Good Manufacturing Practice and chemotherapy preparation: A case study on implementation of a robotic system in a Danish hospital pharmacy.
Pdf
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Why was it done?
In 2017, the hospital pharmacy has started a project for automated chemotherapy preparation aimed at managing the increasing workload, while ensuring highest level of quality and healthcare workers safety. In Denmark, the authorities expect hospital pharmacy preparation to be GMP compliant. To achieve the best implementation of APOTECAchemo, go-live was preceded by thorough qualification process and followed by robot performance evaluation in a GMP-pharmacy.
What was done?
A robotic system for aseptic preparation of cytotoxic drugs was implemented in the pharmacy-based, Grade C cleanroom compliant with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). Specific work organisation allowed the integration of APOTECAchemo into the pharmacy workflow, thereby steadily improving the robot productivity.
How was it done?
A multidisciplinary team defined 228 User Requirements Specification (URS) addressed in the tender and associated to GMP regulations to assess that the technology complied with the intended purpose. APOTECAchemo passed through all qualification stages: design qualification (DQ), factory-acceptance testing (FAT), installation qualification (IQ), site-acceptance testing (SAT), operational qualification (OQ), performance qualification (PQ). The implementation of robot was evaluated in terms of doses prepared, active ingredients processed, and % of the total production compounded. Data were taken from the management software and examined from June 2019 to September 2020.
What has been achieved?
The qualification process was completed in 13 months (from April 2018 to May 2019). APOTECAchemo fulfilled the requirements set in accordance with GMP regulations and went live in May 2019. In the first 15 months of operation, 20,968 doses were prepared with the robot, of which 18,242 infusion bags (87%) and 2,726 elastomeric pumps (13%). The number of active ingredients processed were 21, of which five (5-fluorouracil, calciumfolinate, irinotecan, gemcitabine, carboplatin) covered 58% of the total production. Average production of the robot increased by 39%, from 963 doses/month in 2019 to 1,582 doses/month in 2020. The % of the total production operated by APOTECAchemo rose from 20.9% (2019) to 46.4% (2020).
What next?
APOTECAchemo robot was successfully implemented in a fully GMP-compliant hospital pharmacy, thereby enabling the automation of the preparation process and the reduction of the manual operations. Through the evaluation performed, the hospital pharmacy decided to install a second robotic system to further enhance the automated production.
THE APPLICATION OF AN EHEALTH MODEL IN THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Pdf
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
MAR GOMIS-PASTOR, ANNA DE DIOS LÓPEZ, MARIA ANTONIA MANGUES, MIRIAM ORS, MERITXELL CUCALA, CATERINA SANPOL, VICTOR ROBERT, XAVIER BORRAS, GEMMA CRAYWINCKEL
Why was it done?
HTP are therapeutically complex patients who may benefit from an intensive telematic follow-up. Moreover, human relations among patients and health providers may be enhanced to improve patients’ empowerment with their health care. Additionally, interdisciplinary eHealth projects lead to increased interaction among health providers, expanding advanced patient-centered care in healthcare systems.
What was done?
An eHealth program directed to heart transplant patients (HTP) was implemented. The software developed was called mHeart and consists on a mobile phone application complemented by a website(https://n9.cl/ajut). A pilot study to validate the software and a clinical trial were conducted. This tool is now extended into clinical practice.
How was it done?
This project and its potential scalability has achieved the creation of a well-established framework involving among relevant others the Legal Department, the Information Systems Department, the patient data protection supervisor, and the Innovation Research Institute.
The success and the scalability of these innovative projects in our centre depended on health providers’ engagement with eHealth, new interoperability solutions, adequate institutional support, and government reimbursement models.
What has been achieved?
The clinical trial conducted in 134HTP has demonstrated to improve recipients’ adherence to immunosuppressants (85% mHeart follow-up vs 46% conventional follow-up)[OR=6.7 (2.9;15.8),P-value=.000], to improve patients’ experience of therapeutic regimens and to reduce in-clinic facilities because the mHeart follow-up. (65% mHeart follow-up vs 35% conventional follow-up)[OR=3.4 (1.7;6.9),P-value=.001].
What next?
This eHealth experience has allowed continuing creating evidence on the use of the eHealth in other populations: an onco-hematological platform, EMMA(Ehealth Medical self-Management Aid), has been designed including diverse profiles depending on the clinical specifications (e.g. multiple myeloma or bone marrow transplant conditions); MyPlan has been adapted to perform an interdisciplinary follow-up of any multimorbid population with polypharmacy. Thus, the system can be used in any multimorbid patients by activating or omitting certain modules that define the target patients’ specific comorbidities (e.g. glycemia module or blood pressure module).
