Pdf

Author(s)

Sophia Hannou, Cristina Nicorici, Patricia Spitz, Samuel Cotte, Wanda Bosshard, Nancy Perrottet, Pierre Voirol, Farshid Sadeghipour

Why was it done?

Medication use process is at high risk especially for opioids. In our geriatric rehabilitation unit, self-reporting incidents are submitted regularly to our quality system. Among the 44 drugs incidents reported in 2021, 11 included opioids. Prevention with training is a way to reduce these errors. However, theoretical teaching covering the “5 rights” rule remains insufficient. Therefore, an interactive learning with a room of horrors focused on opioids was selected by our unit to prevent these errors. The objective was to cartography and identify the most risky steps and to introduce specific actions to reduce these risks.

What was done?

A room of horrors with a specific focus on opioids has been developed and implemented to reduce errors in medication circuit.

How was it done?

An interprofessional group created the room of horrors based on real incidents. Fictional patient, clinical situation and opioid prescription were created in the medical software. Several drugs and medical devices were available. A model wore an identification bracelet. Ten errors, covering the five rights, were hidden in the room. A pair of healthcare givers had 20 minutes to realise the simulation (5 for the briefing, 10 for the exercise and 5 for debriefing).

What has been achieved?

During the World Patient Safety Day 2022, 38 healthcare professionals (19 nurses, 10 assistant nurses, 9 geriatricians) participated to this training. Errors were detected in variable proportions. For example, 58% of the participants uncover the patient identification error, 53% the pharmaceutical form, 53% the expired date, 47% the allergy contraindication and 47 % used the oral syringe.

What next?

Results and theoretical notions will be presented to all professionals of the unit. This room of horrors is transposable and can be used in other units of the hospital. A video of this simulation was created as an e-learning. It will be implemented as a continuous training or for new collaborators in our unit and can be shared to other units of the institution. Incidents will be continuously monitored and the training will be adjusted in the future. Based on the success of the room of horrors, this interactive learning will be used in other areas with other clinical or technical dimension.

Why was it done?

This solution, an integrated module of our electronic health record (EHR) (Millennium Oracle Cerner), allows the computerised validation of the administration of medication in real-time at the patient’s bed by scanning a bar code identifying the medication or the infusion.

What was done?

The implementation of a solution allowing the secure administration of medication (oral or injectable) at the patient’s bed is one of the latest processes we have put in place to improve the security of the medication circuit and the quality of patient care within our establishment.

How was it done?

Our pharmacy has a robot for automated dispensing of unit forms of medication by over-packaging (PillPick Swisslog). A unique code of each oral medication is affixed to each sachet and this code, once scanned, will be used to verify the concordance between the physical medication in the hands of the nurse dispensed by the pharmacy and the medication prescribed in the EHR.
For infusions, a tool of our EHR makes it possible to generate a barcode label taking again information of the prescription as well as patient identity and that one is affixed on the infusion after reconstitution/dilution the barcode being scanned at the time of the installation.

What has been achieved?

In collaboration with the care services we have set up a Bluetooth barcode reader connected to the nursing cart for the scanning of the therapeutics and the patient. The process allows after scanning and verification of the patient’s identity, to scan all the drugs to be administered orally or by injection directly at the time of administration and their validation in the patient’s file at once.

What next?

The approach around this work and its deployment has allowed team work between the pharmacy, the care services and the IT services in charge of the EHR to achieve the rapid and sustainable implementation of this solution, fast learning and saving nursing time. It allows us to secure our circuit from the production of therapeutics by our robot to the administration to the patient and also to respect the 5B rule of the drug circuit.

Pdf

Author(s)

Cathrine Noergaard Peulicke, Michelle Lyndgaard Nielsen

Why was it done?

The process of building a new hospital has led to development and rethinking the drug concept. At the hospital we always have “the patient first” in mind. This is our codex. That is why we are changing the concept for delivery, dispensing and administration of medication. We wanted to ensure that the concept functioned from a patient safety perspective, patient flow perspective, patient involvement perspective, professional development perspective and perspective of a healthy operation. The vision is the right medication, from the right hand at the right time.

