure that all the necessary materials for the preparation and administration are included along with the corresponding drug and infographic.

Author(s)

Baptiste Fulbert, Florian Poncelet, Marilyne Legrand, Céline Mongaret, Dominique Hettler

Why was it done?

Very frail elderly patients are a particularly high-risk population due to their frequent multi-medication and the risk of associated adverse effects.
Clinical hospital pharmacists play an increasingly important role in patient care.

What was done?

We developed a program comprising several clinical pharmacy services for very frail elderly hospitalization.

How was it done?

We conducted a 3 month prospective study in short and middle geriatric stay included patients admitted in emergency department aged at least 75 with a Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGA) frailty score above 11. We performed, as clinical pharmacy services, best possible medication history (BPMH) in the emergency department and medication reconciliation at admission (MRA) in hospital ward and medication review during hospitalization. Medication reconciliation at discharge (MRD) was carried out on a geriatric medicine unit over 2 months. All activities were performed by pharmacy students, two residents and a pharmacist.

What has been achieved?

120 patients were included. 96 BPMHs were performed : 62 in emergency department and 34 in hospital ward.
MRA was performed for 81 patients (68%), identifying 774 discrepancies of which 19 (3%) were unintentional discrepancies (UD), 6 (32%) involving Digestive Tract and Metabolism drugs. 9 (47%) of these UDs concerned omissions.
During the 163 medication reviews, pharmacist performed 98 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for 53 patients, with an acceptance rate of 56%. Most of drugs involved with the acceptance rate was Nervous System drugs (20;36%) and Digestive Tract and Metabolism drugs (16;29%). Among the accepted PIs, 22 (40%) relate to dosage adjustment.
Finally, MRD was performed for 25 (21%) of patients identifying 256 discrepancies, 8 of which (3%) were UDs, mainly involving Digestive Tract and Metabolism drugs (5;63%). 5 (63%) of these UDs concern omissions.

What next?

The high number and nature of the discrepancies support the idea that this population is a relevant target for a clinical pharmacy program.
This program could be applied in other hospitals with the hospital pharmacists and provide a better care for these patients.
The development of MRD in geriatric wards and collaboration between hospital pharmacists and primary care professionnals, by a discharge summary to handover the changes between the entry and the exit prescription can complete this study.

Author(s)

François TISSERAND, Pierre MENAGER, Alexandre NAVID, Léa ROUSSET, Adeline BANNIER, Julie MORIO, Hélène PERRIER, Elsa JOUHANNEAU

Why was it done?

The geriatricians contacted the pharmacy to deliver training courses to the geriatric residents. This has enabled pharmacists to develop a close relationship with geriatricians to offer them clinical pharmacy activities in their ward. Geriatricians were familiar with clinical pharmacy, in particular the medication reconciliation, which is used to perform the former in other hospitals. Geriatricians are concerned with iatrogenic illness and therefore see medication reconciliation and pharmaceutical analysis as a relevant approach to clinical pharmacy.

What was done?

A successful model of partnership between Geriatrics and Pharmacy has been created and developed.

How was it done?

A first meeting was held between geriatricians and pharmacists. It was decided a pharmacy resident would be dedicated to a given geriatrician. This first resident’s objectives are to follow the medical rounds and to carry out medication reconciliations upon admission and discharge. Pharmaceutical support has enabled real-time validation for the prescription of the appropriate drugs. As the internship progressed, the resident became the privileged interlocutor for a Pharmacy-Unit relationship.

What has been achieved?

To date, 37 medication reconciliations were carried out, where the resident followed 2 medical rounds per week over 17 weeks. All unintentional discrepancies were corrected (n=13). Concerning the appropriateness of prescriptions, 16 inappropriate medications were stopped. During the medical rounds, 34% of the therapeutic problems (n=35) were related to inappropriate drug according to guidelines, 17% to dosing errors, 14% to drugs without indication. More than 50% of pharmaceutical interventions were judged capable of preventing harm that requires increased monitoring or treatment or lengthening of the hospital stay (63%). During this period, 54 questions were asked and discussed between the resident and the geriatrician to improve patient care. At the geriatricians’ request, two courses were organized about non mastered topics. On the ward, the resident acted as a go-between for a number of issues such as referencing medical devices, rearranging the storage of medicines or finding the right contact person for information activities.