The new EMMA and MyPlan will be clinically tested in diverse trials in 2020 including several health care interdisciplinary teams, including the emergency setting, onco-hematology, migraine, dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk, among relevant others. In addition, other Spanish centers are implementing the eHealth model and the software in their Institutions assisted by the experience gathered.
REVIEW OF THE HOSPITAL HIGH-ALERT MEDICATIONS LIST USING HOSPITAL AND INTERNATIONAL DATA (submitted in 2019)
Pdf
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Why was it done?
In University Medical Centre Ljubljana (UMCL) a HAM list was created in 2008 and has not been significantly changed since then. Our aim was to develop a systematic strategy to review the list by including local data.
What was done?
We comprehensively updated the hospital list of high-alert medications (HAM) and identified hospital specific medications not yet present on HAM lists. We joined international HAM data supported by medication error (ME) reports and expert opinion with data from the hospital ME reporting system.
How was it done?
We analysed 390 MEs submitted to the UMCL ME reporting system from 2016 to 2018. We compared the HAM list from Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) and the UMCL HAM list. The criteria such as frequency of the reported ME, severity of harm for the patient, affected population, novelty, etc, were used to identify potential HAM. Furthermore, we calculated the probability of the ME report for the individual medications from the reported MEs and the hospital medication consumption data. The calculation was done for the medications involved in 3 or more reported MEs (Tyynismaa et al, 2017) and for the medications involved in MEs which caused harm to the patient.
What has been achieved?
The joined results from the comparison of HAM lists and reported MEs showed that several other medications could be added to the UMCL HAM list, e.g. individualised parenteral nutrition for the paediatric population, oral sedation agents for children, dialysis solutions, lidocaine IV, methadone, bupivacaine, and nusinersen. The probability-based HAM identifying method supported our previous suggestions to extend the UMCL HAM list. Additionally, the method unexpectedly revealed medications with a high probability of ME and/or harm for the patients, that are not included in any HAM list (ISMP, UMCL), such as romiplostim, parenteral iron preparations, ampicillin with sulbactam, and others.
What next?
In future we plan to develop a paediatric specific HAM list based on the same strategy; i.e. considering international suggestions and analysing paediatric ME reports in UMCL.
THE ACTIVITIES AND IMPACT OF A HOSPITAL-WIDE MEDICATION INITIATIVE (submitted in 2019)
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Alice Oborne, Mark Kinirons, Virginia Aguado, Steve Wanklyn, Laura Watson, Jaymi Mistry, Duncan McRobbie, Abhiti Gulati, Emma Ritchie, David Wood, Niall Stewart-Kelcher, Adrian Hopper, Patricia Snell, Tony West
Why was it done?
Medicines are common interventions but have inherent dangers: 9% inpatient prescriptions contain errors, and medication errors occur at an estimated rate of one per patient per day [1-3]. Medication incident reporting was low, with high proportions of harmful incidents.
What was done?
Senior and junior staff collaborated to systematically improve safe medication processes and outcomes in a 1200-bedded multi-site hospital. The work aimed to reduce harm from medicines and improve medication safety culture.
How was it done?
Pharmacists, doctors, nurses and governance staff set up a Medication Safety Forum which met monthly to focus on high risk drugs, processes and patients. Published literature and international guidance were reviewed [1-3]. Twelve subgroups worked on safer opioid, insulin, anticoagulant, allergy and injectable medicine use and paediatric, elderly, critical care and peri-operative care. Subgroups published guidelines on the hospital intranet. External aviation and patient safety experts reviewed processes. Medication incident data were reported to staff monthly from June 2008. A monthly medication safety newsletter (total 68), screensaver messages, podcasts, mouse-mats, ‘safety days’, audit, training and senior staff promoted best practice. Electronic prescribing and medication administration (EPMA) with decision support was introduced in 2015.
What has been achieved?
The Medication Safety Forum met monthly 2009−2019. Medication incident reporting increased from 60 to over 400 per month (total 31330 over 11 years), whilst harmful incidents all reduced (Figure). Incidents with harm reduced from 51 to 24 in the first to last 20 months. Dose omissions reduced by 10% despite an increase in patient acuity, anticoagulant use and insulin use. The most common incident type was wrong dose, agreeing with national incident data. New guidelines included 30 for insulin, 28 anticoagulation and 19 opioid use. Medication incident reporting increased from 10th to highest in similar hospitals [3].
What next?
