Pdf

Author(s)

Amaia Martiarena Ayestaran, Ane Ros Olaso, Iosu Barral Juez, Cristina Saiz Martinez, Ane Latasa Berasategui.

Why was it done?

Detection of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) exceeding maximum dose in elderly patients. Communicate these findings to nursing home´s (NH) medical staff adding information to make easier the review. Evaluate the results obtained after the pharmaceutical intervention (PI).

What was done?

Pharmaceutical care provided in NH includes systemic reviews and drug adjustments in collaboration with clinical team to enhance the rational use of drugs.
It is designed a semi-automated pharmaceutical care circuit to detect exceeding maximum dose PIPs due to high prevalence in this population. The objective of this practice is to reduce, after a PI, PIPs to improve patient’s safety.

How was it done?

Selection of the most prevalent exceeding maximum dose PIPs based on STOPP-START criteria, safety notes and technical sheets from Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products: omeprazole, esomeprazole and rabeprazole ≥ 40 mg/day, pantoprazole ≥ 80 mg/day, lansoprazole ≥ 60 mg/day (PPIs); zolpidem (ZLP) > 5 mg/day; acetylsalicylic acid > 100 mg/day (AAS); citalopram > 20 mg/day; escitalopram > 10 mg/day (SSRIs); iron > 200 mg/day (Fe).
Automatic data extraction.
Registration in medical records and email notification to NH´s physicians including drug and dosage, adjustment recommendation and bibliographic reference.
Results evaluation after 2 weeks.
Limitations: way of communication and drug prescribing doctor different from NH´s doctor. To solve the first issue, an email has been sent after 1 week. On the second case, no action could be taken.

What has been achieved?

155 residents with one or more exceeding maximum dose PIPs are included from 22 centers with 2,223 elderly people linked to hospital pharmacy service. The mean age is 85.3 years and 69.7% are women.
After PI, PIPs are reduced by 66.5%.

PIPs TOTAL PPI ZLP Fe SSRI AAS
INITIAL 164 73 51 18 17 5
AFTER PI 55 20 21 5 8 1

Dose reduction and prescription discontinuation are the reasons of the PIPs reductions. Physicians justify don´t change prescriptions on 8 cases.

What next?

This semi-automated circuit is focused on PIPs. That is why the tool allows easy and rapid detection of a higher amount of patients with drug safety problems at once. In the future, it will be used for other PIPs and other NH.

Author(s)

Lanzone E. (1), Baldessarelli D. (2), Tinebra A. M. (1), Albini E. M. E. (1), Panarotto A. (1), Rossi C. (1) – (1) SC Farmacia Ospedaliera ASL Novara, (2) Scuola di Specializzazione Farmacia Ospedaliera Novara.

Why was it done?

A comprehensive analysis of systemic antibiotic use in hospitals during the first half of 2024 was conducted, revealing a significant increase in the consumption of WATCH class drugs, specifically carbapenems (ATC J01DH) and fluoroquinolones (J01MA). This prompted the implementation of rigorous monitoring for prescriptions of these drug classes.

What was done?

These antibiotics are key targets of the National Plan Against Antimicrobial Resistance (PNCAR 2022-2025), which mandates a reduction of at least 10% in consumption by 2025 compared to 2022. The initiative aimed to address the rising consumption and enhance antibiotic stewardship.

How was it done?

Data were extracted from the regional IT system, with consumption expressed in Defined Daily Doses (DDD) per 100 patient days. The project monitored the use of systemic antibiotics (ATC J01), focusing on carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. Motivated requests received by the Hospital Pharmacy (FO) were reviewed for therapeutic indications, dosage, treatment duration, and the availability of an antibiogram. All requests were recorded in an Excel sheet for effective data analysis and management.

What has been achieved?

In the first half of 2024, the Hospital Pharmacy received a total of 277 motivated requests for antibiotic prescriptions. Among these, 177 requests were aligned with the objectives of the PNCAR. Specifically, there were 54 requests for fluoroquinolones, including 35 for ciprofloxacin and 19 for levofloxacin. Within this subset, 16 requests included an antibiogram, while 27 were based on empirical data. Additionally, there were 6 requests for surgical prophylaxis, 1 for continuation of therapy, 1 accompanied by a positive urine culture, and 3 that were incorrectly filled out.
The analysis of requests also highlighted a significant number related to carbapenems, with a total of 123 submissions. Of these, 120 were for meropenem, 2 for imipenem in combination with cilastatin, and 1 for ertapenem. Notably, 80 of these requests included an antibiogram, with 74 deemed appropriate based on the established criteria.