What was done?

At the new hospital, the medication logistics will undergo major changes. There will only be medication for acute use at the wards, the rest will be delivered ready-to-use from the main pharmacy or from a decentralised unit, called Pharmaservice. Here IV-solutions with short expiration are being reconstituted and oral solutions are dosed according to the prescription. Tablets and capsules are dispensed in the multi-dose robot at the main pharmacy. The multi-dose medication is equipped with a bar code which is scanned at administration and full electronic documentation is obtained. The majority of the medication will be dispensed daily for 24 hours and delivered in boxes for each patient to the wards.
In order to ease the transformation, we have built a mock up of a Pharmaservice unit where this set-up is enrolled to all inpatient wards in the hospital on the geriatric ward, children’s ward and gynaecology and obstetrics ward.

How was it done?

A steering group was founded and membered by managers from the involved wards including the hospital Pharmacy. Frequent meetings with the involved wards has been necessary to ensure competences and communication. Post-implementation we are closely evaluating the initiative.

What has been achieved?

Patient safety is in focus and with the multi-dose dispensing robot we have achieved full electronic documentation from the prescription, dispensing and administration process, and thereby have reached closed loop medication.

What next?

Having implemented the initiative on three wards, we are now working on enrolling this to the entire new hospital when it is ready in 2024. At the new hospital, we will have five Pharmaservice units servicing all inpatient wards.

Pdf

Author(s)

Rik Stuurman, Sofie Hessels, Chantal Kats, Chantal van Egmond, Kim Gombert-Handoko

Why was it done?

The administration of intravenous medication directly into the drip chamber has several benefits: 1) it saves time during preparation and administration for the nursing staff, 2) the patient has a shorter and controlled administration of the medication, often with less fluid and 3) the reduction of the use of infusion bags is sustainable and reduces costs.

What was done?

Administration of intravenous medication into the drip chamber using the integrated needle-free injection adapter is a good alternative to bolus injections and parenteral infusion. We conducted two pilot experiments at four wards, where we injected the 30 most frequently administered medications directly into the drip chamber instead of using an additional infusion bag via a sideline, which is the common practice in our hospital.

How was it done?

For the most frequently administered medications, we assessed whether it was possible to inject directly into the drip chamber. For these medications, we also defined the pump speed and the volume to rinse the system after each infusion. This information is explicitly described in our local parenteral handbook. In addition the nursing staff was fully trained and the procedures were updated.

What has been achieved?

During the evaluation of the first pilot after three months of the implementation, about 90% of the nurses indicated that they were satisfied with this alternative way of administration, that they did not experience any problems during the procedure and that they saved time compared to the old method. The second pilot will also evaluate the real-world reduction in infusion bags and costs (results are expected in December).

What next?

This alternative way of administration is now fully implemented and will be rolled out over the other wards with a “starter package”, which includes a guide for implementation, training material and frequently asked questions. In addition, the method will be fully integrated into the local parenteral handbook and the list of medications will be expanded.

Pdf

Author(s)

Trine Birkholm, Trine Rune Høgh Andersen

Why was it done?

The Danish Ministry of Health has declared which healthcare professionals should handle medication such as dispensing and administration to patients in hospitals. Traditionally, primarily nurses and physicians handle administration of medicines in the Danish hospitals. In recent years a massive shortage of nurses in Danish healthcare has called for other professions to participate in administration of medicines. As Denmark has employed less than one clinical pharmacist per 100 beds in hospitals, pharmacists are not able to contribute to the task. However, clinical pharmacists can have an important role in educating other healthcare professionals e.g. HCAs in handling medicines.

What was done?

Because of massive lack of nurses and thereby healthcare professionals to administer medicine in psychiatric wards in Region Zealand, Denmark, the pharmacists developed and implemented a training course for social and healthcare assistants (HCAs) to participate in the task.