Multidisciplinary leadership, multimedia guidance, technology, audit and feedback in medication safety can be applied in any healthcare setting to enhance patient safety. Further system enhancements are planned.
References:
[1]National Patient Safety Agency 2004. Seven steps to patient safety
[2]Prescribing report, 2010. www.rcpLondon.ac.uk
[3]NHS Improvement organisational data reports
VANCOMYCIN CONTINUOUS INFUSION FOR PATIENTS ON ICU (submitted in 2019)
Pdf
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Why was it done?
In the ICU there was a lot of misunderstanding around the administration of vancomycin by intermittent dosing, particularly around the timing of pre-dose vancomycin levels and appropriate dose adjustment. It could take several days for a patient to reach the therapeutic range of vancomycin.
What was done?
A protocol for the administration of vancomycin by continuous infusion was developed for patients on ICU, replacing the previous method of giving vancomycin by intermittent dosing; this was developed in consultation with the Anaesthetics and Microbiology Departments.
How was it done?
To develop a vancomycin continuous infusion dosing schedule for patients admitted to ICU, through a review of the available literature and with reference to vancomcyin continuous infusion protocols already established on ICUs in other hospitals. A proposal for administration of vancomycin continuous infusion needs to be included on the electronic clinical information system currently in use in the ICU. An IV drug monograph for vancomcyin by continuous infusion will be included in the ‘ Intravenous Medication Infusion Guidelines’; this will provide information on compatibility with other infusions if required. To recommend vancomycin continuous infusion in patients as agreed with the Anaesthetics and Microbiology Consultants at the daily ward review, this would require the patient to have a dedicated IV line.
What has been achieved?
A finalised version of the Vancomycin Continuous Infusion protocol has been developed in consultation with Anaesthetic and Microbiology Consultants. We have included additional information for patients on CRRT (continuous renal replacement therapy) that has been used in some patients on continuous vancomycin infusion. A standardised prescription for infusion of vancomycin is available on the electronic prescribing system. Vancomycin continuous infusion is now recommended for any patients requiring vancomycin therapy on the ICU.
What next?
We would propose to audit the number of patients on Vancomycin Continuous Infusion in the ICU, including time taken to reach therapeutic range, frequency of sampling and any other cost-saving initiatives perceived.
SIMULATION CURVES MAY HELP TO ASSESS ANTIBIOTICS ORALISATION PROCEDURES (submitted in 2019)
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Martin Breuling, Ina Geist
Why was it done?
In the context of antibiotic stewardship, rapid oralisation of a parenteral antibiotic is recommended in many antibiotic stewardship guidelines. Such a sequence therapy is easy to implement if both application pathways lead to comparable efficacy levels at the site of infection. However, this does not apply to all anti-infectives, in particular some beta-lactam antibiotics represent a challenge in therapy. Additionally, the information about this topic is very sparse in the literature.
What was done?
In order to achieve an improvement in antimicrobial prescriptions, we have addressed possible problems regarding oralisation of antibiotics. For this purpose, we graphically compared the simulated efficacy levels of parenteral and oral forms of beta-lactams.
How was it done?
We programmed a computer based procedure that allows a simulation of plasma levels of antibiotics upon intravenous versus oral administration. Based on the obtained data and EUCAST-based MIC-distributions for a set of bacteria, we assessed the respective putative clinical actions.
What has been achieved?
Our simulations show that some oral beta-lactams do not reach the PK/PD condition of a sufficient therapy (fT>MHK) in the approved dosage. The simulations have been used for education seminars with physicians and partly led to an improvement in oralisation procedures. Additionally, an oralisation standard has been established.
What next?
Our next step is to develop a special prescription form for oral antibiotics which will enable us to control prescription behaviour even more effectively. We plan to monitor the prescription habits for anti-infectives more closely before and after establishing the prescription form.
STANDARDISATION OF DILUTED POTASSIUM INTRAVENOUS SOLUTIONS IN NEONATAL CARE UNITS (submitted in 2019)
Pdf
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Luis Pérez de Amezaga Tomás, María Magdalena Parera Pascual, Mónica Sanz Muñoz, Catalina March Frontera, Gonzalo González Morcillo, Alejandra Mandilego Garcia, Álvaro Medina Guerrero, Ana Filgueira Posse, Montserrat Vilanova Boltó
Why was it done?
Administration of intravenous KCl produces hyperkalaemia and this can result in cardiac arrest and death. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) as well as other security agencies have recommended the withdrawal of KCl 2M from ward stock. This project was born as a response to these recommendations. We focused on a group of patients where these practices have not been extensively implemented. The aim of the protocol was to standardise the prescription, preparation, dispensation and administration of KCl to neonates in our hospital.