What next?

Based on the collected data, modifications to the personalized motivated request form were proposed, introducing stricter criteria for empirical use of these antibiotics. This aims to limit their use to serious and well-defined cases, representing a significant step toward more effective antibiotic therapy and improved clinical outcomes while reducing the risk of resistance. The new form specifies that ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin requests can only be made under certain conditions, and carbapenems are restricted to cases of hemodynamic instability or severe respiratory failure.

Pdf

Author(s)

Anette Thomsen, Sarah Mejlvang, Maria Grønkjær

Why was it done?

Automatic multidose Dispensing System (ADS) was implemented in April 2024 in the Hospital Pharmacy Central Denmark Region.
Before the implementation, new software functionalities were developed in the medication module (MEM) of the electronic patient record. The development included creation of new workflows in the wards and in the Pharmacy. A new functionality makes it possible for nurses and pharmaconomists at the hospitals to manually order dose-dispensed medicine (DDM) to patients who are discharged from the wards. The orders are sent from MEM to the ADS on one patient for a given time period. Medication can be ordered hourly until noon.

What was done?

Medicine for 1-5 days of use can be dose-dispensed (DD) for the patients ready for discharge, which gives the following advantages:
-Improved patient safety. The transition from hospital to home now uses a concept regarding DDM that is known in the primary healthcare sector.
-Increased time for the patient to buy new medication at a local pharmacy after discharge.
-Extra time for newly added/removed drugs to be incorporated in future DDM from local pharmacies.
-Less time spent by nurses dispensing medicine for patients who are being discharged.

How was it done?

To support patients in the transition between hospital and home it has been important to make an easy way to order and dispense medication. Following developing tasks has been made:
-Identification of needed functionalities
– Identification of necessary IT-support
– Requirement for ADS
-Developments in MEM Development and implementation of new workflows in the clinic
All points were created in collaboration between doctors, nurses, IT specialists and pharmacy staff.
The development took around one year

What has been achieved?

All clinical wards that receive DDM can now manually order DDM for patients who are on their way home. This is a great help in the clinics.

What next?

Extending the timespan in which it is possible to order DDM to patients who are being discharged is planned.
Qualitative studies in patient safety for patients receiving dose dispensed medicine in the transition between Hospital and home is considered.

Pdf

Author(s)

Muñoz Cid, CL; Sierra Torres, MI; Sánchez Martín, A; Martín Roldán, A; González Sánchez, B

Why was it done?

A procedure was designed for the registration of drug allergies of patients admitted to the hospital in the electronic prescription program by reviewing the digital medical record.

What was done?

Several issues lead to the need of this development:
-Lack of integration of allergy information from computerized history and electronic prescribing.
-To facilitate the appropriate triggering of alerts, correct allergy terminology, coded properly, and captured in a standard location
-Variability in the recording of this information at the different levels of healthcare (primary care and hospitalized).
-Difficulty in accessing information on drug allergies when prescribing and validating medical treatments.
-To improve Patient safety, there is a high risk of serious adverse events if the patient receives a drug to which he/she is allergic.

How was it done?

-Review of allergy documentation (free text), including a more detailed specification and characterization of the patient´s allergies to coded properly (allergy to medicines or therapeutic groups, contraindications, intolerances).
-Validation and configuration of the alert system stratifying risk by means of different colors of according to the information from the clinical history.
-Development of an algorithm to evaluate how to register each allergy depending on every different situation.
-Elaboration of a procedure to alert management and incorporation into the electronic prescription program.
-Dissemination of the procedure and awareness-raising of the need for proper recording.

What has been achieved?

-Preventing medication errors related to drug allergies and ensuring patient safety.
– Improving access to all allergy information for all healthcare professionals involved in the prescription and validation of medication.
– To have a standardized methodology for recording and coding allergies.
– Integrating medical record information into the electronic prescription system.
– Setting-up an effective alert system to avoid allergy errors in the e-prescribing system.

What next?

We have achieved the implementation in the Pharmacy Service of our hospital, but it has already been taken to the safety committee in order to extend this practice to all the services of our hospital and we are working on the formation of a working group within the Patient Safety Commission. We are considering extending this procedure to primary care in order to address this problem from all healthcare areas.

Pdf

Author(s)

S Hurel, H Benoist, N Guesdon, S Niemczyk, A-P Gaumon, A Perdriel, E Labbe
Hospital Center of Falaise, Falaise, FRANCE
sylvelie.hurel@orange.fr

Why was it done?

Implementation of a local cooperation protocol (LCP) to enable pharmacists to renew and adapt prescriptions within the hospital.

