Pdf

Author(s)

Giuliana Lo Cricchio, Margherita Galassi, Ernesto Ruffino, Claudia Tirone, Vito Ladisa

Why was it done?

In accordance with regional provisions and national guidelines, the initiative has had the dual objective of reducing hospital access, and potential infections, and ensuring therapeutic continuity for cancer patients.

What was done?

Some therapy protocols have been modified for the treatment of blood, gastrointestinal, lung, breast, head and neck tumors, in order to obtain equally effective patterns but with longer intervals between doses.

How was it done?

Patients have been stratified on the basis of the neoplasia location and biology, the general conditions and the treatments characteristics and they have been shifted to modified treatment regimes, even outside the indications temporarily authorized by regional decision: Nivolumab from 240 mg Q2W to 480 mg Q4W for Hodgkin lymphoma, non-small-cell lung-cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; from weekly Paclitaxel to Docetaxel Q3W for breast cancer; Pembrolizumab from 200 mg Q3W to 400 mg Q6W for lung cancer and melanoma; remodulation of protocols including fluoropyridines and platinum coordination compounds for gastroenteric tumors.

What has been achieved?

The schedule modification allowed a reshaping of agendas to reduce the frequency of day-hospital access and the risk of infection with Sars-Cov-2 for patients, carers and health professionals, in addition to reducing the costs of outpatient services. Treatment interruption rate, with possible consequent progression of disease, as reported by early Chinese data in the literature, has been reduced.

What next?

The extraordinary health emergency changed the clinical practice and aroused interest especially in oncology, where the evaluation of the relationship between benefits and risks associated with therapies has required greater attention because they are life-saving therapies that cause immunosuppression in patients for which the adverse course of viral infection is more frequent than that of the non-neoplastic population.
The possibility of using the modified therapy schemes has been limited only to the emergency period and has not yet resulted in an extension of the indications. The achievement of the therapeutic objective, together with the feedback that the new dosages have not led to a significant increase in adverse events compared to normal clinical practice, encourage us to hope that the indications can be extended in Italy, as has already happened in Canada and USA for the Nivolumab.

Pdf

Author(s)

Pauline Barreau, Joséphine Courouble, Pierre Pilven, David Vandecapelle, Thibault Stala, Geoffrey Strobbe, Guillaume Marliot, Frédéric Feutry

Why was it done?

Two prescription assistance software are using in the hospital: DXCare®, for global drug management, and Chimio®, specific to the prescription and preparation of injectable chemotherapies. Clinical pharmacists (DXCare®) and pharmacists in charge of preparation (Chimio®) carry out the pharmaceutical analysis independently and they may not detect potential pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics drugs interactions or pathophysiological contraindications, slowing down the pharmaceutical analysis. Pharmaclass® can improve that by crossing all data flows between DXCare® and Chimio® and alerting the pharmacist. The objective were to select and code priority alerts and evaluate the detectability of drugs interactions and pathophysiological contraindications by the software Pharmaclass®.

What was done?

Pharmaclass® is a software based on rules created by the pharmacist, from pharmaceutical algorithms. This rules engine crosses in real time all data flows of several software and sends alerts that must be analyzed by a pharmacist. It was applied in oncology for injectable chemotherapies.

How was it done?

An interface was set up between DXCare®/Chimio® and Pharmaclass® to allow the creation of requests. An analysis of drug consumptions and drugs at risk of interactions helped to select seven molecules (Methotrexate, Bevacizumab, Fluorouracil, Ifosfamide, Irinotecan, Cisplatin, Pemetrexed). A study of the summaries of the product characteristics and the drug interaction thesaurus and a bibliography was conducted and the rules were coded. These were checked by creating test patients with false prescriptions.

What has been achieved?

Eleven rules were created and, after some tests and coding readjustments, all was detected. Nine rules are about drugs interactions: three contraindications (Methotrexate/Trimethoprim, Methotrexate/Acetylsalicylic acid, Bevacizumab/Naloxegol), three associations not recommended (Methotrexate/Amoxicillin, Methotrexate/Ciprofloxacin, Fluorouracil/Antivitamin K), one precaution of use (Ifosfamide/Aprepitant) and two other rules concern enzymatic induction and inhibition of the metabolism of Irinotecan. The last two rules link the glomerular filtration rate with Cisplatin and Pemetrexed.

