Author(s)

Jon Michaeli, Bryan Li

Why was it done?

The novel delivery method provides an on-demand option for senior citizens at higher risk of serious Covid-19 infections to receive health essentials while maintaining social distancing. The program launched before Covid-19 vaccines were publicly available, and was sustained during a period of especially intense Covid-19 spread in the US from Nov 2020 – Jan 2021.

What was done?

In early May 2020, Matternet, CVS, and UPS launched direct-to-consumer drone delivery of prescription medicines and other health goods to The Villages, the United States’s largest retirement community with more than 135,000 residents. The operations have expanded in scope since and are ongoing

How was it done?

The drone flights were conducted by Matternet’s M2V9 UAV platform and drew upon the companies’ experience operating other US healthcare drone networks. Deliveries are dispatched from CVS store 8381 and flown to New Covenant United Methodist Church, with final delivery to front porches via golf cart. This is an important milestone on the journey to drone delivery to individual homes at scale.

What has been achieved?

Matternet and UPS have completed 2,500+ deliveries to date. The partnership has expanded operations to Elan Buena Vista, another retirement community nearby. The program’s success helped pave the way for other healthcare drone programs, including a new route at Wake Forest Baptist where Matternet and UPS are transporting Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccines (first ever in the US).

What next?

Full automation achieved via Matternet’s proprietary drone port, the “Station,” will permit pharmaceutical drone delivery at scale and accelerate the roll-out of city-wide networks that give pharmacists more flexibility around where and how patients receive medicines. These networks will support and accelerate the shift to tele-health and “hospital at home” as well as just-in-time inventory management, with significant potential to reduce medical waste through stock centralization. First commercial deployment of the Station occurred in Lugano, Switzerland in September 2021. The same month, Matternet announced a partnership with the Abu Dhabi Department of Health and the UAE’s General Civil Aviation Authority to launch a city-wide medical network serving 40+ locations by 2023. Similar systems are planned for Europe, in cities such as Zurich, Berlin and Athens.

Author(s)

Mª Ángeles Parro Martín, Beatriz Montero Llorente, Teresa Gramage Caro, Manuel Vélez Díaz-Pallarés, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Sagrado, Hilario Martínez Barros, Ana María Álvarez Díaz

Why was it done?

To ensure continuity of treatment and pharmacotherapeutic follow-up in patients vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection included in a home delivery and telepharmacy program.

What was done?

Implementation and adaptation of home delivery and telepharmacy during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

How was it done?

A work procedure was designed to detail the new functions to be performed by administrative assistants (AA), pharmacy technicians (PT) and pharmacists (PH). A first procedure was designed, which was adapted and improved after 6 months of experience, giving rise to procedure 2.

Procedure 1

– AA phone call to patients scheduled to obtain consent for home delivery and confirm delivery data.
– The PH grouped patients who had confirmed home delivery in the appointment manager.
– The PH reviewed the electronic prescription of all patients and performed telepharmacy to those who were due and/or had incidents.
– The PT prepared the packages.

Procedure 2

Phase 1

– The AA called all patients scheduled until the end of the year to offer them the option of remaining in the home delivery and telepharmacy program permanently. If they accepted, their consent and delivery data were recorded. From this point on, the call to offer home delivery and telepharmacy was discontinued; it was only offered to patients when they attended in person.
– A specific diary for home delivery patients was created.
– The telepharmacytelepharmacy was added to the PH diary.

Phase 2

– Trained PT in home delivery incident resolution (address changes, absent patients, package rejection) to reduce FAR’s working hours.

Phase 3

– Development of a computer application: computerization of manual processes (labels, identification of refrigerated shipments, SMS delivery confirmation sent to patients, and request for appointment changes).

What has been achieved?

31,066 home delivery have been performed on 7,170 different patients. 7,443 telepharmacy consultations have been performed.

PT training and computer development has reduced the PH dedication from 7 hours to 3 hours.

