Skip to content

REINVENTING PHARMACOTHERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER THROUGH STRATIFICATION AND PERSONALISED DEPRESCRIPTION: OPTIM-CP PROYECT

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

Mª Antonia Meroño Saura
Rebeca Añez Castaño
María García Coronel
Francisco Valiente Borrego
Elena Urbieta Sanz

Why was it done?

Prostate cancer patients are often elderly, frail, and chronically medicated. The introduction of new hormonal therapies has increased treatment complexity and the risk of drug related problems. Despite evidence linking excessive polypharmacy to poor outcomes, structured deprescribing models are rarely applied in oncology. OPTIM-CP was introduced to address this unmet need by integrating validated stratification tools (Risk stratification model (EM) for the pharmaceutical care of oncology patients with solid or haematologic neoplasms (SEFH)) into routine practice to prioritise patients at highest risk and guide pharmacist-led interventions.

What was done?

The OPTIM-CP initiative was developed to improve the safety and quality of pharmacotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. It implemented a structured pharmaceutical care model based on clinical-pharmacological risk stratification and individualised deprescribing.

How was it done?

A multidisciplinary working group of clinical pharmacists reached consensus on the practical adaptation of the EM to prostate cancer patients, ensuring consistency and clinical validity. Eligible patients receiving oral hormonal therapy were identified and stratified during pharmaceutical care consultations in the Hospital Pharmacy Department through. According to their assigned risk level, follow-up intensity was adapted. Medication reconciliation was performed using the regional electronic prescribing system to ensure accuracy and coherence across hospital and primary care records.

What has been achieved?

The initiative achieved full integration into the hospital’s outpatient pharmacy circuit. A total of 111 patients were stratified during pharmaceutical care consultations. The mean age was 78,25 ± 9,6 years, and most were treated for hormone-sensitive metastatic disease. According to the ME, 4.5% were classified as high risk, 38.7% as intermediate, and 56.8% as low risk. Polypharmacy was present in 73% of patients, and 72% used at least one high-risk medication. Treatment-related variables were the main contributors to overall risk.

The implementation of the stratification model improved communication with patients, reduced medication discrepancies, and allowed prioritisation of high-risk patients for closer follow-up.

What next?

OPTIM-CP is now being consolidated as a permanent part of routine care. The next phase focuses on the systematic deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medications identified during stratification, using validated decision-support tools (CheckTheMeds®) and shared decision making with clinicians. Future steps include expanding the model to other oncologic populations.

MANAGEMENT OF DRUG THERAPY IN HIV-POSITIVE PATIENTS: SYNERGY BETWEEN THE IMMUNOLOGY DEPARTMENT AND THE HOSPITAL PHARMACY

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Clinical Pharmacy Services

Author(s)

Noemi Tatti, Melania Rivano, Giacomo Bertolino, Valentina Mureddu, Raffaele Deidda, Arianna Cadeddu

Why was it done?

Patients are required to attend a follow-up visit every three months for viral load testing. A collaborative protocol has been implemented to facilitate treatment adherence, monitoring, and access to medication.

What was done?

Collaboration between the immunology department and the hospital pharmacy facilitated the management if drug therapy in HIV-positive patients, enhancing access to care and improving treatment adherence.

How was it done?

The visit schedule is shared monthly. Each patient is assigned an alphanumeric code to ensure anonymity. Any change in appointments, test results, visits, or therapy regimens is also communicated. Through the hospital’s electronic system, pharmacists can access each patient’s treatment plan, review the dates of medication pickups, and verify treatment adherence. In case of discrepancies, these are promptly reported to the physician before the patient’s next visit. Additionally, sufficient medication to cover three months of therapy is prepared in advance for each patient, simplifying the dispensing process and preventing unnecessary hospital visits.

What has been achieved?

This initiative has optimised adherence monitoring, which is particularly important for this category of patients. It has also facilitated the drug dispensing process. By reducing waiting times and hospital visits, it has improved treatment compliance and ensured the protection of their privacy. This project was implemented on 792 patients, and from 01/10/2024 to 01/10/2025, a total of 1,369 dispensations of antiretroviral drugs were carried out.

What next?

This approach has been used to improve the quality of care and overall experience of this patient group. We hope that it will soon be extended to all patients who collect their medication at our hospital.

PROCEDURE TO ENSURE CORRECT MEDICATION MANAGEMENT IN THE PERIOPERATIVE PROCESS (submitted in 2019)

Pdf

PDF Icon

European Statement

Patient Safety and Quality Assurance

Author(s)

Noelia Vicente Oliveros, María Muñoz García, Álvaro Ruigomez Saiz, Montserrat Ferre Masferrer, Teresa Bermejo Vicedo, Eva Delgado Silveira, Lucía Quesada Muñoz, Ana María Alvarez-Diaz

Why was it done?

An analysis of the indicators of the perioperative process reflected the need to improve their quality. One of the causes of scheduled surgery cancellation was the lack of the follow up of the anaesthetist’s medication recommendations. Medications need to be carefully managed to prevent perioperative complications.

What was done?

We designed and implemented a flow chart to ensure the patient compliance of anesthetist’s medication recommendations prior to surgery. We designed a protocol for the perioperative medication management.

How was it done?

A multidisciplinary group was formed with the management of the hospital and representatives of all the services involved in the perioperative process. The group designed the flow chart of the process by consensus. Patients were candidates to enter in this process if they were on treatment with anticoagulant or 2 or more medications from the following groups: antiplatelet, antihypertensives, antidiabetics. A pharmacist called by phone three times (the day before, the day of medication change, and the day after) to the patient to ensure the compliance of anaesthetist recommendations. If there was a lack of compliance, the pharmacist contacted the surgeon who was in charge of deciding if the surgery procedure continued as scheduled. Moreover, the domiciliary medication of these patients were reconcilliated and recorded in their health record. Healthcare professionals could consult it during hospital stay. The group designed a protocol for the perioperative medication management with different medical specialists.

What has been achieved?

The project started in April 2019. The pharmacist called patients with scheduled surgery of lower limbs. A total of 31 patients benefited from the new flow chart. The pharmacist detected 38 medication errors; two involved errors concerning the suspension of anticoagulant drugs prior to surgery and four implied antihypertensive drugs. Once, it was necessary to contact the surgeon. In this case, the surgeon decided to continue with the surgery as schedule. Fifty-seven medications suffered a change in the period between the anaesthestic visit and the surgery, nine of them belonged to the monitored medication group. 

What next?

The next steps are to spread the flow chart to other patients, to distribute the protocol among hospital healthcare professionals and to implement a procedure for the reintroduction of the modified medication.