EAHP represents over 30,000 hospital pharmacists across 37 member countries. EAHP represents and develops the hospital pharmacy profession within Europe in order to ensure the continuous improvement of care and outcomes for patients in the hospital setting. This is achieved through science, research, education, practice, as well as sharing best-practice and responsibility with other healthcare professional
The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
The EAHP staff supports the Board in executing EAHP’s mission. The Staff assists in financial management, events organisations, policy activities and all EAHP projects. The EAHP staff works closely with EAHP’s members and ensures the effective communication all relevant stakeholders.
The first member countries were Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands in 1972. EAHP has now 36 EAHP members and 2 Associate Members. EAHP is open to countries members of the Council of Europe and since 2022 to organisations representing the interests of hospital pharmacists from outside the Council of Europe (Associate Membership)
EAHP’s structure is also composed by different standing committes: EAHP Scientific Committee, EAHP Education Executive Committee and the EAHP CTF Steering Committee.
At EAHP, we are committed to transparency in our governance, ethical standards, and funding practices. This section provides open access to our foundational documents, including the EAHP Statutes, Code of Conduct, and Funding Sources. By sharing these resources, we aim to uphold accountability and foster trust with our members, partners, and the public.
Keep up with all EAHP’s events and webinars. Contact the team at info@eahp.eu should you have any questions about upcoming events or activities.
Here you can find all upcoming events organised by EAHP and by all its members and associate members. Do not hesitate to contact the events team at events@eahp.eu should you have any questions about the organisation of these events.
Hospital pharmacists conduct a critical role in the care of patients in hospitals. Learn more about what they do here and in all the pages under Hospital Pharmacy practice and Policy.
Self-Assessment
SILCC
Closed SIGs
EAHP brings together experts from many areas of hospital pharmacy practice providing and highlighting good local sustainable practices as that can be up-scaled and shared with other countries. The EAHP Working Group on Sustainability has the aim of reducing the environmental burden of the hospital pharmacy services.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and its 36 member country platforms are creating a Common Training Framework for the hospital pharmacy education in Europe. The goal of this project is to allow the free movement of hospital pharmacists within the European Union.
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) have collaboratively developed the Oath to Society. The Oath to Society is all encompassing and acts as a contract for excellence in providing compassionate patient care, working as part of the healthcare team and advancing the pharmacy profession, and showcasing how clinical and hospital pharmacists work every day
A day created to highlight the importance and to celebrate the work done by hospital pharmacies. This day celebrates all hospital pharmacy teams.
The Early Career Network aims to empower early-career pharmacists by sharing opportunities, insights, and success stories from across 25 member countries.
Together, we’re building a stronger, more connected hospital pharmacy community: one story, one country, one pharmacist at a time.
Catch up with EAHP’s press releases
Find all EAHP relevant publication like the EAHP Surveys, annual reports and the history books.
The European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for hospital pharmacists worldwide, EJHP is a major source for continuing education as well as updates on advances in the practice and standard of pharmaceutical care for patients.
When EAHP and Hospital pharmacists appear in the news.
EAHP publishes a monthly EU monitor with updates about the latest EAHP initiatives and information relevant for the hospital pharmacy profession.
The Sponsor Channel is designed to maximise visibility and engagement, allowing sponsors to connect with the hospital pharmacy community and partners in a dynamic and interactive environment. From product demonstrations to networking sessions, the Sponsor Channel offers a range of opportunities for sponsors to showcase their offerings and generate leads in the new EAHP Website.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
IGNASI SACANELLA ANGLÈS, MARTA MARTIN MARQUÉS, HELENA SUÑER BARRIGA, DAVID PASCUAL CARBONELL, PILAR LÓPEZ BROSETA, JÚLIA BODEGA AZUARA, MARÍA VUELTA ARCE, Mª ÁNGELES ROCH VENTURA, ISABEL PLO SECO, ERIKA ESTEVE PITARCH, ANTONIO GARCÍA MOLINA, SÒNIA JORNET MONTAÑA, CARLA DAIANA CIUCIU, SILVIA CONDE GINER, LAURA CANADELL VILARRASA
Drug dosages and treatment algorithms in paediatric emergencies must be precise and unambiguous to ensure the safety and well-being of patients. Therefore, the introduction of electronic prescription systems in the Paediatric Emergency Room (PER) has become essential to assist clinical staff in prescribing, preparing, and administering the most commonly used drugs.
