EAHP represents over 30,000 hospital pharmacists across 37 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professional
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
The Early Career Network aims to empower early-career pharmacists by sharing opportunities, insights, and success stories from across 25 member countries.
Together, we’re building a stronger, more connected hospital pharmacy community: one story, one country, one pharmacist at a time.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Gregorio Romero Candel, Esther Domingo Chiva, Laura Rodenas Herraez, Cristina Urbano, Jose Marco del Rio, Nieves Cuenca Cano, Maria Jesus Sanchez Cuenca, Antonio Sanz Arrufat, Ana Valladolid Wals, Angel Escudero Jimenez
In the areas of critically ill patients such as emergency, intensive care and resuscitation, the use of intravenous drugs (IV) in “Y” are common in clinical practice. Stability and physical-chemical compatibility of IV drugs admistered in “Y” are important, affecting directly the safety of patients and the therapeutic efficacy of medicines, which can lead to medication errors (ME). A quick reference chart was developed in order to facilitate the administration of these drugs and reduce errors in these areas.
A chart for quick reference of compatibility of drugs in “Y” for the most commonly used drugs in the areas of critically ill patients of our hospital.
It was a team composed of a doctor specializing in emergency medicine, a nurse and two hospital pharmacists. Economic management of pharmacy program Farmatools® was used to obtain the list of drugs most consumed and those most relevant and specific of these areas were selected.
A chart was made where the header of the rows and the columns was the list of drugs in the study. Finally, we conducted a systematic research on Micromedex® “Y” compatibility with each drug with the remaining, completed the chart with a visual color code: green (compatible), red (incompatible), white (not tested) and orange (precaution, existence of various stability dilutions and consult your pharmacist).
The elaboration and implementation of this table will provide a fast and visual consultation instrument to nurses before the administration of drugs in “Y”. This tool intended to facilitate decision-making, contributing to increase the effectiveness of the drugs and avoid possible adverse reactions in patients, increasing the quality of care and lowering the ME.
We are still working on the same areas to increase safety in drug therapy in critical care. Currently, that improvement measures that are being developed are: new pharmacotherapeutic protocols specifically for those units: high risk medications perfusion protocols and new safety guidelines.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Aude Desnoyer, Anne-Laure Blanc, Christian Skalafouris, Rolf Hauri, Alain Lorenz, Pascal Bonnabry, Bertrand Guignard
PIM (i.e. over-/under-/mis-prescriptions, and drug interactions) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events and morbi-mortality (1). Its incidence is high and underestimated in internal medicine (2). While many paper checklists, providing explicit statements, related to PIM in geriatrics exist (3), none had been developed for adults in internal medicine. Moreover, as all these tools are only available as paper versions, they are not easily accessible in daily practice (4). Therefore, we decided to develop an electronic checklist, dedicated to adults in internal medicine.
We developed an electronic screening checklist to detect potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in internal medicine.
We conducted a 4-step study including literature review, 17 semi-structured interviews, a 2-round Delphi survey, and a forward/back-translation process (French English) to develop PIM-Check (5). Sixty-five medical specialists and pharmacists, from 22 hospitals in Belgium, Canada, France, and Switzerland were enrolled. Experts agreed on 160 statements, in 17 medical domains, and 56 pathologies. These statements were then integrated in a specifically developed web-based electronic tool. Each statement is associated with at least one pathology and one medication (1600 ATC encoded).
The application is available in French and in English on a website (www.pimcheck.org). A “Screening” function allows users to select for a specific patient, his/her co-morbidities and medications to switch on statements that are the most relevant. A “Favourites” function, gives quick access to selected statements, and a “Learning” function gives access to the list of all statements, those unread and those already read. Details regarding the conception of the tool, direct access to the references (n=333) and useful links (n=29), publications related to the tool and a contact section, are also available. Between February and September 2016, PIM-Check has been visited more than 75.000 times, in over 66 countries.
Several studies assessing the impact of PIM-Check are ongoing. The algorithm and content of the tool are constantly updated. Thanks to the English version, PIM-Check can be used in different European countries and healthcare settings (6), and will be helpful to support clinical pharmacists’ education in appropriate prescription analysis.
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
A. Navarro Ruíz, A. Martínez Valero, R. Gutiérrez Vozmediano, A. Andújar Mateos, A. Martí Lorca, I. Jiménez Pulido
The purpose was to increase the efficiency of this management process involving a high workload due in part to the absence of information.