What next?

Following these creations, Pharmaclass® has allowed to detect drug interactions and pathophysiological contraindications that were not previously detectable. Thereafter, objective will be to establish an organization for the management of alerts and evaluate the number and the relevance of these alerts. New rules will be created for all injectable chemotherapies used in the hospital. Other center of Unicancer will be able to use these rules.

Pdf

Author(s)

Xando Díaz-Villamarín, Ana Pozo-Agundo, Paloma García-Navas, Celia Castaño-Amores, Alba Antunez-Rodriguez, Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo

Why was it done?

Pharmacogenetics (PGx) has the potential to predict patient´s drug response. Many genetic polymorphisms have been associated with variable drug response. This has been demonstrated with the highest level of evidence in fact many of them have been included in clinical dosing guidelines such as those from the Dutch Pharmacogenomics Working Group (DPWG) and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). Actually, many drug labels include the recommendation about genotyping specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) prior to drug prescription.

What was done?

We have implemented pharmacogenetic tests in our hospital for a total of nine drugs.

How was it done?

Our hospital provides a PGx test service according to the following workflow. Physicians order the PGx test to the Pharmacy Unit, we take a saliva sample with sterile-cotton tipped swabs and send them to the Genomic Unit at Genyo. There, we extract the DNA and genotype the variants of interest. Genetic results are reported back to the Pharmacy Unit within 48-72 hours. After genotype-phenotype-recommendation translation according to the CPIC and DPWG dosing guidelines, we upload the dosing recommendation as a PGx report to the electronic patient´s medical history.

What has been achieved?

Since 2012, 2414 patients have benefited from our PGx test service for at least one drug-gene interaction. These tests have been requested by seven hospital departments with regard to a total of nine different drugs. We have reported 932 PGx dosing recommendations: Clopidogrel with 2013 genotyped patients and 845 dosing recommendations; Azathioprine with 208 and 21; Capecitabine: 48 and 1; 5-FU: 5 patients without recommendations; Tamoxifen: 117 and 48; Trastuzumab: 34 and 15; Irinotecan: 4 and 2; Simvastatin/Atorvastatin: 2 genotyped patients and no recommendations.

What next?

Since the first PGx test in 2012, we have been able to implement PGx tests in daily clinical routine in our hospital affecting 9 drugs. 2414 patients have benefited from this service and we are working on the implementation of new polymorphisms affecting drug response to expand our services.

Pdf

Author(s)

Tanja Schicksnus

Why was it done?

The team of the geriatric trauma center consists of an orthopedic surgeon, geriatrician, nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist and a discharge management and diabetic nutrition expert according to the German society for orthopedic surgery (DGU) and now also a pharmacist who performs risk screening for drug-related problems such as fall, dizziness, cognitive impairment, conspicuous laboratory values, lack of appetite, etc. immediately after admission, in order to optimize drug therapy.

What was done?

The geriatric trauma center aims to provide geriatric patients with the best possible peri- and post-operative care after a fall with a fracture so that they resume their usual life and environment after the hospital stay. The pharmacist joined the interdisciplinary team with the aim of a medication review for the often multi-morbid and multi-prescription patients.

How was it done?

After the patient has been assigned to geriatric complex therapy according to the DGU criteria, the doctor requests a pharmacological consultation for this patient via the digital patient record. The pharmacist carries out a medication analysis with information from the record as well as bed side visits focusing on possible medication based problems.
Results are stored in the consultation report, serving as documentation and as basis for later evaluation. Important information for immediate implementation is highlighted in the digital file and transmitted to the attending physician by telephone.
Once a week, the entire team meets, with the scope for each patient being: What are the remaining problems? How can these be solved (interdisciplinary)?

What has been achieved?

During four months, medication reviews were carried out for about 100 patients. In the areas of bleeding risk, anticholinergic adverse events, antibiotics, malnutrition, dose adjustments and medicines inappropriate for geriatric patients, for one third of patients corrections led to an improvement in patients. For nearly 10% of patients also a prescription cascade was resolved and some medical device training has increased drug therapy safety.

What next?