Design and implementation of pharmacological cards as a supporting tool to standardise and streamline the dosages, preparation, and administration of the most frequently used drugs in paediatric emergencies, ensuring a prompt and safe response.
Pharmacological cards were developed for paediatric emergencies, including scenarios such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), seizures, sepsis, hypoglycaemia, anaphylaxis, and respiratory emergencies. These cards included the most commonly prescribed drugs, with input and agreement from paediatricians.
The files were organised based on weight categories (3.5-60 kg) and considered the age range of patients (0-15 years). Information collected included the active ingredient, commercial name and presentation, dose per kilogramme, total dosage, dose (expressed as volume for administration), maximum allowable dose, and administration technique. Certain specific conditions were highlighted in colour.
Both medical and nursing staff underwent training in the utilisation of these tools. An evaluation of the protocols was conducted 12 months after their implementation.
We developed a total of 21 pharmacological cards, categorised by weight range, encompassing 33 drugs commonly used in paediatric emergencies.
The pharmacological cards were designed in a tabular format, which included the following information: active principle (highlighted in black), commercial name (in red), drug concentration (in blue), standardised dose (in g, mg, mcg, ml, mEq) per kilogramme, total dosage, total volume for administration, maximum allowable dose, route of administration, and administration technique. Additionally, we used background colours to highlight specific situations, such as red for CPR, black for intravenous administration, green for intramuscular routes, and purple for intranasal administration.
During the 12-month evaluation period, we did not encounter any medication-related errors.
The development of pharmacological cards has helped to standardise practices and simplify the prescription, preparation, and administration of commonly used drugs in paediatric emergency situations. The protocolisation and implementation of this tool have enhanced drug safety in emergency scenarios by reducing human errors and minimising medication-related harm.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Despite numerous attempts to improve medication information, patients express a need for more information about their drug treatment after discharge from hospital. A consequence of missing information could be unintentional non-adherence or adverse drug events. In Denmark, the electronic Shared Medication Record (SMR) lists the patients’ current drug treatment, but further relevant patient requested information is needed to support patients.
A booklet called My Medication Plan was developed as a tool to assist patients in managing their medication treatment. The Design Thinking Framework was applied as a model for involving patient representatives in the development as co-designers.
Three patient representatives from Hospital Sønderjylland participated during two group sessions with the purpose of generating ideas and designs for the My Medication Plan. Brainstorming was applied as an idea generating technique, since it is easy to use and effective in generating ideas in a short time. The ideas from the first session were used as inspiration for six prototypes of the booklet, which were presented and discussed at the second session. The final edition of the My Medication Plan was prepared based on this input.
The patient representatives stressed a need for specific instructions about the drugs’ application, boxes to note over-the-counter medication, dietary supplements and herbal remedies, as well as appointments with healthcare professionals to be a part of My Medication Plan. Additionally, free-text space for notes and questions about medication was requested. A non-electronic tool was specifically preferred because patients would have something to look at and write in meanwhile discussion medication changes and appointments. Furthermore, it could also provide relatives the opportunity to seek information about agreements made. According to the patient representatives, the final tool should include a print of the SMR and predefined pages including a glossary of medical terms. The developed tool, My Medication Plan, contains the requested information in an interchangeable design with a print of the SMR and the predefined papers added into plastic sleeves.
After developing the My Medication Plan, the next step is to use and test the effect of using the tool in relation to a sector transition intervention conducted as a randomised controlled trial.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Patricia Van den Bemt, Thijs Oude Munnink
Healthcare is responsible for an important part of the carbon footprint and medication production and use contribute substantially to this footprint. In line with Green Teams being established in all layers of society at the moment, the UMCG departments were also starting to implement such teams. The CPP was among the first departments establishing such a Green Team in order to reduce the footprint of medication use.
The department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology (CPP) is responsible for providing pharmaceutical patient care to all hospitalised and ambulatory patients of the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) in tThe Netherlands. Two years ago, the department has established a Green Team, dedicated to making this pharmaceutical care as sustainable as possible.