What was done?

In France, a decree published in February 2023 allows pharmacists working in hospital pharmacies to renew and adapt therapies (RAT) in a concerted manner (RATC) or directly (RATD). Previously, pharmacists could not intervene directly in prescriptions, but could only recommend changes to the prescriber, which were often time-consuming and never made. The aim of setting up this protocol was to improve patient care and optimise pharmacist and medical time.

How was it done?

The LCP was implemented on 8 July 2024 in a 600-bed hospital on three long-term geriatric test units (100 beds) following validation by the hospital medical committee in June 2024. A prospective study was carried out over three months on seven indicators: number of patients included, RATCs, RATDs, physician acceptance rates, adverse event (AE) and serious AE rates, and pharmacist and physician satisfaction rates. The indicators were collected in real time using a dynamic cross-tabulated Excel table, and satisfaction was assessed using a survey comprising five multiple-choice questions.

What has been achieved?

The number of patients included over the three months implementation period was 58. A total of 153 RATs were performed, including 53.6% (n=82) RATDs and 46.4% (n=71) RATCs. The main interventions concerned drugs prescribed but not referenced in hospital (n=38), inappropriate treatment durations (n=23) and supra-therapeutic dosages (n=18). The acceptance rate by doctors was 100% (n=153). There were no AEs or serious AEs reported. The satisfaction rate of doctors (n=3) and pharmacists (n=2) showed an overall satisfaction rate of 100% (n=5).

What next?

This three-month feedback showed that healthcare professionals were completely satisfied with the service provided by this LCP and the indicators have proved that this protocol can be applied safely. Thanks to this results, the LCP will therefore be continued in the three test units before being rolled out to other departments. Implementing this LCP in departments such as surgery will make it possible to secure prescriptions in a partnership between doctors and pharmacists.

Pdf

Author(s)

Kristin Michaels, Chief Executive
Tom Simpson, President

Why was it done?

Polypharmacy and medication overuse remain critical concerns in modern healthcare, often leading to adverse drug events, increased hospitalisations, and diminished quality of life, particularly among the elderly. Recognising the need for improved medication management and patient safety, Advanced Pharmacy Australia initiated MedsAware: Deprescribing Action Week in 2022. The initiative aimed to promote awareness and education on deprescribing practices to optimise pharmacotherapy and reduce the burden of unnecessary medications.

What was done?

MedsAware: Deprescribing Action Week is an annual, nationwide campaign involving a series of educational programs, workshops, and collaborative efforts with healthcare professionals. The initiative provided evidence-based resources, clinical guidelines, and decision-support tools to pharmacists, physicians, and other stakeholders, and promoted key messages to patients around deprescribing and quality use of medicines. It also facilitated interdisciplinary forums to discuss strategies for implementing deprescribing protocols within various healthcare settings.

How was it done?

The initiative employed a multifaceted approach combining digital platforms, live seminars, and interactive workshops. Educational materials were disseminated through webinars, online modules, and social media outreach to maximize accessibility. Collaborative partnerships were established with hospitals, clinics, and professional organisations to integrate deprescribing practices into routine care.

What has been achieved?

MedsAware Deprescribing Action Week is about driving conversations around discontinuing medicines that are no longer required, or for which the risk of harm outweighs the benefits.
MedsAware seeks to raise awareness around ‘polypharmacy’ and ‘deprescribing’, empowering Australians and their care teams to manage every medicines regimen ensuring it is current, effective and safe.
#MedsAware supports and raises awareness of Australia’s 10th National Health Priority Area, Quality Use of Medicines and Medicines Safety.

What next?

Building on the momentum, Advanced Pharmacy Australia continues its annual MedsAware: Deprescribing Action Week to continually promote best practices, with the addition of the EAHP through MoU making the initiative global. In 2025, MedsAware turns its attention towards sustainability highlighting the benefits of deprescribing that can be felt all around us – for patient and planet. Future efforts will focus on longitudinal studies to assess the sustained impact of deprescribing interventions on patient health outcomes. Additionally, the development of an Australian national deprescribing framework is proposed, aiming to standardise practices and facilitate integration into healthcare policies and education curricula.

Author(s)

Ignacio Javier Tamboleo Sánchez, Julia Fernández Vela, Fernando Lago Ballester, Mª CARMEN MIRA SIRVENT, Elena Conesa Nicolas

Why was it done?