Future benefit evaluation will be carried out based on resumption of patients due to a fall, in the categories: Time until next hospital admission, reason for next admission, adoption of optimized medication plan.

Pdf

Author(s)

Olga Nedopilkova, Stanislav Gregor

Why was it done?

The project was created to increase quality and maintain continuity of a health care provided in the Czech Republic and to prevent any discontinuity which could endanger the patient. Emergency dispensing of a drug is enabled by new functionality which is the patient’s drug record (PDR) which was only launched in the CZE in June 2020. Last but not least it is about expanding existing competencies of pharmacists and strengthening pharmacists’ position in the healthcare system.

What was done?

The Association of Young Pharmacists, with support of the Czech Chamber of Pharmacists, created a project which is focusing on a possibility of dispensing a chronically used prescription drug in case a patient cannot obtain a prescription for various reasons (“emergency dispensing of a drug”). In hospital pharmacies in the Czech Republic (CZE), it is possible to dispense medicines to the public. A concept has been developed that describes all the essentials that must be followed.

How was it done?

A project proposal describing specific situations when the pharmacist can proceed to emergency dispensing, rules of the actual implementation and also cost analysis has been prepared). A search for experience from abroad has been conducted as well. Subsequently, a survey among pharmacists was conducted. The purpose of the survey was to determine whether pharmacists are interested in this competence and have comments on it. Then a comprehensive concept was submitted to the Ministry of Health. Specific legislative changes will now be needed.

What has been achieved?

Among pharmacists in the CZE, a considerable agreement was reached with the draft. According to the survey 94% of pharmacists agree with the prepared proposal, 3.2% disagree, and the remaining 2.8% agree with minor modifications to the request. Furthermore, we managed to develop a concept that describes detailed conditions for dispensing drugs in emergency mode. The concept was submitted to the Ministry of Health, with which the details of this proposal will now be gradually negotiated.

What next?

This project represents only one of the new competencies that pharmacists could achieve. We want to follow up on this step with another project that would enable pharmacists to prescribe chronically used drugs under specific conditions even outside emergency situations.

Pdf

Author(s)

Grainne Johnston, Jennifer Brown

Why was it done?

The High Tech Scheme (HTS) in Ireland facilitates access to high cost drugs with proven cost benefit for patients. Combined national expenditure on adalimumab (Humira®) and etanercept (Enbrel®) exceeded €190 million in 2017. Biosimilar versions of both drugs are available, however largely not utilised. The most cost effective options for each drug were designated as the Best Value Biologic (BVB). Prescribing a BVB option offers the opportunity to save a considerable amount of money for the state.

What was done?

The Mater Misericordiae University (MMUH) Integrated Medicines Optimisation Pharmacist (IMOP) provided education and removed barriers to initiate biosimilar prescribing of adalimumab and Enbrel in the MMUH.

How was it done?

The MMUH IMOP was delegated to assist with implementation of BVBs prescribing.
The MMUH IMOP generated Patient Information Leaflets in relation to BVB switching.
The IMOP reviewed out-patients currently prescribed Humira® or Enbrel®, and provided education and information on switching from the originator to the BVB

What has been achieved?

Prior to the IMOP intervention, no patients in the MMUH had been prescribed a BVB.
Following IMOP intervention, between June 26 and September 27, 2019:
• 291 Humira® or Enbrel® patients were scheduled to attend MMUH rheumatology, gastroenterology and dermatology clinics.
• Of these, 64% (n=185) were switched to a BVB. An additional 19 patients were newly commenced on a BVB.
• The IMOP educated and counselled 91% (n=92), 93% (n=53) and 48% (n=13) of patients switched to a BVB in rheumatology, gastroenterology and dermatology respectively.
The largest contributing factor identified for patients not being prescribed a BVB was, no review by the IMOP prior to medical review; 65% (n=35), 59% (n=10) and 86% (n=12) for rheumatology gastroenterology, and dermatology respectively.

What next?

BVB prescribing can save vital health funds for the state while maintaining patient care. The MMUH IMOP is now progressing to adopt BVB prescribing for a number of other biological medicines at significant savings for the MMUH and state.

Pdf

Author(s)

Isabelle Sommer, David Palmero, Céline Julie Fischer-Fumeaux, Lydie Beauport, Vincent Adamo, Hervé Schwebel, Pascal Bonnabry, Lucie Bouchoud, Farshid Sadeghipour

Why was it done?