What next?

Establish criteria for prioritization of patients who are candidates for home delivery and telepharmacy.
Implementation of video call instead of telepharmacy

Author(s)

Ghalib Abbasi

Why was it done?

As we venture into the 2020s, health-system pharmacies need to consider these novel approaches to deliver pharmaceutical care to their patients given the changing population needs, lifestyles, and available home technologies accessible to most patients. The ultimate goals are to enhance patient safety, increase hospital pharmacy operational efficiency, and maximize revenue.

What was done?

Novel technologies were implemented at Houston Methodist to enhance patient safety and experience. These include voice-activated devices in patient rooms, smart glasses for pharmacists, smart phones for hospital pharmacy service provision, artificial intelligence, and tele-health

How was it done?

Careful infrastructure considerations/build took place along with pharmacist-driven algorithm write-up. During this GPI, we’d like to discuss specific steps to make this happen along with sensible benefits we realized from implementing each technology.

What has been achieved?

Our hospital pharmacists got significantly more involved in direct patient care where notable efficiencies were realized on the operational side. In addition, medication education was significantly enhanced with improved patient access to their in-house hospital pharmacist.

What next?

Next steps include deploying these these technologies to further service lines and patient care areas, as well as investing into further meaningful technologies. We’ll review what’s in the pipeline as well.

Pdf

Author(s)

ARDIZONE BEATRIZ, MARTA HERNÁNDEZ SEGURADO, MARÍA FORTE PÉREZ-MINAYO, LAURA GARCÍA JIMÉNEZ, ELENA TORTAJADA ESTEBAN, ANA CORDERO GUIJARRO, NATALIA BARRERAS RUIZ, LAURA JIMÉNEZ NAVARRO, JAVIER BÉCARES MARTÍNEZ

Why was it done?

First, we had a high number of patient inquiries by phone and by email. Furthermore, patient queries related with their treatment and their resolution were not recorded in the electronic clinical history. Finally, we needed a communication platform that would guarantee personal data privacy.

What was done?

In collaboration with the IT department, we developed a software tool called “Web Dialogue” within the e-health portal of our institution. This tool allows the patients to communicate with the pharmacist using a chat box where they can write queries about drug interactions, adverse effects and any questions about the hospital dispensing treatments, as well as other medications and herbal products. A pharmacist answers the queries within 24 hours, from Monday to Friday.

How was it done?

We asked the IT department to activate this tool for all active patients to whom we dispensed medication in our service (a total of 8000 patients). The development lasted 2 years (2017-2019), but it was not until March 2020, with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, that the “Web Dialogue” began to be used by our patients more widely. We also made an informative video that was posted on the e-health portal in order to achieve a wider knowledge of this tool among patients. See link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Z9pd93sNY8

What has been achieved?

The median number of messages per month in 2020-2021 was 202 (IQR= 100,5; 468). At the beginning of the state of alarm in Spain there was a peak in the use of the “Web Dialogue”, mainly to query about how to access the medication (94% of the queries). Over the following months, the proportion of these consultations decreased and consultations regarding doubts about treatment, adverse effects and drug interactions increased. Furthermore, the Net Promoter Score (NPS), an indicator that allows us to measure the satisfaction of patients, shows that in the last year we have achieved, for the first time, a score over 60, which is considered excellent.

What next?

Some of our ideas for the future are: the possibility of selecting the type of inquiry and the interlocutor by the patient, creating algorithms for the automatic response of certain questions and carrying out Big Data research studies.

Author(s)

Belén Serna Serrano, Victoria Lerma Gaude, Ana Valladolid Walsh, Cristina Del Pozo Carlavilla, Juan Manuel Collado Sanz, Héctor Alabort Ayllón, Eduardo Tébar Martínez, Andrea Drozdz Vergara

Why was it done?