The initiative started in October 2022, it was a response to the challenges associated with prolonged intravenous antibiotic use. The overarching goals were to enhance patient care, mitigate unnecessary intravenous antibiotic prescriptions, and foster a culture of responsible antimicrobial stewardship. Recognizing the need for a systematic and collaborative approach, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) pharmacist played a central role in implementing interventions across various medical specialties, with a clear focus on improving patient outcomes.

What was done?

The initiative promoted the adoption of sequential antibiotic therapy among hospitalised patients undergoing intravenous treatment for more than three days. Leveraging the Wise Antimicrobial Stewardship Support System® (WASPSS®) and detailed analysis of medical records, the programme identified eligible patients based on criteria such as clinical stability, oral bioavailability, infection specifics, and antibiotic suitability.

How was it done?

The ASP pharmacist’s central role proved instrumental, with 74% of alerts resulting in actionable recommendations. WASPSS® detects every patient with intravenous antibiotic more than 3 days and the ASP pharmacist decides which patients will benefit from sequential therapy. Choosing the recommendation criteria is essential to have a good response from medical specialties ensuring a more efficient and tailored approach to intervention implementation. The main obstacles to the introduction of this initiative were the establishment of refined communication routes and the targeted training to the different specialties which are not yet fully implemented.

What has been achieved?

Results revealed that 74% of alerts met the criteria for transitioning from intravenous to oral administration. Among the 573 alerts reviewed, 45.1% witnessed a successful switch to oral antibiotics, 21.2% showed no change, and 16.7% of patients were discharged. Notably, higher acceptance rates were observed in specific specialties, such as pneumology (61.3%) and general medicine (54.4%). Nevertheless, oncology (35,3%) general and digestive surgery (25,8%) had the lowest acceptance rate. In conclusion, the global acceptance rate was lowest than expected (43,8%) but there are many improvements measures that are being carried out.

What next?

This initiative serves as a beacon for responsible antibiotic management, making noteworthy contributions to patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and the overall quality of healthcare delivery. Recommending ongoing collaboration, continuous training, and regular analysis of recommendation criteria will enhance its impact.

Pdf

Author(s)

Ana Concepción Sánchez Cerviño, Jorge Coca Crespo, Maria Rivera Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Alcaraz López, Adrián López Fernández, Elena Pérez García, Bárbara Ubeda Ruiz, Amelia Sánchez Guerrero

Why was it done?

Sequential therapy, or switch therapy, consists of an early conversion from intravenous to oral (PO) treatment, without compromising the therapeutic effectiveness. In advantage, PO in selected cases, avoids intravenous associated risks, it is more comfortable to patients and represents an important economic saving.

The aim of the GPI was to implement a daily program that allows the pharmacist to identify the patients that would benefit from the AST.

What was done?

Implementation of a program of antibiotic sequential therapy (AST) and evaluate the outcome of the pharmaceutical recommendations carried out in a third-level hospital.

How was it done?

A database was created to select the active antibiotic prescriptions with more than 72 hours duration, susceptible to AST: metronidazole, clindamycin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and linezolid.

Patients clinical criteria for initiating AST were established as:
• Temperature ≤ 37 ºC
• Systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg
• Heart rate < 100 bpm • Respiratory rate < 24 rpm • Oxygen saturation ≥ 90% • Capacity for oral intake Once the patients were identified, the pharmacist communicated the recommendation to the doctor in charge, and worked together to make a final decision. Due to the high burden of care, the follow-up of patients who could not be substituted to PO in the first 72 hours was lost.

What has been achieved?

From October 2022 to March 2023, 453 patients on intravenous antibiotic treatment were reviewed. The mean age was 65.7 ± 20.9, and 57.4% of the patients were men.
47 patients were selected as they met the established criteria.

All the antibiotics presented a similar percentage of recommendation with a mean of 19.2% ± 6.3. Of this percentage, 59.6% of the patients were switched to oral antibiotics. Stands out linezolid, with a 83.3% of acceptance.

Lower respiratory tract infections were the most prevalent, representing 51.6% of the total. However, only 11 patients (5.1%) were suggested for AST due to the frequent use of nasal spectacles or oxygen therapy, a criterion that excludes AST

What next?

The high number of accepted recommendations shows the importance of implementing an AST programme in order to optimize antimicrobial treatment, and this initiative could be easily implemented to all Pharmacy Services.

Pdf

Author(s)

STEFANIE HEHENBERGER, IRENE LAGOJA, SANDRA BIELITZ-HOLZER

Why was it done?

Creation of a stoma means change in secretion, intestinal motility and absorption. Depending on localisation, this has also consequences for the absorption of drugs or certain drug forms. Data on absorption of drugs in ostomy patients are rare, but as most drugs are absorbed in the small intestine, ileostomy patients may more likely experience difficulty in absorbing and, therefore, gaining maximum benefit from oral medications.