The Green Team CPP started in June 2021 with a brainstorm on potential subjects. As the main focus we chose to ‘contribute to sustainable medication use and to reduce disposal’. The team consists of representatives of all CPP sub-departments. Proactive measures and projects were defined, but increasingly the Green Team is being consulted by doctors and nurses regarding issues on sustainable medication use. Department-wide awareness is fuelled by a periodic newsletter.
Three projects were conducted: 1) Switching from paracetamol intravenous therapy to oral/rectal therapy (based on doctor’s question); 2) Patient’s own medicine use combined with self-administration of medication (POM/SAM project; based on nurse question); 3) Exploring oral anticancer drug waste by patient interviews (in preparation of improvement measures; proactive Green Team project). The results of these projects are of interest to all European hospital pharmacists and can inspire others to establish Green Teams to contribute to sustainable pharmaceutical care.
Given the success of the paracetamol project, we will expand this to other intravenous medications. The pilot project on POM/SAM has inspired us to implement POM/SAM within all nursing departments of the UMCG. And the results of the interviews on oral anticancer waste form a solid justification of the necessity of implementation of re-use of medication. In addition, we will continue to perform new proactive projects, aimed at deprescribing (by performing medication reviews), improving medication adherence, optimising the logistics of medication (reducing the amount of medication being dispensed, implementing of ready to administer medication, implementing of pharmacy IV service), reducing medication and financial waste using vial rounding, and proper disposal of medication. We will also continue to be the expert group to which doctors and nurses can direct their questions on sustainable medication use.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Lene Juhl Biltsted, Louise Stilling Rasmussen
In Denmark, patients with schizophrenia receive free antipsychotic medication for the initial two years post-diagnosis. Post this period, patients transition to the primary sector and assume the medication costs. Historically, the clinic dispensed larger medication quantities, offering short-term relief but not addressing the issue. This approach risks medication waste. The new workflows empower healthcare professionals to help patients establish stable financial arrangements with local pharmacies, curbing fluctuating medication expenses. This enhances patient safety by reducing at-home medication stockpiles. Financial barriers often undermine patient compliance. Healthcare professionals strive to aid patients, curbing relapses and readmissions, through rational, sustainable medication management that minimises resource wastage.
Training improved healthcare professional’s understanding of the Danish medication subsidy system and options for deferment in the primary sector.
The healthcare professionals’ new knowledge has provided the foundation for the development of optimised workflows in the treatment process, ensuring a more sustainable medication management during the transition to the primary sector. The project establishes the framework for reducing the risk of medication waste upon the patient’s completion of treatment at the clinic.
It also created a favourable setting for healthcare providers to collaborate with patients, enhancing adherence.
Healthcare professionals received training on deferment arrangements, subsidies, and compliance, with supervision from clinical pharmacists.
Patient cases were analysed to determine factors for future guidelines.
Guidelines were formulated to aid healthcare professionals during the patients’ transition to the primary sector.
A tool (calculator) was created for assessing the patients’ economic choices regarding medication expenses.
Healthcare professionals gained confidence in guiding patients on stable medication expenses.
Enhanced rational and sustainable medication use by incorporating the seven rights.
New guidelines now allow an appropriate quality assurance strategy to ensure sustainability and adherence.
Tool to assess medication costs which improves the patients adherence in the sector transition.
Lowered risk of over/under treatment and improper storage.
Diminished treatment failure risk by predicting patient medication expenses during the primary sector transition
In the next 6 months, the clinic will trial the established guidelines and routines with patients concluding their 2-year treatment.
Education and Research
Tom Simpson, Kristin Michaels, Kylee Hayward, Nick Sharp-Paul
The need to establish a recognition framework that resonated with pharmacists, aligned with their career journeys, and held tangible benefits prompted the inception of ANZCAP. Recognising that existing programmes lacked broad appeal, ANZCAP aimed to redefine recognition in a way that was meaningful, inclusive, and motivated pharmacists towards continuous development.
The Australian and New Zealand College of Advanced Pharmacy (ANZCAP) represents a pioneering advancement in pharmacy recognition and career progression. Addressing the limitations of previous models that struggled to gain broad support, ANZCAP emerged as a strategic response to bridge the recognition gap within the pharmacy profession.