In the pharmacist-patient clinical interview (CI), DP-I revision is frequent due to consumption increase of phytotherapy in recent years. The aim of the initiative was to study the degree of discrepancy (DD) based on the severity criteria (SC) found about the recommendations on the management of DP-I. Nowadays there are multiple databases with lack of unification. Patients diagnosed of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are frequently interviewed by the pharmacist and they often take herbal medicines (HM).

What was done?

We unified the information collected from the commonly consulted databases of drug-plant interactions (DP-I) whose information could be scarce or contradictory, by creating a tool based on the most consulted plants in our clinical practice (CP).

How was it done?

To create our own DP-I tool, the sources consulted were:
– Our own plant database based on CP. A total of 56 plants.
– Six official databases of DP-I: (A)-Phytotherapy official monographs, (B)-MedInteract®, (C)-Micromedex®, (D)-UpToDate-Lexicomp® (E)-Medscape®.

In order to unify the DP-I information consulted and to be able to identify the DD (0 to 2), the SC for all databases were unified in 3 levels: if the database had 5 levels (1=1-2; 2=3-4; 3=5) or 4 levels (1=1-2; 2=3; 3=4). In first place we decided to test this tool with a small sample size of drugs (6 drugs commonly used for the treatment of MS) to check whether the discrepancy between the databases usually consulted was significant or not.

What has been achieved?

Finally, 6 DP-I were detected with Hypericum perforatum (HP) and Echinacea angustifolia (EA):

The DD seems to be similar between A-B databases and greater respect to the rest of them. Depending on the database consulted the pharmacist’s performance could change and consequently, pharmaceutical care may be affected. Since this tool was implemented in our CP, none of our MS patients have taken HP or EA, therefore, it has not been necessary to modify their treatment because of DP-I.

What next?

This tool could speed up the pharmacological review of possible DP-I and improve decision-making for the care of MS patients. Our next step is to increase the sample of analysed drugs commonly used in other pathologies, such as antiretroviral drugs.

Author(s)

Dorothea Strobach, Ute Chiriac, Sigrun Klausner, Claudia Langebrake, Christiane Querbach, Carolin Schuhmacher

Why was it done?

Although guidelines for DI demand regular quality assurance procedures, no method of evaluation is internationally agreed on. The tool should be feasible, reproducible and reflect real-life quality of DI. It should allow to identify areas for quality improvement in general and for every participant.

What was done?

We developed a tool for annual quality assessment of drug information (DI) provided by hospital pharmacies on behalf of the German Association of Hospital Pharmacists ADKA e.V.. The tool has been successfully implemented for four years.

How was it done?

We developed a new tool for quality assessment of DI using a fictitious test enquiry and simulated real-life conditions and proved it representative for real-life quality [1]. The answers for the test enquiry are evaluated by blinded experts for content and formal requirements. For four years, 2017-2020, annual assessment of DI was offered to German language hospital pharmacies with changing topics and enquiry levels. Participants receive their own result in comparison to average of all regarding content-related and formal requirements. A proposal for an answer is published afterwards for educational purposes.

What has been achieved?

The annual DI quality assessment tool was successfully implemented as shown by increasing numbers of participating hospital pharmacies (45/71/79/118). Areas for improvement have been identified in general and can be identified by each participant as well. As an example, presentation of references has improved over the years [2]. Since 2018, a certificate of participation is offered as document for quality assurance audits thereby underlining the importance of this hospital pharmacy service.

What next?

Annual quality assessment for DI by hospital pharmacies will be further offered. Results over years will be evaluated for overall effect of the annual test tool on quality improvement regarding content-related and formal requirements. This method for annual quality assessment of DI provided by hospital pharmacies could be implemented by other countries.

References
1. Strobach D et al. EJHP 2020 online ahead of print. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002409
2. Strobach D et al. Krankenhauspharmazie 2020;41:187-91

Pdf

Author(s)

MARINA CORRALES PAZ, CLAUDIA RODRIGUEZ MORETA, INMACULADA LOMARES MANZANO, ANA GANFORNINA ANDRADES

Why was it done?