What was done?
Development of a protocol that standardises diluted potassium intravenous solutions for neonates (including those preterm over 28 weeks of gestation). This allowed us to remove concentrated potassium chloride (KCl) 2M from neonatal care units in our hospital. For this purpose, the hospital pharmacy centralised the preparation and distribution of KCl ready-to-use infusions.
How was it done?
The elaboration of the protocol took place as follows: • A multidisciplinary team designed KCl ready-to-use solutions that met the requirements of the newborn: – Glucose 10% 250mL with 5 mEq KCl (20mEq/L solution) – Glucose 10% 250mL with 10 mEq KCl (40mEq/L solution). • The hospital pharmacy centralised the preparation of these solutions. A risk assessment was performed and determined an expiration date of 7 days. • These solutions were stocked at all neonatal care units: Intensive Care Unit, Hospitalized Paediatric Unit and Paediatric Emergency Unit. • Weekly, the hospital pharmacy distributes these solutions and disposes of the expired ones. • Only ready-to-use KCl solutions were able to prescribe at the electronic prescription programme. • A formation plan was implemented to train all the professionals involved in neonatal care.
What has been achieved?
The protocol was implemented in November 2016. Since then, 65 patients have been treated with 20mEq/L solution and only 1 patient with 40mEq/L solution. No remarkable imbalances in electrolytes have been detected resulting from the standardisation of the fluid therapy with KCl. Only 3 incidents have been registered. All of them were prescription errors (solution selection); they reached the patient but without damage.
What next?
Nowadays, we are developing a stability study of the KCl solutions in order to assess the appropriateness of the expiration date.
MICROBIOLOGICAL CLEANLINESS IN A CHEMOTHERAPY ROBOT DEPENDING ON DIFFERENT INTERVALS OF INTENSIVE CLEANING IN THE WORKING AREA (submitted in 2019)
Pdf
European Statement
Production and Compounding
Author(s)
Jannik Almasi, Irene Krämer
Why was it done?
Aim of the study was to evaluate if the microbiological cleanliness of the working area of APOTECAchemo® is affected by extending the interval of intensive cleaning from biweekly to monthly cleaning intervals.
What was done?
Automated preparation of ready-to-administer chemotherapy products with the APOTECAchemo® robot is well established in a number of pharmacy departments. One of the few disadvantages is the time-consuming, intensive cleaning and disinfection of the working area (clean room class A) by wiping with cleaning and disinfection solutions.
How was it done?
Every two weeks (period 1: 07-12/2018) or every four weeks (period 2: 01-06/2019) all surfaces in the working area of APOTECAchemo® were wiped with ethanolic NaOH solution in order to inactivate or remove cytotoxic spillages. In a second work step all surfaces are disinfected by wiping with spore-free alcohol. The procedure lasts about one hour. The working area is at the end of each working session irradiated with UV light for 4 hours. Microbiological monitoring of the working area is done weekly in operation by passive air sampling (2 settle plates at predefined locations S1, S2) and surface sampling (3 contact plates at predefined locations O1, O2, O3) and colony-forming units (CFU) are counted after incubation. Results of the microbiological samples (CFU ± standard deviation) were compared for period 1 and 2. On average, 0 CFU (n=52) were detected (period 1) and 0.04±0.2 CFU (n=44) (period 2) on settle plates. During period 1 on average 0.04±0.19 CFU were found at O1, 0 CFU on O2, and 0.81 CFU±4.23 at O3 (n=27 each). During period 2, 0 CFU were detected at O1, O2 and 0.04±0.2 CFU at O3 (n=25 each). The extended interval for the intensive cleaning process did not affect the microbiological cleanliness. The CFU limits set for clean room class A were met.
What has been achieved?
Maintaining the daily cleaning procedure, the interval of intensive cleaning can be extended to one month without increasing the microbiological contamination risk and saving two hours of cleaning.
What next?
Monthly intensive cleaning will be attended by trending the microbiological results.
MULTIDISCIPLINARY CAR-T TEAM (submitted in 2019)
Pdf
European Statement
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Author(s)
MARGHERITA GALASSI, CHIARA DELLA COSTANZA , CLAUDIA TIRONE, SARA BERTOLI, ERNESTO RUFFINO, ELEONORA FERRARI, ELENA ALIPRANDI , VITO LADISA
Why was it done?
