The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
Electronic prescription protocols for personalised sterile preparations for the paediatric surgery department
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Author(s)
Isabel María Carrión Madroñal, Concepción Álvarez del Vayo Benito , Begoña Balboa Huguet , Santiago Lora Escobar , Paloma Barriga Rodríguez
Why was it done?
-Improve security, planning, and access to information for correct prescription, administration, and management.
-Guarantee the traceability of all processes.
-Improve the satisfaction of the services involved, preventing forgetfulness and therefore management of emergency calls, unjustified need for the prescribed preparations, and incorrect packaging.
-Improve communication and the work circuit from PD.
What was done?
To prepare a protocol with the processes of prescription, validation, preparation and dispensing of personalised sterile formulations in the Paediatric Surgery Department (PSD: Otorhinolaryngology, Ophthalmology and Neurosurgery) from the Pharmacy Department (PD).
How was it done?
1. Creation of a multidisciplinary team in which a circuit for the prescription, validation, preparation and dispensing of sterile preparations was agreed.
2. Analysis with the departments involved of the personalised sterile-medications prepared by PD for use in paediatric-surgical-rooms, and the most frequent doses used.
3. Bibliographic review: PubMed®, Cochrane®, Uptodate®, Stabilis® and other sources such as the Good Clinical Practices (GCP) and the book ‘Preparation of Drugs and Magistral Formulation for Ophthalmology (JM Alonso).
4. Creation of electronic prescription protocols in ATHOS-Prisma®, containing:
• help notes and preconditions for the prescription.
• information for the administration and management of waste.
• detailed brew sheet and custom label for the PD.
5. Review of the protocols created and the circuit proposed for the prescription, preparation and dispensing.
6. Start-up of the circuit: review and validation of prescriptions, preparation of sterile formulations centralised in PD through laminar flow hoods and dispensing directly to the surgical-room on the scheduled date.
What has been achieved?
Piloting began with sterile otorhinology formulations in 2021, expanding to ophthalmology and neurosurgery in 2022-2023.
– Creation of three groups of protocols that will contain those related to each specialty to facilitate location and prescription by surgeons:
*Paediatric ophthalmology:
• Mitomycin 0.2mg/ml intraoperative-solution-trabeculectomy
• Fluorouracil 5mg/0.1ml intraoperative-solution-trabeculectomy
• Intracameral-cefuroxime 2mg/0.2ml (antibiotic-prophylaxis)
*Paediatric otorhinology:
• Cidofovir 5mg/ml intralesional (laryngeal-papillomatosis)
• Bevacizumab 2.5mg/ml intralesional (laryngeal-papillomatosis)
• Mitomycin 0.5mg/ml (choanal-atresia)
*Paediatric neurosurgery:
• Interferon-alpha 3MIU/0.6ml intralesional (craniopharyngioma)
– Sixty-two preparations have been prepared and dispensed for a total of 30 children; average age of 4 years (1-10). No adverse events were reported in any patient after the administration of these sterile preparations.
– A study limitation was sample size. Circuit under development.
What next?
The protocol is applicable to any hospital with electronic-prescription and surgical-area.
A prospective observational study of medication prescribing errors in an Emergency Department.
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Carmen Ortí Juan, Cristina Toro Blanch, Maria Àngels Gispert Ametller, Ana Perez Plasencia, Cristina Lecha Ochoa, Anna Dordà Benito, Rosa Sacrest Güell
Why was it done?
Prescribing errors (PE) are an important cause of medication-related adverse events in the Emergency Departments (ED) but limited data are available in ED with electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) systems. Knowing the frequency and types of PE can help healthcare professionals to prevent and reduce the risk of them occurring.
What was done?
To determine the rate of PE in the ED, to classify incident types and to identify critical points where measures should be implemented to improve patient safety.
How was it done?
Prospective, observational and cross-sectional study in an ED with ePA system during 6 working days (May-June 2021). The inclusion criteria were patients stayed more than 8 hours in the ED and all patients awaiting hospitalization. Prescriptions were analyzed by a multidisciplinary team made up of two pharmacists, an emergency physician and the person in charge of the hospital’s medication errors committee. PE were reported to the hospital’s patient safety-related incident notification system.
What has been achieved?
Of the 65 prescriptions revised during the study period, PE were reported in 84 cases and 15 situations with the capacity to cause errors were detected. The average age of patients was 67 ± (SD=17,9) years and each prescription had an average of 8.4 medications. The rate of PE was 1.52 errors per patient, being higher in less severe patients than monitored patients (1.09 vs 2.0 PE per patient, respectively). The most common types of EP were omission of the usual medication (60.7%), wrong dose (15.5%), wrong frequency (7.1%) and drug is not indicated (7.1%). No adverse reactions related to EP were detected. According to the Spanish consensus about Medication Reconciliation in Emergency Units, 47.1% of omissions of usual medication were drugs that should be reconciled during the first 4 hours in the ED. The results of the study and the importance of medication reconciliation are highlighted in a session in the ED.
What next?
The PE rate in the ED was 1.52 per patient and the main type was omission of the usual medication. A cross sectional study will be made in the future and compared to the current one to establish the impact of the implemented measures on the PE rate.