The EAHP Board, elected for three-year terms, oversees the association’s activities. Comprising directors responsible for core functions, it meets regularly to implement strategic goals. Supported by EAHP staff, the Board controls finances, coordinates congress organization, and ensures compliance with statutes and codes of conduct.
Value-based procurement model for the purchase of hyaluronic acid for intra-articular use
European Statement
Selection, Procurement and Distribution
Author(s)
ERMINIA CACCESE
Why was it done?
The aim is to hold a value-based tender by incorporating the clinical benefit into the competition score for the procurement of Hyaluronic Acid (AI) for intra-articular use.
The main purpose of this tender is to purchase the product with the best cost-effectiveness profile according to the Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) and putting drugs and medical devices in competition.
What was done?
In Italy as well as in Europe medical devices (MDs) procurement is based on construction features and on price. The price of MDs is not negotiated by regulatory authorities, but it’s defined by industry. Today, in a limited resources scenario, it is necessary to implement value-based procurement.
How was it done?
We used the NMB method (1) as an award criterion, a parameter that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the therapeutic intervention.
A bibliographic search was carried out to support the chosen endpoints and the tender lots. The utility and cost values linked to therapeutic failure were sought and the minimum accepted quality was defined. The starting price was calculated per therapy cycle/patient.
Finally, a software was designed to calculate the value-based competition score.
What has been achieved?
The tender consisting of 3 lots was announced with resolution n.209/2023 (2). The technical evaluation focuses on the enhancement of the clinical benefit based on the following scores: price (30)/clinical benefit (70). The endpoints chosen for the evaluation of clinical benefit are deltaVAS and deltaEQ-5D. Both drugs and MDs can be offered for each therapeutic indication.
What next?
This tender is an example of value-based procurement that uses the evaluation of clinical effectiveness as a quality evaluation criterion.
The aim is to quantitatively link the purchase price of a therapeutic intervention to the extent of the benefit observed in clinical studies, rewarding the interventions that produce the greatest benefits. The innovative nature of our tender lies in putting drugs and MDs in competition in the same tender lot and for the same therapeutic indication, thus purchasing the product with the best cost-effectiveness profile based on scientific evidence. We are awaiting the award of the tender, the results of which we will publish shortly.