How was it done?

As hospital pharmacists should ensure that the information needed for safe medicines use, including both preparation and administration, is accessible at the point of care (EAHP statement 5.9), aiding in the development of a training course for HCAs was ideal for the clinical pharmacists. The training course has a duration of 3 days followed by a mentored trainee period. The course includes psychopharmacology lessons to teach HCAs to observe and react to overdoses, lack of effect or side effects as declared in medicine handling guidelines.

What has been achieved?

Approximately 150 HCAs have attended the course since 2020. Eight out of ten state that the course has enabled them to take on the new work tasks. Nine out of ten believe that they can use the newly acquired knowledge and practical skills for their new work tasks. Today, the administration of medicines in the psychiatry ward is also managed by HCAs, thus relieving the nurses’ time needed for more specialised tasks.

What next?

There is also a shortage of nurses in the somatic hospitals. To ensure patient safety and enough staff to dispense and administer medicines, several hospital wards have requested similar training for HCAs. It is believed that similar training courses with modifications can target somatic wards as well.

Pdf

Author(s)

Betânia Abreu Faria, Sara Barroso, Antonieta Silva, Olga Martins

Why was it done?

Portuguese legislation “The Basic Health Law (No. 95/2019) and the National Plan for Patient Safety 2021-2026 (NPPS 2021-2026) and the goals of the World Health Organization (WHO) are fundamental pillars of healthcare safety. The NPPS has promoted patient safety in the Portuguese National Health Service, focusing on specific issues such as safety culture, unambiguous identification of patients, safe surgery, pressure ulcer prevention, prevention of falls, infections associated with healthcare and incident reporting and drug safety. Thus, it is essential to ensure the training of health professionals (HP) in the field of patient safety and the safe and rational use of medicines. The objectives of the training actions focused on the safe use of medication, promoting patient safety and sharing experiences between the various HP, in order to optimise the circuits and procedures already implemented.

What was done?

Multidisciplinary training actions were carried out within the scope of safe medicine practices.

How was it done?

A team of four pharmacists and one nurse carried out training actions in the context of Safe Medicines Practices. The following topics were addressed: medicine circuit; good practices in drug preparation; identification of medicines: Look-Alike Sound-Alike (LASA) and High-Alert Drugs; physicochemical incompatibilities; factors that modify stability after reconstitution/dilution; fractionation and crushing of Solid Oral Pharmaceutical Forms (SOPF); drug information sources; reporting adverse drug reactions and other incidents; good practices in medication administration. 

What has been achieved?

Training actions were carried out with a total of 29 hours of training and 357 participants. Suggestions for improvement were presented: optimisation of drug signage, compliance with established circuits, logistical aspects, on time drug information, improvement of communication channels, increase in the frequency of training actions. The trainees expressed receptiveness and interest in this initiative, which provided content that was little discussed and very relevant to their daily practice. 

What next?

The correct preparation and administration of medicines is essential to safeguard their effectiveness and patient safety, which is the ultimate goal of every health professional’s daily activity. The Pharmacist, as part of the multidisciplinary team, must promote strategies that safeguard Safe Practices throughout the drug circuit. Hence it is important to ensure the continuity of these trainings.

Pdf

Author(s)

Louise Rasmussen Duckert, Marianne Kjettrup Jensen, Mette Lethan, Trine Schnor

Why was it done?

The hospital pharmacy wishes to support the implementation of OPAT and during the process the need for standardised kits with utensils was identified. The availability of kits with necessary utensils for aseptic handling of parenteral infusion would simplify and standardise the work for hospital and home nurses. Considerations regarding patient safety and sustainability were also in favour of the kits, as choice of utensils could secure compliance to regional guidelines considering use of closed systems and rinse of the line after infusion. Kits containing the exact needed utensils for an administration also reduces the possible waste.

What was done?

The hospital pharmacy has composed standard kits with utensils for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT).

How was it done?