What next?

What has been done needs to be continued and improved. A pharmacist-geriatrician cross-training should be implemented soon. New activities with pharmacist-geriatrician interactions are being created, such as day hospitalization for falls in the elderly population and a geriatric emergency unit.

Author(s)

Juan Campillo, Manuel Bonete, Marta Zayas, Maria Molina, Laura Barrajón, Cristina Martínez, Ángela Rizo, Maria Ángeles Bernabeu, Maria Teresa Aznar

Why was it done?

Medication errors (ME) occur in different phases of the drug circuit: prescription (16%), transcription (27%), validation, preparation, dispensing (48%) and administration (9%). The AEP is a tool to guarantee the safety of this circuit, being able to avoid up to 65% of ME. There is also a learning curve in new users of an AEP, confirming the need for support to reduce ME.

What was done?

1-Maintenance of the Assisted Electronic Prescription Program (AEP)
2-Implementation in 11 wards and in the Emergency Department of a 396-bed tertiary hospital
3-Training
4-To set a pilot AEP
5-Reeducation strategies

How was it done?

1- 1465 drugs included in the Pharmacotherapeutic Guide were configured. 3 levels of danger were created for Hazardous Drugs (HD) and the recommendations for their preparation / administration were agreed upon. The Therapeutic Exchange Guide was integrated into 443 drugs (761 exchange proposals).
2- It started in the Emergency Department and every week a new ward with AEP was opened.Paper was eliminated throughout the circuit, drug dispensing trolleys were modified and a computer was fitted to record administrations at the bedside.114 pharmacotherapeutic protocols were created.
3- A technical training program, changes in procedures, schedules and training documents were designed. 72 sessions were given to 346 physicians and 88 sessions to 543 nurses.
4- 490 incidents were reported, prioritizing the most urgent (compromising patient safety). 224 claims to expedite resolutions. We also collaborated with other hospitals.
5- Welcome plan to train new staff and annual sessions. A tutorial video to focus on the points that caused the most errors was recorded. Preparation of new documents to report the changes.

What has been achieved?

First hospital to implement computerized administration. Elimination of transcription errors. Improved administration security. Greater visibility of the pharmacist and participation in decision-making. Contribution to development of the AEP and its implementation in 15 more hospitals.

What next?

Monitoring the necessary interventions to develop educational strategies when a growing trend is observed. Improve the welcome plan. Continue piloting the new AEP versions Follow the evolution of pending incidents. Evaluate the impact of the educational strategy of the tutorial video.

Author(s)

PILAR RANZ ORTEGA, MARÍA ARRIETA LOITEGUI, DANIEL GONZALEZ ANDRES, ANA MARÍA AGUI CALLEJAS, MARIA TERESA POZAS DEL RIO

Why was it done?

– Optimize the workflow:Nursing staff are independent in final product quality control.Dissapear the manual register of compounding sterile preparations.Fewer mixtures are discarded.Also in Pharmacy Service only elaborate the sterile preparations with an economic and safety impact.

– Improve the safety of drug administration in pediatric patients: there are ready-to-use commercial parenteral presentations, which can lead to errors when dosing per kilo,fe: enoxaparin…

– Optimize economic savings:all excess vials are reused

What was done?

Previously,some parenteral drugs were compounded at Pharmacy Service.The rest of the vials were discarded daily,so the pharmacist had to anticipated some elaborations not to throw,so then some were suspended.
Also, the pharmacists done the final product quality control,it could be delayed the dispensing and specially when it´s necessary to repeat the mixture.

The changes were:

– Re-selection of the parenteral drugs compounded at Pharmacy Service by:
• Economic criterio:the cost of drug has to be >20 euros/vial
• Safety for the pediatric patient:redose individually parenteral drugs “readytouse”

– Review the storage conditions:physicochemical (technical data sheet drug,Stabilis web) and microbiological stability (Good practices for preparation drugs in hospital pharmacy services publised by Spain Goverment) of all parenteral drugs previously selected.Although the physicochemical stability is higher,the final stability will be limited by the microbiological stability and the risk level microbial contamination(USP 2004).