The development of ANZCAP commenced with the acquisition of the Advancing Practice (AP) credentialing programme by the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). Previous efforts to engage pharmacists with the programme were reassessed, and a comprehensive review process was initiated to devise an innovative and pragmatic model of recognition. Development comprised multiple phases, including qualitative surveys, workshops, focus groups, and expert consultations. An iterative approach was adopted to refine the model, culminating in a prospective, merit-based system that recognises specialty areas and levels of practice. The focus shifted from individual competencies to broader domains within the National Competency Standards Framework for Pharmacists in Australia 2016, fostering flexibility and practicality.
ANZCAP has already recognised pharmacists at all levels – Resident, Registrar, and Consultant – through a Prior Professional Experience process. The college also extends its reach globally, welcoming international pharmacists to join its transformative community.
ANZCAP’s future involves strengthening the alignment of recognition with promotion and remuneration mechanisms, enhancing engagement among pharmacists. By seamlessly integrating learning experiences with Continuing Professional Development (CPD) activities, ANZCAP aims to foster a culture of lifelong learning and advancement. In the broader landscape, ANZCAP’s journey involves cultivating partnerships with international pharmacy associations, leveraging collective expertise, and fostering an inclusive recognition culture. The programme’s evolution will be guided by feedback, research, and a commitment to advancing pharmacy practice globally.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
MARÍA ELENA CÁRDABA GARCÍA, SILVIA FERNÁDEZ PEÑA, AMPARO SALVADOR PALACIOS, MERCEDES FERNÁNDEZ PRIETO, CLAUDIA GONZÁLEZ GONZÁLEZ, MARÍA TERESA SÁNCHEZ SÁNCHEZ
Antineoplastic drugs, chemotherapy specifically, are a clear example of “high risk” medications. The drug administration phase, within the drug utilisation circuit, is where the highest incidence of errors has been detected, ranging between 38%-81%, so the development and implementation of tools aimed at improving security at this stage is very important.
The integration of Farmis-Oncofarm ® and Oncosafety-RC® pharmacy software was done, in order to improve the prevention, detection and reduction of medication errors in the administration phase of antineoplastic treatment in the Onco-Haematology Day Hospital (OHDH).
A Drug Library was created in Farmis-Oncofarm® software (v.4.0.11.107). Dosage units, stability, standard concentrations, maximum and minimum doses, time and infusion rate, and preparation and administration recommendations were parameterised and standardised. Parameters for the implantation of Oncosafety-RC® software (accepted percentage of volume deviation in the mixtures, types of intravenous lines, possible adverse reactions, drugs to be used in case of extravasation) were also defined. When the connectivity between Farmis-Oncofarm® and Oncosafety RC® was validated, Oncosafety RC® was implemented in the OHDC.
To evaluate the results of the implementation of this strategy, a retrospective study from May 2022 to May 2023 was carried out. Collected data, obtained from Oncosafety RC® software were: number of mixtures (antineoplastic, supportive drugs and intravenous fluid therapy) and treatments administered, dose deviations, adverse events, incorrect infusion rates, errors avoided due to incorrect medication.
12,294 treatments (44,898 mixtures) have been administered in OHDC.
Dose deviations were registered in the 0.01% of the mixtures, due to adverse events that required termination of the infusion. Only three adverse events happened in the study period.
The infusion rate was incorrect in the 0.5% of the mixtures; this information is useful to improve drugs administration and prevent infusion-associated reactions.
This strategy prevented errors due to incorrect medication on 2,499 occasions.
The integration between Farmis-Oncofarm® and Oncosafety RC® has improved the security in the administration of onco-haematological treatments, allowing the reduction of administration and medication errors. This strategy can be implemented in hospitals that have assisted electronic prescription software and information management software between different clinical management systems and infusion pumps.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
ROSA MARIA ROMERO JIMENEZ, VICENTE ESCUDERO VILAPLANA, ESTHER CHAMORRO DE VEGA, MARIA FERRIS VILLANUEVA, ELENA LOBATO MATILLA, DANIEL GOMEZ COSTAS, JUAN VICENTE VALOR, ANA HERRANZ ALONSO, MARIA SANJURJO SAEZ
BT for patients with IMID have increased the effectiveness, but also with adverse events (AE) or problems in their administration. In addition, patients have greater formation and communication needs. We wanted to develop an app to improve communication and monitoring of these patients.