The kit is composed in collaboration between the pharmacy, hospital nurses and home nurses. The best suited infusion set was chosen – a closed system with two spikes for antibiotic mixing and infusion. Hereby nurses avoid direct contact with antibiotics and avoid antibiotic aerosols in the citizen’s home. The infusion set contains no PVC, phthalates or latex. When fully emptied the infusion set can be discarded as regular waste.
The kit also contains a sterile cover for the workstation, sterile ethanol swabs, gloves, pre-filled saline syringes for rinse of the line after infusion and a written manual. All is packed and labelled by the hospital pharmacy and lot numbers are registered for traceability.

What has been achieved?

The kits have been tested in selected municipalities and the content of the kit has been adjusted. As a result of the feedback a film has been recorded showing the handling of the infusion set. The video is used for training and a QR code on the written manual guides the home nurse to the video if needed. The kit is now used widely in the region and response is positive. With the set-up being identical in all municipalities in the region, handling antibiotics and utensils is simpler for the hospital nurse at discharge.

What next?

As the number of patients in home-based OPAT rises, experiences with the kits will probably result in wishes for adjustments. A new kit with utensils for changing PVK is under development.

Why was it done?

Our proposed system comes from the idea of a large clean room with pressure regimes, and airlock, hoods and other ancillary equipment, Which we made from it a very small clean room that is our box, when there will be no need for us as operators to get into it, or very simply take only those parts that are supposed to be sterile, and only those parts that are the two ends of the infusion bag and the end of the medicine vial

What was done?

“Closed” and airtight system for preparation (reconstitution, measurement, dilution) and injection of IV drugs at the patient’s bedside, in the various clinics and further home treatment, Disposable system, All its parts come in one piece without the need for threading, or assembly and disassembly
Estimated dimensions: 10 cm length, 5 cm width and 3.5 cm depth or similar, its shape can be rectangular or any shape convenient for use operation storage and destruction at the end of the process
Intended for a wide range of types of drugs – such as intravenous antibiotics, cytotoxic drugs, biological drugs, etc.
Designed according to its different variations for different types of vials and different amounts of drugs that come as a dry powder for dissolution, and are also suitable for drugs that come in the dissolved liquid form.
It is also intended for use with glass ampoules and there is a wide range of drugs that still come in glass ampoules
Intended for administration of drugs that do not need to be diluted in an infusion bag given in IV PUSH

How was it done?

We designed the device with 3D software (solid wark). It consists of a number of functional parts,
The sterile closed system comprises an airtight enclosure, which is shaped so as to define an enclosure interior; and an infusion-bag receptacle. An infusion-bag seal is configured, when in a sealing state, to make an airtight seal with respective external surfaces of a medication port and an IV tubing port of a bottom region of the infusion bag, when the medication port and an IV tubing port are inserted into the infusion-bag receptacle.

What has been achieved?

The proposed solution and its advantage
– A single-use system built in one piece, without the need for assemblies, disassembles, etc.
It will be possible to perform the entire process in one place, such as at the patient’s bedside or in the clinic, starting with the powdered drug dissolving process, mixing a measured dose, mixing it in an infusion bag and injecting it into the patient’s vein safely and accurately.
Maintains the perfect process under sterile conditions without fear of contamination of the injected drug
– Preparation in a system that is safe for the immediate environment and safe for the caregiver himself from contamination of drugs such as cytotoxic drugs, antibiotics and more
Savings in building very expensive infrastructure of clean rooms
Saving on very expensive disposables, such as closed system transfered deviced, robes and more
Save valuable work time dedicated team of pharmacists, nurses work time, work time transportation, storage places and more
Minimize the chance of errors in administering medications and confusion between different medications
Working with non-exposed needles reduces the chance of needle prick injury

What next?

Applied research will be carried out by pharmacists and nurses, in order to test the efficacy and safety of the device (by using a basic prototype), these experiments will use different IV administration drugs, we will test the method of dilution from a drug vials and glass ampoules, measure the exact dose and transfer to the infusion bag, and remove through the IV line, the accuracy of the preparation, the sterility of the preparation, the quality in terms of leakage or drip, comfort, safety and more are measured.