– Standard Operating Procedures with structured and updated information

– Reuse of partially used multi dose vials:we reviewed the physicochemical and microbiological stability of open vial

– Final product quality control by nursing staff

– Save time to pharmacist:daily scheduling instead of anticipated elaboration of sterile preparations

How was it done?

– A nurse involved in the circuit change giving her feedback on the changes

– Traceability of the rests of the vials:stickers are affixed to the opened vials indicating the reconstitution data and the expiration date

– Final product quality control should be done by a diferente nurse to elaborated to detect potencial errors

What has been achieved?

The total cost savings for this year is 295.778€. After the circuit´s change, the savings have increased by 55% for liposomal amphotericin b, 51% defibrotide, 24% micafungin.

What next?

Compounding sterile preparations individualized in Pharmacy Service to patients hospitalized at home, transplanted of hematopoietic progenitors and immunocompromised

Author(s)

Mariosa Kieran

Why was it done?

Review of the 2019 Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) Medication Safety Monitoring Programme, and in-house Emergency Department (ED) medication variances review identified that risk reduction strategies for specific high-risk drugs and high-risk situations were required.

What was done?

A multidisciplinary team reviewed and implemented initiatives to improve medication safety practices for procedural sedation, emergency tray drugs and ketamine use in emergency settings was undertaken.

How was it done?

• Multidisciplinary teams (MDT) of key stakeholders were formed to review each high-risk drug / practice requiring improvement.
• The MDT developed the required procedures and policies that were further reviewed and approved by the relevant hospital committees.
• The MDT supported roll out of the improvement initiatives through communication, staff education and process review.

What has been achieved?

• A hospital wide procedural sedation policy and patient information leaflet was developed. Competencies for staff that perform procedural sedation have been identified. A specific procedural sedation incident report form has been piloted. A poster detailing the process for sedation reversal is in development.
• Emergency tray drug preparation, storage and use has been standardised across all hospital settings, including the introduction of dedicated emergency drug bags. The bags enable prompt drug retrieval during emergencies and supports safe storage, documentation and disposal of used /unused emergency drugs.
• A protocol for ED use of ketamine was developed. The protocol supports safe use of ketamine for specific emergency indications for which there is little published information, e.g. procedural sedation, analgesia and agitation.
• The initiatives were implemented and included in ED simulation training.

What next?

The described medication safety initiatives have considered the practice challenges for high risk drug access and use in emergency settings. The initiatives have standardised processes for specific high-risk drugs, supporting safer use. MDT collaboration ensured early and ongoing staff engagement from applicable disciplines, facilitating implementation and practice changes. Evaluation of the initiatives in practice is currently under review. The initiatives and learnings are transferrable to other emergency clinical settings.

Author(s)

MOHAMMED ADNANE EL WARTITI, WAFAA ENNEFFAH, BOUCHRA MEDDAH, MUSTAPHA BOUATIA

Why was it done?

The GPG was developed in a concern of practices standardization to guarantee the safety and efficacy of parenteral antibiotics, especially those stored in vials which reuse in possible only if conditions of administration and stability are respected.

What was done?

We developed a Good Practice Guide (GPG) for the usage of major available parenteral antibiotics.

How was it done?

After we listed all parenteral antibiotics available at the hospital pharmacy, we selected the most used ones and we synthesized all manufacturers’ data to establish a GPG for their administration. We also used literature data to complete missing information in “Summaries of Product Characteristics” related to pediatric use of these drugs. Finally we determined the most antibiotics consuming units according to their defined daily doses, where GPG recommendations will be implemented, before their extension to all other units.

What has been achieved?

The GPG concerned the most used antibiotics, which mainly belong to the following classes: Beta-lactam, Glycopeptide and Imidazole antibiotics, Aminoglycosides and Quinolones. It specifies the galenical presentation, used solvents, volume and duration of administration, stability after reconstitution as well as incompatibilities and special measures relating to the use of these drugs. The most antibiotics consuming units are pediatric intensive care units, “IIB” pediatric unit and pediatric surgical emergency department.

What next?