PN can be composed of about 50 different ingredients, whereof the majority are amino acids (AA). Therefore, PN represents a complex and high-risk fabrication. ME are often related to PN and may include prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration errors. As the treatment with PN is indispensable for a good cerebral and neurologic development as well as a postnatal weight gain, ME can result in growth retardation, developmental disturbances, and infections.
This project was performed with the aim to reduce ME having an impact on vulnerable newborns and to improve the security and quality of their nutritional treatment.

What was done?

A standardized pediatric parenteral nutrition (PN) solution for the first days of life of newborn infants has been developed. An industrial partner manufactures the ready-to-use double-chamber bag which is available 24/7 and of high-quality allowing a secured administration as well as a reduction of medication errors (ME).

How was it done?

A working group composed of pharmacists, clinicians, neonatologists, and industrials developed a PN solution for the first days of life of newborn infants conforming to the needs of two different neonatal services. An applied standardized PN and the ESPGHAN guidelines haven been used as references. The feasibility of an industrial production of double-chamber bags has been evaluated and implemented.

What has been achieved?

The developed PN solution has been formulated for a peripheral venous administration with an osmolarity under 900 mOsm/L to allow a wider range of application. The production of double-chamber bags has been chosen to increase the stability and shelf-life. The first compartment contains an AA admixture and the second compartment contains glucose and electrolytes (sodium, calcium, organic phosphate). This solution is initially produced by the service of pharmacy and afterwards by the industrial partner. The standardized PN bag has been implemented successfully on the neonatal ward in March 2019. Since then, almost 1800 standardized bags have been used (appr. 90 bags/month), resulting in a reduction of individual on-ward PN preparations of nearly 80%.

What next?

Further standardized PN for newborn infants need to be developed to allow a safe nutritional treatment. On-ward PN preparations must be prohibited to prevent undetectable preparation errors.

Pdf

Author(s)

SOFIA KONSTANTINIDOU, VANGELIS KARALIS

Why was it done?

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), like erlotinib and gefitinib, are widely used in anticancer therapy. However, after long term administration of TKIs, resistance is observed in the majority of patients. Thus, it is necessary to be able to define individualised dosage regimens for TKIs in cancer patients. Nowadays, modelling and simulation approaches represent the most powerful tool in the hands of clinical pharmacists towards precision medicine.

What was done?

Population pharmacokinetic (PK) – pharmacodynamic (PD) modelling was utilised to simulate erlotinib and gefitinib dosage regimens for non-small cell lung cancer. In silico clinical trials with virtual patients, of several resistance levels, were simulated in order to optimise pharmacotherapy and get better therapeutic outcomes.

How was it done?

The utilised PK/PD model and average parameter values were obtained from the study of Eigenmann and colleagues. This model was fully validated using statistical criteria and goodness of fit plots. In order to simulate many possible conditions that may occur in clinical practice, several different values of erlotinib and gefitinib clearance, absorption rate, pharmacodynamic characteristics (like tumor volume), and resistance were assessed. In addition, several dosage schemes were simulated. The entire modelling work was performed in Monolix® 2019R1.

What has been achieved?

Concentration vs. time and effect vs. time plots for the virtual patients were simulated for a variety of conditions and tumour resistance levels. For both TKIs, decrease of body clearance led to higher plasma concentrations, as well as more intense and longer duration of the effect (i.e. tumour volume shrinkage). Enhanced drug effect on resistant cells resulted in a decrease in tumour volume. In addition, a variety of concentration-time profiles were simulated, making it possible to choose the best regimen for each patient.

What next?

In this study, the use of modelling techniques led to the simulation of many conditions of patients and adjustment of dosage regimens according to their needs. Wider application of in silico methods using virtual patients will allow the design of the most appropriate individualised dosage schemes tailored to the patients’ requirements.

Pdf

Author(s)

Eva Heffernan, Deirdre Smith , Avril Tierney, Louise McDonnell

Why was it done?