In 2020, we developed a mobile application (app) to improve communication and monitoring of Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) patients treated with biological therapies (BT). We implemented the app in December 2020.
A multidisciplinary group composed of pharmacists, dermatologists, rheumatologists, gastroenterologists, and nurses designed an app for IMID patients in a tertiary hospital. The app consists of the following modules: Medication, Questionnaires, Adverse Events (AE), Useful Information, Messages, and Patient Profile. We offered the app to IMID patients who initiated a new BT. We performed an observational, longitudinal study to assess the app’s impact on medication adherence, safety, and communication. The inclusion period was from December 2020 to August 2022. The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of an IMID, and ownership of a Smartphone. Patients with language barriers were excluded.
380 patients were included (mean age: 43.6 years [SD=13.9] and 58.3% were female). Concerning the type of IMID, 61.1% of patients had a rheumatologist disease, 26.3% a dermatologist disease, and 12.6% a gastrointestinal disease. The mean follow-up time for app use was 20.5 (14.5) months. In the Medication module, 100% of patients registered their biological therapy and 51.1% also used this module to record each dose of medication administered. 85.3% of patients had adherence >90%. A total of 433 AE were registered. 31.3% of patients registered at least 1 AE. The most frequent AEs were fatigue (32.1%), injection site reaction (15.2%), headache (11.8%), and diarrhoea (8.3%). 53% of patients used the Messages module to communicate with healthcare professionals. The most frequent messages concerned doubts about managing AEs (29.8%), logistical and citation issues (20.8%), and drug interactions (17.9%).
The next steps will be that the app can be used in other hospitals in our country and also adapt the app to be used in other pathologies.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
Marta Anghilieri, Francesco Guidoni, Vito Ladisa
The new DNA sequencing techniques, globally defined “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)”, allow the parallel sequencing of many samples producing in short times a big amount of data. To enable comprehensive analysis of the data and develop new specific and clinically useful therapies, we have introduced the approach of evaluating the data by the MTB, which includes pharmacists as experts in drugs and their use.
Hospital Pharmacists (HPs) are integrated into the Molecular Tumour Board (MTB), a multidisciplinary group, to select the most appropriated therapy for oncology patients, ensure and facilitate patient access, and demonstrate therapeutic appropriateness found by MTB analisys.
MTB members, including HPs, perform DNA sequencing on each patient using NGS to identify known/unknown alterations. These data are entered into a database available to all MTB members and are the basic tool for selecting potential target therapy. The MTB meets once a week to discuss and integrate the observed DNA alterations with the patient’s clinical history. In this way, the most appropriate target therapy for the patient can ultimately be selected. The HPs then provide the patient with access to medications.
In this study, 208 patients affected by Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer were evaluated. DNA sequencing of patients identify 117 altered genes. After an extensive literature search, 15 genes were highlighted as potential targets for available drugs. They marked 116 patients potentially tractable with target therapy, of which 47 patients were candidates to a target therapy already in clinical practice and 69 to a target therapy not in clinical practice. Comparing the two groups, among candidates for drugs in clinical practice, treatment was started in 65% and continued in 53%; among those treated with drugs not in clinical practice, treatment was started in 23% and continued in 69%.
The inclusion of HPs in MTB allows for more deliberate use and better selection of drugs. HPs provide valid support to select drugs and facilitate access to them: HPs individualise the applicable therapy for a larger number of patients through MTB, they analyse the therapeutic outcome (MTB-selected therapy has a bigger chance to last longer) and the cost impact on the NHS.
Clinical Pharmacy Services
NOELIA VICENTE-OLIVEROS, CARMEN PALOMAR FERNANDEZ, TERESA GRAMAGE-CARO, PAULA BURGOS BORDEL, MARÍA DEL CARMEN CALATAYUD SÁNCHEZ, SANDRA CASADO ANGULO, ANA MARTÍN ÁLVARO, MARÍA BEGOÑA RIVERA MARCOS, SONALI KARNANI KHEMLANI, MANUEL VELEZ-DIAZ-PALLARES, ANA ALVAREZ-DIAZ
Patients with moderate-severe psoriasis require systemic hospital-dispensed treatments. Hospital pharmacists look for actions to anticipate patients’ needs for achieving health outcomes and the system’s sustainability.