CAR-T cell therapies are a new advanced type of personalised immunotherapy against cancer. In the EU the authorised therapies are tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, both used in our centre as third line for the registered indication of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. CAR-T therapies production and administration process consists of multiple stages: patient’s leukapheresis, genetic engineering of lymphocytes, lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LC), CAR-T cell infusion, monitoring of the patient. Considering the complexity of the procedure and the observance of specific schedules, these therapies should be administered in highly specialised centres complying with specific organisational requirements, with disposal of an adequate multidisciplinary team.
What was done?
A multidisciplinary team (CAR-T team) was constituted for the management of CAR-T therapies (Chimeric Antigen Receptor T). The pharmacist was included in the team for the planning and organisational phase of the process.
How was it done?
The pharmacist is responsible for the approval of the physician’s prescription, the LC preparation according to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), the LC distribution on scheduled time, the making available of treatments for supporting the patient until CAR-T infusion, and treatments after infusion for management of adverse events. At the arrival of the CAR-T product, the pharmacist is responsible for the check and release of it in good condition. The LC protocols foresee the administration of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine on the 5th, 4th and 3rd day before the CAR-T infusion, and are defined on the basis of the summary-of-product characteristics. The medications are provided locally and refunded by the national health system.
What has been achieved?
In our center 8 patients were treated with compassionate use of axicabtagene ciloleucel. The pharmacist’s presence in the multidisciplinary team was advantageous because, through validation of the therapies and verification of dosages, they guarantee further security to the patients. The high-tech automated centralisation and computerisation of chemotherapies at our centre ensured quality and safety of the preparations.
What next?
The realisation of defined paths and codified proceedings, the respect of fundamental timings for the success of the process and the chemotherapy preparation centralisation could lead to increased investment, decisive for obtaining a high quality product and process level. The experience, now limited to haematology, could be used for future CAR-T applications.
A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ON HEPARIN INFUSION SAFETY IN AN ACUTE TEACHING HOSPITAL (submitted in 2019)
Pdf
European Statement
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Author(s)
Anthony Hackett, Alice Oborne, Emma Ritchie, Caroline Broadbent, Rebecca Chanda, Karen Breen
Why was it done?
Anticoagulants such as UFH are recognised as high risk drugs. UFH requires frequent monitoring of the activated partial thromboplastic time ratio (APTTr), ensuring therapeutic anticoagulation and minimising adverse effects. UFH infusions and the APTTr were recorded using a paper based system. Incident reporting identified by the paper system resulted in inappropriate monitoring and management of UFH infusions, and dose omissions which could have resulted in harm.
What was done?
A Trust-wide electronic prescribing and medicines administration (EPMA) system was implemented in 2015. Complex infusions, e.g. unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions, remained on paper due to EPMA functionality limitations. The complex infusion function was added into later EPMA upgrades. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) involving nursing, medical and pharmacy staff working within anticoagulation, EPMA and medication safety sought to design UFH infusions in EPMA.
How was it done?
Baseline audit (Paper-March 2016): Patients prescribed UFH infusions (n=14) were identified using SharePoint (e-reporting) by searching for the UFH infusion placeholder. Performance was measured against eight audit standards.
Re-audit (EPMA-March 2019): Patients prescribed UFH infusions (n=26) were identified using SharePoint by searching for those prescribed a UFH infusion on EPMA. Performance was measured against the same eight audit standards.
Chi square applied to results to test for statistical significance.
Incident rate per prescription: The Datix system was searched to identify heparin incidents reported during the data collection periods.
What has been achieved?
Audit standard 2016 audit v 2019 audit
1-Baseline APTTr checked before starting infusion 93% v 100%, p=0.1
2-Received correct loading dose of heparin based on APTTr 79% v 96%, p=0.07
3-APTTr checked 6 hours after infusion started 72% v 100%, p<0.05
4-APTTr checked 6 hours after infusion titrations 86% v 96%, p=0.2
5-APTTr in target range within 24 hours 50% v 70%, p=0.2
6-APTTr checked 24 hourly after 2 consecutive APTTr’s in range 100% v 100%=no change
7-Patient receives a medical review 24 hrly 65% v 100%, p<0.05
8-Heparin syringe and giving set changed 24 hrly 65% v 100%, p<0.05
UFH related incidents reduced from one incident per 1.6 infusions, to one incident per 6.5 infusions following the implementation of an EPMA system.
UFH incidents as a proportion of all anticoagulant incidents reduced from 43% (March-2016) to 20% (March-2019).
What next?
Electronic solution’s for high-risk, complex infusions such as heparin prescribing and monitoring improved care, quality and safety. Further high-risk infusions such as insulin are being developed