Transitions of care such as hospital discharge present an opportunity for medication error. Lapses in communication at this interface are common. For the next healthcare provider (HCP) to issue the correct medication safely and in a timely manner, the discharge prescription needs to bridge this communication gap. Prescribing errors are the most frequent subtype of medication errors and can be repeated systematically for prolonged periods. Detection of medication error using tools such as audit, learning from these errors and planning corrective action is essential to building safer healthcare systems.
This study adapted the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) national standard for patient discharge summaries to create a benchmark for discharge prescriptions in SVPH. A QI initiative targeting prescribers was developed. This was designed as a bundle intervention and was called the Discharge Prescription Education Bundle (DPEB).

What was done?

The aim of this project was to evaluate the current level of discrepancies on discharge prescriptions for surgical and medical patients and to ascertain if a quality improvement (QI) initiative can impact on the severity of medication error at the point of discharge.

How was it done?

Uncontrolled consecutive baseline and re-audit of discharge prescriptions on a 26-bed mixed medical and surgical ward. The baseline audit assessed 70 patients’ discharge prescriptions. Deviations from the standard were termed discrepancies. Discrepancies were divided based on capacity to cause error (NCC-MERP Category A) and error occurred (NCC-MERP Category B-I). Discrepancies where an error occurred (NCC-MERP Category B-I) were reported using the in-house medication incident reporting (MIR) system and dually assessed by an independent panel and the project lead for potential to cause harm. The QI initiative was implemented and its impact assessed with a re-audit of 70 patients’ discharge prescriptions.

What has been achieved?

The overall number of discrepancies reduced from 156 in the baseline to 59 in the re-audit (p<0.05). Overall compliance with the audit standards improved from 17.1% to 54.3% (p <0.05). In the baseline audit 22.8% (n=16) of patients had a discrepancy where an error occurred; this reduced to 2.65% (n=2) in the re-audit (p<0.05). The severity of errors reduced in the re-audit.

What next?

The QI initiative used was proactive not reactive. Use of the discharge education bundle was not restricted to pharmacy opening hours.
This initiative was very low cost to implement. Following on from the successful results of this project one component of DPEB called the discharge prescription visual prompt is now preprinted on all SVPH discharge prescriptions as a reminder to prescribers.

Pdf

Author(s)

MARTA VALERA-RUBIO, ROSARIO MORA-SANTIAGO, MARIA ISABEL SIERRA-TORRES, JOSE LUIS ORTIZ-LATORRE, ISABEL MOYA-CARMONA

Why was it done?

The existence of different prescription systems could lead to validation errors when the pharmacist responsible for the ICU is not available. Furthermore, ICU physicians could not benefit from all the advantages that the official prescription system included. The presence of a common integrated prescription system among all units allow the exchange of prescription drug information between the ICU and the rest of the units, in accord with the health situation of the patient. Moreover, with this new system they can have access to allergies, renal adjustment doses, recommended posologies, therapeutic exchanges, and pharmacy validation, among other items.

Moreover, with this new system they can have access to allergies, renal adjustment doses, recommended posologies, therapeutic exchanges, and pharmacy validation, among other items.

What was done?

The intensive care unit (ICU) used a computerised physician order entry system different from all the hospital units. The pharmacy service, along with the ICU physicians and nurses, have tried to adapt the special features of this unit to integrate it with the clinical decision prescription system that is official in the hospital.

How was it done?

A multidisciplinary team formed by ICU staff (doctors and nurses) and pharmacists met to discuss the points that should be followed when implementing the new electronic prescription programme. In these working meetings, especially with physicians, we tried to agree on what and how the infusion protocols would be included in the new system, based on the infusion pumps guides made by both units. A pilot phase was established by the end of July 2019 to detect possible errors in the process of prescription, and mostly, when a patient changed from two units, from the ICU to another health care service and vice versa. All errors or discordances found were discussed between the pharmacist and the physician or the nurse, and in order to solve them we contacted the managers of the prescription system or we modified the parameters that are included in the system such as names of drugs, dosage guidelines, new nurses’ orders, etc.

What has been achieved?

The implementation of this new system has been well embraced by the staff, since it allowed a more efficient and secure health care circuit for the patients. All physicians are now able to use this system while the other one is no longer used.

What next?

We will continue making formative sessions with both physicians and nurses, in order to solve all the doubts that can appear during the training period. We will update periodically the available data and make improvements in the programme configuration.