Due to the health crisis caused by the SARS-COV-2 virus, many hospitals have seen
the necessity to implement a safe dispensing system (telepharmacy) to provide medication to
high risk patients and those infected with Covid-19 in order to prevent interrupting their
treatments.

What was done?

To implement a system that guarantees a sure and effective supply of medical treatments to those vulnerable patients, those at increased risk or with difficult access to the hospital during the coronavirus pandemic.

How was it done?

A database was created with those patients attending our hospital’s outpatient service(OS)to pick up their medication within the next 7 days, verifying through pharmaceutical software and the patient’s medical history records (MHR)their next dispensing date. After checking if the patient had a medical appointmentthat could coincide with the dispensing date, a phone interview was conducted with the patient to schedule the pick-up of the medication through theOS or by telepharmacy(patients’ consent was requiredto use their personal information and we asked how the treatment was going). In our case the patients could pick-up their medication in the referral hospital (RH), a newly created OS in an affiliate hospital or by telepharmacy toprevent the collapse of the hospitals. We registered: number of patients attended in RH, new OS or by telepharmacy and number of dispensations. Patients were grouped in areas based on their city and delivery date for telepharmacy and in the case of patients picking up their own medication they were made an appointment.

What has been achieved?

During the months the state of emergency was in place in Spain (March 14th– June 21st)3385 patients were attended in total and 9316 medicationswere dispensed. 2245(66.3%) patients were attended in the RH (5794 dispensations), 583(17.2%) patients were attended through the new OS (1436 dispensations) and the rest 557(16.5%) had their medication sent to their address (2086 dispensations).

What next?

A safe and effective dispensing system was achieved to outpatients during the Covid-19 pandemic through the implementation of a new telepharmacymethod and the establishment of a new OSthat allows convenient dispensation of medication while minimising the risk of virus spread.

Pdf

Author(s)

CLARA NOTARIO DONGIL, PATRICIA ARAQUE ARROYO, MARÍA MAR ALAÑÓN PARDO, ALEJANDRO MARCOS DE LA TORRE, MARÍA CARMEN GARCÍA CONDE, BEATRIZ PROY VEGA

Why was it done?

The circuit was designed during the pandemic period responding to the COVID-19 situation. The aim was providing the best service to hospitalized patients. The activity began on March 10, 2020.

What was done?

Due to the current pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, our Pharmacy Service (PS) has been reorganized and adapted its activity by areas according to the needs of a given situation.

How was it done?

1.- Priority areas were set up.
2.- Main activities to develop in each section were defined.
3.- There was a redeployment of the PS staff.

What has been achieved?

Pharmaceutical assistance: PS developed pharmacotherapeutic protocols, collaborated giving advice to medical staff selecting appropriated treatments and detecting the most important interactions between drugs. It also advised regarding to compatibility and stability of medication, providing in addition written information through tables and triptychs elaborated.

Pharmacotechnics: 1,320L of hydroalcoholic solution were elaborated and 1,161L that were donated to the hospital were repackaged; 5.3L of hydroxychloroquine 25 mg/mL oral suspension were prepared for patients in the Intensive Care Units (ICU).

Parenteral preparations: Perfusion elaboration was centralized in the PS; 495 infusions of midazolam 1.6 mg/mL and 1,570 of fentanyl 0.012 mg/mL were formulated to ICU. Individualized doses of intravenous tocilizumab belonged to 31 patients were elaborated.

Management and acquisition of medicines: Two new hospitalization areas and three new ICUs were set up, equipped with medication kits. We increased the frequency of medication replacement and the stock of medication in the hospitalization units was adapted. We made a continuous review of medication stocks due to high stocks turnover because an elevated demand. To guarantee the supply of medicines related to SARS-CoV-2, medication was requested through the application of “management of medicines in special situations” of the Ministry of Health. 45 applications were processed.

What next?