Author(s)

Nicolas Sagaria, Daniele Mengato

Why was it done?

Dysphagia is a swallowing disorder more common in the elderly. The pharmaceutical market is not always able to meet the needs of dysphagic patients and manipulation of a medication is sometimes the only possible way to ensure its administration. This activity is often delegated to nurses or other professionals without the necessary education.

What was done?

The manipulation of solid oral pharmaceutical forms, such as tablets or capsules, is such a common act that it is sometimes regarded superficially. In order to guide the clinical pharmacist in assessing the crushability of a tablet, we designed, and validated through an on-field application, a decision-making algorithm.

How was it done?

The first two steps of the algorithm help, respectively, to understand whether there are clear indications in the summary of product characteristics on how to manipulate the drug and/or whether there are alternatives on the market, other than the solid oral, suitable for administration to the dysphagic patient. When neither of these steps is feasible, the pharmacist is guided towards direct manipulation of the drug, supported by evidence in literature and study of excipients. If a solution cannot be found, the physician should be advised to consider a switch or a discontinuation of therapy. Finally, we tested the algorithm by including it in a medication review form in a otolaryngology-ENT department, where the incidence of dysphagic patients was higher.

What has been achieved?

In the second half of 2020, we analyzed 45 medrev forms filled out in the ENT-department. Each form contained an average of 2.8 drugs to be re-analyzed for the dysphagic patient. We applied our algorithm to a total of 123 drugs. For 101 (82%) of these, we provided precise information on the correct way to administer and manipulate the drug. For only 22 drugs, a discussion with the prescriber was necessary to identify an alternative. In this way we have improved patients’ and operators’ safety.

What next?

In the near future we will expand our test to other departments, not only surgical, and try to minimise the rate of drugs for which we could not provide information on manipulation. In addition, we are planning to develop a software to simplify the process.

Author(s)

Catarina Oliveira, Ana Mirco, Fátima Falcão

Why was it done?

-lactams have proven to be effective and safe antibiotics over their history, and as a consequence, these drugs are typically among the most frequently prescribed in hospital settings. Optimization of treatment with β-lactams can be achieved by their administration by continuous infusion. Furthermore, this approach leads to a reduction of the nursing time devoted to preparation and administration. However, information regarding continuous infusion of β-lactams is not readily available for most antibiotics, leading to doubts about dosing, renal adjustments and administration, particularly uncertainties related to dilution of the antibiotics as most patients benefit from fluid restriction. Also, it was indispensable to understand which antibiotics had stability to be administered through continuous infusion.

What was done?

A protocol for continuous infusion of β-lactams was established in a coronary care unit (CCU), replacing the previous method of intermittent dosing in most patients.

How was it done?

Firstly, we evaluated which antibiotics benefited from this approach and had, simultaneously, stability. The antibiotics selected were Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Cefuroxime, Piperacillin/tazobactam, Penicillin G, Ampicillin and Flucloxacillin. In order to stablish a protocol for continuous infusion of these antibiotics, an extensive literature review was performed. Information about loading and maintenance dose, reconstitution, dilution (solvent and maximum concentration), infusion rate, renal adjustments, stability and storage was collected and summarized in a table.

What has been achieved?

A ready-to-use version of the β-lactams continuous infusion protocol was developed. In addition, dosing adjustments in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy, commonly made in patients in the CCU, were included too. This protocol was made available to all health professionals through the hospital’s intranet as well as posted in the CCU in order to be easily accessible by doctors and nurses. Thus, continuous infusion is now the standard for most patients requiring therapy with β-lactams in the CCU.

What next?

The implementation of this protocol has an education purpose, allowing the best use of documented practices in prescribing, medication review and administration continuous infusion of β-lactams. This protocol can similarly be easily implemented in other medical units. In the near future, we plan to monitor the compliance to the protocol and consider further improvements if necessary.