The approach used in this work can be adopted in other similar structures in order to establish GPGs within the framework of a quality control policy aiming to raise the standard of care.

Why was it done?

To achive the international Organization for Standardization (ISO)´s objectives related to medication errors.

What was done?

A multidisciplinary isoappearances group formed by a clinical pharmacist, a nurse, and two physicians has been set up on site at the ER.

How was it done?

Observational study.

What has been achieved?

In the future, hopefully medication errors at the emergency setting would be reduced.

What next?

Because the Isoappearance group will promote patient safety.

Why was it done?

Long waiting times and delays in patients leaving ED increase the risk for missed doses. Medication reviews and analysing incident reports identified missed doses as a patient safety issue where the strategies implemented aimed to improve this.

What was done?

Reducing missed doses and improving patient safety was addressed as follows:
 Integrated pharmacy service was established
 Audit completed
 Education model developed
 Stock list reviewed

How was it done?

Integrated pharmacy service:
-Outlined the role of the pharmacy team in ED.
-Pharmacist medication review service established which identified medication incidents particularly missed doses.
-Pharmacy technician role expanded: Reviewed patient charts, identified issues, collaborated with the ED team, and dispensed medication in medication
transfer bags.
-Implemented medication transfer service: Individual patient medication transfer bags were sent from ED to the transfer ward ensuring timely availability
of medication during transitions of care.

Data collection and analysis:
-Quantified missed doses and reviewed the percentage of these which were time-critical. Time-critical medications are medications where timely
administration is crucial to prevent patient harm.

Education model:
-Developed and implemented a pharmacy technician training programme: This ensured an optimal medication management service.
-A local list of time-critical medication was agreed upon. A poster was developed and erected in ED to highlight time-critical medication.
-Structured and targeted multi-disciplinary education was provided on time-critical medication and the impact of missed doses.

Stock list modified so medication was immediately available in ED. Capacity in the automated dispensing unit (ADU) was an obstacle so the ADU was reconfigured to overcome this.

What has been achieved?

 A clinical pharmacy service was established which reduced medication errors.
 Missed doses decreased by 75%.
 Time-critical medications are readily available.
 Medication transfer bags ensured timely availability of medication during transitions of care.
 Education model implemented which improved patient safety.

What next?

 Continue the integrated pharmacy service in ED.
 Missed doses will be assessed through point prevalence surveys, medication reviews, and incident reports.
 Extend the education model to other areas of the hospital and apply learning.
 This initiative can be adapted to other hospital settings.

Author(s)

Françoise LONGTON, Olivia Polinard, Linda Mattar, Anna Pauels, Mireille Bourton, Michel Mattens

Why was it done?

A thorough medication history at admission reduces medication errors. The presence of a clinical pharmacist in the preoperative clinic increases the number of inpatients who receive a standardized medication history by a pharmacist.

On admission, the adaptation of home medications to the hospital formulary can also be a source of error or delay. The fact that the patient is seen by a pharmacist prior to hospitalization makes it possible to anticipate drug substitutions and possible orders for non-formulary drugs.

Moreover, surgeons do not always have the possibility to prescribe medications taken at home upon admission, which results in a delayed availability of the medication. Thanks to this multidisciplinary project the continuity of treatment is assured.

What was done?

During the preoperative consultation, a pharmacist takes a medication history and enters it into the computerized medical record, making it available for the anaesthetist.

Upon admission of the patient, the continuity of the medication is ensured by the pharmacy.

Indeed, during the admission, the nurse follows a procedure that informs the pharmacy of any medication changes since the preoperative consultation. Afterwards, the pharmacy encodes the treatment into the computerized intra-hospital prescription and delivers it to the department.

Before any drug administration, this treatment is signed by the doctor responsible for the patient.

How was it done?

Preoperative consultations had to be structured so that each patient was first seen by the pharmacist, second by a nurse and third by the anaesthetist.

Thus, the main obstacle was organizational and it was overcome through the centralized management of preoperative clinic appointments.

What has been achieved?

In 2020, 54% of patients admitted for surgery (elective or emergency surgeries) were seen in the preoperative clinic.

What next?

This is an example of good practice as it ensures a standardized medication history and admission management.