We stratified psoriasis patients according to the pharmaceutical care needed and established their pharmaceutical care plan. We calculated the time needed in pharmaceutical care after stratification.
An observational, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in a university hospital. One hundred psoriasis patients who received medication in the outpatient hospital pharmacy were randomly chosen between March-May 2022.
Capacity-Motivation-Opportunity (CMO) pharmaceutical care model (SEFH, 2018) was used to stratify patients. This model consisted of 23 variables (demographic, clinical, pharmacological, socio-sanitary, cognitive and functional). Each variable scored between 1-4, depending on patient risk. Patients were classified on three levels which determined the subsequent pharmaceutical care to be provided to each patient:
1. global score≥31 points,
2. 18-30 points and
3 ≤17 points.
Information was collected through patients’ interviews and electronic health records review.
A group of nine pharmacists were set up to adapt the CMO pharmaceutical care model to our hospital.
Total time spent in pharmaceutical care was obtained through patient visits before and after stratification. The scheduled average time for each visit was 10 minutes. The number of visits pre-stratification was the sum of all the visits scheduled for the patients, and for post-stratification was the sum of all the visits with the new CMO model (level 1 (biannual), 2 (annual), 3 (as needed).
Most patients were stratified on level 3. A pharmaceutical care plan has been designed to meet the needs of each patient.
Stratification has improved the time pharmacists have to accomplish the needs of each patient (16.3 hours/year (98 visits)). Sixty-two percent of patients had as needed visits (level 3), 36% needed annual visits (level 2) and 2% biannual (level 1). However, during pre-stratification, most the patients (70%) had every nine months visits, 18 % every 12 months, 9% every six months and 3% every three months.
We will expand the stratification to the rest of the psoriasis patients and other outpatient pathologies.
We will coordinate strategies with Social and Psychological Services, Primary care and Community pharmacy to improve pharmaceutical care.
Patient Safety and Quality Assurance
Joana Pinto, José Feio, Sebastião Silva, Francisco Machado, Ana Dinis, Margarida Abreu, João Peres, Mariana Guia
Clinical decision support systems comprising information on DDI improve DDI risk detection, avoiding preventable patient harm. The resulting DDI alerts can change prescribers’ behaviour to benefit patient care. However, an excessive number of alerts can lead to alerts’ desensitisation by prescribers.
We monitored the drug-drug interactions (DDI) alerts displayed in the prescription system through three subsequent homologous periods, occurring after the integration of a DDI database in the prescribing software system of a teaching hospital to assess its impact on the prescribing pattern.
We developed a DDI database – MedH® – to be integrated into the prescribing software system to support hard stop DDI alerts. only the higher clinical risk DDIs were included in this database in order to restrain the burden of alerts and warrant acceptance by health professionals.
Data of all inpatient hospital prescriptions over a 12-month period prior to MedH® implementation were extracted and intersected with MedH® DDI BD to identify the top 10 co-prescribed binomials at risk of severe DDI. The number of alerts for the same binomials was then monitored through three subsequent, post-implementation, homologous periods.
Considered the TOP10 observed in the pre-implementation period, the number of alerts for all binomials has consistently reduced over the three post-implementation periods analysed.
The integration of MedH® DDI BD into the prescribing system, resulted in changes in the prescribing pattern, translated by a decrease, between 67% and 100%, in the number of alerts for a sample of control risk binomials coinciding with the top 10 co-prescribed risk binomials observed in the pre-implementation period. These results reflect the good acceptance by the professionals and the didactic effect achieved by the exposure to alerts.
More importantly, these results are indicative of the effectiveness of the implementation of MedH® Alerts in reducing patient exposure to high-risk combinations of medicines, thus promoting patient safety.
It will be important to ensure that data from IDD alerts are rigorously analysed to recognise clinical situations in which the co-administration of risk binomials is justified, to ensure consistent application of recommended risk minimisation measures, and the availability of safer therapeutic alternatives whenever possible.