In Spain, the availability of drugs under special circumstances is regulated by the Spanish Royal Decree 1015/2009 of 20 June, which established three instances: (1) use of investigational medicinal product undergoing a clinical trial, (2) use of medical products for a medical purpose not in accordance with the authorised product information (off-label use) and (3) access to unauthorised medicines in our state but which are legally marketed in other states. Also, each region has its own regulatory system for medicines. In the pharmacy department, we have developed a software application for managing requests for medicinal products in the situations described above, and in accordance with our region’s regulations. It is organised in different sections that collect patients, prescribing physician details, medicinal products and diagnostic information. It has restricted access through user accounts and a menu for multiple search parameters.
In the pre-design phase, we held individual meetings with pharmaceutical and administrative staff involved in this process to identify their specific needs and priorities, and to assess these once the software application was created. The database management system used for the development of the computer application was Microsoft Access 2003. Once finished, it was tested for 2 months to help pinpoint specific errors and improvement opportunities.
Computerisation of this process has improved the efficiency in requests management, facilitating the use of information, increasing speed and reliability, allowing the possibility of analysing large volumes of data, providing greater confidentiality and increasing security through backups.
The next step will be to assess the usefulness of this software application using a satisfaction survey. To incorporate this initiative into other hospitals in our area requires only compatible software able to run the application.To extend its use to other regions would need adaptation of this software application to the existing regulations in each region.
Production and Compounding
Chemotherapies are generally prescribed and produced as a function of Body Surface Area (BSA). The most recent literature recommends that marketed drugs continue to use BSA-based dosing supported by clinical evidence. If not, it recommends DB with adjustments for other important parameters.
Determine which of the drugs compounded in our centralised chemotherapy production unit were potential candidates for dose banding (DB) for adults, whilst guaranteeing patient safety and meeting the needs of physicians, pharmacists and nurses.
The database of chemotherapy doses produced between 2010 and 2013 was analysed to define a Top 10 chart of the most common protocols and compounds. Dosage patterns were analysed and new bands were modelled using exponential calculus in order to aid in DB decision-making. Discussions with interdisciplinary teams and senior physicians took place in order to promote acceptance of the project and its deployment.
Oncology professionals requested an integration of bands into the electronic prescription system, the possibility to prescribe doses above those suggested using BSA and a maximum 5% margin of difference to the usual prescribed dose. They highlighted the necessity of maintaining “ready for administration” doses. For example, in 2013, 613 infusion bags of gemcitabine were produced in 111 different doses, ranging from 266 to 2900 mg. Following the new specifications, just two bands (2000 mg and 1805 mg) already fulfil 50% of annual production needs; producing five band doses streamlines 90% of annual production needs.
Chemotherapeutic doses can now be prepared in bands and the pharmacy activity can be rationalised by producing doses in batches. The imminent introduction of automation should ensure accuracy of the doses delivered. Future studies should examine product stability so that chemotherapy production planning becomes highly efficient.
Introductory Statements and Governance
D. Campbell, W. Baqir, O. Crehan, R. Murray, N. Wake, R. Copeland
Supplementary prescribing was implemented as an attempt to reduce prescribing errors at the point of admission. Pharmacists working in more ‘traditional’ clinical roles would identify errors and then ask junior doctors to correct the mistakes made. Not only did this expose patients to unnecessary risks but this was an inefficient use of resources. Prescribing allowed pharmacists to work much more autonomously.
Our initiative was to implement pharmacist prescribing across an NHS hospital trust. We focused on developing and using generalist prescribing pharmacists to enhance their current ward based role. We have adopted an “anytime, anywhere” approach to prescribing, where the prescribing pharmacist, like their medical counterparts, can prescribe any medicine, for any patient, for any condition and in any setting.
Pharmacist supplementary prescribing commenced on a single ward, with staff working within a care plan, managing patients. Independent prescribing allowed prescribing service to be rolled out across the Trust. We now expect all pharmacists to obtain a prescribing qualification as a condition of employment. The pace of development was very much dependent on the rate at which pharmacists could be trained.
Supplementary prescribing on the admissions unit showed 39% (127/326) of patients audited were prescribed medication that otherwise would have been omitted. In 2014, of the 49 pharmacists employed, 29 (59.2%) are actively prescribing, with seven also having specialist roles. Seven pharmacists (14.3%) are currently in training. An audit of prescribing showed that pharmacists prescribed for 40% (182/457) patients accounting for 13% (680/5279) of all items. In a separate audit, 4 (0.3%) errors from 1413 items prescribed were detected.
This process has become embedded across our Trust. Regionally, other Trusts agreed a workforce strategy which included the development and deployment of prescribing pharmacists in the way we have described above.