The project is applicable to whatever PS, a defining figure in SARS-CoV-2 health crisis´s management, giving priority to essential services.

Pdf

Author(s)

Xando Díaz-Villamarín, Ana Pozo-Agundo, Paloma García-Navas, Alba Antúnez-Rodríguez, Celia Castaño-Amores, Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo

Why was it done?

Nowadays, it is known that at least 33% of patients show variable response to drugs. Of those, genetic polymorphisms explain around 15-30% of these cases, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) being the genetic markers most clinically relevant. In 2013, 40 million SNPs were identified in humans and some have been observed to determine drug response. These observations lead to the incorporation of genotyping some of these SNPs as a recommendation in many drug labels before treatment initiation.
Since patient´s drug response may be determined by certain SNPs in different genes it is necessary to develop CDSS based on pharmacogenetic (PGx) information that makes feasible its application in clinical routine, translating genotypes into phenotypes and dosing recommendations.

What was done?

We have developed a local Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that informs the physician on the availability of a PGx test in our hospital for certain prescribing drugs. This system will also be able to translate the genetic information into dosing recommendations.

How was it done?

We selected all the SNPs affecting drug response for which there is already a PGx test available in our hospital. All of them have been previously validated, and, only genes/SNPs related to drug response with the highest level of evidence, available in the Dutch Pharmacogenomics Working Group (DPWG) and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) dosing guidelines with a minor allele frequency higher than 0,1% in our population have been included. We have considered all the different genotypes according to the SNPs included and linked them to a phenotype and dossing recommendation according to CPIC/DPWG guidelines.

What has been achieved?

Our CDSS connects different drugs with available PGx test in our unit, showing which gene should be genotyped before prescription. It translates genotypes into phenotypes and also provides dosing recommendations once PGx results are received, according to the CPIC and/or DPWG guidelines. Nowadays, this system facilitates the workflow for the implementation of pharmacogenetic tests in our hospital.

What next?

We have developed a CDSS that manages PGx information facilitating the implementation of pharmacogenetics in daily clinical routine. It will also allow us to expand our services to other medical departments within our hospital.

Pdf

Author(s)

Helle Brauner

Why was it done?

There was a need for improved planning and preparing processes, as when it comes to price negotiations and estimates on financial burden and strategic procurement.

What was done?

Amgros, a part of the Danish health care system, has secured the supply of medicines and hearing aids to public hospitals and hearing clinics across Denmark for 30 years. This is done through efficient procurement and tendering procedures, creating economies of scale and savings.

In addition to this, in January 2017, Amgros launched its own Horizon Scanning unit. Now, the Danish Horizon Scanning system provides the health care system with an overview of medicines, indications and extensions e.g. pharmaceutical forms expected to be entering the Danish market within the next 2-3 years.

How was it done?

In 2016, it was decided to establish an Horizon Scanning system in Denmark. Then, input from internal and external stakerholders regarding their needs and expectations were gathered.

The outputs from the Horizon scanning unit consist of an overview of medicines about to reach the Danish market, as well as estimates of costs for new, expensive medicines and possible savings, for example if there are cheaper biosimilar drugs on the market. We also assess potential patient population and location of treatment. This is done in close cooperation with several Danish clinicians.

Sources for verifying and validating the data inputs are primarily EMA, complemented with commercial databases and a niche group of other sources. Data is gathered in a database.

What has been achieved?

The outputs enable our stakeholders to better plan the introduction of new medicines, to secure more cost-effective health solutions for everyone and to achieve more health for money in the Danish hospital setting.

Danish Regions, the interest organization for the health care regions, use the estimates in their annual negotiations with the Government on finances and the individual regions use them in their own budgets.

The predictability this system brings to Denmark is key in a future with more rare diseases, treatments and advanced pricing.

What next?

The Horizon scanning function is continuously being developed to meet the needs of our stakeholders, as we want to enable them in providing health care to the Danish citizens.