What was done?

As part of a project, it was evaluated whether and which drug-related problems (DRPs) occur in stoma patients and, if so, measures for optimising drug therapy were proposed.
Relevant drug data (tmax, site of absorption, etc.) were collected and systematised in tabular form and the need for further pharmaceutical interventions was surveyed.

How was it done?

Over a period of 21 weeks, medication of Ileostomy patients (new created and pre-existing) hospitalised in various wards was screened.
A Level 3 medication analysis was performed, and the medication was then analysed with regard to possible stoma-specific DRPs.
All DRPs and pharmaceutical interventions were categorised and documented, and the identified DRPs brought to the attention of the patient’s medical team for review/ discussion in written form and/or personally.

What has been achieved?

Seventy-nine DRPs were identified in 15 medication reviews, of which 49 (62%) were classified as stoma associated DRPs. The pharmaceutical interventions were categorised, most common recommendations were monitoring (18) and change of the medication form (15). Acceptance of the interventions was also recorded (82%). Since a HOS (High output stoma) occurred frequently, an escalation scheme for the therapy of liquid stool and/or stool volume ≥1500ml/day was established. Finally, an interdisciplinary cooperation taking into account the complex patient factors could successfully be established.

What next?

Due to these results it can be assumed that ileostomy patients benefit greatly from pharmaceutical interventions, and that clinical-pharmaceutical care of ileostomy patients contributes to the drug therapy safety of this patient group and is therefore now being continued and incorporated into everyday clinical practice. In addition, further projects such as the creation of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the interdisciplinary care of ileostomy patients are in progress.

Pdf

Author(s)

Carlos José Cortés Sánchez, Josefina Giménez Castellanos, Mónica Abdilla Bonías, Arantxa Valdivia Piqueres, José María Gómez Portolés, Irene Toledo Guasp, Eva García Cortés

Why was it done?

Proper use of antimicrobials is essential to ensure their efficacy and minimize the emergence of resistance. The evaluation of antibiotic prescription in a district hospital can provide information about clinical practice, adherence to local protocols, and the possibility of addressing antimicrobial resistance issues.

What was done?

Review the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription according to local guidelines and protocols.

How was it done?

This is 4-month prospective observational study(May to August 2023) in a district hospital. A daily list of admitted patients on antibiotic treatment was obtained through OrionClinic® electronic prescription. Each patient was reviewed and discussed for appropriateness with antimicrobial stewardship team in a Microsoft-TEAMS© chat. The following data were recorded: registration date, patient identification, hospitalization unit, microbiological culture, treatment modality (prophylaxis, empirical, or targeted) and appropriateness using a Microsoft FORMS©.
Descriptive analysis expressed as number and percentage and relationships derived from registration: percentage of patients by hospitalization unit, treatment modality, and appropriateness. Percentage of patients on empirical treatment with microbiological culture. And appropriateness according to treatment modality.

What has been achieved?

A total of 172 patients were analysed, of which 83(48.25%) were surgical patients (orthopaedic surgery, general surgery, urology, gynaecology, otolaryngology), 64(37.2%) are from internal medicine,MIN, 17(9.9%) from intensive care unit,ICU, and 8(4.7%) from paediatrics,PED. Of the total of patients, 95(55.2%) had requested a microbiological culture. About 52(30.2%) patients were on prophylactic treatment, 103(59.9%) empirically, and 17(9.9%) on targeted treatment. In conclusion, 119(69.2%) antibiotic treatments were appropriate (prophylactic 26/50%, empiric 80/77.67% and targeted treatment 13/76.5%).
Breaking-down data by hospitalization unit and treatment, of the 83 surgical (49 prophylactic, 28 empirical, and 6 targeted) 47(56.6%) were appropriate. Among the 64 MIN patients(1 prophylactic, 56 empirical, and 7 targeted), 54(84.4%) were appropriate. In ICU of 17 patients(2 prophylactic, 12 empirical, and 3 targeted), 11(64.7%) were appropriate. In PED of 8 patients(7 empirical and 1 targeted), 7(87.5%) were appropriate. Of the total of patients on empirical treatment(103), in 28(27.2%) there isn’t microbiological sample.

What next?

This is a preliminary analysis of our hospital’s situation in order to assess where interventions are needed for those patients who are not appropriate. It also helps us identify the hospitalisation units in which it is more necessary to implement strategic non-imposing measures to improve antibiotic prescription.